Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScott Walker’s yellow politics
Scott Walkers yellow politicsBy Catherine Rampell at the Washington Post
http://tablet.washingtonpost.com/commentary/scott-walkers-yellow-politics/2015/02/13/1dde50c0-b2fa-11e4-827f-93f454140e2b_story.html
"SNIP................
Likewise, when Florida began drug-testing applicants for cash assistance in 2011, just 108 of 4,086, or 2.6 percent, failed. (For comparisons sake, an estimated 8.6 percent of adult Floridians use illegal drugs in a given month.) The cost to conduct Floridas testing was $118,140, more than the state would have paid out in benefits to the people who failed the screening. And that does not include the $400,000 in legal bills that the state has paid defending the law in court, only to see it struck down for violating the constitutional protection against unreasonable government searches.
None of this has stopped states from pursuing drug-testing mandates for welfare applicants, albeit using more careful wording to avoid the constitutionality concerns (though they may yet face their own legal challenges). At least 12 have passed such laws, and 12 others are considering them. In Wisconsin, Walker wants to test not just welfare applicants but also anyone applying for Medicaid, food stamps or unemployment insurance benefits.
Now, some people might say that these kinds of mandates are really about harassing and inconveniencing the poor, since there is little evidence that this population has high rates of illicit drug abuse. (Alcohol is actually the most common substance abused by the poor.) Others might say theyre really about funneling public funds to well-connected drug-testing companies. Or that our elected officials just want to score cheap political points, since no politician likes being branded as the sap who favors making it easier for drug addicts to suckle at the government teat.
Still others might contend that, whatever the motivation behind the proliferation of such laws in recent years, they are at the very least a gigantic waste of taxpayer money when you consider the costs of administering the tests.
.................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 569 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scott Walker’s yellow politics (Original Post)
applegrove
Feb 2015
OP
Blue Owl
(50,491 posts)1. Viva Velveeta
Fake cheese all around...
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)2. They should be testing themselves first.