Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
Thu May 3, 2012, 06:05 PM May 2012

Jonathan Capeheart: Romney fights for Chen Guangcheng but not Richard Grenell

When there’s a situation as fluid as what’s going down in Beijing between the Obama administration and the Chinese government over blind attorney Chen Guangcheng, it’s best for those not directly involved to sit back and watch. This is especially so of those running to unseat the sitting president. But Mitt Romney just couldn’t hold his tongue.

“We’ve heard some disturbing things from across the world that suggest that, potentially, if the reports are true, some very troubling developments there,” Mr. Romney said, according to a report in the New York Times. “If these reports are true, this is a dark day for freedom and it’s a day of shame for the Obama administration.” Missing from that statement is what exactly what Romney would do and how he planned to deal with the fallout from said action.

Seeming to fight for Chen was a messy move for Romney. But what it lacked in long-term thinking it made up for in short-term benefit. For it shifted the day’s conversation away from Romney’s unwillingness to fight for Richard Grenell.


For my part, I doubt Romney even knew who Guangcheng was until four days ago. I can't find anything to show otherwise.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jonathan Capeheart: Romney fights for Chen Guangcheng but not Richard Grenell (Original Post) Bolo Boffin May 2012 OP
Romney is as stupid as Bush, he does this with very foreign policy related issue JI7 May 2012 #1
Once again Mz Pip May 2012 #2
Why is Romney even talking about a sensitive diplomatic problem w/ China? Botany May 2012 #3
Absolutely, and one thing's for certain Bolo Boffin May 2012 #4

JI7

(89,248 posts)
1. Romney is as stupid as Bush, he does this with very foreign policy related issue
Thu May 3, 2012, 06:19 PM
May 2012

comes out criticizing Obama but says nothing about what he would do.

Mz Pip

(27,441 posts)
2. Once again
Thu May 3, 2012, 06:19 PM
May 2012

Romney is hot to criticize but offers no clue as to what he would do.

I hope someone asks him that but I won't hold my breath.

Botany

(70,501 posts)
3. Why is Romney even talking about a sensitive diplomatic problem w/ China?
Thu May 3, 2012, 06:24 PM
May 2012

Isn't our Sec. of State in China right now?

Mitt is the most awkward man in the world.


The proper response from any American leader would be to say "no comment" or defer to the State Department.

Politics stops at the water's edge.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
4. Absolutely, and one thing's for certain
Thu May 3, 2012, 08:26 PM
May 2012

We now know positively how President Obama would have been treated had the bin Laden mission failed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jonathan Capeheart: Romne...