General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe have people dying...
For lack of healthcare, we have people starving for lack of food, we have people living on the streets for lack of a house...
Yet we are preparing to spend billions on attacking Syria for humanitarian reasons?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,995 posts)Why are we not taking care of our own people?
It's nuts.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)they keep obstructing everything!
Rockyj
(538 posts)a lot more homeless people lately? I live in a small city and have noticed a surge in homeless people there! Especially over labor day weekend!
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)We want to bomb Syria because they killed children, but here we won't even keep WIC's budget in tact to give food assistance to women, infants, and children.
Don't fall for the "it's for the kids" bullshit rhetoric. It's only being used to pull otherwise sensible people into endorsing another war where more kids will die.
Lancero
(3,028 posts)I always show them some pictures of the Iraqi children that were killed in the US bombing campaign against Iraq.
Response to Lancero (Reply #4)
another_liberal This message was self-deleted by its author.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,872 posts)But yet we wont do anything about guns.
I can't explain this countries priorities.
AnotherDreamWeaver
(2,856 posts)priorities...
(But confess I know a few who believe what they hear on Faux news.)
me b zola
(19,053 posts)GREED with a good helping of GLUTTONY.
GeorgeGist
(25,329 posts)At taxpayer expense.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Really? You wouldn't be making shit up, would you?
Sid
City Lights
(25,171 posts)We are so fucked up.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)It's about Empire. One of the primary reasons for the Fall of the Roman Empire was this situation. Power and control (money, gold, oil, drugs, pipelines, continents...whatever), like a food or an alcoholic or drug addict...without a changing of courses ... consumes itself ultimately.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)If we were, we would be looking at other avenues.
Raine
(30,565 posts)Initech
(100,210 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts)It would be a little more honest!
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Those battlefleets in the Mediterranean aren't free.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)that the GOP is going to pass legislation to solve the problems of poverty if we don't punish Assad for committing crimes against humanity?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)solve the problems of poverty if we do punish Assad? They pass legislation to punish poor people and to humiliate them. What legislation has the GOP passed to solve any problems? None.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Cryptoad (599 posts)
16. You really think
that the GOP is going to pass legislation to solve the problems of poverty if we don't punish Assad for committing crimes against humanity?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I asked a question. a quite satiric question, i must say
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)The GOP isn't going to SHIT no matter what happens to Assad, but your premise is if we punish Assad the GOP will pass legislation on poverty? You think the GOP cares about humanity? ANY HUMANITY? That is fucking ridiculous.
my premise is the GOP is going to do nothing for the poor as they have been doing no matter what happens in Syria
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I never said anything about wanting to go to war.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)If they don't shoot back, that is. If they do, and other nations are drawn in, who knows how many hundreds of billions we could end up wasting.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)brooklynite
(95,296 posts)If it's all about the money, and solving America's problems first, why waste a penny?
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Money spent on a new war of choice, one of exceptionally dubious nature, is money we might as well have used to light a barbecue grill.
brooklynite
(95,296 posts)...per the OP
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Not only will we have money for a host of greater needs, we will also be far less likely to engage in military adventures abroad.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)from humanitarian bombing.
brooklynite
(95,296 posts)...if we're following the principle espoused by the OP.
Lancero
(3,028 posts)Aid to countries that have recently experience natural disasters I can support.
It will vary from case to case, but overall this would be one of the few kinds that I'd support.
Right off though, all money that goes to support or improve other nations military's should be cut.
WillYourVoteBCounted
(14,622 posts)Like we did Iraq and Afghanistan.
toby jo
(1,269 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)avebury
(10,954 posts)The fact of the matter is that feeding and housing the poor and providing health care for those in need does not fill the coffers of the MIC. That is the heart of the problem and will not change any time soon. Apparently being a "Christian Nation" does not mean following in the footsteps of Jesus.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
gateley
(62,683 posts)its way to the programs and areas to help our citizens.
It's so sad, and so wrong.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity.
Just how humane can a bombing be, anyway?
Lancero
(3,028 posts)That George Carlin said that. Or something similar anyway.
I can't remember what show it's from although I think it's the same one where he says that the only thing the US is still good at is bombing other countries.
raging moderate
(4,331 posts)And manufacture machines that attack the real problems facing us?
durablend
(7,472 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)You do not bomb people for humanitarian reasons.
It is about oil. It is always about oil. Always has been. Always will be.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Quel Surprise!! Israel Grants Oil Rights in Syria to Murdoch and Rothschild
http://www.oneworldchronicle.com/?p=16659
forestpath
(3,102 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)A fairly new national identity. It started with Reaganomics...
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Don't forget Idiocracy.
gtar100
(4,192 posts)After all the failures of the US Military, it's all too obvious to everyone that they are the solution to nothing.
CanonRay
(14,181 posts)Let's take care of our own, for a change.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)its not like you can do both at once..
you guys have really bought into the 'were broke!' crap from the right :p
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)But we are not broke? I hope you are not a salesman, because you are not very good.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)The 1% are hoarding the money.
And we're wasting tons on the wars.
If our policies were sensible, we'd have all we need.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)The 1% is doing 5 million times better than anytime since the gilded age. The rest of us are broke. Our policies are not sensible and that is not about to change, you might want to take a closer look at that "if."
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)by definition.
That's not saying much.
WE need to do something about the 1%.
Then WE will not be broke.
If WE decided to worship and grovel before the 1% INSTEAD of taking our country back, then WE are worse than broke. Then WE are worthless.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)"If WE decided to worship and grovel before the 1% INSTEAD of taking our country back, then WE are worse than broke. Then WE are worthless."
We are at that stage currently, I hope the enthrallment ends soon.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)That's what's being referred to as "humanitarian relief" here.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)always ensure a profit for defense contractors.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)So we will punish Assad. And who will punish Obama for his drone attacks against non-hostile countries, his assassination programs?
If it wasn't for hypocrisy, I don't think this party could even be said to have a platform.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)No War For Profit.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Rain Mcloud
(812 posts)When you are over a barrel then you will pay anything for another chance for a shoddy 1000% profit procedure.
When the Xs finally appear over the eyes,its off to the mortuary in a $15,000 dollar coffin which is sold to the next victim after the corpse is dumped into a common anonymous grave in a wooded area.
These are not nice people.
[link:http://archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=1292|
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)onenote
(42,952 posts)throughout our history. Do you think that the only times we've acted militarily or spent billions on humanitarian aid were times when no one in the US lacked healthcare, shelter or food? Dream on.
Based on your premise, the US shoudn't send aid to countries devastated by natural disasters until such time as we have complete healthcare, no one starving, and no one homeless. Dream on again.
Tells us a lot about the values of our elected officials. We're contemplating a bombing campaign on the basis of humanitarian concerns.
Uh...right.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)and the conservatives see nothing wrong with this.
I actually think that conservatives hate their fellow Americans if they aren't in the same elite class as themselves. But they believe fervently in American exceptionalism Unfortunately I think the only thing exceptional about America is we are stupid. God did not choose us just as God did not choose Israel. We are not special and our empire will die as the 21st century plays out. Chine and India will replace us just as we replaced France and Britain.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)marble falls
(58,069 posts)they did and do!