Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 06:22 PM Feb 2015

TPP - Is Ron Wyden (D) the KEY for blocking its passage in the senate?

The Social Movement against “Globalized Trade” and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
2/1/15

Since the President’s State of the Union message where he announced his plan to push corporate trade agreements and seek Fast Track trade promotion authority, the movement against Fast Track, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and globalized trade has grown. Instead of the bump in support that Obama expected after the State of the Union, opposition has increased inside Congress and in the grass roots.

Before the President’s speech there was already a large movement organized from across the political spectrum to oppose Fast Track and stop corporate trade agreements.

When we took action on Capitol Hill this week, we did so as part of a larger campaign to stop Fast Track. The US Trade Rep Michael Froman testified before the House and Senate. It was essential for him to be confronted at these hearings because he has consistently misled the Congress and the people. There are multiple false statements to dissect, but his latest is the claim that Fast Track will give Congress the power to shape the negotiations. This is a laughable lie since the negotiations have been carried on in secret for most of Obama’s Presidency. How can Congress shape negotiations that Froman claims are near completion?

The truth is that Fast Track removes Congress from the equation....

...After the President’s speech there was a protest at a town hall of Oregon Senator Ron Wyden. Wyden is a key player as the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee. He has played both sides of the debate and the movement needs to monitor him closely and hold him accountable. If he cannot reach agreement with Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch, then Fast Track is unlikely to pass the Senate. This week Senator Grassley said that currently they don’t have 60 votes in support of Fast Track and therefore it could not pass a filibuster. If Wyden demands that Congress sees the text of the TPP and has true involvement in the negotiations before they are finalized, then he and Hatch will not reach agreement and the Republicans will have to go it alone.

In the House there are even more challenges for Fast Track. Chuck Porcari of the Communication Workers (CWA) writes:

“House Speaker John Boehner has said that the White House needs to deliver at least 50 House Democrats if Fast Track has any hopes of passing, especially now that the White House is trying to whip together 80 Democrats in the House and New Democrat Coalition is trying to cobble together at most 40 votes. . . . According to a story by Inside U.S. Trade, ‘one informed source questioned whether the New Democrats actually have an idea of which lawmakers will provide the 40 ‘yes’ votes they are seeking.’”...

**********

How We Win

The movement opposed to corporate trade is larger – representing tens of millions of Americans; broader – representing people concerned about food, water, healthcare, the Internet, workers’ rights, the environment, banking regulation and more; and more committed because they have seen degradation of the economy and environment by NAFTA and similar corporate trade agreements.

The key is for this movement to mobilize now. The next two months will decide whether corporate trade is finished for the remainder of President Obama’s term in office. If people take action (go to www.StopFastTrack.com), we will win.

There is also a week of national actions being planned in February during the congressional recess. Take the pledge at www.FlushtheTPP.org to get involved and stay informed.

This is a battle between mass people power and trans-national corporate power. It is a battle the people can win, and it is essential for every issue we care about that we win.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-social-movement-against-globalized-trade-and-the-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp/5428642


Wyden voted against Keystone XL, so I hope he is just as wise in his decision regarding the TPP.

This is very hopeful.

EDIT: Or maybe not hopeful. We ALL need to call/write this guy. Here's a bit more information about Wyden & the TPP~




April 2014

The new chairman of the Finance Committee, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), made a speech this week announcing that he was working to introduce a new version of trade promotion authority that he is propagandistically calling “smart-track,” but which sounds more like fast track in sheep’s clothing. Wyden was vague on the details, but this far into the process any fast track bill being pushed will still rig trade in favor of transnational corporations.

Pushing for any form of fast track to get the unpopular Trans Pacific Partnership through Congress is a suicidal political move in an election year. The TPP is kept secret because it is unpopular, why assist the passage of something so unpopular — an agreement that will undermine jobs and income for most Americans, expand the wealth divide and increase the trade deficit. Already people are predicting the Democrats may lose their majority in the senate. Wyden’s pushing ahead on fast track for the TPP is a sure way to turn off the Democratic base and demonstrate once again the Republican-lite nature of today’s Democratic Party.

https://www.popularresistance.org/senator-wyden-starts-round-ii-in-campaign-to-stop-the-tpp/


