Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 01:53 PM Jan 2014

Sheriff rejects popcorn killer’s ‘stand your ground’ defense: ‘Why didn’t he move seats?’



By Travis Gettys
Friday, January 17, 2014 8:51 EST

The sheriff who’s investigating the fatal shooting of a moviegoer this week in Florida said the state’s “stand your ground” defense doesn’t apply in this case, but an attorney said it likely does.

“What most people don’t understand is, the law is not concerned with what started your argument; the law is not concerned about how petty it is,” attorney Stephen Romine told First Coast News. “The law is concerned about the acts between two people — the person who died and the person who did the shooting.”

Retired police captain Curtis Reeves was charged with second-degree murder after he shot 43-year-old Chad Oulson to death Monday afternoon because he refused to stop sending a text message to his 2-year-old daughter’s day care provider.

Reeves told investigators that he feared for his safety when he was struck in the face with an object that investigators determined was popcorn, but his attorney suggested may have been a more dangerous object.

Pasco County Sheriff Chris Nocco dismissed that claim, saying there was no evidence of another object – and besides, the 71-year-old Reeves could have just found another seat.

“It was an empty movie theatre,” Nocco told the Daily Mail. “If he was scared, why didn’t he move seats?”

The sheriff said all the detectives at the scene Monday agreed that the state’s controversial self-defense law did not apply in this case.

“From our investigation, it seems simply that the agitation of someone using their cell phone to text has caused this,” Nocco said. “The suspect was sitting there, they had an argument about texting, the victim turned around, threw something, a shot is fired and the next thing you know a man is dead.”

But Romine, who is not representing Reeves but has tried many high-profile cases, said the state’s law focuses on one thing: Did the retired officer believe that he was in danger?


If so, Romine said, he had the right to use deadly force to defend himself – even if the weapon was popcorn.

Under the state law, a person has the right to use deadly force if he fears death or great bodily harm, even when retreat is possible.

The attorney said the reason the two men fought doesn’t matter under the statute, because all that matters is whether Reeves believed Oulson would hurt him.

Under Florida law, he added, it’s considered a felony offense to strike a person over 65 years old with something as small as a marshmallow.

Reeves and his wife, Vivian, were seated behind Oulson and his wife, Nicole, during a matinee screening of “Lone Survivor” at a Wesley Chapel movie theater when the retired cop asked the younger man to stop using his phone.

Investigators said Reeves went to get a manager but came back alone and continued his dispute with Oulson.

“We believe the manager didn’t have a full conversation with the individual because he was dealing with other customers,” Nocco said. “But the fact the suspect had the ability to go and see the manager shows he had the ability to move his seat.”

After the argument resumed, Oulson threw a bag of popcorn that struck Reeves in the face, and he drew a pistol and fired one shot at the younger man.

Oulson’s wife tried to shield her husband, but the bullet passed through her outstretched hand and struck her husband in the chest.

Authorities said Reeves then calmly sat down and placed the gun on his thigh before he was restrained by an off-duty sheriff’s deputy.

“It was jammed when he put it down on his thigh,” Nocco said. “I can’t tell you if he was trying to shoot again, or what he was doing. We will look at the gun to see what happened In the future, but that isn’t relevant to the second-degree murder charge at present.”

A judge denied bond for Reeves, who retired from the Tampa police department in 1993.

His attorney said Reeves was “heartbroken” that a life was lost in the shooting.

Watch this video report posted online by First Coast News:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/17/sheriff-rejects-popcorn-killers-stand-your-ground-defense-why-didnt-he-move-seats/

Full article posted with permission
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sheriff rejects popcorn killer’s ‘stand your ground’ defense: ‘Why didn’t he move seats?’ (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2014 OP
Fuckhead is only "heartbroken" because he's up on charges. Aristus Jan 2014 #1
Hey, come on! Popcorn's a dangerous weapon, donchya know? eom DonViejo Jan 2014 #3
Damn good question, sheriff. Thanks for asking. (nt) Paladin Jan 2014 #2
The attorney is not correct Dash87 Jan 2014 #4
Violent people with their guns and stand your ground defense = crazy stuff. AlinPA Jan 2014 #5
"saying there was no evidence of another object" Rex Jan 2014 #6
No, the Sheriff is saying that there's no evidence of Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #9
Oh okay, thanks for clearing that up. Rex Jan 2014 #10
LOL. eom. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #12
I mean...I won't use it or even have it loaded Rex Jan 2014 #14
That'll certainly get their attention, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #21
Good one! ellie Jan 2014 #27
I, still, don't understand ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #7
"Imposing our demand" is as American as apple pie. arcane1 Jan 2014 #19
Yep ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #22
There's nothing American about Apple pie dickthegrouch Jan 2014 #25
Florida- where shooting people is ok but God forbid you attack a senior with a marshmallow. Kaleva Jan 2014 #8
If he is acquited on the facts known exboyfil Jan 2014 #11
Too bad this doesn't apply to Black kids. Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #13
My thoughts exactly. EOM. TheOther95Percent Jan 2014 #23
Sorry, but the guy with the gun bears some responsibility NightWatcher Jan 2014 #15
He didn't move seats because he thinks louis-t Jan 2014 #16
Skittles and popcorn are two things you should not buy in Florida. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #17
Counter-intuitive but... Xyzse Jan 2014 #18
So in Floriduh, popcorn and marshmallows are now lethal weapons? These people have lost their minds. OregonBlue Jan 2014 #20
If you are carrying a gun, how can you say you feared for your life? ryan_cats Jan 2014 #24
The key is demonstrating a reasonable fear of great bodily harm or death... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #26
Based on what is reported, "reasonable fear" can not be demonstrated. ManiacJoe Jan 2014 #29
Gun nuts can't wait for an opportunity to shoot someone. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 2014 #28
I couldn't have said it any better. Sheldon Cooper Jan 2014 #30

Aristus

(66,380 posts)
1. Fuckhead is only "heartbroken" because he's up on charges.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 01:56 PM
Jan 2014

Anyone who's the type to be heartbroken at the criminal waste of innocent life is not the type to be packing for a visit to a movie theater.

