Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
1. Women go through labor and delivery
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 12:56 PM
Mar 2012

with complications thereof. Men, obviously, don't need this coverage. My husband paid $125 a month for his insurance. I paid $165 a month for mine. Plus, ironically, I am post menopausal. OLDER women still pay more.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
6. Medical costs for women are higher because of your longer lives.
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 01:31 PM
Mar 2012

not because of childbirth.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/

Principal Findings
Per capita lifetime expenditure is $316,600, a third higher for females ($361,200) than males ($268,700). Two-fifths of this difference owes to women's longer life expectancy. Nearly one-third of lifetime expenditures is incurred during middle age, and nearly half during the senior years. For survivors to age 85, more than one-third of their lifetime expenditures will accrue in their remaining years.
 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
3. I don't think the blue chart's accurate
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 12:57 PM
Mar 2012

If abortion and birth control are still excluded in some states/policies in 2014, then that blue chart's not valid. Excluding women's procedures so that they have to be paid for separately or privately doesn't count as equal coverage.

msongs

(67,405 posts)
5. men pay for pregnancy related services even tho not attached to a woman....
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 01:27 PM
Mar 2012

at our work we subsidize that even though we may not have a significant other female in our lives. no discounts available

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
7. I appreciate that.
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 02:22 PM
Mar 2012

Isn't that ironic that loud voices are arguing that health insurance shouldn't cover contraception, while pregnancy is vastly more expensive?

This would be a good time for everyone else to loudly argue that they definitely want health insurance to cover birth control, because they'd rather pay for birth control than pay for someone else's pre-natal care & childbirth!

Nikia

(11,411 posts)
10. At my work previous job, I subsidized health insurance
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 07:36 PM
Mar 2012

For men with three heart attacks, two men with cancer requiring chemotherapy/and or radiation treatment, and two women with expensive chronic conditions even though I had none of those problems. There were only two pregnancies during this time period. This was for a period of five years for a company of 60 people.
Should all of us without heart attacks or cancer gotten a discount? The point of health insurance is that it spreads the risk.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Much More Do Women Pa...