General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDharun Ravi Guilty on 15 Counts... and I'm kinda sick to my stomach over it.
http://gawker.com/5893951/tyler-clementi-webcam-spy-gets-mixed-verdict-faces-deportationI don't know if you all have followed the Tyler Clementi / Dharun Ravi case. Clementi was the young gay man from Rutgers who jumped off the (?) George Washington Bridge. Dharun Ravi was his roommate who set up his computer to film the room while Clementi had a gentleman caller over.
Dharun was offerred a plea deal with no jail time but turned it down and went to trial instead. Now he has been found guilty on all 15 charges and is going to spend the next LARGE chunk of his life in jail.
I feel kind of sick by that. I'm a gay guy and remember moving off to college and getting tossed into a dorm room with a straight guy. It is a strange situation and fraught with nervous tension and was pretty difficult to deal with at times. Dorm rooms are tight quarters and I was pretty sure my roommate would freak if he knew he was sleeping three feet away from a gay guy. Every gay person knows, even the best of family or friends, can sometimes freak out and say or do something stupid when you tell them you are gay. Gay people's lives are a history of people having odd reactions to coming out.
But you talk those things over, you work them out, time heals all wounds. Dharun Ravi is Indian and comes from a culture where being gay isn't so good. He was 18 and moved off to college and into a dorm room where he was curious why his roommate wanted him out of the room. He did a stupid thing and set his computer camera up so he could see what was going on in the room. And he found out his roommate was gay. He texted "I saw him making out with a dude. Yay." to his friends. Then, like a total dick, he filmed Tyler and his friend the next time he came over and broadcast the encounter. Total dick. Rotten thing to do. He put Tyler through a horrible experience. But he realized he did wrong and He sent a text to Tyler and told him he was OK with Tyler being gay. I think he was sorry to hurt Tyler and with a little time these two might have worked it out. But Tyler ended his life.
I ache for Tyler and his family. I'm a softy who can still cry when I think about Matthew Sheppard being left on that fence to die. I lost a friend to suicide over homosexuality when I was 16. It is terrible and it leaves ruined lives behind.
And now I feel the same way thinking about Dharun Ravi. He did a really stupid, crappy thing and now his life will be ruined as well. His parents must be crushed. And I'm kind of surprised that I am confused by my emotions. As much as I want to think the situation is just--that he should be held accountable--it doesn't sit right.
An 18 year old guy didn't deal well with having a new gay roommate. He did a crappy thing and filmed a make-out session. What 18 year old straight guy isn't going to be a little shocked to see his new roommate, whom he sleeps a few feet away from, is gay and making out in his room with another dude. He must have been pretty freaked out--I imagine he probably felt pretty vulnerable and you can just imagine the 100s of scenarios that ran through his head. In that emotional state he made the decision to broadcast the make out session.
Should he be held accountable? Yes. Should he have to make up for it somehow? Yes. Should his life be ruined and no good from this? I just don't know. What good comes from him spending the next decade getting raped in jail? Will he come out of that having learned a lesson or will he come out of that damaged and ruined?
Though I'm gay and though I fight really hard for gay rights, this is a case where I hope the judge has leniency. I hope this young man's life isn't thrown away.
And as a gay guy, it kind of freaks me out to feel that way.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)His life isn't ruined - he'll serve "maybe" half the 10 year sentence. What also pisses me off is that he was A GUEST of this Country, not a citizen. I'm glad they threw the book at the mean-spirited smarmy little bastard.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)remorse that I can tell. He needs to stand up and handle the consequences of his actions. How many mean things has he done to gay kids that were never punished? Go to jail, sonny. THen leave the country.
TuxedoKat
(3,818 posts)because the newspapers and media were saying this, but then I just read this article in The New Yorker that said he did no such thing, the only thing filmed was an embrace and only for a few seconds:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/02/06/120206fa_fact_parker#ixzz1pJsUOJW6>
Such a terrible tragedy.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)I'm advocating for young people being free to be idiots or naive. We all were in the old days.
Gay hypersensitive screwed up students aren't 'special'. They do not deserve special treatment.
Where gay kids need intervention is before college.
I was gay in high school. I went through the knocks as did every gay activist I knew in the early 1970s.
As an anti-war activist I had known young men in the US Army in the period between 1969 through 1972. I knew a few who killed themselves. Suicide is complicated.
The Indian American boy is in no way responsible for Tyler's choice to end his life.
If I were to succumb to my own depression and shoot myself or take an overdose I would in no way want anybody to be blamed. I think if Tyler Clementi could see what is happening he would 'take it back'. (But he can't.) He would see that any shame -at age 18- is a fleeting foolishness.
Democratic Underground friends, most of you despise capital punishment.
Why on earth would you want to support useless jail time for a then 18 year old kid who was being dumb using his modern technology? There were no rules which said 'you can';t use a computer to show a roommate having sex in your shared dorm room.
As I posted before I was naive to the max. I was filmed in a 'Boogie Nights' type operation, in lesbian movies. If I hadn't already been disowned by family that would have been the coup de gras.
But being shamed and embarassed is part of life especially when we are young.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Unfortunately, that isn't what he was charged with.
He was found guilty of 15 counts, including:
The jury also found him guilty of lying to investigators, trying to influence a witness and tampering with evidence after he tried to cover up Twitter and text messages inviting others to join in the viewing.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/nyregion/defendant-guilty-in-rutgers-case.html?pagewanted=all
polly7
(20,582 posts)he did something cruel and terrible. He's not a child who wouldn't know how devastating this would be.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)He chose to film somebody's private life and he chose to share that film for the purpose of humiliating the people involved.
He chose to turn down the plea deal that would have meant no jail.
He made his choices and now he can pay the price for them. No pity from me. He'll be just fine when he goes back to India. I hope he doesn't come back here.
I'm not gay, but I have NO sympathy for people who deliberately hurt others. I was called a fairy when I was too young to know what it meant, and rejected and humiliated by both boys and girls in school. Most recently, now pushing 60, I had co-workers deliberately use a mentally disabled man to sexually harass me at work to try to drive me out. I have NO sympathy, NONE, for such people. They SHOULD be punished and severely.
renate
(13,776 posts)And compassionate, too, to be able to see the situation from Ravi's point of view.
After reading this (detailed and long) article about the case, I think Ravi may have been more arrogant and asshole-ish than deliberately cruel. Still, he did what he did, with really horrible results.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/02/06/120206fa_fact_parker
William769
(55,146 posts)I think deportation is to good for him. I for one would like to see his ass rot in jail and never see the sun. Then he can rot in Hell!
Just my two cents.
Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)This guy is a kid and from a different culture. I hate it when people don't cut other people some slack. I did stupid things when I was a kid including being prejudiced and saying stupid things when I was in college.
I was just repeating things I heard in my home from older siblings who I hero worshipped and hadn't begun to sort things out for myself.
Its the same thing with Rod Blagoyovich (sp?) - he's a narcissist from the word "go" but I don't think he's a an evil person. Just too ambitious and kind of a nut. I feel sorry for him and his family yet its quite "hip" here in Chicago to ridicule him, even as he took that long walk into prison for 11-14 years. How is that amusing?
I can't help but feel terrible for him and wish he had used some common sense and hadn't been such an arrogant ass but he's still a human being who is suffering very, very much.
Hope you have a good evening.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)While Wall Street criminals and War Criminals go free and profit from their crimes, I do not think Blagojovich deserved that sentence at all. For his children it must be devastating. Too little compassion and humanity and too much need for revenge in this country. A little more kindness would probably go a long way to making this a better and less violent society.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Now hewill have up to 10 years to think about his choices.
Spazito
(50,326 posts)What he did was despicable and it was done deliberately BECAUSE his roommate was gay. His actions directly resulted in Mr. Clemente's suicide.
