General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTavis Smiley On Obama's Trayvon Martin Speech: 'He Was Pushed To That Podium' (VIDEO)
Tavis Smiley On Obama's Trayvon Martin Speech: 'He Was Pushed To That Podium' (VIDEO)The Huffington Post | By Rebecca Shapiro
Posted: 07/21/2013 1:19 pm EDT | Updated: 07/21/2013 1:32 pm EDT
<snip>
During a discussion on Sunday's "Meet The Press," Tavis Smiley criticized President Obama's remarks on Trayvon Martin's death and the outcome of the George Zimmerman trial.
Obama surprised everyone, including the White House press corps, when he walked into the briefing room unannounced on Friday. The president candidly commented on Travyon Martin's death, saying that the teen "could have been <him> 35 years ago." Smiley took to Twitter following the president's unexpected comments, calling the remarks "weak as pre-sweetened Kool-Aid."
The PBS host added to his criticism on "Meet the Press." He said:
But when he left the podium, he still had not answered the most important question, that Keynesian question, where do we go from here? That question this morning remains unanswered, at least from the perspective of the president. And the bottom line is this is not Libya, this is America. On this issue, you cannot lead from behind.
<snip>
Link (w/Video): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/21/tavis-smiley-obama-trayvon-martin-pushed-podium_n_3631739.html
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)For posting this...
DULink: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023299248
I just wanted to point out that their are many points of view on the Presidents remarks the other day.
Some of them from the African-American Community.
And being a critic is not the same as being a "hater".
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)You wrote:
Wish he would have spent more time on the street.
I find that objectionable, but would be willing to hear your explanation for it.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Was that maybe he should have spent more time as a community organizer...
Toughening himself to fight for the 99% against the 1%.
Unfortunately... he has fallen victim the the status quo virus.
As so many of our politicians do...
With the exception of Alan Grayson, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren.
Hope that helps.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)That's why I didn't respond to your first challenges to try to smear me with racism.
And when I finally did... you find it not credible.
Big fucking surprise.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)post do all the work here.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)time he spent on the street?
My understanding is that he could've easily taken a job on Wall Street and become a corporate lawyer. He didn't!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)you don't like 'objectionable'? 'Wrong' would be a better word. I don't find people's opinions to be objectionable, just wrong, as you have been many times but you're certainly entitled to have wrong opinions, and in a democracy no one should find opinions to be 'objectionable'. They should attempt to correct wrong opinions, to educate people with facts. Some are resistant to facts, but others learn when the facts are presented anyhow.
How sad, to find an opinion 'objectionable'.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)are online resources available that will help you. You only need google them.
.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I had no idea. Thanks for the response though.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to use it to bash Obama.
That's your game plan on EVERY story on Obama--twist it into a negative.
With Democrats like y'all Obama doesn't need Darrel Issa or Roger Ailes.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)I answered your question.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Your slip is showing.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)have to do with his speech about race and Trayvon?
Answer: nothing.
Haters gonna hate.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)When was the last time you did that ???
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Appeared On MTP, MSNBC, CNN, and all over the Internet should not dissuade you.
But you want DU to be... what...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)remarks.
That you think bitter-ass Tavis fucking Smiley's reaction is more interesting and relevant than that of Trayvon's parents says a hell of a lot more about you and your fake concern than it does about the issue in general.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
WillyT
(72,631 posts)How censoring of you.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Here's the link to the statement released by Trayvon's parents, not that you give a fuck, since they say nice things about Obama which instantly disqualifies their opinion as irrelevant in your sad little troll world.
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/1014542703
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)thread so I do not know what he said that caused you to drag something from another thread into this one and attack the OP. Seems to me if you have a reasonable response to a wrong opinion it should not be difficult to prove someone wrong. Whenever I see personal attacks I assume someone cannot argue their case.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)CatWoman
(79,302 posts)he and his partner in crime Cornel West
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)of the race debate.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)or is supposed to represent all black people...kinda like more profiling
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)because they can be solidly counted on to bash whatever the President is doing: too much, too little, not soon enough, not enough, blah blah blah blah.
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)brush
(53,957 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Tavis is a special kind of clown. They use the President to get attention. I mean, WTF is he talking about?
Obama: 'If I Had A Son, He Would Look Like Trayvon' (updated)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002460121
Considering the President's Comments on Racial Profiling
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023300448
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)i`m not sure why there isn't anyone in chicago that could handle the radio gig.
brush
(53,957 posts)Green monster time: Somehow they think President Obama came from out of nowhere and usurped their position as the heirs to the throne of black leadership. They were poised to take over from Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson while adding an "intellectual" gravitas that would validate themselves even more as the anointed ones.
This goes back to the mid-2000s when Smiley was a huge Hillary supporter and she was the presumptive Dem nominee for the 2008 presidential campaign. He may even have envisioned himself as a running mate, or at least a high level appointee when Hillary won.
But that got all screwed up when upstart Obama arrived on the scene. He even had the nerve during the campaign to bow out of an invitation to appear on Smiley's annual "State of Black America" TV panel show.
