Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 05:50 AM Dec 2014

"I hate niggers. That is all."

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by William769 (a host of the General Discussion forum).

I cannot even believe that I am reading this in the year 2014. Racists should not be able to be police officers, and especially not in areas that are majority POC. I can't even get my head around this kind of blind hatred.

* And here's my edit. I'm not changing the title, I'm not taking the quote out, and I'm not softening the language that the cop used. I'm sorry if you are offended by my quoting him directly - but am shocked that you aren't offended that he used the word - and more focused on me quoting him without using ****** or @%#$^. This is the word he used. Let it be seen. I took the title from a link that showed up in my feed on another site. I copied and pasted to share the article with you all. Again, I'm disappointed that so many of you are focusing on the fact that I quoted him, without censoring, than with the fact that he and his buddies, entrusted to fairly enforce the law, were texting each other these hateful words. I am a white woman. My husband is a POC, and our children are bi-racial. I do not use the word, nor does anyone in my family - and that includes all of my extended family. I have been fighting against racism since I was a kid, and long before I had any personal stake in the issue. But now? Now, my children's lives are on the line, and I want it out there. I want people to see what these people are saying behind closed doors and amongst themselves. They don't have the nerve to say it to our faces, but I will hold them accountable for saying it anywhere and to anyone. This has been sent to jury twice now, and has been voted on to be left alone, twice. If it offends you so much that you can't even focus on the real issue - police discrimination against POC - then I suggest that you find another cause to fight for, because this one is going to roll you over if that's all it takes to get you to the point of disgust and disengagement.


Article:

Racists OUTRAGED After Ohio Deputies Suspended For Disgustingly Racist Texts (Screenshots)

Five Ohio deputies have been implicated in sending racist text messages to one another after an anonymous tip was sent to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office. After an investigation it was revealed the deputies had allegedly sent racist texts to one another between 2011 and 2013 on their personal cellphones.


http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/racism/racists-outraged-after-ohio-deputies-suspended-for-disgustingly-racist-texts-screenshots/

