General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMan feels misled, frustrated that tattoos cost him job
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) - A man is left confused and frustrated after he feels he was denied a job based on his tattoos.
Bill Roach reached out to Eyewitness News because he thinks he was a victim of discrimination and was treated unfairly.
He said the tattoos arent gang related and shouldnt be an issue. Hes proud of them, and they all mean something to him.
My right arm is nothing but music, he said. You know, songs.
more
http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/investigations/Man-feels-misled-frustrated-that-tattoos-cost-him-job-279992932.html?mobile=y
pipoman
(16,038 posts)I won't hire people with excessive visible tattoos, and I have a fair amount of skin coverage myself, just easily coverable..."discrimination"? Maybe for making bad decisions. My son has several and we have a conversation about how easily covered each new one will be.
Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)I often feel like the minority because I don't have tattoos.
But, still, most of the people with visible tats are in business where it doesn't matter. And those who are in businesses where it matters are able to cover them, like you.
It's prudent to be thoughtful about it when doing it.
Does that make it right? No. It's just life.
I had a conversation with a friend that actually shocked me (last summer). He's from LA, and he said that people with tattoos frightened him. I was like: Really? Why? I know they're more ubiquitous in Brooklyn than West LA, but, there are plenty of artists and whatnot in LA to get over that fear. It just surprised me.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)My son was in San Diego until last spring. I think it is generational, tattoos weren't widely accepted by the baby boomers outside of military and prison/criminal. And then it wasn't usually sleeves or large coverage, more here and there. I read somewhere recently that 18 to 25 40% have at least one tattoo, and 15% have multiple.
Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)why. My friend is turning 50 next summer, so he's of an older generation.
Revanchist
(1,375 posts)in either business or business casual attire. While tattoo's aren't the stigma they used to be, too many of them will still limit employment choices and I don't see that changing anytime soon.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)lame54
(35,290 posts)Liberal In Texas
(13,552 posts)I think it's actually a requirement.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)or a skate/surf shop
or a fitness center/yoga studio
Vinca
(50,271 posts)Throw in a few nose rings and giant ear lobe earrings for good measure.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Next to neck, face, and head tats....
My son wanted a tat when he was 16, I refused to permit it. I coined a phrase, "dumber than a neck tattoo", and used it frequently. ..then he began saying it too...I don't think he'll ever consider neck, face, or head tats..
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)seaglass
(8,171 posts)Lancero
(3,003 posts)And something like this will probably get alot of views.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I understand his point and think his point is something to talk about. But for him to act like he doesn't understand or have a clue at all when it comes to businesses and tattoos really tells me something about him. How is he this confused.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)But, Roach said thats exactly what he did and was told by a manager that it wouldnt be a problem.
I pulled my stuff up, and I showed them I had tattoos, said Roach, and I wanted to be up front, because to avoid wasting my time as well as theirs ... and he encouraged me to take the test and said, you know, don't worry about it."
He raised the issue before taking the test. After passing the test, they told him it was because of the ink they wouldn't hire him.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It is a very common practice. I review applications all of the time. Not for employment but for something else. As litigious of a society as we live in the reason given for denial is always the one that has the best legal backing. It is how it works. Your point is correct though and does change my understanding of his confusion.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)n/t
kairos12
(12,861 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)old fart. I see a young person with their tattoos and wonder why. I guess it is a sign of the times. It is something that will pass in a generation or two.
But if the person with tattoos can do the job I don't see an issue with them.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)As for it passing though. I don't know. I think like that darn rock music it will just get louder, faster and way more absurd as times passes.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)I always think that they just make people look messy and cluttered. I can't imagine committing to one -- to me it's like deciding to wear the exact same piece of clothing for the rest of your life. And so the acid-washed jeans you chose at age 21 are with you decade after decade ...