Callous disregard for human life is part of gun culture.

Good for the sheriff. Fuck that idiot attorney guy...

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
4. The attorney is not correct
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:00 PM
Jan 2014

You can't, for example, start taunting someone until they snap and attack you, and then pull out your gun and shoot them. You also wouldn't be able to attack someone and then claim that Stand Your Ground applies. That guy who filmed himself killing his neighbor tried that and was arrested.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
6. "saying there was no evidence of another object"
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:02 PM
Jan 2014

So that was bullshit that he threw some popcorn at the murderer? I kinda figured he was shot for failure to follow orders by a former police cpt. Dickhead.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
9. No, the Sheriff is saying that there's no evidence of
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:10 PM
Jan 2014

anything other than popcorn being thrown at this nut.

Reeves told investigators that he feared for his safety when he was struck in the face with an object that investigators determined was popcorn, but his attorney suggested may have been a more dangerous object.

Pasco County Sheriff Chris Nocco dismissed that claim, saying there was no evidence of another object – and besides, the 71-year-old Reeves could have just found another seat.
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
10. Oh okay, thanks for clearing that up.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:13 PM
Jan 2014

Well you know, I really hate it when those kernels get stuck in between my teeth! It would have been a hail mary shot, but still possible!

I think I should take my bazooka the next time I go to the movies...just in case someone brings milk duds and bad intentions.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
14. I mean...I won't use it or even have it loaded
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jan 2014

just keep it perched on my shoulder the entire movie...so everyone can see I mean business at all times!

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
21. That'll certainly get their attention,
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:23 PM
Jan 2014

but probably not in a good way.
You know you can legally buy a used anti tank missile launch tube, carry that around and see the reaction you get, it's perfectly legal, but I think you'll get a very bad reaction from the cops.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
7. I, still, don't understand ...
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:03 PM
Jan 2014

how we got to a place where we feel it our right to tell someone else to stop doing something and when/if they don't; rather than just walking away, we feel justified in imposing out demand ... even to the point of killing someone?

I guess we really do need to consider the decision point query: "Is this a hill I'm willing to die on?"

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
22. Yep ...
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:36 PM
Jan 2014

"I get to do whatever I want to do and you get to do whatever I want you to do ... or I will shoot you!"

Kaleva

(36,307 posts)
8. Florida- where shooting people is ok but God forbid you attack a senior with a marshmallow.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:07 PM
Jan 2014

"Under Florida law, he added, it’s considered a felony offense to strike a person over 65 years old with something as small as a marshmallow."

exboyfil

(17,863 posts)
11. If he is acquited on the facts known
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:14 PM
Jan 2014

Would it be enough to change SYG? Given his victim was a real jerk, he might have the possibility of being found not guilty.

I think he should spend the rest of his life in jail so I am not excusing his actions, merely speculating on how this may play out.

If the victim was someone like Trayvon Martin (African American teenager) I would put the odds at least at 50%/50%. In this case probably 25%/75%.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
15. Sorry, but the guy with the gun bears some responsibility
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:17 PM
Jan 2014

You don't just get to carry a gun and wait for someone to piss you off. This isn't Tombstone.

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
16. He didn't move seats because he thinks
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:17 PM
Jan 2014

his mission in life is now to edumicate the younger generation about politeness. Or kill them cuz they won't listen to him. Not sure which.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
18. Counter-intuitive but...
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:20 PM
Jan 2014

I feel like, I am glad the guy's lawyer is making that defense on stand your ground.
It just shows how crazy that law really is.

Then again, I don't know, it also may just once more show how far we have fallen as a society.

ryan_cats

(2,061 posts)
24. If you are carrying a gun, how can you say you feared for your life?
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 03:34 PM
Jan 2014

If you are carrying a gun, how can you say you feared for your life? I know that packing heat lets the packer think they can't be beat and now he is saying he feared for his life, from popcorn?

Second degree murder sounds right, it wasn't premeditated but he sure as hell started it so he can't claim manslaughter. Since this is Florida, I am interested to see what happens if it goes to a jury trial. It doesn't say but hopefully the prosecutor will go before a grand jury since that was supposed to be one of the problems with the Zimmerman trial.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
26. The key is demonstrating a reasonable fear of great bodily harm or death...
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 04:05 PM
Jan 2014

I am not convinced that this maniac can do that. From my perspective this entire incident only makes sense if you assume that this ex-cop deliberately provoked a confrontation with the intent of killing someone.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
29. Based on what is reported, "reasonable fear" can not be demonstrated.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 04:33 PM
Jan 2014

Reasonable fear = "ability, opportunity, jeopardy".

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
28. Gun nuts can't wait for an opportunity to shoot someone.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 04:32 PM
Jan 2014

They play out situations in their heads over and over. Cowboy situations, hero situations, break in situations, they're itching to shoot someone. The gun gives them a feeling of confidence that they wouldn't have otherwise. Gun nuts tend to be insecure losers until you put a gun in their hand.



Now that we know you can get off (ala zimmerman) we'll be seeing a lot more of this.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
30. I couldn't have said it any better.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 04:36 PM
Jan 2014

They fantasize and dream of such situations, going over it in their minds, over and over again, and probably rubbing their crotch while doing so.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sheriff rejects popcorn k...