General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPost removed
elleng
(131,429 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)I don't think it's a stretch that it's logical one black model should have been included in the ad, do you?
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)Prior to the movies Dec. 19 release, Target partnered with Renée Ehrlich Kalfus, the costume designer for the new Annie movie. In November, the department store began selling clothes inspired by the orphan characters wardrobe. The collection includes 26 tights, jeans, dresses, shirts and accessories ranging from $4 to $30.
Joshua Thomas, a Target spokesman, noted that the in-store ads actually feature girls of various ethnic backgrounds. The ad for the online store features one black girl and two white girls.
141230131130-target-annie-620xa
Since the collection was designed to have a limited-run, itll be out of Target stores by the end of this week.
Target says they wont be apologizing to Quvenzhané Wallis, but they admit they had preliminary conversations about Willis modeling the clothes, but it never materialized
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Whatever ad she saw, there were no black children in it and she wrote an email complaining. My guess is this will become the outrage dejour more for the FOX News bigots who can't stand anyone of another race speaking out. Good job doing your part though.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I've seen more examples of this right here on DU than I could count.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)It would seem to be a purposeful racist thing to not use the current Annie if you are marketing a product to tie with in the latest movie. I agree with the protestors.
sakabatou
(42,204 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)The Washington Times is a far-right publication, they like to invent outrages. They want you to believe that it is the people that they are writing about that are creating false controversies, but it is them and the type of people who read their publication who are pushing false controversies.
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)You do realize that the Daily Mail is another right-wing tabloid I hope, they are owned by the same guy that owns Fox News. Thanks for proving my point that the right-wing is stoking this controversy.
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)The petition was started by a person who wanted to see a black character from the movie represented by a black girl in the ad. She wrote to target and started a petition on the internet, it was really no big deal, her petition was harming no one. Then the Washington Times and the Daily Mail come around and turn this person's petition into a national news story, but they published it to an audience that they knew would be extremely hostile. While they would never publicly admit it the Washington Times and the Daily Mail know that there are lots of racists that read their publication so they decided to fan the flames of racial controversy.
roody
(10,849 posts)Do you remember when there were no black people on tv? I'm 61 and I remember it well.
AZ Mike
(468 posts)That is an active decision to change the representation of Annie as a white girl. What is the purpose of that?
dissentient
(861 posts)it is based on a comic strip called "Little Orphan Annie" that was started back in 1924.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine the low hanging fruit even get outraged over nothing more than people getting outraged-- yet rationalize theirs as mere concern whilst condemning the same in others-- in effect, holding others to a higher standard than they hold themselves to.
lpbk2713
(42,775 posts)JI7
(89,289 posts)Yup
Kingofalldems
(38,517 posts)How did you find out about this? Are you a regular reader?
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)don't you? We need to protect the hurt feelings of white folks everywhere.