Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

naaman fletcher

(7,362 posts)
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:28 PM Apr 2012

Taxed by the boss. (Un freaking believable)

http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2012/04/12/taxed-by-the-boss/

Across the United States more than 2,700 companies are collecting state income taxes from hundreds of thousands of workers – and are keeping the money with the states’ approval, says an eye-opening report published on Thursday.

The report from Good Jobs First, a nonprofit taxpayer watchdog organization funded by Ford, Surdna and other major foundations, identifies 16 states that let companies divert some or all of the state income taxes deducted from workers’ paychecks. None of the states requires notifying the workers, whose withholdings are treated as taxes they paid.

General Electric, Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, Chrysler, Ford, General Motors and AMC Theatres enjoy deals to keep state taxes deducted from their workers’ paychecks, the report shows. Foreign companies also enjoy such arrangements, including Electrolux, Nissan, Toyota and a host of Canadian, Japanese and European banks, Good Jobs First says.

Why do state governments do this? Public records show that large companies often pay little or no state income tax in states where they have large operations, as this column has documented. Some companies get discounts on property, sales and other taxes. So how to provide even more subsidies without writing a check? Simple. Let corporations keep the state income taxes deducted from their workers’ paychecks for up to 25 years.
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taxed by the boss. (Un freaking believable) (Original Post) naaman fletcher Apr 2012 OP
Amazing (nt) varelse Apr 2012 #1
WHAT? Are you kidding me? dkf Apr 2012 #2
Ho-hum, just another example of how government conspires with large corporations to indepat Apr 2012 #3
Well, states have to show their appreciation for job creations SOMEHOW. Brickbat Apr 2012 #4
I wonder when this will start happening at the federal level? pa28 Apr 2012 #5
New Jersey is way ahead of the pack on this. enough Apr 2012 #6
No surprises there... tallahasseedem Apr 2012 #34
It's official, we are as corrupt as any 3rd World country. Odin2005 Apr 2012 #7
exactly nt. naaman fletcher Apr 2012 #8
Banana Republic Doctor_J Apr 2012 #27
We became a banana republic the day the SCOTUS invalidated the constitution and installed GW prez lark Apr 2012 #37
+1 HiPointDem Apr 2012 #36
Holy fucking shit. That is fucking madness. joshcryer Apr 2012 #9
Still think the insurance companies are going to be strictly regulated? Fumesucker Apr 2012 #13
Not sure I said that. joshcryer Apr 2012 #16
This doesn't appear to be fraud, I gather it's perfectly legal.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #17
I generally argue for the mandates. joshcryer Apr 2012 #23
Graphic (The 16 States): Auggie Apr 2012 #10
What the WHAT?!? annabanana Apr 2012 #11
AYFKM?! But...we pay taxes on taxes that are diverted. Not legal IMHO. nt live love laugh Apr 2012 #12
Graphic (The 20 Companies): Auggie Apr 2012 #14
What the Fuck! pscot Apr 2012 #15
The workers get credit for their withholdings dems_rightnow Apr 2012 #18
It doesn't just feel weird, it's a con. Workers think they are paying taxes. fasttense Apr 2012 #25
WTF!!!!!! How is this not flat out thievery?? Initech Apr 2012 #19
Here's another thieving scheme that plays out daily SoCalDem Apr 2012 #20
I've seen that one personally... n/t Fumesucker Apr 2012 #21
I had an asshole boss once who tried to buy my W-2s at the end of the year RedRocco Apr 2012 #22
This is a swindle and a con. These workers think they are paying state taxes. fasttense Apr 2012 #24
This tax deferred arrangement does not affect how much employees pay in state taxes KurtNYC Apr 2012 #29
Could you claim exempt on W4 - pay off fed later and not owe the state? Capt. Obvious Apr 2012 #26
Wake up and smell the fascism - n/t coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #28
WTF?! Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2012 #30
Welcome to the new company store... Javaman Apr 2012 #31
so this is what they mean by "tax incentives." mainer Apr 2012 #32
K&R and bookmarking. Wow. n/t myrna minx Apr 2012 #33
MOTHER FUCKERS! n/t Hotler Apr 2012 #35
Brereton Jones was the Ky governor at the time the taxed by boss law was passed. alfredo Apr 2012 #38
The US has become one giant con game MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #39

indepat

(20,899 posts)
3. Ho-hum, just another example of how government conspires with large corporations to
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:36 PM
Apr 2012

fuck/rob the 99% for the exclusive benefit of the 1%. Oh, the joys of living in a morbidly sick RW-dominated society in which founding principles are routinely pissed on by government.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
4. Well, states have to show their appreciation for job creations SOMEHOW.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:40 PM
Apr 2012

When states are willing to scab on each other for the sake of jobs at any cost, other states have to get creative.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
5. I wonder when this will start happening at the federal level?
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:55 PM
Apr 2012

Allowing corporations to pocket employees tax withholdings sounds like some sweet sweet Republican daydream.