But, I get that many others love tats and tat culture.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)And it took me forever to realize it was a tattoo. My former coworker always had the perfect eyemakeup and when I asked what her secret was (I wanted to know what brand she used), she informed me that it was tattooed on.
I could not imagine the pain associated with having my eyes tattooed.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)This?
or
or
? (google 'corneal tattoo')
Or, for a different twist,
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Stupid is as stupid does.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The last time I googled corneal tattoos, most of the results were simply people with the 'whites' of their eyes tattooed a solid blue or red or whatever, to make them look like Fremen from Dune or demons or somesuch. These results look 'too perfect'. And I actually don't have any problems with them on an aesthetic level. I just think I would have to be under general anaesthesia to have my eyes (or tongue) tattooed. I don't think I could do it under a local or topical.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)But I've basically worn the same clothes for decades. Multiple pairs of the exact same shoes, the same jeans, the same shirts. Even drawers full of identical underwear and socks. It makes both shopping for new clothes and dressing very easy
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I'd never wanted to deface my body before, not even when I was in the Army.
It was only decades later, at a Vietnam vets' reunion, that I had occasion to think again about it. I was sitting with a half dozen buddies when one proposed that we all go together to the tattoo tent and get inked. It suddenly occurred to me: Who's going to see it now? My mortician?
So I got a couple on the shoulders, under the shirtsleeves. The red dragon/green bamboo design of the Vietnam Service Medal on one shoulder and the Screaming Eagle insignia of my unit on the other. Just a little something to entertain the folks when they're embalming me.
Oh, and the tattoo artist couldn't do us all that day, so I volunteered to wait until the next day, the last day of the reunion. So (and I never told my buddies this) I got mine for half price.
And we were all stone cold sober when we agreed to do it.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)It was really impressive, but i figured I've got the scars, I don't need the tattoo.
The Combat Infantryman Badge tat with its blue background also was cool. But I decided to go with these.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)You wear them well.
Thank you
blackcrowflies
(207 posts)Why would someone get an award for being wounded? I would think the idea is to avoid being wounded.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)After I was wounded I was kicking myself for not doing better to avoid that. But I accept the fact that I was wounded serving my country, and I accepted the medal.
And I had a lot of friends who were awarded the medal posthumously.
R.I.P.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)...we got it from the French. Which makes sense with their historical lack of winning wars. It does improve moral as well as recognize self sacrifice. it serves a good purpose
thucythucy
(8,050 posts)Why are so many Americans obsessed with dissing the French?
After all, they did enable us to win the revolution. Remember Lafayette? And if not for Napoleon the Brits would have creamed the USA in 1812. As it is the Brits managed to burn DC, and only agreed to a settlement because the Napoleonic wars had exhausted them. Then too, it was the French (and Brits) who held off Germany for four years during WWI, until the US decided to join in at the last moment. And even during their darkest hour, during WWII, the Free French did heroic deeds in North Africa, Italy, and then France itself after 1944. The French Resistance saved numerous Allied flyers from prison camps or worse. If the US were occupied by a foreign power, one as ruthless as Nazi Germany, you honestly think the typical American response would have been any better? At least the French government had the courage to declare war on Germany after its invasion of Poland in 1939. It took the US more than two years of head-in-the-sand denial of the threat before it joined in the effort--and then only because Germany declared war on the US. Even then, it took another two years before the US and Britain dared to confront the German military in western Europe, and only after it had been all but gutted by the Soviets.
And speaking of Vietnam, it doesn't look to me that the US had any better luck defeating the Vietnamese than did the French. So why the superior attitude? What makes the US so great that Americans feel entitled to sneer?
I've never been able to understand French-bashing, except as the immature corollary of American "exceptionalism." To me it ranks up there with any other ethnic prejudice, and always seems out of place on a progressive site.
