General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExcellent question!
Tweeted by Kevin Jon Heller, Professor of Criminal Law, University of London, SOAS:
[blockquote class="twitter-tweet"](1/2) If the US gets to attack Syria to vindicate the fundamental international rule against chemical weapons, doesn't that mean other -- Kevin Jon Heller (@kevinjonheller) -- September 4, 2013
[blockquote class="twitter-tweet"](2/2) states get to attack the US to vindicate the (even more) fundamental international rule against the illegal use of force? -- Kevin Jon Heller (@kevinjonheller) -- September 4, 2013
markpkessinger
(8,395 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Limitedstrikemongers?
Step up to plate and take a swing or two.
markpkessinger
(8,395 posts). . . from the war apologists!
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... "limited strike" sales personnel at least a half dozen times. I get nothing except dumbassed diversion attempts. It's exactly the same crap game played by the Idiot Son's minions in the lead up to the Iraq debacle.
Strange coincidence, eh?
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)to self-defense in the face of any imminent military threat.
I wonder if Kerry and his lickspittles will call it 'war' after one of our ships is sunk.