Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Santorum Told CBS News That Amniocentesis "More Often Than Not" Results In Abortion. - CNN (Original Post) WillyT Feb 2012 OP
I hope he keeps on sharing his views with us. LisaL Feb 2012 #1
Gosh, I really hope the Republicans don't nominate him. He'd be unbeatable! Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #2
Your not suppose to know that story!! BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #7
Gee, something else, no doubt, he would like to persecute and imprison the RKP5637 Feb 2012 #3
GOP: need a statistic to back you up? Make one up! nt Ilsa Feb 2012 #4
rick is a fanatical science denier. blinded by religion. spanone Feb 2012 #5
If the results show a problem - is he not correct? BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #6
But how many amnio procedures show a problem? gratuitous Feb 2012 #8
Not everybody can afford to sit at home homeschooling their kids either. LisaL Feb 2012 #9
He did not qualify it that way so no he is not correct. You can turn almost any false statement yellowcanine Feb 2012 #12
According the the article in the OP ... BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #17
I would have to know what qualifies as "bad news." yellowcanine Feb 2012 #18
Here is one source ..... BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #21
and so what if he is correct? noiretextatique Feb 2012 #23
That has to be not only wrong but wildly wrong starroute Feb 2012 #10
Not intended to be a factual statement (?) Motown_Johnny Feb 2012 #11
Santorum: emphasis on the fecal matter. originalpckelly Feb 2012 #13
It's really too bad there isn't a prenatal test to find out who will be an asshat. originalpckelly Feb 2012 #14
Short of dousing himself with gas and hifiguy Feb 2012 #15
Did anyone actually call him on this statement? fugop Feb 2012 #16
Is there no way to shut this fuck up? lapislzi Feb 2012 #19
* "Not meant to be a factual statement" TM Viking12 Feb 2012 #20
he's the new science guy noiretextatique Feb 2012 #22
I know his statements about women, gays, Democrats, religion are all offensive. Jennicut Feb 2012 #24
Another day, and another Santorum fabricated fact. salin Feb 2012 #25

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
2. Gosh, I really hope the Republicans don't nominate him. He'd be unbeatable!
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:28 PM
Feb 2012

Please, please don't throw me in that briar patch.

RKP5637

(67,107 posts)
3. Gee, something else, no doubt, he would like to persecute and imprison the
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:28 PM
Feb 2012

medical profession for ... a whole new cause,

 

BOHICA12

(471 posts)
6. If the results show a problem - is he not correct?
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 12:38 AM
Feb 2012

Amnio leads to peace of mind or the most gut wrenching decision in life. Our choice was not to have amnio because the decision was already made, but we did have a choice.*


* - we suffered no consequences - just a 19 year old College Junior.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. But how many amnio procedures show a problem?
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 12:45 AM
Feb 2012

If there are 100 amniocentesis samples taken and five show a problem, and three of those fetuses are aborted for whatever reason, I'd say Santorum's incredibly wrong, as that would be a 3% abortion rate. But if you want to change what he said to restrict it only to amnios that show a problem, then he's correct, in a way.

I don't think it's up to Rick Santorum, however, to decide for those three couples what they think they can stand to do. There may be profound defects, and the parents (or single parent) simply doesn't have the resources a millionaire like Santorum has. Keep in mind that Santorum is also against funding for programs that would help the parents of a profoundly disabled child. In Santorumworld, sex is only for procreation, and damaged babies are apparently a risk to be taken and accepted. Unless you're Rick Santorum, and you can call on your wife's former boyfriend to do a little "procedure" for you.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
12. He did not qualify it that way so no he is not correct. You can turn almost any false statement
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 10:56 AM
Feb 2012

into a correct statement by adding a qualifier. Presidential candidates should not be making statements which are clearly false just to play to the base.

Anyway, even if one adds the qualifier, I very much doubt he is correct. In many cases, the confirmation of a problem by amniocentesis will allow doctors to manage the pregnancy for a better outcome for both fetus and mother. And many parents choose to continue with pregnancies of a fetus having chromosomal or congenital abnormalities - except that now they and the doctors are better prepared. In any case it is almost certain that Santorum has no data to support his claim, qualifier or no. So he should not make it. Santorum's problem is that he is of the mindset that more information is somehow bad - of course he and his co-religionists seem to lose this distaste for information when it comes to forcing women contemplating abortions to have sonograms. Amniocentesis just happens to be one of the boogeymen of the Christian Right.

 

BOHICA12

(471 posts)
17. According the the article in the OP ...
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 01:56 PM
Feb 2012

termination has been shown to be in the vast majority in cases where the amnio came back with bad news. But hey, that's just CNN.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
18. I would have to know what qualifies as "bad news."
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 02:41 PM
Feb 2012

Abnormalities where the baby has almost no chance of surviving more than an hour or two after birth - ok, I could believe that. But chromosomal abnormalities such as Down's syndrome where there is a pretty good chance for survival to adulthood - I very much doubt that anywhere near a majority of those cases result in termination. And if you are going to make such a claim you have some responsibility to point to a credible medical study which of course he did not.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
23. and so what if he is correct?
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 06:58 PM
Feb 2012

unless he and his religious friends choose to pay for the care of a severely physically or mentally impaired child...it's still none of his fng business.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
10. That has to be not only wrong but wildly wrong
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 12:47 AM
Feb 2012

I can't find exact figures -- but various sites say that only 5% of amniocentesis results show any problem with the baby. And not all of those parents choose to abort.

I also find that 90% of abortions are performed in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, and that amniocentesis is usually performed between 14 and 20 weeks.

Either way, it means that the vast majority of abortions do not follow amniocentesis, and that the vast majority of amniocentesis procedures do not lead to abortion.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
11. Not intended to be a factual statement (?)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 01:07 AM
Feb 2012

It seems right up there with "over 90% of what Planned Parenthood does is abortions".


originalpckelly

(24,382 posts)
14. It's really too bad there isn't a prenatal test to find out who will be an asshat.
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 11:18 AM
Feb 2012

We all know the results of Santorum's test, if it did exist.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
15. Short of dousing himself with gas and
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 11:21 AM
Feb 2012

lighting himself on fire, is there anything more Santorum could do to destroy himself? Every time he opens his noise hole something ever more insane comes marching out.

fugop

(1,828 posts)
16. Did anyone actually call him on this statement?
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 12:34 PM
Feb 2012

Did anyone ask him to cite where he got his info from? Or did they just, as usual, let the lie stand?

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
19. Is there no way to shut this fuck up?
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 02:48 PM
Feb 2012

I've read about four articles today where this idiot is pontificating bullshit of the purest ray serene, and it's just published without comment.

Viking12

(6,012 posts)
20. * "Not meant to be a factual statement" TM
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 03:10 PM
Feb 2012

I think John Kyle is going to get mad that Froth-boy keeps infringing on his trademark.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
24. I know his statements about women, gays, Democrats, religion are all offensive.
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 07:00 PM
Feb 2012

But if he keeps making them he looks more and more loony to middle of the road independents. I don't know whether to be incredibly pissed off or slightly happy that we might have an easier election then I thought. Rick, do you have any advisers around you to tell you to shut up?
By the way, amniocentesis is rare to begin with. It hardly leads to more abortions. I wouldn't abort a developmentally needy child. Repubs don't care about these types of kids anyways, they want to cut programs and education funding to public schools that help teach these kids. I know, I work with these types of children all the time as a paraprofessional. Lack of funding is a big issue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Santorum Told CBS News Th...