Just my two cents.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)No France, No USA; anything else is a complete misunderstanding of history.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)phylny
(8,380 posts)I wonder how they'll look when the tattooed are old farts themselves
pipoman
(16,038 posts)And always think the same thing....who gives a shit. ..it isn't like old people's skin is oh so attractive anyway. Further, I for one, and most people I know with tattoos have them for their own reasons and enjoyment, not for the approval of others. I have about 30% coverage on my back..I am very public and well known, nobody has any idea
phylny
(8,380 posts)tattoos for different reasons, so my opinion is my opinion, and of course people should and ought to do what makes them happy.
As they age, the art is going to change as the skin changes. I just think they're unattractive no matter WHAT the age. I've never seen a tattoo that I think would be worth it, nor do I find myself thinking one enhances anyone's look. Again, my opinion, which has no bearing on anything but me.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)And I agree with this employer.
I personally don't have any and every now and then I see a really cool one and think that I'd love to have something like a cat on my back. But when I was a little kid, my dad and I were driving by a tattoo shop (not intentionally, it was on our way somewhere) and he explained to me exactly how tattoos were applied. I'm afraid of needles, so naturally I was turned off from that day forward.
Some tattoos are very tastefully done and look great. But I'm of the school that less is more. You're better off making a statement with 1-2 than with your whole body covered.
I guess I'm still old-school when it comes to them though. If the dude has his arms covered, I'd expect him to be wearing long sleeves to work. You can also still have tattoos that an employer would not see (such as the song lyrics on his back instead of his arm).
(Now if he wanted to work at say Hot Topic, that's a whole new ball game).
pipoman
(16,038 posts)After the death of my entire childhood family I first understood the phenomenon of people who cut themselves out of anguish. I never did that, but found/find the pain of getting an 8 hour tattoo very cathartic.
JEB
(4,748 posts)Not how I judge anybody.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)It's like saying to yourself "Hey, I think I'll make myself less employable for life".
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Long sleeves with a collar would cover them up.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and I have never been able to understand why someone would put permanently on their body a piece of "art" they would never temporarily hang on their wall.
When I was in my teens and twenties the only people I ever saw with tattoos were bikers, people who had been in prison, and the occasional hardass military veteran. Even then it was usually something only on the upper arm. This is, IMO, one of the dumbest trends in recent American history.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I know it's just a hard to kick prejudice, but apparently someone hammered that idea into me in the early 60's and it stuck.
Retrograde
(10,136 posts)because my grandfather (born 1901) got several when he was in the navy.
I've seen a few that I thought looked attractive, mostly geometrics, or the so-called tribal tattoos. Most of the others are at best meh. I'll stick with the temporary version - I just can't commit to any one design long-term.
irisblue
(32,974 posts)3 pairs of dog paws and cats paws leading to a rainbow bridge. Those will be under clothing. Surprise the Doctor and Mammo tech when they see them on my late 50s upper back.
azmom
(5,208 posts)52 and considering my first one. I want it next to my scar from my back surgery.
REP
(21,691 posts)It's not for me, but I don't really care if someone else has them. If they're capable of performing their job well, what difference does it possibly make?
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)At my work, 80% of our accounting department has multiple tattoos. Visible ones, on wrists, necks, etc. It never factored into who got the job or not. My boss has the most tattoos, lol. Around here, if employers decide to hire people with no visible tattoos, there is going to be very slim pickings. Most people that I know under age 35 have at least one tattoo. I'm over 35 and I have tattoos. It definitely has no effect on my job. I read somewhere, though, that accountants (surprisingly) were the profession with the highest amount of tattooed people compared with other professions.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)Don't think it will work out for him...
TYY
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)he's even dumber than I thought.
G_j
(40,367 posts)they wouldn't be able to find many people to employ.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)when I get tattoos or piercings. All of mine can be covered with shorts and a t-shirt. People say it's a person's character that counts, but it's not. Looks mean almost everything to most people.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)There are many things about appearance we can't change- skin color, height, etc.
We can choose body art, piercings, and how we dress.
