General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTaxed by the boss. (Un freaking believable)
http://blogs.reuters.com/david-cay-johnston/2012/04/12/taxed-by-the-boss/Across the United States more than 2,700 companies are collecting state income taxes from hundreds of thousands of workers and are keeping the money with the states approval, says an eye-opening report published on Thursday.
The report from Good Jobs First, a nonprofit taxpayer watchdog organization funded by Ford, Surdna and other major foundations, identifies 16 states that let companies divert some or all of the state income taxes deducted from workers paychecks. None of the states requires notifying the workers, whose withholdings are treated as taxes they paid.
General Electric, Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, Chrysler, Ford, General Motors and AMC Theatres enjoy deals to keep state taxes deducted from their workers paychecks, the report shows. Foreign companies also enjoy such arrangements, including Electrolux, Nissan, Toyota and a host of Canadian, Japanese and European banks, Good Jobs First says.
Why do state governments do this? Public records show that large companies often pay little or no state income tax in states where they have large operations, as this column has documented. Some companies get discounts on property, sales and other taxes. So how to provide even more subsidies without writing a check? Simple. Let corporations keep the state income taxes deducted from their workers paychecks for up to 25 years.
varelse
(4,062 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)fuck/rob the 99% for the exclusive benefit of the 1%. Oh, the joys of living in a morbidly sick RW-dominated society in which founding principles are routinely pissed on by government.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)When states are willing to scab on each other for the sake of jobs at any cost, other states have to get creative.
pa28
(6,145 posts)Allowing corporations to pocket employees tax withholdings sounds like some sweet sweet Republican daydream.
enough
(13,260 posts)snip from the article>
New Jersey approved $73.2 million in new deals in 2011 on top of $178 million diverted that year alone under previous deals. I calculate that at nearly $80 per household in corporate welfare based on New Jerseys 3.1 million households.
snip>
Also a comparative chart at the link in the OP.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)My neighborhood is about to get "reassessed" which I'm sure means more taxes for little service. Thanks Christie.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Hopefully at some point our leaders will be Mussolini'd
lark
(23,134 posts)It's all been downhill since then. Even Obama is not a liberal and has increased the upward drain on income since he's been in office. He's really a moderate Repug, it's just that Republicans are no longer a real party, they have morphed into the Tea Crazies.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Enquiring minds want to know..
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Perhaps confusing my opinion on crowd funding with my opinion on mandates?
I think insurance will still be ripe for fraud as even Medicare is now. It will take a lot of iterations to fix them both.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)And I think I have seen you argue in favor of the PPACA rather strenuously, although you are by no means the most vociferous on that..
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)PPACA without a public option is just epic fail. I do not actually support it as it exists, I just dislike bullshit arguments against it.
Auggie
(31,177 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)OK.. this has got to be low hanging fruit. Surely something can be done about this one....
live love laugh
(13,123 posts)Auggie
(31,177 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)The voters and being fleeced and the workers are being fleeced twice.
dems_rightnow
(1,956 posts)They're saving the trouble of swapping checks for their tax breaks. But yeah, it feels weird.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)Workers think they are paying taxes to the state to fix roads, pay for education, pay for police, pay for state government workers. Instead they are directly giving their wages to the corporation.
Why don't they identify it for what it is. Why don't they label it on the worker's paycheck that it is diverted taxes for corporate profit? They don't. They hide it from the worker. They don't want to tell the worker, the worker might complain. Instead they lie, in order to cheat the citizen of their hard work and wages.
The reason the state governments and the corporations wont tell the workers is because America is big into fascism.
Initech
(100,088 posts)SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)company hires undocumented workers with a wink & a nod.
tells them they have to have taxes withheld , so their checks take big tax-hit.
These are often off the books workers , so the boss "cashes" their checks for them
The employers know that these workers will not file a return, and will not dare to report them, so the employer tears up the worthless checks & keeps the difference.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)RedRocco
(454 posts)fasttense
(17,301 posts)Instead they are paying off the corporation. If nothing else it is a fraud because workers think the money is being taken for taxes and then it merely remains in the CEO's hands. This is a cheat and a con. Why don't they take the money and identify it for what it is - forced corporate charity. Instead they hide it by claiming it is a state tax.
You know why they are lying like this? Because if they came out and put on the pay check a line item for forced corporate charity workers would complain. Instead it is easier to lie to the workers.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)in spite of what the headline says.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)or pay off state later and screw your company out of this f'd up arrangement?
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,422 posts)and I imagine that some of these states are the same ones screaming about having to cut services, pensions, bust labor unions, etc. in order to "balance the budget" and remain fiscally solvent, right? This means that states could technically have had a lot more money to work with to balance their budgets but allowed the money to continue to go to these companies instead, right?
Unf**kingbelievable!
Javaman
(62,531 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:13 AM - Edit history (1)
it's just like the old one, only without the fancy marketing gimmicks.
mainer
(12,022 posts)It looks like Maine is losing out 60 million dollars a year because of this sweetheart deal with Bath Iron Works. I'm steamed.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Hotler
(11,433 posts)alfredo
(60,075 posts)He was a Republican when living in Virginia, but when he moved to Ky he changed to Democrat because the Dems had a 2 to 1 registration advantage. He was also pissed at Nixon. Nixon made it tough for Reps to get elected.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)with 99% of Americans as rubes.