He refused a plea deal, his choice, a bad one.
There are consequences for hate crimes and Mr. Ravi is now suffering them.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)in that case, this may help-
What would happen to Mr. Ravi if he had set up a clandestine webcam on some girl he knew (an ex or a girl who rejected him or a total stranger) and invited the whole internet to watch her have sex with her new boyfriend?
That's right, no one would have the least little sympathy for this creep, the jury wouldn't let him off and he'd go to jail.
Now do you understand?
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)That was what I have been thinking since this case first broke. If he had been filming a straight couple having sex, then he would have already been forced to plead guilty. Because he was guilty.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)krawhitham
(4,644 posts)Not ten years for a hate crime
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)than one who is truly sorry.
He deserves jail. Maybe then he'll realize what he did was wrong.
DearAbby
(12,461 posts)and that is admirable but examples must be made, I too hope the judge shows some leniency in this case. But this person committed a crime, he must pay for it.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)This wasn't a hate crime. This was a stupid kid being stupid.
The whole fucking thing is a tragedy in every direction.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and sure, he could not have known that Tyler Clementi would commit suicide as a result of his actions. Many of us look back on certain things we did in our youth with regret. Sometimes those things were stupid or mean or worse. Usually those things do not have such terrible consequences. So I do have some sympathy for him for the reasons you outline here.
However, he had the opportunity to take a plea deal that involved no prison time. That, apparently, was not good enough for him, suggesting arrogance on his part. Well whatever his reasons, he has now found out the reality of rolling the dice at trial and losing.
I wonder if it was him or his lawyer who decided to take that chance. I'll bet it was him.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Who probably believed he did nothing wrong.
kanrok
(4,460 posts)He was offered a blind plea that reduced the top prison sentence to 5 years.
The prosecution lopped off 5 years and retained the right to argue for prison, leaving the sentence up to the judge.
Not particularly lenient, and really did not offer any real reduction, since the court is unlikely to sentence a first time offender to the maximum sentence.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...I did not know that. If that is the case, then the choice to go to trial is less surprising.
renate
(13,776 posts)The second offer was for no jail time and 600 hours of community service and "help" with not getting deported, according to MSNBC and the New Yorker link I posted above. You're right about the first offer, but the second was an incredibly sweet deal.
The reporting on this case (and, especially right afterwards, even about which counts he was found guilty on) seems unusually disorganized; in one article earlier today I read the same thing that you must have about the first plea deal, with no mention of the second. So no wonder it was confusing.
dkf
(37,305 posts)His obtuseness does seem more culturally related than anything though. I think he has no idea how things work here.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)This is too much.
kanrok
(4,460 posts)Compassionate and level-headed.
A felony conviction is a harsh penalty and that alone will follow this young man for the rest of his life.
The fact that his actions may have contributed to his roommate taking his life is a much harsher punishment than any prison sentence could ever be.
His roommate's family are also asking the court to exhibit compassion in sentencing.
A price needs to be paid.
But prison is not the answer.
JI7
(89,248 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)He caused the death of a fine young man. He caused endless heartache for the family and friends of that fine young man. They will never wake up again to a world with him in it. Never.
One thing is certain: Ravi intended to harm Tyler, one way or another. Nothing good could possibly have happened afterwards.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)I said something similar to a friend earlier- both of us are bi- and had to quickly explain what I meant before she got angry with me.
It's always harder to read about this in a very young person- whether legally adult or not. I turn 40 this year, and have daughters his age and older. It makes me feel like my generation has totally failed in the message we've passed on to his generation. One young life gone and one ruined over something we should be beyond by now.
I don't have an argument with the verdict. It just makes me sad. That's all.
Logical
(22,457 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Basically he dared them to find him guilty and send him to jail. He could hardly argue that he didn't do the things that he did. He could have pleaded guilty, throwing himself on the mercy of the court, expressing contrition out the wazoo and gotten probation like most non-violent first offenders, but instead he opted to go for broke: exoneration. How in the world did he decide that, guilty as he was? Well, wouldn't they look at him, a nice young man, doing all the right things, college bound, presumably heterosexual, as presumably were a majority of themselves? Wouldn't they sympathize with him, alive, there in the courtroom (unlike the victim), quietly wearing a tie, not a menace to anyone, but facing legal consequences for acts that prompted a loss of life that can never be brought back no matter how much punishment might be doled out?
And what about that lost life? What was lost really? Wouldn't they each and in their private counsel intuitively understand Ravi's feelings about his roommate? Would they REALLY be prepared to lock this fine young man up just because he 'made some fairy cry'? The lawyer would know how to put it: "it was all a lark, ladies and gentlemen, a prank! There was no intent to persecute!" Ultimately, he would brace the jury with the prospect of "destroying a SECOND life - but to no moral purpose whatever! An utter waste, this time committed by our legal system, compounding the tragedy that the deceased person sadly decided was the fated end of his life."
When Ravi's life was put in their hands, would they really be prepared to wreck it over the "privacy" or "right to be free of intimidation", or whatever, of some human anomaly who would let another naked man lie on top of him and kiss him, and who let's not forget would himself be the one in violation of some state law, somewhere, up until quite recently? In India, Dharun Ravi could probably kill his sister, sister-in-law, or fiancée outright, if word got back to him that she was a "slut", and probably escape any punishment by a court whatsoever... It happens hundreds of times a year.
No. They wouldn't destroy his bright budding life over something stupid like that. He hadn't even slapped Tyler around! Not over a "Tyler Clementi" - who couldn't even face what he was, or bear for his parents to know! The jurors would even feel like he did probably. They would put themselves in his place and imagine what they might have done. They wouldn't find him guilty, because then what would happen to him would be on their heads. They wouldn't want to be responsible for him being punished -put in jail where everyone knows what happens- over the pathetic suicide of a life that was bound to end badly anyhow.
He would DARE them to find him guilty.
But the jury wouldn't be pushed around like that. He didn't find a jury that was willing to set aside the law and let their majoritarian / homophobic biases settle the matter. And I'm kind of surprised, as I read around in this thread, that he failed to find a jury like that.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)than the American soldier who murdered 16 Afghani women and children. The military always protects their own.
JI7
(89,248 posts)saras
(6,670 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)It was a CRIME.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)6000 hours of community service and counseling...he made yet another bad choice...I'm having trouble feeling any sympathy for this guy.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Which makes me even more disgusted at him. I have no sympathy for him at all. Especially since his sentence isn't just for one act but for several. It could have been much worse and if it had been I wouldn't bat an eye.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)sympathy for this guy also.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)What he did was horrible, but he didn't know the guy would kill himself.
18 months to 2 years sounds about right to me.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)What he did contributed to Clementi's death, but there were many things that can be blamed on Clementi's low self esteem and shame of his homosexuality. His parents, his church, his community etc. The fact that this kid made the decision to end his life
involved years of shame.
I believe Ravi should get some punishment just not sure 10 yrs is the right call for a stupid college kid. I went to college with a lot
of dumb pranksters and I can picture a number of those fools doing something similar if it was available at the time.
I hope I don't get flamed, but a bad decision has now ruined many lives.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)I can't even comment on this. WTF.
_ed_
(1,734 posts)First of all, did you perform some kind of psych eval on the kid before he died? No? Then shut up.
Second of all, did any of your college pranks lead to someone's suicide? Where did you go to college?
What if your son was dead? Your friend? Crying a river for the perpetrator of the crime tells me all I need to know about you.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)columnist) agrees with me. Prank may be reductive, however, Ravi's intent was to laugh, humiliate etc. not to have the
guy kill himself. What I am saying is that many people had a hand in this suicide. The bullies in his previous schools, his parents, church etc. The shame that he internalized all the way to the point where this humiliation made him think there was no
alternative.
