Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 01:47 PM Jul 2013

The names of nations we’re in a drone war with is classified, so don't ask

Even who we’re in a drone war with is classified
By Pro Publica
Friday, July 26, 2013 11:22 EDT

In a major national security speech this spring, President Obama said again and again that the U.S. is at war with “Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and their associated forces.”

So who exactly are those associated forces? It’s a secret.

At a hearing in May, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., asked the Defense Department to provide him with a current list of Al Qaeda affiliates.

The Pentagon responded 2013 but Levin’s office told ProPublica they aren’t allowed to share it. Kathleen Long, a spokeswoman for Levin, would say only that the department’s “answer included the information requested.”

A Pentagon spokesman told ProPublica that revealing such a list could cause “serious damage to national security.”

“Because elements that might be considered 2018associated forces’ can build credibility by being listed as such by the United States, we have classified the list,” said the spokesman, Lt. Col. Jim Gregory. “We cannot afford to inflate these organizations that rely on violent extremist ideology to strengthen their ranks.”

It’s not an abstract question: U.S. drone strikes and other actions frequently target “associated forces,” as has been the case with dozens of strikes against an Al Qaeda offshoot in Yemen.

During the May hearing, Michael Sheehan, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, said he was “not sure there is a list per se.” Describing terrorist groups as “murky” and “shifting,” he said, “it would be difficult for the Congress to get involved in trying to track the designation of which are the affiliate forces” of Al Qaeda.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/26/even-who-were-in-a-drone-war-with-is-classified/
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
1. since I know of no other nation with our level of drone air fleet...
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 01:49 PM
Jul 2013

wouldn't drone turkey shoot be more apt?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
3. Secret wars, secret killings, secret prisons, secret spying..donchya just love democracy?
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 01:55 PM
Jul 2013

You know, the kind of government that is based on an "informed electorate" deciding how the government should be run.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. Friedrich Nietzsche

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
4. The people on the receiving end certainly know where are drone wars are.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 02:12 PM
Jul 2013

Afghanistan.
Pakistan.
Yemen.
Somalia.

Who else?

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
6. When One Country drops BOMBS on another country...
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jul 2013

...with which no Declaration of WAR exists,
that is an Act of Aggressive WAR,
and a WAR CRIME by most International Treaties and Agreements.
It is especially despicable when the "target" has no military value,
and innocent civilian Women and Children are Killed and Maimed.

Can you imagine if another country dropped a BOMB on YOUR neighborhood,
killed your children and you neighbors children,
and THEN that country claimed it was OK and "LEGAL" because they "SUSPECTED" that a "terrorist" might be hiding somewhere in YOUR neighborhood?

Can you IMAGINE how YOU would feel?
Its OK if you can't do that,
because that requires something called "empathy",
and I have been told that there is a special group of people do who NOT have that ability.


1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
7. So, what they are saying is they can go anywhere after anyone. No constraints.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 05:21 PM
Jul 2013

And the sheep will tell you to move on, there's nothing to see here. Hell, Bush did it, so it must be legal for Obama to do it too, right? After all, Bush was never prosecuted for his murderous overreach and Obama deserves no less. Right?

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
9. It's called "Global hegemony" of the USA/International Surveillance & Security State
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 05:30 PM
Jul 2013

Who knew that Mr. Hope & Change would bring us a 100% Saturation-Surveillance State,
with secret kill lists, for secret reasons, with secret laws, through secret "courts", et. al.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The names of nations we’r...