213 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I hate niggers. That is all." (Original Post) PsychGrad Dec 2014 OP
I wonder how many African American people they've harassed. newfie11 Dec 2014 #1
or worse Derek V Dec 2014 #3
I wonder how many convictions can potentially be overturned as a consequence of that MADem Dec 2014 #142
This message was self-deleted by its author marym625 Dec 2014 #186
WTF? You need to check yourself, Ma'am. MADem Dec 2014 #188
exactly what you said to me marym625 Dec 2014 #193
The black people in my family PsychGrad Dec 2014 #205
I agree marym625 Dec 2014 #209
It just isn't necessary to use the N word- even in excoriating its use. cali Dec 2014 #2
I quoted. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #4
people would recognize precisely what he said if you used this: N***** cali Dec 2014 #5
I told you why PsychGrad Dec 2014 #7
You need to stop using that word. brush Dec 2014 #111
+1 nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #116
So someone should be assaulted for using a word?? phil89 Dec 2014 #118
Somebody used that word towards my wife at work once. stone space Dec 2014 #120
Are you new to this country or something? brush Dec 2014 #176
I'm well aware.... PsychGrad Dec 2014 #182
I am not black... PsychGrad Dec 2014 #156
How the hell would I know you were a woman? brush Dec 2014 #172
I didn't use the word. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #180
You posted it brush Dec 2014 #183
I'm not new. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #184
I don't get it brush Dec 2014 #203
Well - I am not new. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #211
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your alert stone space Dec 2014 #119
I think the jury got that one right. Quackers Dec 2014 #162
It seemed a good idea to give DU another chance. (nt) stone space Dec 2014 #190
While I understand you're upset about the jury decision on the OP Quackers Dec 2014 #206
A post doubling down on the original offense. stone space Dec 2014 #212
I don't use it and I'm black... MrScorpio Dec 2014 #147
louie CK addressed this in "Chewed Up" Orrex Dec 2014 #12
+1 nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #19
Excellent point. Pacifist Patriot Dec 2014 #196
It's a word, not a magical spell. Frank Cannon Dec 2014 #20
Really? You've not heard of "Them's fightin' words"? Denying the power of words is ridiculous. WinkyDink Dec 2014 #25
They have only the power we assign to them. Frank Cannon Dec 2014 #28
Thank You RobinA Dec 2014 #50
Their power comes from historical context gollygee Dec 2014 #57
totally agree nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #64
I agree...Every word can't be defused by repetition -- Some can, most can't, IMO. n/t whathehell Dec 2014 #80
And the people who get to decide whether that's a reasonable take on the word gollygee Dec 2014 #82
Psych Grad is white. stone space Dec 2014 #108
And it's a quote... PsychGrad Dec 2014 #158
I'll take a wild guess and say it's mostly white folk think this word should be repeated LawDeeDah Dec 2014 #99
I don't know of any data that suggests it's a belief of any particular race.. whathehell Dec 2014 #154
says the white man? nt seabeyond Dec 2014 #87
Yeah, I'm a white guy. So what? Frank Cannon Dec 2014 #91
So what? You are for blacks not to be offended proceeds black having historically offensive words seabeyond Dec 2014 #100
This message was self-deleted by its author KansDem Dec 2014 #93
It's disrespectful gollygee Dec 2014 #37
Not -er but -a notadmblnd Dec 2014 #109
This. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #157
Should "To Kill a Mockingbird" print the word as "n*****"? (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #47
no. and the reasons are in your face obvious. cali Dec 2014 #75
People would realize precisely what Harper Lee meant if they printed this: N***** Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #81
you don't seem to grasp the difference between a post on DU and a work of literature cali Dec 2014 #86
Why soften that word's impact in some places but not in others? Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #89
He's a passive aggressive disruptor... tenderfoot Dec 2014 #90
see Rhinodawg Dec 2014 #110
You're comparing a subject line on DU gollygee Dec 2014 #78
Come on grow up...we're all big boys and girls on here titaniumsalute Dec 2014 #70
Exactly. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #159
I just can't believe nichomachus Dec 2014 #177
You thuse it regularly...? Or is it possible that you require specific qualifiers prior to using it? LanternWaste Dec 2014 #198
At one time I would have agreed with you, but... Pacifist Patriot Dec 2014 #195
I believe DU'ers are educated and well-aware. Your reasoning is specious. Why not edit? WinkyDink Dec 2014 #24
Because it's a quote. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #170
It's very personal for a lot of folks. stone space Dec 2014 #69
Because PsychGrad Dec 2014 #163
Because DU has aparently decided that... stone space Dec 2014 #189
Um.... PsychGrad Dec 2014 #192
I said it once, in reply to somebody who suggested that you might be Black. stone space Dec 2014 #199
We know the word is ugly. Now you are too for using it. TeamPooka Dec 2014 #164
I'm not new... lol PsychGrad Dec 2014 #167
You're becoming irrational. Quick... blame someone to rationalize it! LanternWaste Dec 2014 #200
what? lol PsychGrad Dec 2014 #202
I would usually agree but right now (and hopefully an extremely limited future) Live and Learn Dec 2014 #9
Exactly. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #18
Exactly....thank you! Eloquently put... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #151
I agree. nt cwydro Dec 2014 #21
I agree. delrem Dec 2014 #23
I concur. bemildred Dec 2014 #32
+1 demmiblue Dec 2014 #72
totally agree nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #73
I don't like it either, but historically DU has said its ok if quoting others. I think if we are stevenleser Dec 2014 #85
Neat, more than a third of replies to the thread are here. joshcryer Dec 2014 #201
Read the cop forums and blogs. They are equally as frightening. nt Live and Learn Dec 2014 #6
where are they? PsychGrad Dec 2014 #8
There are many but here is one that has recently made the news for being vile: Live and Learn Dec 2014 #10
You might want to edit that title n/t malaise Dec 2014 #11
That is what the guy said.....that would be like taking it out of Tom Sawyer... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #13
Comparing this OP cwydro Dec 2014 #22
Not comparing the OP to Twain...don't be ridiculous... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #148
True. It's nothing more than rationalizing its use. Not surprising at all. LanternWaste Dec 2014 #204
Being shocking is rude, people don't want to be shocked by random posters on the internet. nt bemildred Dec 2014 #31
huh????? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #145
Being incoherent doesn't help either. nt bemildred Dec 2014 #161
uh no. not close. not in the same ball park. NOTHING like it. duh. cali Dec 2014 #76
He is NOT the one saying it.....its a quote.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #143
The moniker ''PsychGrad '' is the giveaway. :-/ n/t DeSwiss Dec 2014 #15
Wink malaise Dec 2014 #16
Meaning? PsychGrad Dec 2014 #17
! DeSwiss Dec 2014 #34
+1. nt bemildred Dec 2014 #35
+ 2 cwydro Dec 2014 #36
No idea... PsychGrad Dec 2014 #169
Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #178
Really? PsychGrad Dec 2014 #181
Guess what? ReRe Dec 2014 #14
How the hell did they get on the force? sakabatou Dec 2014 #26
Please edit your title. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2014 #27
Time to get real. earthside Dec 2014 #131
And in here stone space Dec 2014 #136
the one thing we have....SHAME THEM....thats why you don't sugar coat it.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #153
Yes. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #166
Well, fine then. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2014 #185
John Crawford III's last trip to Walmart was about 5 miles outside Montgomery Co. CincyDem Dec 2014 #29
"So, is that your primary job skill?" nt bemildred Dec 2014 #30
Edit your title please, it's offensive to most DU'ers nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #33
Yes it is. We don't have to hear it to know it. LawDeeDah Dec 2014 #43
agreed nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #45
Don't edit it...we should be shocked that cops used that word adigal Dec 2014 #38
There's a good reason to edit it. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #44
That's a really LAME reason!!! hexola Dec 2014 #59
Ah, so screw poor people, DU is only for people who can afford home internet? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #74
That is an even lamer reason. hexola Dec 2014 #79
Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #83
It would certainly be no more effective getting by content blockers. hexola Dec 2014 #84
I guess that you found out below that... stone space Dec 2014 #104
It's the PC Police. When people are turned off by all the B Calm Dec 2014 #61
It seems that this type of racism is endemic in police departments. blackspade Dec 2014 #39
It is a little scary how openly racist many people are online Marrah_G Dec 2014 #40
And I can't believe you had to title this thread as you did. LawDeeDah Dec 2014 #41
I do wonder mythology Dec 2014 #42
3-4 to keep?? Seriously?? stone space Dec 2014 #46
what the crispy fuck is wrong with some people. LawDeeDah Dec 2014 #48
There is an ongoing problem here at DU reguarding... stone space Dec 2014 #52
That's exactly the edit I was just about to suggest. The_Commonist Dec 2014 #49
it IS in quotes. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #168
This message was self-deleted by its author Inkfreak Dec 2014 #51
Censoring preserves the word's power... hexola Dec 2014 #53
Lenny Bruce hexola Dec 2014 #56
HATE is the word to be concerned about. (nt) hexola Dec 2014 #54
Yay, Cops! Iggo Dec 2014 #55
Do NOT edit your title. Iggo Dec 2014 #58
+1. . . . n/t annabanana Dec 2014 #60
If you can get over your own preciousness snpsmom Dec 2014 #62
Because I quoted a racist? PsychGrad Dec 2014 #171
Because you made it your title snpsmom Dec 2014 #191
It was the title of the link that showed up in my feed on another site. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #194
"But making this your title is an assault. It cannot be avoided." bobclark86 Dec 2014 #197
I hate YarnAddict Dec 2014 #63
Please edit your title - the word HATE is offensive to some. hexola Dec 2014 #65
+1 B Calm Dec 2014 #66
Very dismissive gollygee Dec 2014 #67
HATE is the relevant word...If the cop said "I hate Black People" hexola Dec 2014 #71
The people who get to choose how to use words that have been used to dehumanized them gollygee Dec 2014 #77
So - PsychGrad Dec 2014 #173
Vomit, Trash, Ignore, Logout, YouWin. antiquie Dec 2014 #68
all the cops that dehumanize black folk - that is what they think. just not all of them say it. nt ellenrr Dec 2014 #88
Would everyone who insists the word should be used in the title and is black CBGLuthier Dec 2014 #92
Would everyone who insists the word be censored in the title and is black hexola Dec 2014 #94
You really should take it down a notch or two tkmorris Dec 2014 #98
You're replying to the wrong person... hexola Dec 2014 #101
agreed nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #96
* Hand raised * Glassunion Dec 2014 #113
Suspended? That's it? lonestarnot Dec 2014 #95
I notice the Ohio Deputies are getting off scott free in this thread tkmorris Dec 2014 #97
It is. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #174
Did you "get" what you wanted by posting this? CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #102
He is not the first DUer to use the n-word in full in a post. Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #107
John Lennon wrote that song CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #112
I got a jury hide for using this term -- IN CONTEXT -- in the body of a post. Atman Dec 2014 #103
Skinner himself has been known to use the actual "n" word in his posts. Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #105
It is a direct quote... PsychGrad Dec 2014 #175
well I hate psych grads olddots Dec 2014 #106
People in this post seem to be more outraged over your thread title... Odin2005 Dec 2014 #114
Yep, people can be really dumb. nt greyl Dec 2014 #155
Folks...dont give this word power it doesnt deserve. Rhinodawg Dec 2014 #115
It has already been given the power. William769 Dec 2014 #117
That is just plain ugly! sheshe2 Dec 2014 #123
Im sure the officers involved appreciate your efforts to have their words censored. hexola Dec 2014 #129
It's going to push some of us away from DU. stone space Dec 2014 #130
For some of us, this is a re-hash and has been discussed many times... hexola Dec 2014 #133
just too sad... LawDeeDah Dec 2014 #124
+1000 (nt) stone space Dec 2014 #128
People are so offended by the word, they forgot to get mad at the cops. Weird. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #121
As usual Grumpy... YOU NAILED IT !! Rhinodawg Dec 2014 #122
Really? Arent there major protesets happening nationwide... hexola Dec 2014 #126
I mean many of the posters on this thread. n/t Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #139
Nationwide protests going on, I think we got that covered. William769 Dec 2014 #127
"At least I know where you are coming from now. But then again I have known all along." Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #140
That is pretty weird. I almost forgot what the topic was. Quayblue Dec 2014 #150
You then believe no one is angry and frustrated with the cops? Cool blinders you wear... LanternWaste Dec 2014 #208
Basically. joshcryer Dec 2014 #210
Do you all freak out when you hear the word used in comedy? hexola Dec 2014 #125
Guess what? Fuck tha Police!!!!! bravenak Dec 2014 #132
Please delete and repost at Discussionist, where it will be better appreciated. stone space Dec 2014 #134
You know who should feel the most shame is the COPS that used the word Kalidurga Dec 2014 #135
THAT goes without saying... hexola Dec 2014 #137
I have no idea Kalidurga Dec 2014 #138
Thank you. PsychGrad Dec 2014 #179
for the record, all those cops should be fired, a no brainer to me nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #141
Not surprised in the least... Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #144
Free speech is a first amendment right polynomial Dec 2014 #146
If we submit to censorship, we can never say FUCK the POLICE! (nt) hexola Dec 2014 #152
Sadly, quite a number of the few remaining racists out there are still pretty open about it..... AverageJoe90 Dec 2014 #149
unfortunately Howler Dec 2014 #160
this guy is Howler Dec 2014 #165
After the trolls seeing on twitter that go after me marym625 Dec 2014 #187
I don't fault you at all Blue_In_AK Dec 2014 #207
Locking. William769 Dec 2014 #213

