General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow talented are Kim Kardashian and Beyonce?
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by greatauntoftriplets (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Just from my untrained eye, neither seems to be very talented. However, they are very sexual. And they promote and sell sex. Their butts and legs are the envy of women around the world. Little girls want to be like Kim and Beyonce. They see men that worship their looks. Is America really this stupid?
I must confess that I enjoy looking, although I see little redeeming quality in promoting these mental giants.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The average fungus has more "talent" than Kardashian. Any Kardashian.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I can't even really say Kim K. has anything more than average talent between the sheets, either...
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)But no hate here.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)But I can't say I am surprised. She's all about her shallow, talent-free self 24/7/365.
srican69
(1,426 posts)mikeysnot
(4,758 posts)is beautiful, Kim not so much....
Do no listen to pop music so I could give two shits about them....
Don't underestimate the American populous to repurchase the same crap over and over again.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)On the other hand, watching the Kardashians makes me want to join Al-Qaeda.
hlthe2b
(102,514 posts)I can see the talent shine through in Beyonce--even though her act is not really my "cup of tea"... I really like those singers whose voice is the highlight--with range and ability to "belt out" once in a while. Beyonce's forte' seems more toward the "performance" side and her singing voice is rather limited with most of her songs sounding "spoken" rather than sung, but that's fine....She clearly entertains her fans.
Kim Kardashian, on the other hand--bleh. a self-entitled, superficial "celebrity" for no apparent reason.
pscot
(21,024 posts)beyond that I can't offer an opinion.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)and a savvy businesswoman.
Kim has good publicists.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)I think Beyoncé has talent. Her music may not be everyone's cup of tea, but there's definitely some there there.
Kim? Not so much. Her talent is for being famous and, to some, attractive.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Queen Bey rocks the house!
I'm with you on Kardashian, though.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Mariah Carey and Whitney were in a different league, vocally. Christina too, though she came in the 2000s.
The female vocalists back then were effortlessly sexy. They didn't hide their sexiness, yet they also didn't need sex to sell music. Their voices were truly divine and they put effort into writing music. I saw the latest Anaconda from Nicki Minaj, currently the biggest hit. Broke a Youtube record for hits on the first day IIRC. It looked like a softcore with some amateur remix of "Baby Got Back" going on in the background.
May sound oold saying this, but I miss vocal quality.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)..and she did a very good job of acting, I thought.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I think she has been given a bad time in the right wing media and it looks like it has reached the left too if this thread is any evidence.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)There's a reason she got the lead female role in an Austin Powers movie at the age of 20. Look at the number of talented actresses who have to wait until their 30s for a big budget movie lead.
Her charisma was obvious even to Hollywood at a young age.
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)Best vocals: Jill Scott
Action_Patrol
(845 posts)No fan of either but Beyonce is talented. She can sing. To crib Joel McHale from 'The Soup', Kim Kardashian is 'famous for having a big ass and a sex tape'.
We are comparing Apples and Dogshit (picturesque dogshit, but dogshit nonetheless).
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)Not really up on the music business are you?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)See post 23.... if that's not music to you then I can't help you.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Jay-Z and Bey are the two biggest acts in music right now.
trumad
(41,692 posts)onenote
(42,830 posts)I'm not a Beyonce' fan myself, but I also don't believe that because a certain type of music or art doesn't appeal to my tastes, the creator of that music or art isn't talented. A little bit of research reveals that Beyonce' as a solo artist had her first number one album in 2003 and over a period of ten years, every album she's released has topped the charts in the US and virtually all of them have been in the top ten around the world (Germany, Australia, Ireland, Canada, Netherlands, Switzerland, the UK, New Zealand -- so much for the stupid American audience argument). If you go back to her career as a member of Destiny's Child, her first top five album was in 1999 -- so she's been a successful recording artist for over 15 years. I don't think that makes her a "flash in the pan."
Rex
(65,616 posts)Beyonce became famous, due to her stage performances and singing. Kardashian is famous, because of reality TV...without it we would have no idea who Kim K is.
Beyonce on the other hand, has platinum album after platinum album.
trumad
(41,692 posts)KT2000
(20,604 posts)and it drives me nuts.
I like her politics but her singing - not so much.
The other one you mentioned? what talent would one consider? Selfie photographer?
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I would say Beyonce is more talented than Kim Kardashian. Beyonce is a better performer than a singer. Last night's performance was boring, in my opinion, but normally Beyonce seems to be able to put on a good performance. Her Super Bowl halftime show was a good performance. By good performance I mean she has good to decent dance numbers.
Kim Kardashian on the other hand seems to have very little talent, if any. She is mainly famous for a sex tape, a reality TV show, and good looks.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I dont to have to listen to otherwise intelligent people try to pretend she's talented.
Just because Beyoncé can half-way warble carefully-massaged lowest common denominator Focus Group Tested Corporate Music Product does not make her a "musician" in any way, shape, or form.