Who the F was crying a river for the perpetrator??? Clementi's own parents did not want a 10 yr. sentence. You have issues
that I will evaluate as beyond any reasoned argument on this board.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)He chose to go to trial instead so must live with this now.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)then he did himself no favor by lying through his teeth about it during the trial, tampering with evidence and asking other people to lie to police.
It appears his friend told the best lie she could for him, that she hadn't heard bout him organizing the secnd viewing. But the idiot left a trail all over the net.
The suicide was not a consideration for the jury. It was his pattern of invasive and purposefully malicious behaviour.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)Had Tyler not felt the pressure, whatever kind, social, parental, financial, career, etc., to go to college, he'd probably still be alive today. Would that have been a better outcome?
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)have a nice life.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)If that's not ruined, I don't know what is.
JI7
(89,248 posts)things .
what gets me is his refusal to take the plea deal. that makes it harder to feel sorry for him.
and don't use culture as an excuse , indians aren't all anti gay . it might not be something openly talked about but it's not really something condemned either. at least not where i grew up. even if it was it's no excuse.
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)I don't share it, but I respect it.
I'm not sorry he's going to prison, though. Not at ALL. I'm honestly pleasantly surprised that this crime is being taken so seriously. I would have expected it to be swept under the rug like so many hate crimes against LGBT people are, every day.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)There's a tendency to pick one side as the righteous one and see only virtue on that side and only evil on the other. As a practicing lawyer, I appreciate your recognition that real cases, when you get into them in detail, are usually more complicated.
The responses to your post illustrate the kind of competing concerns that arise. It's valid to want to make an example of a hate crime, to deter others. It's also valid to consider that Ravi wasn't a hardened criminal but an irresponsible 18-year-old.
I haven't studied this case enough to know where I'd come down in terms of an appropriate sentence. I can say, though, that your approach of trying to give fair consideration to all the factors is the correct one.
easttexaslefty
(1,554 posts)Mimosa
(9,131 posts)IMO, people shouldn't be requested to leave their dorm rooms to accomodate a roomate having sex.
In the past that was not expected of college students. Why couldn't Clementi have visited his 32 year old lover at his domicile? A dorm room isn't a hotel room.
I'm not blaming the victim. But nobody should go to jail for this. And suicide can be regarded as an act of violence against family and friends.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Whether right or wrong.
And, that didn't have anything to do with the crime his roommate committed. That's why you have RAs and RDs.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Spying on his roommate is not a good option.
krawhitham
(4,644 posts)They just do not broadcast it on the internet
krawhitham
(4,644 posts)Have problems connecting the dots often?
If he was never asked to leave he would never had thought he should record his room mate
He he never recorded his roommate he would not have been charged with anything
He may not have been charge with causing a suicide but he was convicted for it
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Yes, I am old and yes, I did give them privacy for sex. And yes, they also did make out in front of me. But I never filmed them to humiliate them.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)He apparently did not hate gay people. He is guilty of bullying but he did not know nor could he have reasonably known the guy would commit suicide.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)violated. Whether he was straight or gay, he had his privacy completely violated. Would you want to get caught on camera and flashed across the internets for everyone to see?
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Was the deciding factor. If he'd only set up the camera once to check what was happening, OK stupid, inconsiderate but maybe understandable. But there was no legitimate reason to invite other people to watch the feed. And there was not legitimate reason to set the camera up and do it AGAIN.
Ravi was offered two different plea deals, the second of which would have guaranteed no prison time, just a lot of community service and counseling. He turned both deals down. He was also found guilty of tampering with evidence and witness tampering, not things a normal person with no sense of guilt does.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_1...i-spycam-case/
Here is the verdict breakdown:
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/03/ravi_webcam_trial_verdict.html
Each of the charges was broken down into component parts and the jury decided on each part as well as each charge. Although the news is saying he could get as much as ten years, I suspect the judge will not sentence him for that long, though the judge did say at one point Ravi would see time in jail if convicted. The Clementi family and the man who was also videoed by Ravi released statements to the press and they are calling for a mild sentence. http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2012/03/16/statement-by-tyler-clementis-father-after-dharun-ravi-conviction/?mod=google_news_blog
Ravi did much more than invade Tyler Clementi's privacy and THAT is why he should be punished.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)It wasn't "just a prank" and he turned down a really good plea bargain.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I wish he had been as kind. Another young man might be alive today. I do understand your pov though. But we are a society that is way more into punishment, than into rehabilitation and improvement. Which is probably why nothing ever gets better.
I am glad he has suffered consequences for his cruel behavior. Too bad most people do not. But like you, I hope the judge is lenient and gives him a chance to be a better person rather than a person who becomes bitter and hateful.
He could do more good if he has genuine remorse and spent those years outside jail talking to young people about the horrible mistake he made and what he has learned from it. Iow, he could save some lives to make up for the one he was responsible for. That would be a better way to honor the life that was lost imo.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)I wish he could get more prison time than 10 years. I hope he gets the max and then gets deported.
And, using "cultural differences" to excuse this is rather sickening. By that logic, racism, sexism, honor killings, and a host of other crimes and bigotry would not only be forgiven, but would kinda be the fault of the victims, like Tyler, right?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)opinion ( a famous gay which tops your gay). Read his take and negate anything he says.
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/10/02/before-we-crucify-those-two-teenagers-who-streamed-tyler-clementis-having-sex-over-the-internet
Here is a small except:
There are questions that need answers before we crucify Ravi and Wei: Was Tyler bullied in middle school? Was he bullied in high school? Was Tyler, like so many gay teenagers, bullied at home by homophobic parents who thought they could fix their son by heaping condemnation and disapproval on him, by abusing their child emotionally? Was Tyler forced to attend a church where he was subjected to spiritual bullying? Was he surrounded by children who took the hatred of homosexuals, as expressed by their parents and preachers, as a license to abuse and torment the gay kids in their schools?
The rush to crucify the two Rutgers students who were involved in streaming Tyler's encounter with another boywho has not harmed himselfis more clearly revealed to be, with each passing day, nothing more than an effort to deflect blame by shifting all responsibility for Tyler's death onto the shoulders of a couple of foolish teenagers. But it is clearthe other boy did not commit suicidethat there were other people who contributed to Tyler's death. Indeed, other people may be more culpable: middle and high school classmates who may have brutalized Tyler for years; school administrators who may have failed to protect him; religious "leaders" and religious "traditions" that pounded self-hatred into him. And I'm very sorry to say this but it has to be said: Tyler's own family may bear some responsibility for his decision to
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He also turned down a no time deal, clearly thinking the jury would also think his repeated actions were a funny prank. The jury did not agree.
I'm editing to add that I think it is sort of 'not cricket' to neglect to point out that the Dan Savage quotes come from Oct, 2010 and are not addressing the trail outcome, they are addressing the nature of the discussion at the time.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)below:
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/03/16/the-rutgers-verdict
I do not disagree that Ravi should be held accountable for his actions and when this occurred my knee jerk reaction was to lock him
up and throw away the key. Upon further reflection I do believe many had a hand in Clementi's suicide.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Here's another part.
"Chris Christie, the anti-gay governor of New Jersey, was quoted as saying that he can't imagine how the two students accused of secretly filming Clementi can sleep at night. I'm wondering how Christie sleeps at nightand Barack Obama. When the president says he opposes gay marriage because when it comes to marriage, "God is in the mix," that sends a harmful message to gay children and their parents and their classmates.
Tyler's roommate did not act alone. There are accomplices out there: uncaring teachers, criminally negligent school administrators, classmates who bullied and harassed Tyler, "Christian" churches and hate groups that warp some young minds and torment others, politicians on the right and left who exploit and perpetuate anti-gay prejudice, perhaps even Tyler's own family. We need to learn more. And more charges need to be brought."