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
1. I wonder how many African American people they've harassed.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:06 AM
Dec 2014
 

Derek V

(532 posts)
3. or worse
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:26 AM
Dec 2014

MADem

(135,425 posts)
142. I wonder how many convictions can potentially be overturned as a consequence of that
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:34 PM
Dec 2014

hateful, intemperate comment?

If that asshole testified against any black people in court, that would seem to me to be the basis for a new trial....

Response to MADem (Reply #142)

MADem

(135,425 posts)
188. WTF? You need to check yourself, Ma'am.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:19 PM
Dec 2014

Not all BLACK people are American, thank you very much.

In fact, most are NOT American.

Get real.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
193. exactly what you said to me
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:25 PM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
205. The black people in my family
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:35 PM
Dec 2014

prefer to be called black people. They aren't African, at least not that we know of. They are black Americans. Not everyone prefers the term African-American.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
209. I agree
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:37 PM
Dec 2014

And I should have said it privately. Was not cool. I will delete. Was a response tto before

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
2. It just isn't necessary to use the N word- even in excoriating its use.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:14 AM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
4. I quoted.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:32 AM
Dec 2014

Believe me, I get it, this is very personal for me. But I am tired of stepping around it. This is what he said, and it needs to be heard and read in all its ugliness.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. people would recognize precisely what he said if you used this: N*****
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:39 AM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
7. I told you why
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:44 AM
Dec 2014

I used it without censorship. You don't have to like it, but I'm not changing it. It should make people uncomfortable.

brush

(53,792 posts)
111. You need to stop using that word.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:31 PM
Dec 2014

It has humongous historical baggage and is still hurtful to African Americans.

You are not African American so SHOW SOME FU_CKING RESPECT.

Especially now with all these killings by racist cops of African Americans.

Here's a test for you — since you're so comfortable using it, try using it in person to some black men instead of behind you keyboard.

If that thought makes you uncomfortable, you should stop using it.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
116. +1 nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:17 PM
Dec 2014
 

phil89

(1,043 posts)
118. So someone should be assaulted for using a word??
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:28 PM
Dec 2014

that makes a lot of sense. Unbelievable.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
120. Somebody used that word towards my wife at work once.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:33 PM
Dec 2014

The woman was sent home and told in no uncertain terms never to return, again.

A similar policy would work well here at DU.

brush

(53,792 posts)
176. Are you new to this country or something?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:54 PM
Dec 2014

I am merely suggesting that the poster learn a life lesson of the baggage and hate associated with that word.

The word should not be used, IMO, by African Americans either, and especially on this progressive site.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
182. I'm well aware....
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:11 PM
Dec 2014

but thanks for educating me that when I quote someone that I'm "using" their words. Maybe, you could find some anger towards the cop who actually used the word?

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
156. I am not black...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:08 PM
Dec 2014

But my children are, and my husband is. Trust me, I hear the word more than you can even fathom. And, I didn't say the word - the cop in this article did. By the way, my husband would like to meet you bc he thinks that threatening women for using a quote is some bullshit.

brush

(53,792 posts)
172. How the hell would I know you were a woman?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:42 PM
Dec 2014

And you should still stop using that word, as should African Americans IMO.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
180. I didn't use the word.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:02 PM
Dec 2014

Do you know what quotes mean?????

brush

(53,792 posts)
183. You posted it
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:11 PM
Dec 2014

Since you're new to this PROGRESSIVE SITE maybe you don't know the generally recognized protocol of how to refer to that word, thus, avoiding the hate and baggage associated with it, and therefore being considerate of POC who visit here.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
184. I'm not new.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:13 PM
Dec 2014

Been here almost 4 years. I posted a QUOTE. And, I am well aware of the baggage of the word. Perhaps you would like to come over and talk to my young bi-racial children about the baggage since you seem to think I know nothing of it? And, their father, who is a POC - you want to tell him how to handle it too? Seriously, get over yourself.

brush

(53,792 posts)
203. I don't get it
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:34 PM
Dec 2014

You have a pretty low post count so I thought you might be new.

And as far as getting over myself, you must have noticed I'm not the only one who objected to your posting of the word — I would think you'd understand that especially since you're married to a person of color and have children.

If I were married to a Jewish person I certainly would not be posting even quotes of ethnic slurs against him/her without cleaning them up so as not to offend my spouse, and others.

But that's just me.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
211. Well - I am not new.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:41 PM
Dec 2014

I just haven't posted a lot. I have posted recently bc this issue is a big one for me. I do notice that you aren't the only one who objected, but I also notice that many people saw the quote for what it was - a quote. Two jury decisions and several private messages, and several public - stating that it's not my job to censor what the racist cop wrote.

I talked to my husband about it - and he would be offended IF I used the word. I didn't. A cop used the word, and I quoted him. When my husband asked what the tweet was - I said it, out loud, without censoring - and my husband didn't take it personally from ME - but was pretty disgusted with the cop.

The word IS offensive. But, part of the problem is that when we discuss it out in public, we clean it up - so we don't have to see it or hear it. And, I think that is a problem and I think it hinders our progress forward in that - if we never have to see it or hear it - we don't have to feel its ugliness. That ugliness in the pit of our stomachs when we see it or hear it can be the catalyst for change and progress - if we focus that disgust and anger and energy where it needs to go.

In this thread, many are focusing it on me. That's the problem - its focus should be the cops who texted it to each other. If I soften it for them, then people don't get that pit of the stomach ick - they get that obscure and removed from it "well, that's a shame".

You fight the fight the way you see fit, and I (and my family) will fight it our way. We don't soften it up for the racists - nor do we use the word with one another at all. The only time it is heard or said in our house is when quoting people who DO use it.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
119. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your alert
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:30 PM
Dec 2014




On Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:21 AM you sent an alert on the following post:

I told you why
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5913560

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

YOUR COMMENTS

Doubling down on using the N-Word in he title

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:28 AM, and voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The OP title is shitty, but this particular post is not a rulebreaker
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I am going to leave this because I do not want to lock the OP out of the thread. PM'ing him/her to ask for an edit is better than hiding an article that needs to be seen. Hiding it could be taken as hiding the awful content which definitely needs exposure.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: But without using it again.

