General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmost densely populated area in US - Los Angeles with 7,000 people per square mile
California cities most densely populated in U.S.
That's the finding of the U.S. Census Bureau, which on Monday reaffirmed a counterintuitive truth: The cities of the West, barely considered cities at all by many East Coast pundits, often are more densely populated than such skyscraping metropolises as New York and Chicago.
Los Angeles is the nation's most densely urbanized area, with a population of nearly 7,000 people per square mile. The 3.28 million people living in and around San Francisco and Oakland are runners-up, with a density of 6,266 people per square mile.
San Jose places third, with a density of 5,820 people per square mile and a population within its urbanized area of 1.66 million.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/26/BAG91NQI7S.DTL#ixzz1qLrupCEG
dhill926
(16,387 posts)with some of the high rise developments they're talking about......
Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)I'll stick to the Mountain West.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)That's surprising. LA seems more like one giant sprawling suburb. Would have thought New York would be more densely populated.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)"These numbers are shaped by commute patterns and geographic features rather than municipal boundaries. But they make sense to people who see in them an affirmation of how the West Coast has evolved since the 1800s.
That's different than such regions as greater New York, which has 18.35 million people in its urbanized area. The 3,450- square-mile area is centered on the vertical island of Manhattan - but it also takes in much of Long Island and forested swaths of Connecticut, areas that feel remote but in fact are tied directly to the core.
"What defines 'urban areas' is not density per se, or residential units, but an integrated job market," said Gregory Ingram, president of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in Cambridge, Mass. "Think about the spectrum of (types of) places. ... We have clear ideas of what's at either end, but the suburbs kind of muddy things up."
-----------------------------------------
What this in fact says is that the suburban areas surrounding the municipal areas in California Cities are more dense than areas like Long Island, Connecticut and Westchester.
It doesnt really tell you how dense NYC is vs Los Angeles. It tells you how densly populated the NYC metropolitan area is versus the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area.
But to say "California Cities are more dense than NYC" is misleading in my humble opinion.
Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)Los Angeles: 8,092/sq m
New York City: 27,012/sq mi
So your point is well taken...
libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 27, 2012, 08:07 PM - Edit history (1)
home county in the midwest, it would have a population around 2500. If my home county had the same population density as Brooklyn it would have 30 million people.