Salon: David Brooks' statement that Obama has a "manhood problem" is racist
The New York Times' David Brooks said that in foreign policy issues such as the Russia vs. Ukraine conflict,, Obama has a "manhood" problem:
Brooks: "Basically since Yalta weve had an assumption that borders are basically going to be borders and once that comes into question if in Ukraine or in Crimea or anywhere else, then all over the world all bets are off. And lets face it, Obama, whether deservedly or not, does have a Ill say it crudely but a manhood problem in the Middle East. (editors note: the bolding is ours) Is he tough enough to stand up to somebody like Assad or somebody like Putin? I think a lot of the rap is unfair but certainly in the Middle East there is an assumption that hes not tough enough."
Salon's Paul Rosenberg writes:
The racial aspect adds another dimension. Obamas entire political career has been defined by pushing back against the threatening, black alpha-male stereotype. Conciliation, not confrontation, is not just his style, but the core of his substance as well. The slightest break from this stance can trigger immediate backlash as was seen in the knee-jerk response to his comment saying police acted stupidly when they arrested Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates for trespassing in his own home. Since then, conservative activists and media have manufactured countless similar offenses as Obama has consistently failed to produce them himself. He has a deep-seated hatred of white people, as Glenn Beck alleged, without a scintilla of evidence, when Obama held his beer summit to atone for his momentary lapse of inconvenient truth-telling. And that has been the right-wing narrative subtext ever since. But the textual evidence has been virtually nonexistent, because Obamas personality and his politics have been so deeply wedded to compromise and conciliation.
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/22/david_brooks_twisted_manhood_questioning_obamas_manhood_isnt_just_racist_its_wrong/