Pisces
(5,599 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)charges, not no charges as you seem to claim. I'm not calling for charging them. Dan is. And I did not introduce the material, you did.
I'm not asking for anyone to get charged. Dan is.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)exact quote:
Not just criminal charges against a couple of stupid teenagers who should've known better but didn't. But ethical charges need to leveled against adults and institutions that knew better but didn't care.
Ravi and Wei did not act alone. We have to recognize that there were others involved in destroying Tyler Clementi. And we need to start calling the effort to pin all the blame on Ravi and Wei exactly what it is: a coverup
I introduced the material because it seemed relevant to the conversation when other state upfront they are gay as if that should carry more weight when giving opinion. Here is a sex columnist, who is gay and famous. His opinion is relevant.
Argue in circles all you want. I happen to agree with Dan that many people contributed to his state of mind and his suicide.
Another boy did not commit suicide who had the same invasion of privacy. This person was probably embarrassed but not shamed to suicide. Again I do think Ravi is guilty of invasion of privacy, I do think he should be held accountable. I clearly stated that I thought 10 yrs was too much.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)corrupt testimony. I love Dan, but this has nothing to do with his It Gets Better project, sorry!
The young man made worse (and immoral) choices on top of malacious ones- and that has doubled the charges against him. Sounds like a huge asshole who had no respect for other people or the law. He'll go to a country club jail for 3-4 years and Im not going to feel bad about it at all.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)white on their opinions. I understand why he was convicted and i agree he should be punished. I don't think 10 yrs is appropriate.
He made immoral choices, but if you can't see how kids in a dorm screw with each other, especially males, then you have not been
to college. This jackass made the worst decision of his life in a bubble, where others laughed and encouraged him. He had a friend sitting next to him who did not stop him or put up any objections. Shouldn't she bear some responsibility????
Clementi's suicide involved a lifetime of shame and denial. This was the straw and I think the outrage and blood lust against Ravi is
only due to the suicide. I would put money down that college kids around the country have secretly taped or viewed ( by hiding in the closet- the pre computer days method) their roommates having sex. This time the situation ended in a suicide and now we want to
crucify and homophobe for it. Call it by what this is and it is the lynching of a homophobe. We want to ruin his life and cause him as much pain as possible to get back at him for Clementi's death. A death that many people contributed to over his short life. It is a " It Get's Better Moment, whether you want to admit it or not.
There is a website that lets you post naked pics of your ex, a website that let's you post STD accusations against anyone. People are shamed and humiliated every day and they do not decide to end their lives. I think more people need to be honest about Clementi
and know that he had a troubled life regarding his homosexuality. This is not to excuse Ravi's actions but these are the times
Ravi is living in. I am sure he did not think of it as a big deal, the way we do. The internet and Facebook etc make privacy
for teens and twentysomethings obsolete.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)that I am so glad he was punished harshly for tying to organize watching parties, recruit people to watch using twitter, etc. New technology needs new guidelines, new laws to enforce.
your entire post adds up to "boys will be boys" which is a further arguement to make sure rules are in place that actually get enforced, because any idiot behaviour they can get away with in college, some will try.
if teens and twentysomethings are willing to give up their provacy, that;s their problem, the rest of us aren;t living in dorms where we need to put up with this felonious pathetic pervert harrassment. Fuck THAT!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)biased based intimidation, invasion of privacy, and evidence tampering. These are not things others did along with him nor that others did. He was charged with specific actions, some of which were repeated, and most of which happened after the initial invasion of privacy. So others who might share in the crap that made his life so difficult has nothing to do with what a man did on his own.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)He has his opinions, I have mine. I believe that he broke the law and under the terms of the law he'll serve 5-10 years. Is that too harsh? Change the law, then.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Ravi is going to do time, sadly for Dan. And you too apparently. And his being gay doesn't "top" anyone else's gay identity. By that scale Michael Steele's opinions would "top" the opinion of several other Black citizens who are not as famous.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)sorry that Ravi is being held accountable for his actions, I'm not sure 10 yrs is appropriate. Others are also culpable in Clementi's
decision to end his life. This was the final straw, but remember, there was another gay kid in the video who did not
kill themselves who was equally humiliated. However that other person may not have had all of the negativity or bullying,
or shaming that Clementi experienced.
The people sad about Ravi's ruined life are Ravi and his family, I have no emotional attachment to Ravi other than to say many
are guilty of this young man's suicide.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)You replied upthread to a poster named ed. Obamanut did not tell you to shut up because she was gay and you are not, as I read the thread. You might want to review the interaction in the thread.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)for my snarky comments. Sometimes a heated exchange needs time away from the computer to avoid posting
rude comments.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Because I don't post things like that, and know I didn't tell you that.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)and with a PM that you did not want to read.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Wow. What a reply to me. Glad to know that Famous Gays have more a right to talking about LGBT issues than Plebian Gays do. He deserves at least ten years for witness and evidence tampering. Those are serious felonies.
I love being lectured about my not "getting" homophobia, or how teens and children are affected by homophobia from their relatives and teachers. I have lived that life and still do.
I just saw I have a PM from you, and have no desire to read more of the same from you. Good day.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)post by yours with the same subject line. This board can get anyone angry and sometimes people post things in a harsher
tone than would be used in normal conversation. I think he should be held accountable but 10 yrs to me is to much. I am expressing a differing opinion, not knocking you. I responded with Dan Savage because I thought you were pointing out to me that as a gay person your opinion was superior to mine.
Again I apologize for responding so aggressively. We have differing opinions and there is no need to get personal.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)I know a good amount about suicide and depression.
My father committed suicide when I was 18. I came from a broken family. Hy father's suicide deprived me of a chance to know him better and to become close to my paternal grandparents.
As a young activist in the anti-war and gay rights movement in the late 1960s through the 1970s I'd know several close friends (all of whom were gay males) who committed suicide by various means. Being insulted and intimidated by straight people in their schools or lives was never the 'real cause' behind the sudden decision to overdose on pills, shoot oneself in the head or jump off Savannah's big bridge.
Suicidal ideation doesn't suddenly emerge from nowhere. It seems to simmer deep inside accompanying the disease of depression. There have been times when I did something so embarrassing and stupid. Times when I felt my future would hold nothing but pain, no real joy, and grey entropy. There have been times I wished i wouldn't wake up.
But killing oneself is an act of violence against whoever a person is loved by.
Ravi was heartless and heedless but that's not a crime in itself.
What were the official policies of the dormitory rooms arrangement? Was there a policy which instructed roommates what to do when your roommate invites somebody for a night of sex? Meaning, instead of studying, a person's roommate is supposed to vacate his or her room? I'm sure somebody here, younger, can tell me. Because when I was young in the late 60s and through the 1970s, having sex in dorm facilities with outside guests was not officially permitted.
Yet, that is still not the sole issue, just a part of a complicated situation. Tyler Clementi killed himself. He may have been extremely anxious, and may have lacked social skills needed to successfully live in a dorm situation. That's part of why I think he was an only child. In the face of an embarrassing but STUPID invasion of 'privacy' he seemed to have felt to shamed and way too guilty. He may not have had even one friend in real life with whom he could discuss what had happened re: the video. He was probably too ashamed to tell his parents about it. Tyler inflated the videotape invasion of privacy way out of proportion.
It seems to me many people are transferring the unresolvable pain and guilt engendered by a selfish act of suicide to Ravi Dharun. Ravi did one wrong thing. But it was hardly the crime of the decade.
It's possible that somebody suffering from so much inner pain and turmoil would have killed himself anyway. It was wrong to do. I don't see why Ravi should bear the burden of punishment and be assigned the guilt for Tyler's act of violence against his own existence.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)He has an older brother who is also gay.
yardwork
(61,599 posts)Apparently the suicide was barely mentioned in the trial.