Thank you.

Quackers

(2,256 posts)
162. I think the jury got that one right.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:24 PM
Dec 2014

Alerting on that post because the other one wasn't hidden seems petty.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
190. It seemed a good idea to give DU another chance. (nt)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:21 PM
Dec 2014

Quackers

(2,256 posts)
206. While I understand you're upset about the jury decision on the OP
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:35 PM
Dec 2014

That shouldn't have an effect on other post from the same person. That's why DU is getting a reputation for alert swarming. Each post should be judged on its own merits and value to the discussion.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
212. A post doubling down on the original offense.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:42 PM
Dec 2014

Alert swarming is the least of DU's reputational problems at this point.



MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
147. I don't use it and I'm black...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:43 PM
Dec 2014

Marinate on that for a while.

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
12. louie CK addressed this in "Chewed Up"
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:01 AM
Dec 2014

In essence, he called "the N-word" intellectually lazy because it makes the reader "say" the actual word in her head, while the speaker gets away without really saying it.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
19. +1 nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:27 AM
Dec 2014

Pacifist Patriot

(24,653 posts)
196. Excellent point.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:30 PM
Dec 2014

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
20. It's a word, not a magical spell.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:50 AM
Dec 2014

When you do shit like that, you continue to assign to the word a power and influence it shouldn't have. You perpetuate the very problem I think you're trying to avoid.

People have thrown the words "Nazi" and "fascist" around at each other to the point that those words almost don't mean anything anymore. At least, they don't register any particular significance to the listener. Call Ann Coulter a Nazi and see if she gives a rat's ass.

I believe a main reason why African-Americans tend to use the term "nigger" with each other quite a bit, and why so many A-A comedians use it, is because they know that by making it no big deal, they can eventually "wear it out" of its power to wound and hurt. And I believe they're right about that.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
25. Really? You've not heard of "Them's fightin' words"? Denying the power of words is ridiculous.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:08 AM
Dec 2014

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
28. They have only the power we assign to them.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:19 AM
Dec 2014

With enough repetition, they become mundane and thereby toothless.

RobinA

(9,894 posts)
50. Thank You
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:21 AM
Dec 2014

I've been making this point for years. De-power this word. This ridiculous ban on it just perpetrates its power.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
57. Their power comes from historical context
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:35 AM
Dec 2014

You can't just ignore that context. That word is still hurtful. It's disrespectful to blithely throw it around when you aren't in the group it's been used to dehumanize.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
64. totally agree nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:45 AM
Dec 2014

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
80. I agree...Every word can't be defused by repetition -- Some can, most can't, IMO. n/t
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:01 AM
Dec 2014

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
82. And the people who get to decide whether that's a reasonable take on the word
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:03 AM
Dec 2014

are the people the word is used to hurt. It's like me using a knife to hurt someone and saying, "If I use this knife enough, it will get dull and stop hurting!" Maybe, maybe not, but it's inflicting damage in the mean time and I don't have a right to do that.

You know, maybe Psych Grad is African American, in which case I don't intend to second guess him or her. I'm going to let this go.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
108. Psych Grad is white.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:21 PM
Dec 2014
You know, maybe Psych Grad is African American

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
158. And it's a quote...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:15 PM
Dec 2014

You are taking this to a level that is ridiculous. I didn't use the word, I quoted it. Maybe put your energy to better use instead of attacking me for quoting some racist asshole?

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
99. I'll take a wild guess and say it's mostly white folk think this word should be repeated
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:39 AM
Dec 2014

to exorcize it's meaning or some dumb shit like that.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
154. I don't know of any data that suggests it's a belief of any particular race..
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:54 PM
Dec 2014

I've heard both black and white people express their belief in it.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
87. says the white man? nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:17 AM
Dec 2014

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
91. Yeah, I'm a white guy. So what?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:39 AM
Dec 2014

I'm not sure what you're implying, but then, I don't really give a fuck. See how easy that is?

I am against any and all forms of censorship. I don't care who the censor is or what their intentions are. I never elected anyone "word police".

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
100. So what? You are for blacks not to be offended proceeds black having historically offensive words
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:41 AM
Dec 2014

Used.

Cause we whites are so damn special, we can heave that heavy sigh of burden that we have to once again recognize and acknowledge the abuse we have done to a group of people.

Response to Frank Cannon (Reply #28)

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
37. It's disrespectful
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:42 AM
Dec 2014

African Americans use that word as in-language. It helps create community - "You and I are both part of this history."

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
109. Not -er but -a
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:22 PM
Dec 2014

and yes, my son and his friends use it as a term of endearment in the same way others use the term BFF.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
157. This.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:12 PM
Dec 2014

We do not use the word at all. But, when other people use it - they should be held accountable for it. And not have ***** in its place to soften their blow. They want to make a big statement using that word, let's let them make their statement in all its ugliness. And again, I don't say the word or use the word - neither do my bi-racial children or my black husband - but other people certainly do throw it at them and of course I get my own words thrown at me. I am throwing it right back at people now. I'm tired of hearing it, I'm tired of nobody saying it "in polite company" but being able to scream it out their car windows. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE for using it and stop softening it for them!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
47. Should "To Kill a Mockingbird" print the word as "n*****"? (nt)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:16 AM
Dec 2014
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
75. no. and the reasons are in your face obvious.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:57 AM
Dec 2014

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
81. People would realize precisely what Harper Lee meant if they printed this: N*****
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:03 AM
Dec 2014

All readers would know what word was intended, and folks such as you who object to seeing the actual word printed should be happier.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
86. you don't seem to grasp the difference between a post on DU and a work of literature
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:14 AM
Dec 2014

context counts but spew all the hateful language you like while telling yourself you're being brave and bucking pc.

gad. pathetic. truly.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
89. Why soften that word's impact in some places but not in others?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:24 AM
Dec 2014

In any case, here's a browser plugin you might find useful. It will censor words of your choosing:

http://webcensorapp.com

tenderfoot

(8,437 posts)
90. He's a passive aggressive disruptor...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:25 AM
Dec 2014

and I have a feeling you already know that.

 

Rhinodawg

(2,219 posts)
110. see
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:23 PM
Dec 2014

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
78. You're comparing a subject line on DU
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:00 AM
Dec 2014

to literature?

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
70. Come on grow up...we're all big boys and girls on here
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:51 AM
Dec 2014

The use of a bunch of ****** is rather childish. I think we need to see the ugly truth for what it is and not sugar coat crap.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
159. Exactly.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:19 PM
Dec 2014

If they want to use it behind closed doors - drag them out and make them hear its ugliness. It even feels ugly typing it - but if we all keep softening it for them, we help keep the reaction down towards them. He didn't text that the hated N****** - he typed out the whole damn word - in all its ugliness. I can't believe how many people don't see the quotes around it ffs.

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
177. I just can't believe
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:57 PM
Dec 2014

That there is one word that no one is ever allowed to say or write. I don't know who started this, but it's ridiculous.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
198. You thuse it regularly...? Or is it possible that you require specific qualifiers prior to using it?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:30 PM
Dec 2014

You then use it regularly...? Or (and I find this more likely) is it possible that you require specific qualifiers prior to using it?