enough

(13,260 posts)
6. New Jersey is way ahead of the pack on this.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 06:19 PM
Apr 2012

snip from the article>

New Jersey approved $73.2 million in new deals in 2011 on top of $178 million diverted that year alone under previous deals. I calculate that at nearly $80 per household in corporate welfare based on New Jersey’s 3.1 million households.

snip>

Also a comparative chart at the link in the OP.

tallahasseedem

(6,716 posts)
34. No surprises there...
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:54 PM
Apr 2012

My neighborhood is about to get "reassessed" which I'm sure means more taxes for little service. Thanks Christie.

lark

(23,134 posts)
37. We became a banana republic the day the SCOTUS invalidated the constitution and installed GW prez
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:20 PM
Apr 2012

It's all been downhill since then. Even Obama is not a liberal and has increased the upward drain on income since he's been in office. He's really a moderate Repug, it's just that Republicans are no longer a real party, they have morphed into the Tea Crazies.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
13. Still think the insurance companies are going to be strictly regulated?
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 07:18 PM
Apr 2012

Enquiring minds want to know..

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
16. Not sure I said that.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 07:28 PM
Apr 2012

Perhaps confusing my opinion on crowd funding with my opinion on mandates?

I think insurance will still be ripe for fraud as even Medicare is now. It will take a lot of iterations to fix them both.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
17. This doesn't appear to be fraud, I gather it's perfectly legal..
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 07:33 PM
Apr 2012

And I think I have seen you argue in favor of the PPACA rather strenuously, although you are by no means the most vociferous on that..

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
23. I generally argue for the mandates.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 08:55 PM
Apr 2012

PPACA without a public option is just epic fail. I do not actually support it as it exists, I just dislike bullshit arguments against it.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
11. What the WHAT?!?
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 07:06 PM
Apr 2012

OK.. this has got to be low hanging fruit. Surely something can be done about this one....

dems_rightnow

(1,956 posts)
18. The workers get credit for their withholdings
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 07:36 PM
Apr 2012

They're saving the trouble of swapping checks for their tax breaks. But yeah, it feels weird.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
25. It doesn't just feel weird, it's a con. Workers think they are paying taxes.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:49 AM
Apr 2012

Workers think they are paying taxes to the state to fix roads, pay for education, pay for police, pay for state government workers. Instead they are directly giving their wages to the corporation.

Why don't they identify it for what it is. Why don't they label it on the worker's paycheck that it is diverted taxes for corporate profit? They don't. They hide it from the worker. They don't want to tell the worker, the worker might complain. Instead they lie, in order to cheat the citizen of their hard work and wages.

The reason the state governments and the corporations wont tell the workers is because America is big into fascism.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
20. Here's another thieving scheme that plays out daily
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 07:42 PM
Apr 2012

company hires undocumented workers with a wink & a nod.

tells them they have to have taxes withheld , so their checks take big tax-hit.

These are often off the books workers , so the boss "cashes" their checks for them

The employers know that these workers will not file a return, and will not dare to report them, so the employer tears up the worthless checks & keeps the difference.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
24. This is a swindle and a con. These workers think they are paying state taxes.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:40 AM
Apr 2012

Instead they are paying off the corporation. If nothing else it is a fraud because workers think the money is being taken for taxes and then it merely remains in the CEO's hands. This is a cheat and a con. Why don't they take the money and identify it for what it is - forced corporate charity. Instead they hide it by claiming it is a state tax.

You know why they are lying like this? Because if they came out and put on the pay check a line item for forced corporate charity workers would complain. Instead it is easier to lie to the workers.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
29. This tax deferred arrangement does not affect how much employees pay in state taxes
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:37 AM
Apr 2012

in spite of what the headline says.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
26. Could you claim exempt on W4 - pay off fed later and not owe the state?
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:05 AM
Apr 2012

or pay off state later and screw your company out of this f'd up arrangement?

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,422 posts)
30. WTF?!
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:40 AM
Apr 2012

and I imagine that some of these states are the same ones screaming about having to cut services, pensions, bust labor unions, etc. in order to "balance the budget" and remain fiscally solvent, right? This means that states could technically have had a lot more money to work with to balance their budgets but allowed the money to continue to go to these companies instead, right?



Unf**kingbelievable!

Javaman

(62,531 posts)
31. Welcome to the new company store...
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:35 PM
Apr 2012

Last edited Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:13 AM - Edit history (1)

it's just like the old one, only without the fancy marketing gimmicks.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
32. so this is what they mean by "tax incentives."
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:39 PM
Apr 2012

It looks like Maine is losing out 60 million dollars a year because of this sweetheart deal with Bath Iron Works. I'm steamed.

alfredo

(60,075 posts)
38. Brereton Jones was the Ky governor at the time the taxed by boss law was passed.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:28 PM
Apr 2012

He was a Republican when living in Virginia, but when he moved to Ky he changed to Democrat because the Dems had a 2 to 1 registration advantage. He was also pissed at Nixon. Nixon made it tough for Reps to get elected.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Taxed by the boss. (Un f...