Edited to answer your question about vacating the dorm room to allow your roommate privacy for sex - this has been standard for decades. It was standard when I was in college in the late 1970s, and is commonplace now. There is nothing whatsoever unusual about it.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)For that alone, he should get 5-10.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)That "cultural differences" argument doesn't wash one bit, he is a malicious little shit who got the fair trial he demanded, and the verdict he deserved.
In some cultures around the world, stoning gay people to death is legal, allowable, and perfectly fine.
Should we also allow people like that to practice their hateful "culture" when they come here?
After all, we wouldn't want to be seen as intolerant.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)He's been in this country nearly all his life, it's likely his homophobia is home grown all-American. If being gay was OK here why would so many gay kids take their own lives?? This verdict will dissuade many future bullies and tells the country that we value our gay children's lives.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)He came to this country as a little boy. He speaks with an American accent. He went to Elementary, middle and high school in this country. He met his pal Wei in middle school. His parents never became citizens which is why Dharun Ravi didn't automatically become one with his parents as a minor. The kid is an immigrant but he's not from India. To lay the blame on a different culture is to not understand he is part of us and there are many of him out there, home grown if you will.
My parents immigrated from India back in the 50s, one of my siblings was born in India but came here as 5 year old, when my parents became citizens he was naturalized too. He is as American as I am being born here. We grew up back when there were hardly any Indians in the country, too small of a group to qualify as a minority. Maybe that's why we all understand what's it is like to be an outsider? I don't know.
Dharun Ravi is an entitled spoiled brat. He was so arrogant he refused to take the plea bargain. These spoiled kids get drunk on the power social networking gives them. I think social networking ethics should be part of the curriculum in middle school right along with health classes. These kids need to understand what they're playing with. Fire.
I hope the kid gets deported to a country he was born in but wasn't raised in. He will forever live as an outsider and I think that in itself is instant Karma.
There is a great article about this case in the new yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/02/06/120206fa_fact_parker
LisaL
(44,973 posts)LOL.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)But he was offered a plea deal that included no jail time and help with deportation. He didn't take it and now he must pay the piper. That's the way the cookie crumbles.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)What in the world was his family thinking in not taking it? He did something wrong. If he took responsibility for what he did and took the deal? At least then I'd think he had some measure of remorse.
The way it stands now, I don't think he does. I don't think he intended this to happen. He didn't. But he exacerbated Clementi's troubles and doesn't seem to accept his role in the tragedy.
He is a spoiled entitled brat and like you said, the time has come to pay the piper.
JI7
(89,248 posts)give that much ? you would think if he really was sorry anf elt bad about what happened he would take the deal just for that. it would save Tyler's parents the trouble of going through the trial .
but he didn't want to give back in any way for what he did.
i hear his parents took out a page in the yearbook to write about what a great kid their son is. i think his parents were probably the type who felt their boy could do no wrong. like many indian parents when it comes to sons, especially oldest ones as long as he got good grades do whatever the fuck you want.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)My parents expected my brothers to behave to the same standard as my sister and me. We were all treated equally. And my dad was born in the the 1920s in India. He's the reason I'm an engineer. He encouraged me to be who I am today and never asked me to be anything else. I miss him to this day. If he was alive to see this he would be furious.
Dharun Ravi's parents are to blame but I hope we're all enlightened enough to understand it's not ALL Indians who would spoil or cultivate this type of behavior. This was my fear when I hear a person of Indian origin did this. Please don't tar us all with this brush. My son expressed the same fear to me (he's mixed race), I hope people don't think because I'm part Indian I would ever do something like this.
I said of course he wouldn't because he is a compassionate decent person. Unlike this kid and semmingly his family.
JI7
(89,248 posts)but i know many cases where the parents let the sons do whatever they want as long as they get good grades. and yes they spoil them also.
but of course in the end it's still up to the kids themselves to do what is right. there are many who use the benefits and everything they have been given to give something back and just be a good person in whatever way.
but there are others who like to show off crap they bought , so much stuck on materialism. bragging about what car they have or how much they made.
i feel like if RAvi really felt bad for what he did he would have taken the plea deal. that he didn't do so just comes off to me as arrogant don't give a shit type attitude.
i really would like to know what his parents have said or are thinking.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)Not all Indian parents do this. Mine didn't. I'm a 48 year old woman born and raised here. Never once did my father hold his sons over my sister or me. And my family in India? The boys were not allowed to get away with things.
I just think it's important not to stereotype. Individuals do stupid things.
They have another child, I have no idea if it's a son or a daughter. We have no idea if these people would have treated their daughter the same entitled way they treated Dharun Ravi.
The only thing we know is that this kid was treated like he could do no wrong. That is the key.
In my opinion nobody should raise a child this way.
JI7
(89,248 posts)indie_voter
(1,999 posts)Because he gives us all, no matter what age any of us are, a bad name. My brother in law is gay, he's married and they adopted two kids. My niece and nephew. My kids' first cousins. I am sickened by this kid's behavior.
My brother's son called me up and we were talking about this. It's a special feeling of shame when somebody of the same minority persuasion does this.
I am sickened by his behavior. I hope he's deported and has to live somewhere he has no connection too.
ETA: I'm also enraged with the people who came here in the 80s and used to call me "ABCD" Right now I want to say, at least I didn't raise entitled arrogant people who would do this to another human being.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Internet bullying and harassment MUST be punished. Too many children are killing themselves or snapping and killing their classmates in reaction. Convictions like this will make the bullies think twice.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)He had the option of 600 hours of community service (and counseling). Molly Wei took her 300 hours (and counseling).
Nope. Too arrogant for that. Had to roll the dice.
My second factor in the "too bad so sad" conclusion was that the web cam was supposedly launched so that he could watch his "stuff" to make sure that Tyler's guest wasn't stealing. While I *get* that (even though I do not agree), you don't then go to twitter and text messages to invite friends to the "show". Malicious intent.
Lastly, another "mitigating" factor offered was that he texted Clementi just before his suicide with the message "I don't care if you're gay". Well, isn't that nice, but who gives a shit what you do or do not care about - its not all about you, kiddo.
Yes, Clementi likely lived a life of bullying from every angle. School, home, church - and this set him over the edge. I give allowance for that, but Ravi can rot in a cell (until they deport him).
Maybe cooling his heels in a cell for half a decade or so will snap him into the real world and refocus his pride (arrogance) and priorities.
Doubtful 600 hours of community service would have accomplished that.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)I was pissed when it was offered, then I was shocked he didn't take it. Why??? It has to be arrogance, why else would his family counsel him not to take it? Molly Wei knew it was a way out, enough so that she can finish her education and get on with her life.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)And he lost big time. They even promised to help him with deportation. Now that he is convicted of felonies I am pretty sure they will deport him after he serves his sentence.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)I don't know if they'll deport him though because he did grow up here. I'm thinking he's going to spend a year in jail and not be deported although it would be poetic justice. To be deported somewhere that you were born in but left before you can really remember? He'll be an outsider. Your next stop..The Twilight Zone.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)He has been convicted so I believe the law says he should be deported.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)That's why when they offered him the plea where he would be a convicted felon the prosecutors said they would help him against deportation. It's not an open and shut case that he will be.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)In some cases defendants can argue to stay here, presenting factors such as their years in the U.S., family ties, education and employment.
"If this kid doesnt get state prison, and gets a county sentence, I still think he has good chance of staying the country," Gonzalez said.
If Ravi were a naturalized citizen, or if his parents had become citizens before he turned 18 conferring citizenship on him experts said he would have no risk of deportation.
"A lot of people just dont realize," said Nessel, of Seton Hall. "People, when they have their green card and lawful permanent residency, feel very much like a U.S. citizen ... (but) youre very vulnerable."