And those choices are a reflection of our character and judgement.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)It then begs the question, what specifically does a tattoo say one's character, and on what objective measure is that based on?
Orrex
(63,210 posts)What, in your view, would qualify as "objective measure" in such an analysis?
Logical
(22,457 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)My company allows discrete tattoos for those working with customers. Folks working in IT in the fabrication shop can be as inked as they like, but their advancement prospects are impacted for sure.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)They judge books by their covers.
Orrex
(63,210 posts)Disagree?
If you saw a man in KKK robes with swastikas tattooed all over his face, head and body, would you have any initial impression at all, or would you honestly say "I'm going to take time to fully get to know this fellow before I formulate even a preliminary response to his appearance?"
If the former, then I don't believe you.
If the latter, then you're judging a book by its cover, just like the rest of us small-minded folk.
Of course the mere presence of tattoos doesn't automatically equate to any particular type of character, but the nature of those tattoos certainly can convey a message contrary to what an employer might which to convey.
If someone was otherwise qualified for the job but had a "McDonalds Sucks" tattoo on his face, would you require McDonalds to hire him?
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)If I wanted to know where something was in Walmart, I would look for someone wearing a Walmart uniform. If I was interviewing someone for a job, and I thought their clothes were unusual, I would ask them about it.
I also agree that written messages communicate something about the past. Swastikas mean different things to different people, so a swastika would tell me much less than written words, such as "McDonald's Sucks." If I was interviewing someone for a job, and they had something as extreme as "I hate (you business)," I would ask them about it.
I wouldn't require anyone to hire anyone.
However, the posts I replied to just said tattoos, as opposed to the bizarre/extreme situations you offered. If I saw someone on fire and screaming, then yes, I would assume they were in pain. If you saw someone with the face tattoo, "I hate Orrex and I will kill Orrex and I will drink the blood of Orrex," then I wouldn't blame you for feeling uncomfortable around that person, but that is not going to happen.
Orrex
(63,210 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)We all know. That is why we look at you that way.
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)I'm Mr. Low Profile at my job and I intend to keep it that way. It doesn't pay to get noticed for something not job related. We already have a Mr. Tattoo guy and Mr. Earing's dude. They also get mentioned with "girl with bright pink hair".
I have the artists, I have a general idea of the subject matter and a few thousands saved up to pay for it. I'll have to travel for one of the pieces but it will be a one of a kind work of art.
dilby
(2,273 posts)He should just move to Portland OR where tattoos have become a society norm and generally don't prevent you from being hired. Someday the rest of the country will catch up to us but till then you are better off living with like minded people.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)woodsprite
(11,914 posts)Some small, some large. One half angel tats and the other half dark tats. Not really my thing, but she's really nice, takes great care of my BIL, is a good (and healthy) cook, and could wipe the street up with someone if they disrespected her family. My ultra conservative MIL hadn't met her or had any idea until a day or two before the wedding. I just kept stressing how good she was for my BIL and how well matched they were. My MIL tried to get a biblical convo going with her over her "carpe diem" "carpe nocturn" tats on her neck -- yeah, that didn't go over so well, but we all survived.
They had her tattoo artist at their wedding doing tats for the guests (for money). My other SIL kept hounding me to get one (come on, we'll do it together). I told her I have no desire to add tats to my already scarred up body. Besides, not many designs work when you get older with more wrinkles. I'd need one where the folds morphed it into another graphic -- kinda like a folding map!
SIL actually said she's hooked on it because she's addicted to the pain factor and the adrenaline of getting a new one.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)and show his plumber's butt. He had a tattoo of Elmer Fudd aiming his shotgun at Bugs Bunny who was deoicted in the tattoo as diving into the guy's anus. I'm glad I did not see these tattoos.