With the Kardashians there isn't any pretense of talent or musicianship -- she's a pretty little rich girl with a big ass. You get exactly what it says on the tin. I can at least appreciate the honesty.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)JI7
(89,287 posts)it's for her music and dancing . she is a performer . she has to practice and work hard for her shows.
otohara
(24,135 posts)at I'm assuming their magnificent butts, legs and maybe even their breasts.
You trash them then confess to peeking at their assets.
When I see Beyonce I watch her amazing dance moves and listen to her sing.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)ecstatic
(32,786 posts)Kim K got famous off of a sex tape. Kim K's butt is fake, while Beyonce's is real.
But more importantly, Beyonce has been working hard at her craft since she was a little girl, and has created music that millions of girls and women around the world can relate to. Jay Z said it best last night, Beyonce is the "greatest living" entertainer. That's why President Obama invited her to the past 2 inaugurations, etc.
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)Star of a infamous porn tape, the daughter of a infamous lawyer and has been passed around by more NBA players/Hip Hop artists than a NYC subway token. But on the positive side she's got a great ass.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)I didn't recognize the name when I saw this "famous for being famous" no-talent family all the time on TV. Then I thought, "hmmm...Kardashian....oh, he was one of O.J.'s lawyers."
Robert Kardashian is dead but he must have been the brains of the family.
I don't listen to this sampled, shredded, overprocessed auto-tuned crap they call music. Auto-tune is evil. I'm into codge rock. All those guys who have arthritis or are dead by now. From the Beatles and the British Invasion through the 80s. See my avatar for a guy who busts ass for 2-1/2 hours a night on his current world tour, and spends the rest of the time recuperating from it! Still rockin' it at age 67.
I gave up before grunge hit the scene. I thought grunge was awful and Weird Al's parody of "Smells like Teen Spirit" expresses my feelings.
The contemporary person I have seen that impresses me with her talent is Lady Gaga. She has a beautiful voice and is talented. I don't get the strange costumes, but that's ok. She empowers her audiences (little monsters) and tells them they are OK the way they are, and that's important, as in "Born This Way". She's keeping a lot of kids, especially with regards to their sexuality, from killing themselves. She is a far better singer than Madonna ever thought about being.
Adele has a good voice but her songs seem to be the same chords: I - IV, I-IV. One-four. That would be C to F to C to F, in the key of C major. I'm saying this from hearing "Skyfall" and "We could have had it all".
blogslut
(38,022 posts)I'm no major Beyonce fan but the woman is a very good singer. Ms. Kardashian is merely a product of our voyeuristic culture.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 25, 2014, 06:09 PM - Edit history (1)
They have pretty faces but they really don't do much for me, whether through their talent or their looks. But then I'm 64 and over the hill as far as modern celebrities are concerned. Of course I'd be lucky if either one of them gave me 30 seconds of their time. I'm still waiting for classy celebrities in the mold of Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly, or the impossibly charming, beautiful, poised, charismatic, and talented Ronnie Spector (aka Veronica Bennett) to come along and rev my motor.
Sigh:
Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)In my opinion, Beyoncé is quite talented.
Kim Kardashian is clever in a PT Barnum kind of way.
mattclearing
(10,091 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)Each is a carefully-packaged, artificial product being sold to a witless, eager audience hungry for pre-chewed, delicious pablum.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Beyonce is today's Madonna, knowing very well how to market herself.
KK - she's just yuck, personified. And that entire clan.
alp227
(32,075 posts)Beyonce can belt it out! Kim and the result of the KKKardashian Klan have never contributed anything worthy to society.
By the way, for Kim Kardashian's epic fail at singing (at least it was to benefit tsunami victims) here is a TYT video where Cenk and Ana mock the song:
edbermac
(15,950 posts)Kim Kardashian?? I'd need to swallow a bottle of Viagra to be aroused by her.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)but genuinely beautiful. They both are.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Both her personality and her ass gross me out.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)women want their butts? Women are always worried that their butts look too big. At least white women are.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Society has embraced the big ass.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)an excellent advocate for Liberal causes.
I object to the equating of the two. I don't dislike Kim Kardashian, but the two ladies' claims to fame are not similar.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)she just squanders it on the garbage she sings. she can also act... I would like to see her do more of that and maybe sing something decent.
sP
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Kim is famous for having a fat ass and that's about it. She contributes zilch to society and to our culture.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)demmiblue
(36,914 posts)Just beautiful!
I will not mention what I think about KK.
raven mad
(4,940 posts)I like Beyoncé, she has a voice. And the t&a thing doesn't do much for this heterosexual old broad (I'm 60). That said, celebrity is as the MSM puts it out there - ridiculous.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,771 posts)From the General Discussion SoP:
Threads about showbiz/celebrity culture which do not have a political angle are not permitted under normal circumstances and should be posted under Entertainment.
Open discussion of showbiz is permitted during very high-profile news events which are heavily covered across all newsmedia.
Please feel free to re-post this in Entertainment.