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)who grew up here all the time. I think he has a decent chance of being sent back. He definitely would be if his name was Ramon Martinez.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)Pisces
(5,599 posts)family is here. He should be sent to another country that he doesn't know or identify with. A country he may not speak the language
with no means to support himself??? 10 yrs in prison isn't enough for some on this board. Maybe after 10 yrs. he will have
thought about what his stupid, immature act cost 2 families.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)ICE will have him on the first plane to Mumbai the minute he is released.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)I am really pro immigration, including letting undocumented aliens stay here and become citizens, if they can show they have been law-abiding and productive members of their community. Convicted felons, with or without a Green Card? No dice.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)If he had been truly sorry for the whole disaster he created, he would have taken the plea deal. However, his arrogance and total lack of true remorse led him to want to be exonorated by a jury, so that he could say that he did nothing wrong. Like I said, I hope he rots in jail.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)he doesn't get to have a normal life because this asswipe thought it clever to humiliate him.
Glad he has ten years to think about it before going home. Maybe he'll mature.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)Nobody killed him.
Have you ever considered suicide?
There are so many excuses which people use to justify it.
'They'll be sad and feel bad how they treated me after I'm gone. "
'I won't hurt anymore."
Suicide is an act which hurts others deeply and provides no benefit to oneself. We don't know what's on the other side of the door from which nobody returns.
If Tyler Clementi could know what pain his jump off the bridge has caused would he be happy? Would he be satisfied that his own family is grieving and Ravi Dharoun and his family have suffered too?
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I saw your post upthread about suicide, so I think I know where you may be coming from with this, but are you suggesting that Ravi's choice to roll the dice on an acquittal (rather than take the plea deal) and the sentence is facing from breaking 15 laws in conjunction with his original actions should somehow fall on Clementi's shoulders, deserving of blame? That Ravi's family pain is also somehow Clementi's responsibility because he took his own life?
I think (hope) I am missing something here?
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Have you ever been humiliated for being what you are? Have you ever been bullied?
I am not a fan of suicide either but the kindest thing I can say about your simplistic breakdown of suicide is that it is incredibly naive.
On edit I see up thread you are LBGT so my question was superfluous.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)I'm an introvert who stood up in high school for gay people and against the war in Vietnam. I was known for it. Even today 25 + classmates remember me for 'causing trouble'.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)That is the difference. If he took the plea bargain and showed he understood what he did was wrong? Then I'd be right there advocating for compassion.
But he didn't. His lawyers said he was innocent. He isn't. He didn't mean for Tyler to jump. I agree with that. But he caused Tyler undue stress during a transition time when he didn't need it.
I think this was a just verdict.
I see this as verdict as an opportunity to educate our young on social networking ethics. To teach them that in this day and age their words have a power my generation couldn't even imagine. And to borrow the cliche, with great power comes great responsibility.
We all need to learn from this. Instead of throwing around "send him back to XYZ" I think it's important to rejoice in a just verdict yet not stoop to the level of Dharun Ravi and others who would then rejoice in the subsequent suffering.
I do not feel schadenfreude here. I see this as a moment to educate with empathy and compassion so this never happens again.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Are you saying that Ravi has suffered enough, going through this trial? Are you saying Ravi's actions in no way contributed to Tyler committing suicide?
And for the record, yes. I have.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)I'm really sorry for Ravi and his family but I grieve for Tyler and his. What part of that don't you understand?
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)Suicide is usually meant to be 'revenge'.
Revenge to the people who hurt you.
I used to consider it.
Anybody who has ever considered suicide knows it is meant to hurt the ones who hurt you.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)that Ravi was found guilty of.
The death/suicide never factored into the case.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)My husband who suffered from depression for many many years once told me that suicide was simply a way to leave the gray bleakness of life. He is the most gentle man I have ever known. He can't even swat a fly much less off himself to hurt over people. That may have applied to you but hardly everyone.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)But you do not and cannot know what emotional dynamics went on in Tyler's family.
That';s where it's nutty to blame a young man who do what straight young men do. They marginilise and tease.
If Tyler's family had helped him cope, build a stronger ego, he wouldn't have been so weak in the face of normal freshman experiences.
BTW, if you were in college as a freshman, new in a dorm, would you have asked a roommate you didn't yet know to leave the premises so you could have sex???
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Bullying, intimidation, and tampering with evidence isn't acceptable-even by a stupid young man. I was a stupid 18 year old once but I wasn't an asshole and I didn't try to humiliate anyone.
Like it or not, justice was served-at least as well as it can be when a promising young life is lost. Your attempt to blame the victim in all this is particularly disgusting.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)Tyler chose to impulsively kill himself.
I have talked with every gay man and woman i know.
We are in agreement. Life for gays nowdays s much easier than it was.
Ravi was wrong in his stupid acts. But he didn't make his room mate kill himself.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)But its still a nightmare for some kids, regardless of your gay friend's opinions. Thank God none of your gay friends were on the jury. My gay friends disagree-as does the gay man I sleep with.
Your opinion in this matter is just as meaningless as mine. Thank God the jury wasn't as blind as you and your gay friends.
And by the way, I think your opinion on people driven to suicide is hateful and mean-spirited. Yes I've been there but it wasn't to hurt anyone. It was because I saw no positive future for myself. I'm sure Tyler felt the same.
I'm very sad the young man you defend chose to ruin his life. He had great promise and its all wasted now because of his bigoted behavior and now he'll pay the consequences. Life can be a bitch that way. But don't blame it on the victim. Tyler deserves better.
edited to add: My dear....
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)Killing oneself out of disappointment and hurt is wrong. I feel like doing it now. For reasons I can't reveal on the internet.
You can't know what my life or hurts have been.
The only justifiable reason to kill oneself is when one is going to lose dignity and control. In that case euthanasia is justified. Tyler's death has caused nothing but pain. Many gay people have sufferred more than he could imagine, ever. But we struggled on and contributed something.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)but it hasn't always been that way. At 17 I couldn't get an erection when my first shot at heterosexual behavior occured. At 35 I was 50 pounds overweight and had never had a relationship lasting more than a month. I lived in Bumfuck Mississippi and had no future. Now, at 58 I've been with the man I love for 23 years and my life is fucking peaches and sunshine. Like the videos say-IT GETS BETTER. It really does.
I have no problem with you, I just wish Tyler hadn't been so fragile and Ravi had been a friend, not an asshole. But it really doesn't matter, He was and now he'll pay the price. And the world will be a far worse place for the loss of these two young men.
Please, please don't misunderstand. I am sympathetic to you-I've been there. If you need to talk to someone I would be thrilled to get a pm-hell I haven't gotten one from a friend here in years. You have people who care anytime you're willing to be approachable. Don't write me off because we disagree on one issue and please don't feel like you're alone. Sometimes strangers can offer insight. What could it hurt?....Rowdy (aka Steve)
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)I'll keep your kindness in mind. It does matter right now.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)varelse
(4,062 posts)This creature has already thrown away his own humanity. Whatever life remains to him, he will not live as a human being.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)>>>Should his life be ruined and no good from this? I just don't know. What good comes from him spending the next decade getting raped in jail? Will he come out of that having learned a lesson or will he come out of that damaged and ruined? >>>>
I agree. It's an horrific tragedy all around. I'm gay and I say they should go easy on him.
Mixed feelings all over the place. The verdict as such is good in the message it sends.
But the defendant was 18 when he did the deed and could not have known that Tyler would have killed himself. One has to consider these extenuating circumstances.
LGBT and human rights were affirmed with the verdict.
The larger point having been made.... now's the time to show some compassion.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)don't cry for him, Argentina.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)being criminal acts, notwithstanding any consequences.
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
Boys will be boys.