Johonny
(20,851 posts)In Southern California finding someone younger than 30 without a tattoo is getting harder and harder I think this is a generational thing. Mainstream singers are covered in them. Popular actors and actresses show them off on facebook and twitter. Tattoos simply aren't taboo anymore. I know people with PhDs with tattoos. Judging a person by their tattoos is rather silly and rapidly becoming passe.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Old said to me when she came home from college with a tattoo. Times, they are a changing
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)and neck tattoos a sign of extreme poor judgment
I'm sure people will have all sorts of justifications for having them - believe me, I've heard them all.
The messages they actually send go along the lines of the following:
"I have no respect for my own person (and thus am quite unlikely to respect your person)."
"I have a yearning need to fit in to a subculture where tattoos are common."
"I have spent or plan to spend a lot of time in prison."
"Deep down I know there is nothing at all special about me, so let me put marks on my body in a desperate attempt to establish some level of individuality."
"I have no idea what the long term is."
etc.
I'm sure I'll be told I'm a terrible person for this post; regardless, this is the reality of how you are perceived when you tattoo yourself up.
azmom
(5,208 posts)With this stuff.
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)Anyone considering going down that path ought to do so with eyes wide open - this is the reality of getting tattooed up.
Like it or not, tattoos imply risk. In fact, that very implication is why a great many people get them in the first place - they want to be perceived as dangerous and/or edgy and/or different. It's a two edged sword - they will be met with approval in some circles and disapproval in others.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)a perp was identified as an ATM stick up felon because law enforcement recognized his neck tattoo even though his was obscured.
dilby
(2,273 posts)Sorry but people once said all the same messages about people who listened to this old dude called Elvis.
azmom
(5,208 posts)The archaic thinking on this. Wow!
dilby
(2,273 posts)The younger generation view it as Art, in 30 years people won't really bat an eye at it.
ProfessorGAC
(65,035 posts)I'm 58. Tell me what i think.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)None of us are. We're all merely single individuals, who may or may not be typical of ANY group to which we belong, whether by age, skin tone, gender, religion or lack thereof.
So no, when somebody makes a broad statement about some group to which you belong, that does not 'tell you what YOU think'. It's a statement about how the group on average thinks. If you're not part of the groupthink, congrats.
Older people vote far more Republican. This is shown by exit polls. But that doesn't mean YOU vote Republican.
ProfessorGAC
(65,035 posts)Pretty weak. Broad brush statements don't count as broad brush statements if they aren't broad brush statements with little basis in fact.
i get it.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The point was not 'all broad brush statements are true'. Nor in fact was it 'this particular broad brush statement is true'.
The point was that by their very nature, broad brush statements do not apply to individuals. That statements about groups almost never apply to every single member of a group, unless they are statements about how the group is actually defined AS a group. That getting angry on your own individual behalf ('tell me what I think') based on a statement about a broader group to which you belong is often a mistake, because people making the statement aren't talking about you, the individual.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I have lots of friends with tattoos.... Most are reasonably discrete and easily covered. No face tattoos, no neck tattoos. I don't have an issue with those. But if you put a large tatto in a very visible place, you can expect that it will affect your job prospects.... That is all.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)I would have guessed this fad had peaked. I'm certainly seeing fewer tramp stamps than a decade ago and I have never seen a man who had all his teeth with a neck tattoo.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)it began to snowball quickly....
But there is still an unspoken taboo in most workplaces over neck/face/head tattoos...I knew that he didn't have much of a leg to stand on with the neck stuff
IcyPeas
(21,871 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Make better decisions.
You wanna cover yourself in Tats and get all kinds of weird piercings, fine, but don't expect to get work as a teacher.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)but they good sense to not get any that cannot be easily covered with clothing.
Logical
(22,457 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)That will be the policy until positions can't be filled with the best applicants because of it...then it will go to the way side. .
Logical
(22,457 posts)sales job. Very few fully tattooed people apply.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)In the first post. A lot of people have visible tattoos who aren't fully tattooed.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)it's not like he has face tats
blackcrowflies
(207 posts)and they get uglier with age. But that's no reason to deny an otherwise qualified person a job.