He claimed to be busy (he actually was, running for president and all). Michelle, no slouch herself, was going to sub for him but Smiley wouldn't have it and that incident added fuel to his already building jealousy.
It's been downhill since with Smiley and West bashing the President whenever they get a chance.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Really? You really think that?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)making assumptions. See post #5
Number23
(24,544 posts)From Catwoman on down to see what alot of us think about Tavis and the OPs attempt to keep piling criticism on this president for his comments. And every damn thing else.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)I mean... I've known CatWoman for years... even talked to her on the phone once or twice...
After that... I have no idea who is Black on this board.
Hell... I was once "accused" of being Black because my handle has "Willy" in it.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Catwoman in addition to openly stating many, many times that she is black has showed pictures of her gorgeous daughter who was a black woman.
Now, truly I can understand why that would be confusing to some people but to those of us with eyes, ears and a moderately functioning brain, it's really not all that hard to figure out.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)But just for the hell of it...
I have a 4 year old nephew who is Black... I have a 37 year old Hispanic brother-in-law...
And I feel just ridiculous mentioning any of this, but...
I also gave time and money to BOTH of Obama's election efforts...
But none of that is good enough...
We are asked for complete and unfettered support.
Not the America I grew up in...
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Just to clarify things.
and speaking as another white person related to a black person.
It takes a lot of work. And a very open mind, and some serious self-examination.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Unless of course... having a negative opinion disqualifies one from respect.
Number23
(24,544 posts)You're the one ASSuming. I haven't asked for you one blasted thing. And never would.
tblue
(16,350 posts)I don't get attached to politicians of ANY color. When they do things I agree with, I'll say it. When they don't, I'll say that. I don't see President Obama as a great liberal or a great black leader. He's a president who's done some good and done some bad. I don't owe him or anybody unconditional anything. If other people want to do that, I really don't care. It's got nothing to do with me.
As for Tavis and Cornel, some of what they say I agree with and some of it I don't. It's not "all or nothing." I'm not a child and I don't have to choose sides. I don't think President Obama would even want people to do that. He doesn't.
Just don't worry about all these excited people. They have the President they want and I would think they'd be happy and celebrating. Instead they want to gang up on you. (Like, what can you do? Did you know you have this power over people? You can wreck their whole evening it sounds like.) But I guess they're still not happy for whatever reason. They want to berate you until you agree with them or are silenced. That's not your problem though. That's theirs. Peace.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Response to Union Scribe (Reply #102)
Post removed
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)I can only assume by your tone that it's just another in a long series of posts about how people who disagree with you/Obama are racists. I don't recall any such thread, any such posts, and least of all any such "blast"ing. And I'll post wherever whenever I feel like it. Feel free to ignore.
Number23
(24,544 posts)verdict. It was so disgusting even the OP didn't come back to the thread but there you were, berating everyone who thought what the OP was saying was terribly racist and supporting him. Well, that was until you got your behind handed to you by two posters that tried to school you, though why they wasted their time was the real question.
You have steadfastly followed me around this web site. I have never ONCE responded to you because you never say anything that I find remotely valuable or interesting. I have absolutely no idea why you feel so compelled to respond to me but I find you ignorant and very racially clueless, to say that politely. I sincerely wish that you would leave me the hell alone. And I say that not to be needlessly rude or hurtful, but in ALL honesty.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)For someone accusing me of stalking them you sure know a hell of a lot more about me than I do you. I posted, correctly, about people cramming things into the mouth of one of the nicest people on all of DU. If more people were like them there'd be less drama and a lot more action by posters to make this a better world. One person disagreed with me in that thread.
Tell me, what else is in your file of me? What other posts do you want to twist and spin?
And "in ALL honesty" I don't know or care about you other than as I try to any anonymous person. I certainly don't follow you. I don't think of you, nor when I see your posts am I compelled to reply to you. But if you go around saying dumb shit, I may call that. Every other person on this website seems capable of handling that except you. So if YOU don't want to hear from me, ignore me. I will continue to post, in reply to whomever. That means if you reply now, I may reply back. Horrible how discussion boards work isn't it?!
Number23
(24,544 posts)have no interest in you or your perspective. There is no doubt in my mind that when I see your name, I won't agree with whatever half-witted foolishness you are espousing so I ignore you. Fully. Completely.
You are the one seemingly INCAPABLE of not responding to me. It is obvious you find me far, FAR more interesting than I do you. You never have anything even remotely interesting or intelligent to say.
Two people responded to you in that thread. You probably have the other person on ignore. Perhaps they've handed you your ass before? I've seen it done to you enough and yet, you keep sniffing around chasing people who have no interest in what you have to say. About anything. EVER. It is really pitiful.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)you're doing a hell of a lot of talking to and about me, and seem to know what I say about everything. Your attempts at casting yourself above me are undermined by your own behavior. It would be funny if it weren't cringe-inducing.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)this is fucking absurd and the give Cornel a comb remark really is uncalled for . This is the fucking internet people it is cyberspace .
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Kahuna
(27,312 posts)there is an AA group and we all logged in and introduced ourselves. Our secret..M'kay?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)one way or the other, for obvious reasons as you can imagine. It is fun though to see them attack someone who has not identified themselves as Black and who gets a big kick of letting them so. Happens a lot with people who jump to conclusions.