All sorts of cliches come to mind in this case. But in reality, this was more than a passing, quick prank. It was deliberate, planned, lengthy (the criminal's actions occurred over more than one day...maybe multiple days), and intended to humiliate and damage someone. Video is permanent. Even after his initial actions, he could have stepped back. Instead, he kicked it up a notch and showed it to others and tried to make money from it. His actions were criminal, and there were many such actions over a period of time.
The video would haunt the victim the rest of his life. This no doubt contributed to the suicide.
It is sad when someone ruins his own life, but Ravi did just that to himself. This was no schoolboy prank. He didn't rob a newspaper machine. It doesn't matter to me that the victim was gay, necessarily, but that adds an element of shame to it, I guess, in his mind. As a woman, I can imagine this happening to me when I was young (being criminally videotaped in my most private moments). I would likely have killed myself, too. The cruelty of it. The humiliation. The video. It would have been too much for me to bear, as a young woman. Anyone with a brain, like Ravi, could have foreseen a bad outcome for the victim, whether it was suicide or depression or dropping out of school or whatever. And the young man who killed himself was most definitely a victim.
Everyone should know that videotaping someone in his own home, without his permssion, is a crime. How much time did the man who videotaped women in homes he rented to them...how much time did he get, I wonder?
Again, he was found guilty of criminal actions. Not for someone's suicide.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)When I was in my 20s in the 1970s I had a girlfriend who led me into making some quick easy money by getting filmed (with her) in lesbian porn films.
It was a strange period in my life. I was ashamed of what I did on film.
But I wouldn't have killed myself if people I knew had somehow seen the movies.
Should my 20 year old friend been prosecuted if i had killed myself because I was in 2 porn movies?
I don't think so.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I posted a link for you below. It might help to see what he is actually charged with - as Clementi's death didn't even factor into the trial.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)krawhitham
(4,644 posts)No one turns down a no time plea deal and then does not dispute any of the charges or evidence. If if the jury did agree it was just a stupid kid doing a stupid thing he was going to get convicted on the witness tampering and hindering prosecution
very bad lawyer
LisaL
(44,973 posts)For all I know his lawyer tried to convince him to take the deal-but Ravi is the one who decides.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)I'm gay.
I beieve Ravi is not to blame because an emotionally overwrought person jumped over a bridge.
I believe people who are terminally ill and have cancer should be able to choose death.
But as a gay woman who has been hurt so many times in my life I think this issue isn't simple.
If hurt, teased and rejected -as I have been- I still wouldn't kill myself in order to make others 'feel bad'. That is what suicide -except for people who have terminal diseases- is about. A suicidal person wants to displace his or her pain onto others.
easttexaslefty
(1,554 posts)all suicidal people. You can only speak for YOU.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)until you're the one in court looking the judge in the eye
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)I haven't been following this.
I know he set up a computer camera and filmed Tyler's encounter with a man who wasn't a student. It happened in a dorm facility.
But he Ravi Darhoun is not responsible for a very weak person with unknown pychological problems having jumped off a bridge.
I say this as a gay person who many times imagined jumping from the Huey Long bridge.
But I felt for the people i knew. I thought there would be nothing but pain for the few who loved me.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)He was found guilty of 15 counts, including:
The jury also found him guilty of lying to investigators, trying to influence a witness and tampering with evidence after he tried to cover up Twitter and text messages inviting others to join in the viewing.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/nyregion/defendant-guilty-in-rutgers-case.html?pagewanted=all
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)and served no jail time. But thought he could do better. Considering the hateful role he played, to think no jail time just wasn't good enough.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)And he did it. He wasn't expecting that result, but really what was he expecting would happen after humiliating someone that way? I have no sympathy. I've tried, but I just don't.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)and some further retaliation. I have no sympathy for Ravi, but I also do not have a blood grudge against him. I think Clementi
had many people in his life that drove him to this terrible decision.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)People in general live their lives.
They don't intend to torment other people.
EVERYBODY CARES ABOUT HIMSELF First. Few look beyond themselves. That's why I keep saying suicide is a selfish act, despite the pain...
easttexaslefty
(1,554 posts)Maybe in your case it would. That's certainly not ALWAYS the case. Believe I know the issue ALL TO WELL.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)IndyJones
(1,068 posts)Pisces
(5,599 posts)IndyJones
(1,068 posts)support the jury in that they heard all of the evidence and came to the conclusions they did. Ravi would have been better off taking the deal he was offered.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)allow you to post the naked pics of your ex for revenge, a website that lets you post anyone you know with an STD with no proof.
We are living in an age of no boundaries and very little privacy. I do not excuse Ravi, he wanted to humiliate Clementi, but I do
think we need to think about the environment these young people are growing up in and the mixed messages they are getting.
I also want to know why the female friend who was sitting next to Ravi and did nothing to stop him or warn Clementi got off scott free. Is she not somewhat culpable???
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)edit: Yes, she "agreed to testify against Ravi and complete a three-year intervention program, including counseling and community service."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Tyler_Clementi
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)And he had plenty of time to think about it. I don't wish him harm but the story didn't have to end this way. They offered him a plea bargain any sane person would have jumped at. He chose not to. As Kurt Vonnegut said...so it goes.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)He had the chance to avoid this but he chose not to. And now he has to deal with the consequences whatever they might be. It sickens me on a personal level as a person who shares his heritage. I wasn't brought up that way. My children who are his age aren't brought up that way. He did an awful thing and he was offered a way out and decided not to take it. And so it goes.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)The loss of these two young lives is heartbreaking but actions have consequences.
God knows, I dodged the bullet dozens of times as a young man-I was an idiot too. I probably should have done time for my mistakes and my life would have been very different if I'd been held accountable. Thankfully I wasn't. But nothing I ever did was intended to hurt someone. Somehow thats the line I draw.
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)This kid doesn't. His arrogance in not taking the plea showed me at least he didn't. You're right. Actions have consequences. I don't feel sorry for him.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Here's a new article about another case at Rutgers which occurred five months earlier...
Rutgers student pleads guilty to sexually assaulting sleeping roommate
By Tom Haydon/The Star-Ledger | Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 8:18 PM
PISCATAWAY Minjin Oh knew his roommate was asleep in their Rutgers University dorm that night two years ago when he began to fondle the other mans genitals and using his cellphone to make a video recording.
The roommate woke up during the assault and reported it to university police.
Within days of the April 6, 2010, incident, Oh was arrested and charged with several sex crimes.
The 20-year-old engineering student from Bridgewater pleaded guilty to aggravated criminal sexual contact and invasion of privacy in Superior Court on Monday, in a case that brought back memories of another recent case involving sex and video in a Rutgers dorm room.
Under a plea deal with the Middlesex County Prosecutors Office, Oh will be sentenced in August to up to 364 days in the Middlesex County Adult Correction Center in North Brunswick. He remains free on bail.
In addition, he will be placed on parole supervision for life and be required to register as a sex offender under Megans Law, Prosecutor Bruce Kaplan said in a statement today.
Ohs attorney, Steven Altman, said the deal will allow his client, who is from South Korea, to avoid deportation because he faces less than a year in prison.
<...>
Although Oh was removed from the dorm shortly after his arrest, he had continued attending classes on campus, Kaplan said today.
This is the second recent case involving a sexual encounter to wind up in court.
Last month, Dharun Ravi of Plainsboro was convicted of using a webcam to spy on his gay roommates encounter with another man in a Rutgers dorm room in September 2010. Altman served as Ravis attorney.
The gay roommate, Tyler Clementi, later discovered the webcam incident and a second attempted viewing of him and the other man. Clementi committed suicide by jumping off the George Washington Bridge on Sept. 22, 2010.
That incident occurred five months after Oh was arrested.