If the latter, it kinda blows your petulant premise "no is ever allowed to say or write..." out of the water.

Pacifist Patriot

(24,653 posts)
195. At one time I would have agreed with you, but...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:27 PM
Dec 2014

I'm beginning to believe there may be real value in quoting hate speech faithfully rather than softening the impact it has. The cop used the word, and I do think asterisks can visually and mentally lessen the emotional context of the original.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
24. I believe DU'ers are educated and well-aware. Your reasoning is specious. Why not edit?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:07 AM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
170. Because it's a quote.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:38 PM
Dec 2014

I don't edit other people's words. He used the word, in all its ugliness, let him handle the fallout of that.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
69. It's very personal for a lot of folks.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:49 AM
Dec 2014
this is very personal for me


Whenever shit like this is allowed to stand, I question my own involvement here at DU.

Maybe it's time to stop posting at DU altogether.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
163. Because
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:24 PM
Dec 2014

I quoted a text from a racist? If that's all it takes to get you to disengage, then our fight is going to be even longer than I have previously imagined. You are giving them all the power of that word by not making people actually SEE it when they use it, or HEAR it when they use it. I don't think that using it will take its power away - but I think censoring it FOR them takes away the power that WE have against it - which is to let people see how ugly it is, to see the ugliness of its usage - and to not soften it so when people see it they don't actually have to see it. We don't have to agree, but you sent it to jury and they voted to leave it alone - so now what? I'm a racist bc I quoted a racist and didn't use ***** in place of the word that light skinned people have used for hundreds of years to insult those with dark skin?

Imo, you need to get a better grasp on this thing. Your personal vendetta against me bc I quoted a racist is weird and your focus is all messed up. You don't like seeing the word? Neither do I. So, how do we stop it from being seen? Not censoring it when it's every day vernacular for so many Americans, that's for damn sure. Pull it out into the light and let its ugliness be seen.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
189. Because DU has aparently decided that...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:20 PM
Dec 2014

...the use of the N-Word is acceptable here, even in thread titles.

That makes DU into a hostile environment for many of us.

It may be best to just leave.

Your personal vendetta against me


Wow!

Now we're getting into paranoia, aren't we?

I don't even know you, and so far as I know, I've never even seen you here before.

Why do some white folks consider it a personal vendetta whenever anybody objects to the use of the N-Word? Even people they don't know.


PsychGrad

(239 posts)
192. Um....
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:25 PM
Dec 2014

You're way out in left field. First, you assumed I was white, with no information to back that up. Second, you posted multiple times in the thread telling people that I was white - as if I was a white person USING the word, not quoting it. I'm not sure what your issue is - the cop that texted the word should be where your anger and frustration is. If just SEEING the word typed out is that upsetting to you, I'm not sure how you read any news stories - or look at protest signs - or really, just walk around the earth. If you do indeed have a POC wife, how the hell are you so sensitive to it? At this point in my life, it's thrown at my husband and children so often that it seriously is just par for the course nowadays.

I do not like the word. I do not use the word. But this cop did, and I quoted him. So stop saying that I "USED" the word when I clearly did not and stop trying to turn this around like I'm a racist white person and getting defensive bc someone objected to me using the word. I didn't use the word - look up "use" and then "quote".

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
199. I said it once, in reply to somebody who suggested that you might be Black.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:32 PM
Dec 2014
First, you assumed I was white, with no information to back that up. Second, you posted multiple times in the thread telling people that I was white


And no, there was no guessing or assuming involved.

TeamPooka

(24,229 posts)
164. We know the word is ugly. Now you are too for using it.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:24 PM
Dec 2014

You're new here so know this is the kind of action that gets you blocked by other users, like me, so we will never hear any point you want to make here again.
because you blew this one badly.
Bye.

#blockeduser

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
167. I'm not new... lol
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:32 PM
Dec 2014

I've been here for years. And, block away. I got no use for timid people who claim to be in the fight but can't even see a word typed out. And I didn't use the word, the cop in the article did and I quoted him. You're an idiot.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
200. You're becoming irrational. Quick... blame someone to rationalize it!
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:33 PM
Dec 2014

You're becoming irrational. Quick... blame someone to rationalize it (oh, I see you already are)!

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
202. what? lol
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:34 PM
Dec 2014

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
9. I would usually agree but right now (and hopefully an extremely limited future)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:50 AM
Dec 2014

I understand why the OP felt the need to use it to make a point.

The term is being used freely these days on the "other" boards and we need to acknowledge the use and prejudices being expressed whether we like it or not.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
18. Exactly.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:20 AM
Dec 2014

It has quotes, I didn't say it, this police officer did. I'm tired of softening their blows for them.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
151. Exactly....thank you! Eloquently put...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:49 PM
Dec 2014
 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
21. I agree. nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:52 AM
Dec 2014

delrem

(9,688 posts)
23. I agree.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:05 AM
Dec 2014

This should be pretty damn obvious.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
32. I concur.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:26 AM
Dec 2014

Anybody can throw shit, I mean you can, but it just makes the place shitty when someone insists on demonstrating how to do it.

demmiblue

(36,865 posts)
72. +1
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:53 AM
Dec 2014

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
73. totally agree nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:55 AM
Dec 2014
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
85. I don't like it either, but historically DU has said its ok if quoting others. I think if we are
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:12 AM
Dec 2014

going to decide that those kind of words should not be written out even if quoting, and I would be completely OK with that, it should be submitted to admins and made a DU rule.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
201. Neat, more than a third of replies to the thread are here.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:33 PM
Dec 2014

In this subthread.

For the easy derailment.

Hey, I'm contributing, but it's over one third of replies already, not like I can make it worse.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
6. Read the cop forums and blogs. They are equally as frightening. nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:43 AM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
8. where are they?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:45 AM
Dec 2014

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
10. There are many but here is one that has recently made the news for being vile:
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:58 AM
Dec 2014
http://community.policeone.com/general-discussion/

To find others just do a search for officer or cop forums. I can guarantee you will find frightening stuff on all of them.

malaise

(269,063 posts)
11. You might want to edit that title n/t
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:59 AM
Dec 2014
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
13. That is what the guy said.....that would be like taking it out of Tom Sawyer...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:05 AM
Dec 2014

its a quote...and it should be shocking...

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
22. Comparing this OP
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:03 AM
Dec 2014

to great American literature is beyond ridiculous.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
148. Not comparing the OP to Twain...don't be ridiculous...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:43 PM
Dec 2014

You make it sound like I was approving of the quote itself...

I am comparing the word itself, just the word....removing it from either has an effect on context. That is all...

Don't read more into it than there was...

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
204. True. It's nothing more than rationalizing its use. Not surprising at all.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:34 PM
Dec 2014

"Don't read more into it than there was..."

True. It's nothing more than rationalizing its use. Not surprising at all.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
31. Being shocking is rude, people don't want to be shocked by random posters on the internet. nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:22 AM
Dec 2014
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
145. huh?????
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:40 PM
Dec 2014

Are you kidding me?

Seeing "a guy in a White hood" is shocking....its rude...don't show that!

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
161. Being incoherent doesn't help either. nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:22 PM
Dec 2014
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
76. uh no. not close. not in the same ball park. NOTHING like it. duh.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:59 AM
Dec 2014
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
143. He is NOT the one saying it.....its a quote....
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:38 PM
Dec 2014

Go to the South...if you are White you hear this on a regular basis...its THAT bad. Lets not sugar coat these racist assholes....show them for the scum that they are! Rip off those hoods!

