Our Invisible Rich - Paul Krugman/NYT
Our Invisible Rich
Paul Krugman - NYT
SEPT. 28, 2014
<snip>
Half a century ago, a classic essay in The New Yorker titled Our Invisible Poor took on the then-prevalent myth that America was an affluent society with only a few pockets of poverty. For many, the facts about poverty came as a revelation, and Dwight Macdonalds article arguably did more than any other piece of advocacy to prepare the ground for Lyndon Johnsons War on Poverty.
I dont think the poor are invisible today, even though you sometimes hear assertions that they arent really living in poverty hey, some of them have Xboxes! Instead, these days its the rich who are invisible.
But wait isnt half our TV programming devoted to breathless portrayal of the real or imagined lifestyles of the rich and fatuous? Yes, but thats celebrity culture, and it doesnt mean that the public has a good sense either of who the rich are or of how much money they make. In fact, most Americans have no idea just how unequal our society has become.
The latest piece of evidence to that effect is a survey asking people in various countries how much they thought top executives of major companies make relative to unskilled workers. In the United States the median respondent believed that chief executives make about 30 times as much as their employees, which was roughly true in the 1960s but since then the gap has soared, so that today chief executives earn something like 300 times as much as ordinary workers: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/09/24/3571555/americans-underestimate-ceo-pay-gap/
So Americans have no idea how much the Masters of the Universe are paid, a finding very much in line with evidence that Americans vastly underestimate the concentration of wealth at the top.
Is this just a reflection of the innumeracy of hoi polloi? No the supposedly well informed often seem comparably out of touch. Until the Occupy movement turned the 1 percent into a catchphrase, it was all too common to hear prominent pundits and politicians speak about inequality as if it were mainly about college graduates versus the less educated, or the top fifth of the population versus the bottom 80 percent.
And even the 1 percent is too broad a category...
<snip>
More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/opinion/paul-krugman-our-invisible-rich.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region®ion=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=1