Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Next Phase Of The Koch Brothers’ War On Unions - DailyBeast
The Next Phase of the Koch Brothers War on UnionsAnd now, the plan is not only to decimate public-sector unions, but all unionsto deplete the money they can spend on politics.
Carl Deal and Tia Lessin - DailyBeast
12.22.14
AFPs agenda, however, is less obscured. With Wisconsins public-sector unions on the ropes, a newly formed state group is pushing for legislation that will cripple unions in the private sector as wellin effect finishing the job that Walker began. That group is led by Lorri Pickens, a former AFP national director of state operations. Two years ago in Michigan, she oversaw AFP operations to help the Republican-controlled legislature pass sweeping anti-union laws. The Koch-backed group bused protesters to Lansing as the bill was debated, ran ads, and even gave anti-union Tea Partiers cards for free gasoline to get them to lobby their elected representatives. AFP boasts that it was instrumental in the passage of Michigans [so-called] right-to-work law.
Why would politicians and their billionaire backers expend so much political capital (and actual capital) attacking unions when unions in America represent a small fraction of the workforcearound 11 percent? Are they being driven by a philosophical and ideological hatred of collectivists or is it just a crass political calculation? Maybe its because unions spend millions on elections. In the 2012 election cycle, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and Service Employees International Union spent a combined $41 million$5 million more than AFP. And they spent largely on Democrats, who have historically supported legislation that favored unions and the interests of ordinary Americans over super-wealthy individuals and corporations.
Many Republicans have been concerned about the amount unions are spending, former FEC Chairman Trevor Potter, a Republican, explained to usnoting that Citizens United lifted limits on union spending as well as corporate spending.
Karl Rove all but laid out the strategy on national television when he explained how reducing union membership directly impacts elections: In 2009, the unionized work force made up 12.3 percent of all the workers in America, he said on Fox News, while tens of thousands of anti-Walker protesters occupied the Wisconsin Capitol. [Unions] lost 612,000 union members in 2010 alone. Now, think about it. Every one of those 612,000 people had literally perhaps several hundred dollars-worth of union dues going into the political coffers of their union to spend on politics. So if 500,000 people leave the labor union movement [every year] then pretty soon, you start having crimp in the political budgets of these unions. It has a direct effect on the presidential election.
This calculus may be why in 2012, Freedom Partnersa group that Politico dubbed the Kochs secret bankdirected $1 million to the National Right to Work Committee (NWRC). And why Republican legislators and governors, buoyed by Walkers success in kneecapping public-sector unions, are intent on eliminating all unions, public- and private-sector alike. Backed by big money like AFP and other groups in the Koch political funding network, and relying on pre-fab right to work legislation authored by the NRWC and the Koch-funded American Legislative Exchange Council, they have introduced or will soon introduce union-busting legislation in key battleground states: Ohio, Colorado, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Missouri, and Pennsylvania, as well as Wisconsin.
Why would politicians and their billionaire backers expend so much political capital (and actual capital) attacking unions when unions in America represent a small fraction of the workforcearound 11 percent? Are they being driven by a philosophical and ideological hatred of collectivists or is it just a crass political calculation? Maybe its because unions spend millions on elections. In the 2012 election cycle, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and Service Employees International Union spent a combined $41 million$5 million more than AFP. And they spent largely on Democrats, who have historically supported legislation that favored unions and the interests of ordinary Americans over super-wealthy individuals and corporations.
Many Republicans have been concerned about the amount unions are spending, former FEC Chairman Trevor Potter, a Republican, explained to usnoting that Citizens United lifted limits on union spending as well as corporate spending.
Karl Rove all but laid out the strategy on national television when he explained how reducing union membership directly impacts elections: In 2009, the unionized work force made up 12.3 percent of all the workers in America, he said on Fox News, while tens of thousands of anti-Walker protesters occupied the Wisconsin Capitol. [Unions] lost 612,000 union members in 2010 alone. Now, think about it. Every one of those 612,000 people had literally perhaps several hundred dollars-worth of union dues going into the political coffers of their union to spend on politics. So if 500,000 people leave the labor union movement [every year] then pretty soon, you start having crimp in the political budgets of these unions. It has a direct effect on the presidential election.
This calculus may be why in 2012, Freedom Partnersa group that Politico dubbed the Kochs secret bankdirected $1 million to the National Right to Work Committee (NWRC). And why Republican legislators and governors, buoyed by Walkers success in kneecapping public-sector unions, are intent on eliminating all unions, public- and private-sector alike. Backed by big money like AFP and other groups in the Koch political funding network, and relying on pre-fab right to work legislation authored by the NRWC and the Koch-funded American Legislative Exchange Council, they have introduced or will soon introduce union-busting legislation in key battleground states: Ohio, Colorado, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Missouri, and Pennsylvania, as well as Wisconsin.
More: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/12/22/the-next-phase-of-the-koch-brothers-war-on-unions.html#
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 484 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Next Phase Of The Koch Brothers’ War On Unions - DailyBeast (Original Post)
WillyT
Dec 2014
OP
It's not enough for Americans to vote anymore, we need to vote and donate. nt
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#3
tradewinds
(260 posts)1. See you at the ramparts!
Initech
(100,126 posts)2. The Koch Bros are economic terrorists.
okaawhatever
(9,478 posts)3. It's not enough for Americans to vote anymore, we need to vote and donate. nt