Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
James River on fire!! Train details (oil) Lynchburg. Richmond alternate water supply (Original Post) underpants Apr 2014 OP
what...the hell....? Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #1
Richmond Times-Dispatch actually is doing some good reporting on this underpants Apr 2014 #4
Just remember, nothing need be done, as long as the 1% have *their* water villager Apr 2014 #2
Fun fact: Opposition to pipelines means more rail accidents involving oil tanker cars. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #3
Interesting. I'll still take the trains over the pipelines (nt) The Straight Story Apr 2014 #5
Average volume of spill in rail incidents is 5x that from pipelines. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #7
Difference being though The Straight Story Apr 2014 #8
Pic of it: The Straight Story Apr 2014 #6
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
2. Just remember, nothing need be done, as long as the 1% have *their* water
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 04:23 PM
Apr 2014

Shame about the spilled oil cutting into profits, though

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
3. Fun fact: Opposition to pipelines means more rail accidents involving oil tanker cars.
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 04:28 PM
Apr 2014

The oil's going to move somehow, and in the absence of pipelines? It moves by train. In 2013? Total number of gallons of oil spilled in rail transport accidents exceeded the total for the previous 37 years from 1975 to 2012: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/business/energy-environment/accidents-surge-as-oil-industry-takes-the-train.html

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
8. Difference being though
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 04:58 PM
Apr 2014

Is size of spills and contain-ability.

From the link: But most of the 1,556 accidents in this time period happened while the vehicle was being loaded or unloaded; 645, or 41 per cent, happened in transit.

Add in pipelines underground running through the water tables and I will take surface transport.

No method is perfect and one has the potential for a lot larger impact even if being safer over time in quantities of accidents; although I would suspect that a lot of accidents are either not reported or left out of aggregation - train accidents are really hard to miss.

Case in point:
292 Unreported Oil Pipeline Leaks in North Dakota in less than 2 Years
http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/292-unreported-oil-pipeline-leaks-in-north-dakota-in-less-than-2-years-131027?news=851496

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
6. Pic of it:
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 04:42 PM
Apr 2014

news.com.au ?@newscomauHQ 1m

An oil tanker train has burst in flames after derailing in Lynchburg, Virginia http://bit.ly/1nJoWcp (via @ABC) pic.twitter.com/kXhBCjzFbR

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»James River on fire!! Tra...