That guy is kind of clueless to think having tattoos wouldn't rule him out from a lot of companies, however.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)But many are hideous, in bad taste, or both.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)JHB
(37,160 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)man who got the radio station tattoo. They got the same tattoo on their forehead. Is it just me, or does that 48 year old guy look 68 yrars old?
hunter
(38,311 posts)Gang or prison tattoos and obvious sexually explicit tattoos seem to be the only barriers to employment in my community. And there are programs that will assist unemployed people getting gang or prison tattoos removed for free.
My siblings all have body art but of the sort easily hidden by workplace clothing. Heck, one of my grandpas had tattoos that every hard working, hard partying, wartime shipyard worker enjoyed. If you could build and repair Liberty and Victory ships, and you could affirm your support of the U.S.A. in some way, then you were hired. Not much else mattered.
I don't have any tattoos, mostly because I hate needles. But I do have a pierced ear. I used to wear a shiny synthetic diamond in it. Alcohol and a girlfriend overcame my aversion that day.
I didn't decorate my ear when I was a public school teacher but the kids did notice my ear was pierced. I had watch over hundreds of kids each semester. When I was doing my job right they were all granting their full attention to me and their science lessons, therefore they had all the time in the world to notice my pierced ear. And that was okay with me. I'd rather be more interesting than the second hand of a clock.
An unrelated aside, as a naive young teacher I didn't know what would happen when my wife visited my classroom one day.
Almost every adolescent mind went there instantly, a great disturbance in The Force.
They have SEX!
I've never felt more naked, even when I've been naked.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Which tend to have pretty conservative dress code standards in this regard. Tattoos are pretty commonplace where I live, but you aren't getting a job with visible tats in any of the major hospitals in town.
alp227
(32,023 posts)to make bigoted, homophobic remarks while employed by A&E Television will shrug off this guy as "another reason why millennials are entitled Obamabot brats".
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Big ole Phil Robertson beard either, unless they were willing to trim it.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)"I pulled my stuff up, and I showed them I had tattoos, said Roach, and I wanted to be up front, because to avoid wasting my time as well as theirs ... and he encouraged me to take the test and said, you know, don't worry about it.""
Revanchist
(1,375 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts).... the average age around here. (I'm in my 50s). Look, to younger folks tattoos are no big deal and they don't understand the fuss. They do not carry the stigma they did 40 years ago.
Does the employer have a right to not have a tatted person representing him? Yes, I'd say so, it is an appearance issue, just like dressing in nasty clothes. Should the kid have asked first? Yep. But I can easily see why he would not have suspected an issue.
Around here (north TX) tattoos are everywhere and nobody thinks twice about it.
Now those earlobe stretchy things, those are just heinous.
Maeve
(42,282 posts)"Have the tattoo talk NOW, because it WILL come up." Sure enough, she ended up with a small heart on her wrist. Her body, her choice.
But that's why she'll never be a princess at Disney.
When I was growing up, the only people I knew with tats were uncles who had been military or merchant marines. Or strange people with the carnivals....times change, fashions change.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)Most "work" is all about conformity....uniforms..patterns..regulations.. UNLESS you are your own boss..
Bosses will always choose the most conforming/compliant applicant they can.
In work where people must greet "the public", the least unusual is usually the goal.
It may be unfair, but there are many folks who feel uncomfortable with tattooed people, people with facial piercings, etc.
There are lots of places where these things could be perfectly acceptable, but these are not "mainstream" yet.
These are not handicaps that someone is born with or gets from injuries.. these are deliberate adornments, and when choosing them, people have to know that they may be off-putting .
pipoman
(16,038 posts)The guy named "Roach" has tattoo sleeves...lol
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Never walked the streets of Bakersfield.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)getting a little "BrBa" like Bryan Cranston did. Not sure where though. He got his on the inside of one of his fingers. Ouch.