He looks like he could be another Pretendem.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TPP - Is Ron Wyden (D) the KEY for blocking its passage in the senate? (Original Post) RiverLover Feb 2015 OP
I see a "legacy" ride in his future, on Air Force One. djean111 Feb 2015 #1
Crap I hope not. RiverLover Feb 2015 #5
I'm pretty sure Sen. Warren won't vote for it MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #2
Of course, her NO vote is for certain. Wyden has been swinging. Could go either way. nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #3
Bernie Sanders has never voted for one of these so called trade deals. JeffHead Feb 2015 #4
I changed the title, but still if you read the article, RiverLover Feb 2015 #7
centrist Democrats like Obama are not the "Lesser of two evils" - they truedelphi Feb 2015 #6
Nixon cared about the environment more. RiverLover Feb 2015 #8
+10000 woo me with science Feb 2015 #13
I certainly hope not. If Wyden is the key to stopping TPP we're pretty much screwn. pa28 Feb 2015 #9
Just learned all of that. Oy. We have to convince him to change his mind. RiverLover Feb 2015 #10
We definitely need to keep the pressure on. pa28 Feb 2015 #11
"morally flexible" RiverLover Feb 2015 #12
If you call Ron Wyden, remind him he's working AGAINST stated Oregon Democratic Party policy... cascadiance Feb 2015 #14
Jeesh - it seems very clearly spelled out - so what is the deal? truedelphi Feb 2015 #19
"Smart Track"..... KoKo Feb 2015 #15
I just now called Senator Wyden's office... cascadiance Feb 2015 #16
Thanks for sharing that.... KoKo Feb 2015 #18
he's kinda mushy. But aren't they all? n/t librechik Feb 2015 #17

JeffHead

(1,186 posts)
4. Bernie Sanders has never voted for one of these so called trade deals.
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 06:28 PM
Feb 2015

In the House or the Senate. I don't think he'll be starting anytime soon.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
7. I changed the title, but still if you read the article,
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 06:34 PM
Feb 2015

you'll see Wyden is on the fence & hasn't committed to a no vote. He could be what makes or breaks it.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
6. centrist Democrats like Obama are not the "Lesser of two evils" - they
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 06:34 PM
Feb 2015

happen to be the Necessary Evil.

Woudl we have a Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert remain ing silent on the issue of the TPP if it was a Jeb Bush pushing the agreement?

Anyway, go for it - call me a Republican. Or tell me I am delusional.

[h2][font color=red]
But this is NOT the party of FDR.

This is now a party that is so right wing and so Corporate-Master-in servitude that it certainly would not allow a Richard Nixon to be inside its ranks, as Nixon was to the left of these monsters! (And it hurts to write this, as I hated Nixon for so many years, and only stopped hated him when he was six feet under.) [/h2]
[/font color=red]

pa28

(6,145 posts)
9. I certainly hope not. If Wyden is the key to stopping TPP we're pretty much screwn.
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 06:56 PM
Feb 2015

When details of the TPP began leaking Wyden made an angry statement as chairman of the trade subcommittee. He denounced the lockdown on details of the agreement and was outraged at the fact he, as head of the committee overseeing trade did not have access while Monsanto, Halliburton and a raft of other transnational corporations did.

So far so good.

Unfortunately, if you'll recall the second part of the story he came crawling out to the senate floor the next day in order to clarify his statement. He said he would support the TPP even though he didn't know what was in it. He was just bothered by the lack of transparency.

Wyden is on board

pa28

(6,145 posts)
11. We definitely need to keep the pressure on.
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 07:16 PM
Feb 2015

Let's be nice for a second and just say Wyden is "morally flexible".

If the public becomes informed and angry enough he might suddenly decide to do the right thing. I just don't trust him to lead the way.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
12. "morally flexible"
Sun Feb 1, 2015, 07:37 PM
Feb 2015

I love that.

And that's what the authors of the first article are doing, giving him the benefit of the doubt. I'm still going to write him

http://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact

Try to flex him on over to the good side, the side that's best for our country. Stick a nail in the TPP for good.

Then maybe we can start working on re-working NAFTA like both Obama & Clinton -said- they wanted to do back in 2008....this positivity stuff is going to my head.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
14. If you call Ron Wyden, remind him he's working AGAINST stated Oregon Democratic Party policy...
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:22 PM
Feb 2015

... by negotiating on Fast Track legislation that is explicitly rejected by this state's resolution passed in August of 2013!

I'll cut and paste the whole prop here in addition to the link, as I think that this text as a resolution is intended for everyone to know about it and not so much for the income of those writing articles in a publication.

Look here:

http://www.dpo.org/party/business/resolutions/2013-060

Resolution 2013-060: Transparency in Negotiation of United States Trade Agreements
Sponsored by: Jerry Greenfield, delegate from Clackamas County to the Democratic Party of Oregon Central Committee.
Approved: 08/04/2013

A RESOLUTION OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF OREGON

IN SUPPORT OF TRANSPARENCY IN NEGOTIATION OF UNITED STATES TRADE AGREEMENTS


Whereas the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a complex commercial agreement being negotiated among 12 nations, including the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Peru, South Korea and Japan, and

Whereas the TPP would curtail sovereignty of individual nations, including the United States, by empowering a supranational quasi-judicial body to void national laws it determined would interfere with its objectives, and

Whereas TPP negotiations currently underway are largely secret even from most members of Congress, with the few members that obtained access being sworn to secrecy, while 600 Trade Advisors dominated by large multinational corporations have full access to the negotiations and texts of the agreements, and

Whereas President Obama wants the TPP presented to Congress via a Fast-Track procedure that would allow him to sign the agreement before Congress sees it, and only after the President signs it would the agreement be made public, subject to an up-or-down vote to approve without amendment, and

WHEREAS Fast Track Authority in effect under the Trade Act of 2002 expired on July 1, 2007,

NOW, THEREFORE, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF OREGON RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Our Senators should insist that the text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership be made public and subject to full discussion and modification by the Senate before this treaty is voted on by Congress.

