General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: Larry Summers is front-runner for Fed Reserve chairman, source tells Hayes it's certain
2) The Obama administrations top concern is choosing someone who cares about the Federal Reserves mandate to maintain full employment as well as its mandate to keep inflation low. Yellen and Summers are both seen as clearing that bar. So the choice is defaulting to other considerations.
3) This White House, more so than any other in modern memory, knows in its bones that the economy can fall apart at any second. China could suffer a hard landing, Europe could fall apart again. Some London Whale-like trader could blow a hole in JP Morgan Chase. If that happens particularly given Washingtons dysfunction the Fed is really the first responder. This White House is very comfortable with how Summers handles a crisis.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/07/23/right-now-larry-summers-is-the-front-runner-for-fed-chair/
A source close to this says it's "way past that." WH has all but decided on Summers. Unreal.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)In an October 2001 meeting, Summers criticized African American Studies department head Cornel West for allegedly missing three weeks of classes to work on the Bill Bradley presidential campaign, and complained that West was contributing to grade inflation. Summers also claimed that West's "rap" album was an "embarrassment" to the university. West pushed back strongly against the accusations.[36] "The hip-hop scared him. It's a stereotypical reaction," he said later. West, who later called Summers both "uninformed" and "an unprincipled power player" in describing this encounter in his book Democracy Matters (2004), subsequently returned to Princeton University, where he had taught prior to Harvard University.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers#Cornel_West_affair
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)says much about bho
new boss/old boss
roamer65
(36,747 posts)I think I remember something like that happening.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that this is what we get by 'electing Democrats'. But no longer surprising.
He was also one of the gang, together with Greenspan, who drove Brooksley Borne out of her job AFTER she warned about the dangers of derivatives to the economy. I will never forgive any of them for that. Speaking of women being the 'less intelligent' than men.
SHE got it right, all those years ago, and if morons like Summers had not been there to stop her from doing her job, the global collapse might never have happened.
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts). . . in which he said that women are innately/genetically inferior to men in areas of math and science (http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/jan/18/educationsgendergap.genderissues). Sexist, elitist tool!
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)for the 1%
on point
(2,506 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)One of the worst choices imaginable. Might as well have Greenspan back.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Hope this isn't true.
Gus Lammas
(61 posts)Response to AllINeedIsCoffee (Original post)
Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to AllINeedIsCoffee (Original post)
Post removed
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Let me play a game just for fun:
1) Look, the President HAS to pick someone who has a chance of being approved.
Us: Look, maybe he should try fighting for someone who is actually worthy of the job.
2) Summers worked for Clinton. Would you rather have someone who worked for Bush!!
Us: ??? We already have several who worked for Bush. Clapper eg?
3) You just hate Obama no matter what he does.
Otoh, maybe this would be the straw that breaks the camel's back?
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)tritsofme
(17,399 posts)It's been clear for a long time that he was the frontrunner.
leftstreet
(36,112 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)matthews
(497 posts)tritsofme
(17,399 posts)WCGreen
(45,558 posts)A lot of great talk, hinting that he was a progressive, telling a lot of people that it was time for a big change...
But then there was the way he kind of dream walked into office and almost immediately let the GOP Congress define his presidency.
Why didn't he have a plane of action set up? Why did he surround himself with Democrats in name only?
Oh well, that has all been hashed out before.
I guess there is just too much money at stake for anyone really leftist to get elected...
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)roamer65
(36,747 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 24, 2013, 12:14 AM - Edit history (2)
Timothy at least has experience from the 2008 panic as NYFRB president. But I don't think he really wants the job.
Either way it would be only the second time in history that someone served as Treasury secretary and Fed chairman, if one of these two get it. Only other person to serve as fed chair and treasury secretary was G. William Miller under the Carter admin.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)So he's going to appoint the same idiot that miscalculated the needed size of the stimulus by at least half (and ignored all critics to the contrary) to be in charge because he's demonstrated such skill at managing the economy. Next thing ya know he'll appoint a guy that's never improved, much less ran, a public school in his life, as secretary of education..... Oh, wait.....
matthews
(497 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)The remaining hope and respect I had for Obama will be lost if he nominates Summers.
THIS FUCKER PROMOTED AND OVERSAW LEGISLATION THAT ULTIMATELY LED TO THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS / RECESSION!!!
matthews
(497 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)President Obama has only a few months to pick a candidate to replace Ben Bernanke as chairman of the Federal Reserve, and while the betting website Paddy Power has Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen leading the pack at 1:4 odds, Larry Summers remains a strong contender at 11:2.
Despite an impressive resume that includes stints as Treasury Secretary and chief economist of the World Bank, there is a very good reason Summers shouldn't be in charge of monetary policy: He seems to have trouble with interest rates.
During the financial crisis, Harvard lost nearly $1 billion because of some unusual and ill-judged interest rate swaps that Summers implemented in the early 2000s during his troubled tenure as the university's president.
Interest rate swaps allow borrowers to lock in a fixed interest rate on floating-rate debt, which can be good to hedge against short-term uncertainty. The problem with Harvard was that Summers wanted to lock in interest rates for money that the university hadn't actually borrowed and wasn't planning on borrowing for a very long time.
More on a doozy of a bad idea...
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-18/larry-summers-s-billion-dollar-bad-bet-at-harvard.html
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)As there are no obvious candidates without the stench of corporatocracy (and, of course, all attendant and associated foibles), what fucking difference does it make?
More to the point, would it make more sense for Obama to pick a known ally, someone with the potential to steer Fed policy toward his vision of growth and stability, or an individual with a cleaner resume but no loyalty to the administration?
Oh, and by the by, I have no dog in this fight. Call me whatever you wish - I don't care. Just asking.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)It will be priceless to watch.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Help me, then. Whose heads would explode with the biggest bang?
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)No one in her line of work is without some criticism, but she's no Larry Summers.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)instantly disqualifies her among the emoprogs, right?
I've always been discouraged by Obama's fixation on inflation, and clearly think that Yellen's approach is more sensible. But there still is the fealty-factor. I give Obama props for the recovery thus far, so think, to some degree, that it's fair he gets to call the shots.
Color me conflicted, but not outraged one way or the other. Bet that'll make me some new friends here.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)He is essentially a smarter version of Alan Greenspan only lacking Greenspans keen judgment, insight and humility (in case it escaped your notice, this is sarcasm ).
Consider Summers brilliant track record:
He has consistently argued for privatization and deregulation of the financial sector;
He oversaw the repeal of Glass-Steagall via the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act;
He approved the (previously illegal) merger between Citibank and Travelers;
He oversaw (and indeed encouraged) concentration in the financial sector, thinking bulked up banks are a virtue. This led to the rise of the TBTF institutions (formerly known as mega-banks);
He successfully fought Brooksley Born, then chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to rein in financial derivatives;
He oversaw passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, preventing ALL Federal regulation of derivatives. The CFMA also exempted derivatives from state insurance oversight and antigambling laws;
Thanks to Summers, derivatives still have no minimum reserve requirements, no disclosure obligations, no transparency and no exchange listing/reporting requirements
http://www.dailykos.com/#
roamer65
(36,747 posts)He's their toadie.