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
15. The moniker ''PsychGrad '' is the giveaway. :-/ n/t
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:15 AM
Dec 2014

malaise

(269,063 posts)
16. Wink
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:16 AM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
17. Meaning?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:18 AM
Dec 2014
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
34. !
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:30 AM
Dec 2014

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
35. +1. nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:33 AM
Dec 2014
 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
36. + 2
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:36 AM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
169. No idea...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:37 PM
Dec 2014

what being a Psychologist has to do with anything at all, but okay.

Response to PsychGrad (Reply #169)

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
181. Really?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:04 PM
Dec 2014

I've been here for years and nobody has ever said anything about my name. I'm sure you think you're on to something really deep here, but you're wrong. I'm a Psychologist, and I shared an article, and I quoted a racist cop. End of story, but carry on with your theories I guess, lol

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
14. Guess what?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:06 AM
Dec 2014

I hate bigot cops. That is all.

sakabatou

(42,159 posts)
26. How the hell did they get on the force?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:09 AM
Dec 2014

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
27. Please edit your title.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:14 AM
Dec 2014

I don't know how anyone can type those words, quote or not.

We get the idea, thank you.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
131. Time to get real.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:04 PM
Dec 2014

One of the reasons we don't have an honest, upfront discussion of race in this country is because too many are simply afraid to tell it like it is.

Yes, there are racist, bigoted people out there that use that word.

We're not going to be able to confront the hate and malice in our culture if we insist on 'sensitivity' and timidity and censorship. Maybe we need to offend the gentle sensibilities of some liberals and progressives who get upset over what the bigots are really saying and believing in out in real America.

It is ugly and there is no way to pretty it up.

Frankly, I suspect that we are going to be hearing a lot more of this as the Tea Party reactionaries get so riled-up that they cannot help but spew their venom. The barely disguised racism of the Obama birth certificate tactic simply will not suffice for these low-lifes -- they are going to want to go full-out.

And we better be ready to deal with that and talk about it forthrightly and boldly.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
136. And in here
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:10 PM
Dec 2014
Yes, there are racist, bigoted people out there that use that word.
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
153. the one thing we have....SHAME THEM....thats why you don't sugar coat it....
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:53 PM
Dec 2014

who is it really making it easier for?

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
166. Yes.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:30 PM
Dec 2014

And, as uneasy as it made people here who claim to be "in the fight" against it just to SEE it, in quotes - imagine how it feels to hear it, daily, thrown at you with hatred and disgust.

I agree. There is no way to pretty it up. I'm not doing their work for them, the racists, by letting them throw this damn word around UNTIL it becomes public, then we use N******. Not nearly the same ugliness though, is it?

And, exactly - how do we confront things if we aren't even willing to SEE a word typed out in a quote? It's like, giving a fainting couch to those that can't even see it typed out in a quote - seriously people, I hear this word all the time aimed at my children or my husband. This is their reality - and I'm tired of not talking about it and saying, "Oh, he called my son the N word"... That's not what he called my son at all bc that doesn't turn my stomach.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
185. Well, fine then.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:16 PM
Dec 2014

I won't utter or write that word, though. Sorry.



CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
29. John Crawford III's last trip to Walmart was about 5 miles outside Montgomery Co.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:19 AM
Dec 2014


Makes you wonder what's on the personal cell phones of the cops he crossed paths with.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
30. "So, is that your primary job skill?" nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:20 AM
Dec 2014

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
33. Edit your title please, it's offensive to most DU'ers nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:27 AM
Dec 2014
 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
43. Yes it is. We don't have to hear it to know it.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:11 AM
Dec 2014

I hate these 'educational' posts.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
45. agreed nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:12 AM
Dec 2014
 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
38. Don't edit it...we should be shocked that cops used that word
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:54 AM
Dec 2014

Let's not censor them.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
44. There's a good reason to edit it.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:12 AM
Dec 2014

Not everyone logs on from home, some are from public facilities which have software that prevents people from even viewing pages that have such language. When you put such words in the title, you're blocking those people from viewing any page on which this OP's title shows up. If he REALLY feels the words needs to be explicitly spelled out, it should be in the body of the text, not the headline, so that the only page blocked from view is the post itself.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
59. That's a really LAME reason!!!
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:37 AM
Dec 2014

tough crap for them!

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
74. Ah, so screw poor people, DU is only for people who can afford home internet?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:57 AM
Dec 2014

Glad to know where you stand.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
79. That is an even lamer reason.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:00 AM
Dec 2014

Glad to know you're a censor-ist.

Response to hexola (Reply #79)

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
84. It would certainly be no more effective getting by content blockers.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:09 AM
Dec 2014

Enjoy your Ostrich-eye view of the world.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
104. I guess that you found out below that...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:48 AM
Dec 2014

...there still are things that can be said here on DU that can get your post hidden.

Maybe if you had used the N-word, your post might have survived jury review?



 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
61. It's the PC Police. When people are turned off by all the
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:39 AM
Dec 2014

poltical correctness they start looking at the Republican party. What's the Matter With Kansas touches on this subject.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
39. It seems that this type of racism is endemic in police departments.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:54 AM
Dec 2014

And has been for a long time.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
40. It is a little scary how openly racist many people are online
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:06 AM
Dec 2014

Makes you wonder if they act this way in offline and in public.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
41. And I can't believe you had to title this thread as you did.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:09 AM
Dec 2014

or can I.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
42. I do wonder
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:10 AM
Dec 2014

how does one go about finding out that their coworkers are fine with that sort of language? It's not like you can send one of those texts and if they aren't okay with it, pretend you didn't say it.

It's kind of like those cops who were stealing naked pictures from the cell phones of women they stopped/arrested and sending the pictures around.

All it takes is sending it to the wrong person and then you're up a creek.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
46. 3-4 to keep?? Seriously??
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:15 AM
Dec 2014
Automated Message

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: You alerted on a post which was already alerted

Mail Message

On Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:12 AM you sent an alert on the following post:

"I hate niggers. That is all."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025913516

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

YOUR COMMENTS

Do I really have to explain this alert?

JURY RESULTS

Someone else already alerted on this post before you alerted on it, and only the first alert was sent to a Jury. A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of the post on Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:11 AM, and voted 3-4 to keep IT. Please note that even though your alert was not sent to a Jury, it has been forwarded to the Administrators who review all alerts.

Thank you.
 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
48. what the crispy fuck is wrong with some people.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:19 AM
Dec 2014

This should have been a full hide.
Titles like these should always be suspicious, it doesn't take a pysch major to figure out what the deal is here.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
52. There is an ongoing problem here at DU reguarding...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:24 AM
Dec 2014

...the use of the N-word.

I've had it thrown at me several times here out of the blue for no reason, even after requesting that it stop.

We need to stop supporting this sort of bullshit here at DU.



The_Commonist

(2,518 posts)
49. That's exactly the edit I was just about to suggest.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:19 AM
Dec 2014

That's all your post needed, was for the quote to be put it quotes.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
168. it IS in quotes.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:35 PM
Dec 2014

Response to PsychGrad (Original post)

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
53. Censoring preserves the word's power...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:25 AM
Dec 2014

Lets not do that...

