General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChurch violates separation of church and state
Here in North Carolina, the GOP has put a constitutional amendment on the ballot to redefine marriage. Here in Durham, one church has evidently taken a position on the amendment by putting it on their church sign, one that faces a busy road.
[IMG][/IMG]
OK, I know it's blurry: I'll get a better photo later, but it reads "This House is for the Amendment." This is obviously troubling: it's not a statement by a pastor from a pulpit, but a statement that apparently describes the position of this particular church taken as a tax-exept institution.
Gay marriage is already not legal here in NC: these things are designed to increase conservative turnout at the polls. THis seems like a magnet for stupid.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Churches and nonprofits can't support or endorse CANDIDATES, but they can promote their position on ISSUES.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)It does seem strange, though, that a church can endorse a consitutional amendment, which lasts forever until repeal, but not a candidate, who can be unseated in the next election.
Alcibiades
(5,061 posts)Still stupid, even for Baptists.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)And I feel certain it's not a position Jesus would have taken.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)its an advocacy statement. It's no different than "this church supports labor unions". To violate the SC&S, it would have to clearly say vote Republican or you go to hell, or something endorsing a candidate or party.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)During the second Bush election Bishop Chaput (Kaput) who was moved to Milwaukee I believe allegedly told Catholics in Denver that voting for Democrats was a mortal sin because they were pro choice.
Gman
(24,780 posts)But awfully close, a priest we once had told us during his sermon that we should be on our knees doing penance for allowing Obama to be elected. That's when I walked out and returned after the sermon for the rest of the mass.
I was waiting for him in the sacristy after mass and gave him my opinion of what "life" issues was including a living wage, affordable housing, relief on foreclosures, and several other things. It was heated. But a week later he came up to me and said, "pray for me.".
He didnt concede the life issue, but he realized there's more to it.
Initech
(100,070 posts)They rake in billions and have become nothing more than political tools for the right. The Catholic church more than any other religious institution totally crossed the line with the birth control stuff, and any church that promotes that awful Amendment 1 should be forced to be taxed. I'm tired of this.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)The rule: Issue advocacy is okay; candidate endorsement is not.
Here's why issue advocacy is okay: Because practically anything a church says or does could be interpreted as "issue" advocacy by someone. Feed the hungry? You're depriving quickie marts their free market right to gouge the starving $5 for a frozen burrito! House the homeless? You're depriving slumlords their inviolable right to warehouse people in substandard apartments and then threaten them with eviction if they have the temerity to complain. Join a campaign for a living wage? You're trying to bankrupt corporations whose business model relies on cheap or free labor!
And each of these issues has a biblical foundation, which churches take more or less seriously depending on the makeup of their congregation. It's not possible to separate the motivations of random do-gooding with folks following their reading of the Bible.
Alcibiades
(5,061 posts)Though I doubt this counts as "do gooding."