Ravi, who was born in India, faces possible deportation after his conviction on 15 counts that could mean a prison term of 10 years. His sentencing is scheduled for May 21.
Altman, who became involved in the two cases at about the same time, said the reason one became a major news story and the other escaped notice until now was "the power of the victim."
Star-Ledger staff writer Peggy McGlone and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
Terrific OP, btw.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 29, 2012, 08:45 PM - Edit history (1)
Support Dharun Ravi
Know the facts - how the media and the muddled law convicted an 18 year old on Hate Crime Charges
From Indian-American community, a call for justice for Dharun RaMark Di Ionno/Star-Ledger Columnist
Published: Sunday, April 29, 2012, 9:30 AM Updated: Sunday, April 29, 2012, 4:11 PM
By Mark Di Ionno/Star-Ledger Columnist
<...>
On Friday, Mehtani will open his Mirage banquet hall in Edison, the largest Indian catering hall in the state, to a growing force of Indian-Americans who have concerns about how the Ravi case was handled by the Middlesex County Prosecutors Office. They have also scheduled a rally outside the Statehouse on May 14, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
<...>
"We want to know why Dharun Ravi is charged with a hate crime, but the people charged with attacking an Indian family and beating the father to death are not," said Sandeep Sharma, a business partner of Ravis father, referring to the case of five Old Bridge teenagers charged with killing Divendyu Sinha in 2010. Sinha and his two teenage sons were punched repeatedly in an unprovoked attack, and the trial for one of the teens is now under way.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/04/tearful_widow_of_old_bridge_ma.html
On Tuesday morning, Ravis attorney Steve Altman, will file briefs seeking a new trial for Ravi, who was convicted on 15 counts of bias intimidation, privacy invasion, and related charges last month, and faces 10 years in state prison. The wide-ranging motion will claim the verdict went against the weight of evidence, and that the jury was not instructed to discount Clementis suicide as proof of intimidation.
The motion also cites pieces of evidence that may have shed light on Clementis suicide, which were withheld from the defense and ruled inadmissible. The defense will argue this evidence should have been turned over once it became known that the suicide was going to be mentioned during the trial.
<...>
Anjani Gharpure, Plainsboro
To the editor:
Now 19 months later, we know that nothing was ever recorded, and nothing was broadcast over the Internet. For the first time you will get to read and hear what Dharun has to say from Star Ledger article by Mark Di Ionno dated Thursday, March 22, and 20/20 program ABC, March 23, Dharuns exclusive interview with Chris Cuomo.
As we understand from the article and the 20/20 program, every single witness testified unequivocally that Dharun Ravi had absolutely NO hatred towards gays/homosexuals.
The prosecutors office has taken advantage of a faulty law to convict Dharun on bias charges, a law that even the judge, Glen Berman, admitted was muddled. Dharun now faces up to 10 years in jail.
The Dean of Rutgers School of Law says in ABCs 20/20 program that he sees no hate on the part of Dharun. Dan Savage, a gay rights activist, says that there was a rushed opinion at the time of Tylers death and shift of blame on shoulders of teenagers Dharun and Molly. As the CNN article from March 23rd by Charles Kaiser suggests, the punishment for Dharun should be to speak at different high schools every week for a year. This can make a big difference in the lives of many high school students!
Dharun is from WWP district, from our community. Anyone who has been in 15 to 20 years age group, and anyone who has raised teenagers will understand that kids this age are capable of making very foolish mistakes. These mistakes are due to their immaturity and momentary lapses in judgment. However, they are not filled with hatred and these are not malicious acts. Let us understand Dharuns actions for what they were immature and foolish. Dharuns actions were NOT born out of hate and bias.
We feel sorry for Tyler Clementis family as we try to understand their profound grief.
There are many things we as parents, along with counselors, teachers, friends need to consider when we send our 17/18 year olds as a freshman to a college dorm. Are there any major issues in their life that need to be addressed? Should we be concerned about strangers from the streets, much older than our kids, walking into their dorm rooms? Do they understand the implications of texting and tweeting incessantly? How will our kids handle new opportunities and responsibilities? Instead of drawing lines in the sand and taking sides, lets come together as a community. Let us show support to one of our own community members, Dharun and his family.
Please sign a petition at: http://www.defenddharunravi.com/DefendDharun/index.asp
Anjani Gharpure
Plainsboro
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Editor's Letter: Set Ravi Free
4.27.2012
By Aaron Hicklin
[img][/img]
The spotlight on teen suicide in the gay community was overdue, but it has also left us reaching for simplistic answers where there are none.
When the jury in the Dharun Ravi trial delivered its verdict on March 16, it was possible to feel, at least temporarily, a grim satisfaction that the horrible circumstances around the death of a young gay man had been properly acknowledged. We have not always been able to rely on the courts to treat our lives with dignity and respect, and its validating when they do. Ravis conviction was a compelling signal that harassment and bullying of LGBT people carries penalties. Yet the verdict also left a bitter aftertaste, as if what was being satisfied was not justice, but revenge.
Ravi did a terrible thing, but he was not on trial for Tyler Clementis death, nor should he have been. He was on trial for the nebulous crime of bias intimidation, but anyone who believes the case would have gone to trial if Clementi were still alive is kidding himself. Ravi was convicted because Clementi is dead. In that sense, at least, Ravi took the rap for colluding in a culture of bullying and stigmatization that is pervasive. You need only see Bully, an urgent new documentary, which tracks a handful of middle- and high-school students as they negotiate a gauntlet of physical and verbal abuse, to understand that the story of Clementi and Ravi has deep roots. It may have ended with a webcam, but it did not begin with one. Whether Clementi felt ostracized at school, we do not know. But we know he felt ostracized at home: Mom has basically completely rejected me, he wrote to a friend shortly after he revealed his homosexuality.
Its an all-too-familiar narrative, but its also a reminder that the experiences that shape us are complicated. The spotlight on teen suicide in the gay community was overdue and necessary, but it has also left us reaching for simplistic answers where there are none. That is not to excuse Ravi, who did a terrible thing, but it does beg questions around what purpose his imprisonment would serve. Does it honor Tyler Clementis legacy? Will it prevent other kids from killing themselves? If you think the answer to those questions is no, as I do, we should have the compassion not to wreck another life as some kind of atonement for the one that was lost. Ravi faces up to 10 years when he is sentenced on May 21. A wise judge would set him free.
To understand the seeds of Ravis behavior, its worth watching Bully, a moving exploration of teen bullying that had been slapped with an R rating because of a few bad wordsa decision that producer Harvey Weinstein is exploiting in a crafty publicity drive. I wish the director had compromised a little (and maybe he will), because his movie deserves as wide an audience as it can get. Changing the ratings system is a worthy cause, but Bully has an important mission, and bleeping a few expletives wont dilute it. Filmed largely in Sioux City, Iowa, it illuminates the extraordinary degree to which children exploit perceived weaknesses and differences to enhance their status in the social hierarchy. Those who stand by silentlyas kids are punched, stabbed with pencils, and verbally threatenedare collaborators whether they realize it or not.
Watching the movie, I was reminded how small and claustrophobic the world can appear when you are young, and how trapped one can seem. When 12-year-old Alex Libby quietly admits, I feel like I belong somewhere else, its as profound a distillation of the insidiousness of bullying as youre likely to hear. Bully shows how it might be possible to combat that culture, largely by building support groups that challenge the passive collusion of schools and students. But it also shows the power of self-affirmation, particularly in the case of Kelby Johnson, a young transgender teen from Oklahoma, who is shunned by her town after she comes out. She is lucky to have a supportive family and a small cadre of loyal friends, but she also reflects a spunky determination to control her own destiny. Like Johnson, most of us find the fortitude and resilience to survive the vicissitudes of adolescence, but we still have to work out how to help those who dont.