Lenny Bruce used to do a great piece on this...

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
56. Lenny Bruce
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:31 AM
Dec 2014

Are there any niggers here tonight?



From the album "Lenny Bruce Is Out Again"
 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
54. HATE is the word to be concerned about. (nt)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:28 AM
Dec 2014

Iggo

(47,558 posts)
55. Yay, Cops!
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:31 AM
Dec 2014

They're the best!

Iggo

(47,558 posts)
58. Do NOT edit your title.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:35 AM
Dec 2014

That's what he said. Don't sugarcoat it.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
60. +1. . . . n/t
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:37 AM
Dec 2014

snpsmom

(682 posts)
62. If you can get over your own preciousness
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:43 AM
Dec 2014

Maybe you can spare a moment to think about the effect your title might have on others. I'm not advocating you delete the story, it needs to be told. But making this your title is an assault. It cannot be avoided. You show a distinct lack of empathy and concern for others.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
171. Because I quoted a racist?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:42 PM
Dec 2014

That means I lack empathy? Wtf? People here are really disappointing me with this whole thing. And I'm not deleting it nor am I editing it. I stand by typing out the quote as it was. And another poster is right - so many people are focused on the quote that they aren't even discussing the police officers and their behavior or lack of punishment. Nice. Some of you are really backwards about this, seriously. I didn't use the word, this cop did. Aiming your frustration and hate at me is silly and completely unproductive. But okay - never mind - those of us who are a little stronger will fight the fight FOR you. Jesus fucking christ.

snpsmom

(682 posts)
191. Because you made it your title
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:21 PM
Dec 2014

You're being disingenuous.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
194. It was the title of the link that showed up in my feed on another site.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:25 PM
Dec 2014

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
197. "But making this your title is an assault. It cannot be avoided."
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:30 PM
Dec 2014

Exactly. As it SHOULD be, as it was meant as an ASSAULT by the cop. That is WHY the OP used that word. It SHOULDN'T be avoided.

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
63. I hate
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:45 AM
Dec 2014

that word. And I don't think it's acceptable to use it, even when quoting others.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
65. Please edit your title - the word HATE is offensive to some.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:46 AM
Dec 2014
 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
66. +1
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:47 AM
Dec 2014

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
67. Very dismissive
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:48 AM
Dec 2014

The word in the title has a historical context that the word "hate" doesn't have. It smacks of entitelment to dismiss that context and compare it to irrelevant words.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
71. HATE is the relevant word...If the cop said "I hate Black People"
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:53 AM
Dec 2014

It would be no less outrageous..and just as sinister.

History changes words...

"Gay" has a historical context that it does not have today...

"We'll all feel gay when Johnny Comes Marching Home"

Censoring preserves it's power.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
77. The people who get to choose how to use words that have been used to dehumanized them
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:59 AM
Dec 2014

are the people those words have been used to dehumanize.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
173. So -
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:46 PM
Dec 2014

because I'm white, I can't quote it? What if, my life partner is black? What if, my young children are bi-racial? Am I not allowed to stand up and fight the fight for them? Because - I have to do it in the streets constantly - I can't believe I'm having to do it here too simply bc I quoted someone else. There are quotes around it, showing that they are NOT my words.

Seriously people, you are disappointing me beyond belief. I have been reading here for YEARS bc it's a break from the racism I deal with daily IRL. And here, with this - I find, that many of you are so much more concerned with the fact that I quoted someone using a nasty word than you are with the fact that the nasty word was used (by POLICE OFFICERS) in the first place.

Again, I'm not editing it - I'm not deleting it. Look at it, see what this police officer said in all its ugliness, and if you choose to aim your hatred towards me bc of what he said - then so be it, I've been handling this type of shit for years and have a strong back. But, your desire to protect the police officer by softening his words for him is overtaking your common sense.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
68. Vomit, Trash, Ignore, Logout, YouWin.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 09:49 AM
Dec 2014

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
88. all the cops that dehumanize black folk - that is what they think. just not all of them say it. nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:21 AM
Dec 2014

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
92. Would everyone who insists the word should be used in the title and is black
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 10:44 AM
Dec 2014

please raise your hands.

Yeah, that's what i thought. Word to the fucking clueless. if you are white you really suck if you argue for your right to use that word.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
94. Would everyone who insists the word be censored in the title and is black
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:25 AM
Dec 2014

please raise your hands.

Yeah, that's what i thought. Word to the fucking clueless. if you are white you really suck if you argue for censorship.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
98. You really should take it down a notch or two
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:39 AM
Dec 2014

There's no need to be so... frothy.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
101. You're replying to the wrong person...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:42 AM
Dec 2014

I was mocking the post above mine.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
96. agreed nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:27 AM
Dec 2014

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
113. * Hand raised *
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:38 PM
Dec 2014
 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
95. Suspended? That's it?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:27 AM
Dec 2014

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
97. I notice the Ohio Deputies are getting off scott free in this thread
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:37 AM
Dec 2014

That's a shame.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
174. It is.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:52 PM
Dec 2014

And I've become a villain for quoting them. I think I may have found part of the problem of why this stuff is still happening. People are very easily thrown off track just by simply seeing the word - they turn away and hide from it.

CountAllVotes

(20,876 posts)
102. Did you "get" what you wanted by posting this?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:47 AM
Dec 2014

What kind of a damned idiot are you anyway posting such racist/hateful crap?

It's ok though 'cause the "jury" says so right?

Do the right thing and delete your post and SHAME ON YOU!!!

CountAllVotes

(20,876 posts)
112. John Lennon wrote that song
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:36 PM
Dec 2014

and yes, that is the name of it and it is about inequality and women and I stand by my words and thoughts on this issue and the role and perceived role of women in our society.





Atman

(31,464 posts)
103. I got a jury hide for using this term -- IN CONTEXT -- in the body of a post.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:47 AM
Dec 2014

It was a post about language and the meaning of words. Much like the responses in this thread. But a DU jury decided my entire thread should be locked and I got a suspension just for using the so-called "N word" in a thread about language. This place never ceases to amaze me!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
105. Skinner himself has been known to use the actual "n" word in his posts.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:52 AM
Dec 2014

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
175. It is a direct quote...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:54 PM
Dec 2014

And as far as I'm aware, DU allows direct quotes. It would be different if these were MY words, they are in quotes and obviously are not my words.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
106. well I hate psych grads
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:54 AM
Dec 2014

-zzzzzzzz-zz

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
114. People in this post seem to be more outraged over your thread title...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:09 PM
Dec 2014

...than the topic at hand.

Fuck this kind of pearl-clutching. This is the same mentality when I got scolded for saying that rapists think that they are "entitled to pussy". Some people have absolutely zero awareness of nuance and context.

greyl

(22,990 posts)
155. Yep, people can be really dumb. nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:54 PM
Dec 2014
 

Rhinodawg

(2,219 posts)
115. Folks...dont give this word power it doesnt deserve.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:15 PM
Dec 2014

power to scare
power to delete
power to hide.

William769

(55,147 posts)
117. It has already been given the power.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:27 PM
Dec 2014

It was not hidden by a jury, nor was it locked by hosts. That word could have been done like this N$#@&%s but it wasn't.