Section 2. Our Senators should oppose reinstatement or exercise of Fast Track Authority by the president that circumvents the ability of the Senate to carefully consider the TPP and any future free trade agreements.

Section 3. Our Senators should oppose any international trade agreement that would undermine American manufacturing by encouraging production to move to low-wage countries with weak labor and environmental standards.

Section 4. Our members of the Democratic National Committee should refer this resolution to that body as a matter for consideration by the Democratic Parties of all of the states.

Resolution submitted by Jerry Greenfield, delegate from Clackamas County to the Democratic Party of Oregon Central Committee. Passed by DPO Platform Committee, August 4, 2013.
​ADOPTED* by the Democratic Party of Oregon on the 4th day of August 2013.

* Because this was referred without THE standard 25-day listing, it was passed by a 2/3 majority.


He has the chance to not only be a hero of Oregon Democrats in following their wishes expressed here, but be a hero to the American people and the rest of the world too, in shutting down this crucial step towards helping the 1% enslave us all by STOPPING this Fast Track Treaty negotiations, and putting the corporate dictatorship fan loyalty card on the Republican Party where it belongs and not in the Democratic Party and subsequently corner Obama in to yielding to the people's power, and not the power of the wealthy behind the scenes.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
19. Jeesh - it seems very clearly spelled out - so what is the deal?
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 06:12 PM
Feb 2015

When Wyden retires from the US Senate, will he be able to head up a big international charity as Bill Clinton was for all his quid pro quo's?

Or will he be offered some $ 250,000 per speech in front of Corporate podium?

Curious minds will be waiting to see how it shakes out over the next ten years.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
15. "Smart Track".....
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:36 PM
Feb 2015

That's what my House Dem was pushing in a meeting this December with concerned groups about TPP and Fast Track. He was selling it as a way to "slow down" the TPP and give Congress a chance to look at it and modify. None of us were were reassured by his comments ad he has a habit of waffling on issues and always saying "compromise" is the only way to get anything done. He is not a DINO, btw. And has power in the House.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
16. I just now called Senator Wyden's office...
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:52 PM
Feb 2015

I also gave calls to both Oregon congressman Peter DeFazio's office and Oregon Senator Merkley's office.

I thanked Peter DeFazio on his discussion of concerns about TPP in places like Thom Hartmann's show, etc. and asking for it to get more publicity.

Senator Merkley's office noted that he's always been against Free Trade legislation. They did note that he's "looking at" what's being put in front of him for this fast track authority. I told him of our state resolution and told him (and also told DeFazio's office) to remind Senator Wyden of their obligation not only to the Oregon state Democratic Party's positions but to America's and even the world's well being as well, in really pushing back on fast track legislation, that will be necessary in the Senate if we really want to stop this.

When I was being given a presentation just last week on some other topic in my work life, and in it a "TPP" entity was referenced without explaining it in detail, I made a point of asking about it afterwards what it referred to, if it was the Trans Pacific Partnership. It actually referred to something else other than the Trans Pacific Partnership, and he wasn't aware of the Trans Pacific Partnership.

When so many people out there, even very bright people, aren't aware of what Fast Track Authority is doing, and what the TPP is going to potentially do to us, and is more worried about an interception in the end zone of the Super Bowl and all of the ads showing during the game, WE ARE IN TROUBLE FOLKS! We need to tell everyone we know what this is, and try to get more people to really work to stop it.

If "Smart Track" is really a better way and smarter way for the American people to have things voted on for the TPP, then the American people deserve to know about it, and to know that it is something that we can speak on to our elected representatives as an informed public before it is enacted and put in place. Otherwise in my book it is "STUPID Track" or "EVIL Track" for most of us, even if the wealthy power elites think it is "Smart Track" for their own agendas...

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
18. Thanks for sharing that....
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 02:31 PM
Feb 2015

I almost get the feeling it could end up like the "Authorization to Use Military Force". House and Senate Members will say: We didn't think the "TPP" was anything but a Trade Deal, because we didn't have time to read it all...and if we'd known what was in it we never would have voted for Fast Track to allow the President to sign and implement it."

That was what concerned those of us who met with David Price our Congressman. We'd heard it before from him (about we (house members) didn't know what was in it but we can fix some of the worst of it later) and we ended up in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Pakistan, Yemen and South Africa with the "AUMF" which still hasn't been "fixed" or revised and we could end up with a "Trade Deal" which is nothing to do with "free & fair trade" and we won't know the effects of until down the road when it is too late to do anything about it..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TPP - Is Ron Wyden (D) th...