Many people today just has empowered that word on DU. All I can do is shed tears that this is acceptable and that people can't or don't want to see the hurt that this word brings just by being written.

I for one will publicity apologize to the African community on DU for even having to see this word printed here.

sheshe2

(83,793 posts)
123. That is just plain ugly!
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:47 PM
Dec 2014

What the hell is wrong with DU, William? To not get a host lock at the very least? Nothing surprises me anymore.

Tears

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
129. Im sure the officers involved appreciate your efforts to have their words censored.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:00 PM
Dec 2014

They would be the benefactors of the censorship...

Do you really think this word is going to change hearts and minds at DU...?

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
130. It's going to push some of us away from DU.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:04 PM
Dec 2014
Do you really think this word is going to change hearts and minds at DU...?


For some of us, this will be the last straw.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
133. For some of us, this is a re-hash and has been discussed many times...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:06 PM
Dec 2014

And DU goes on...

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
124. just too sad...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:47 PM
Dec 2014

DU is plummeting into a septic tank if the people here allow this sort of awful stuff.

Hello, Boss? you There? Do you Care?

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
128. +1000 (nt)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:00 PM
Dec 2014
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
121. People are so offended by the word, they forgot to get mad at the cops. Weird.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:42 PM
Dec 2014
 

Rhinodawg

(2,219 posts)
122. As usual Grumpy... YOU NAILED IT !!
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:44 PM
Dec 2014
 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
126. Really? Arent there major protesets happening nationwide...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:52 PM
Dec 2014

Sitting at a computer is doing nothing...

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
139. I mean many of the posters on this thread. n/t
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:15 PM
Dec 2014

William769

(55,147 posts)
127. Nationwide protests going on, I think we got that covered.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:58 PM
Dec 2014

Sitting here on DU typing is not going to change that.

But what is written on DU can be changed by typing here on DU.

At least I know where you are coming from now. But then again I have known all along.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
140. "At least I know where you are coming from now. But then again I have known all along."
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:17 PM
Dec 2014

I don't understand what you mean. Where am I coming from? And how did you know this all along?

Quayblue

(1,045 posts)
150. That is pretty weird. I almost forgot what the topic was.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:48 PM
Dec 2014
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
208. You then believe no one is angry and frustrated with the cops? Cool blinders you wear...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:36 PM
Dec 2014

You then believe no one is angry and frustrated with the cops? Cool blinders you wear... I hope they've got a nice paint job.

Weird, part II

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
210. Basically.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:39 PM
Dec 2014

Mind you, I'm on the fence with this one, but no jury would hide it with everyone "discussing" whether or not it was "OK" to use the word. Had the discussion gone on, without the derailment, it may have been hidden. I am bothered that it is a thread title, though, since it is a shitty word to use. I know it is hurtful at such a high context.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
125. Do you all freak out when you hear the word used in comedy?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:50 PM
Dec 2014

How about Larry David/Curb Your Enthusiasm and the "Krazee-Eyez Killa" episode?



Funny or offensive?
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
132. Guess what? Fuck tha Police!!!!!
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:05 PM
Dec 2014










I don't CARE about your subject line!!!!!! THEY should be ashamed, not YOU!!!
 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
134. Please delete and repost at Discussionist, where it will be better appreciated.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:06 PM
Dec 2014

Thank You.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
135. You know who should feel the most shame is the COPS that used the word
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:08 PM
Dec 2014

and they should be even more ashamed that they hate people based on the color of their skin.


AND everyone here should be ashamed of themselves for not LOUDLY denouncing the COPS.

FUCK THE RACIST COPS. I hope they get fired. I hope all their cases are open for review.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
137. THAT goes without saying...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:10 PM
Dec 2014

So why do so many want to protect them with censorship?

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
138. I have no idea
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:14 PM
Dec 2014

I have read all kinds of things in my life. One of my favorite authors is Mark Twain. I wouldn't want his work censored, but it was. There is no reason for it mature people should understand the reason people use the words in the context that they use them. The OP is in the context of not protecting cops by sugar coating what they said. It's tragic if people are disturbed more by the OP than the FREAKING RACIST PIGS.

PsychGrad

(239 posts)
179. Thank you.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:59 PM
Dec 2014

I can't believe how people are angry at me bc I quoted them. People here are so focused on trying to force me to change his quote that they can't even see the forest for the trees. I'm disappointed, to say the least. As someone who has fought the good fight for years regarding racism that people are acting as if I used the word. I would never use the word, never have, and certainly never will. But, this was a quote - and I thought it needed to be seen, especially since it came from police officers and with the issues we have going on with all of the young black men being murdered by police officers.

I may have to take a break from DU - as others have insisted they must bc I quoted someone - bc I'm not sure that I can be part of a community who is so easily distracted from the issue at hand. Or, part of a community that believes that its' MY job to censor what racist assholes say.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
141. for the record, all those cops should be fired, a no brainer to me nt
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:17 PM
Dec 2014

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
144. Not surprised in the least...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:39 PM
Dec 2014

polynomial

(750 posts)
146. Free speech is a first amendment right
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:42 PM
Dec 2014

Free speech is a first amendment right. This right does not specify how good the words should be, or define how bad the words can’t be.

It is alarming that we all can trash talk and make lies in politics, really stretch the truth in commercials, or be educated by television and Hollywood to pantomime the exact definition of a nigger.

When many think through this divisive characteristic many realize it is the media in clever programming that exploits a lot of that definition without saying the word nigger…

If it was talked about fairly most of time the word nigger is not in a lot of conversation. It is rare when that does appear around me, and I avoid it because of the very definition it represents.

However, it’s not the “word nigger” it is the definition of the word nigger that is repulsive, and it not only applies to black people it applies to any color.

Blacks do not have priority on it. One of the famous stupid race comments by Eastwood “ Make my day Punk!!! “ should be just as disgusting.

Or instead of Bush being a profiteer sacking the treasury creating a war with lies torturing people, or creating the worst economic down turn since the depression we could call Bush a white knuckle nigger.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
152. If we submit to censorship, we can never say FUCK the POLICE! (nt)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:49 PM
Dec 2014
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
149. Sadly, quite a number of the few remaining racists out there are still pretty open about it.....
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:44 PM
Dec 2014

Probably because, it seems to me at least, they know that their worldview is slowly dying and being made obsolete.....and so they lash out at the world.

And I agree 100% with you on this; get the racists out of police departments across the country.

Howler

(4,225 posts)
160. unfortunately
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:20 PM
Dec 2014

One of these guys lives a couple of houses down from me. He is a tea party republican that openly displays misogyny on a regular basis. I had never seen his racist tendencies but it is doubtful he would ever displayed them to me because of our political discussions and the different hues of skin color in my family. He is going through a divorce with his wife and treating her and the kids they had together like shit! He has the whole good ole boy network working for him and against her!

Howler

(4,225 posts)
165. this guy is
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:26 PM
Dec 2014

On the swat team and a detective with internal affairs.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
187. After the trolls seeing on twitter that go after me
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:18 PM
Dec 2014

And so many others, not at all surprised. Glad they were caught

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
207. I don't fault you at all
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:35 PM
Dec 2014

for using the direct quote. The hatefulness needs to be seen and absorbed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"I hate niggers. Tha...