I wouldn't worry at all about the small group here who laughingly accuse anyone who criticizes this president on policies as racists, haters or as I was called recently which made me laugh out loud, 'Republican Fan Girl' etc. Considering the sources it has zero impact. Most people, including African Americans who read this forum, simply laugh.
Don't waste your time, most other people have a very long ignore list which is why you see so few responses to them anymore. I have no one ignore, but I do jump over certain names now as I have so little time to waste.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Are a black man in America and have an elevated profile... What do YOU think should happen next in this country regarding issues brought forward in this case? And then how would you go about building consensus to achieve your stated aim?
And know this. You only have to answer this question. You don't have to do this while also managing Syria crisis, unemployment, Afghanistan, protection of our borders,immigration reform, etc. Etc.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)...and always will be about one thing:
Tavis Smiley
This is something that most Americans always knew about about him for many, many years.
He's out for himself. He's out to sell his agenda.
And when Barack Obama couldn't make *HIS* precious event due to a prior engagement, well, that was just the highest sin Obama could ever make.
Ever since then, the bashing hasn't ceased.
mzmolly
(51,016 posts)eom
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Not what I want in a leader.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)But that's okay. Tavis gives white liberals cover to attack Obama - Cornel West too.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Because they're black and criticize Obama, they're giving liberals an inroad to criticize him? Isn't that, by definition, racist?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and pull shit like this--deny Obama's blackness by suggesting Obama is just 'being black' to please other people.
It sends a thrill up the leg of white lefty Obama haters.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)He is a leader who is black.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)get to decide that. For every fucking body else.
Guess what? You don't.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)It doesn't matter who says it.
Obama is not a black leader.
Obama is a leader who is black.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Why Obama Will Never Call Out Racism
The President faces a challenge that befalls many successful blacks. How do you talk about racism when your position in life seems to suggest that it doesn't exist?
Barack Obama is not a black leader. Hes a leader whos black. This is not an insignificant distinction. In order to become President, he had to promise to be President for all the people and not be someone who would be a special friend to the black community, and he has lived up to that pledge. Black America has enjoyed the spiritual boost and pride injection thats come from seeing the brother break the highest glass ceiling and strut through the White House lawn and parade his beautiful family before the world. But when Obama turns to governing, its a different story.
-----------------------
BTW, this was an article by a black man.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)was complete. Before the charges. Before the trial. Before the verdict.
You might think you're being cute, think I'm stupid enough not to divide the apples from the oranges. But you are sorely mistaken. You are not cute in digging up an article from then and comparing it to the Travis Smiley episode of this weekend, mixing it all up and trying to confuse the conversation. I can certainly separate the apples from the oranges.
I won't explain the different circumstances to you that change the opinion entirely. You'll probably pretend not to understand.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)He is not a black leader because he does not advocate for issues that are important to black Americans.
He is a leader who is black.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)They think differently than your perception of them.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Obama is not a black leader.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)I haven't heard such an uninformed post in a very long time.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)So if he was supported by an overwhelming number of Asians, he would be an "Asian Leader"?
When I say "Black Leader". I am intentionally NOT using "black" as a nadjective to describe his race as YOU seem to be.
That is why he is a "leader who is black" and not a "black leader".
Perhaps if he were to actually engage in the problems facing blacks, he would be one. But he has studiously avoiding doing so.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Is that what you're saying with this comment - "Perhaps if he were to actually engage in the problems facing blacks, he would be one. But he has studiously avoiding doing so."
My mother, grandmother, aunts, cousins, ME, we are all so incredibly stupid that we OVERWHELMINGLY support a man that isn't doing anything for our community?
kwassa
(23,340 posts)He has not studiously avoided those problems. Unemployment, recession, health care, many other things.
He is, however, the President of the United States, of all Americans, and he has approached his job that way.
Most black leaders have appointed themselves as leaders, and do not acquire that status by doing so, as African-Americans are very independently minded people. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Cornel West, Tavis Smiley, all would like to be thought of that way, however they are not regarded that way by black people. The media anoints them such, because the media is lazy and wants to find a single source black person that can speak for all black people without the media doing the legwork required to find out what black people really think.
There is no single black leader. There hasn't been, ever. And that is a good thing.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)is an opportunist, not a leader.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)P.S. digging up a random article by some black guy is the equivalent of "I have black friends."
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #97)
Post removed
Number23
(24,544 posts)and pat them on the head and tell them they aren't saying really moronically racist things. Always one.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)they know what's best for black people act all huffy when wingnuts do the same with Ben Carson or Hermn Cain.
Number23
(24,544 posts)out to make themselves feel good. Sometimes, the black person is all too happy to trot themselves out. Even on message boards.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Women who tell other women they should be okay with a little sexism, gay men who lecture other gay men for acting too un-heterosexual, etc.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)leads us down the wrong path.
You're right, though.
I always find it interesting how white people try to define for us who our leaders are; when we should be offended by something; what is racist and what is not; how we should respond to an event or not, etc.
The arrogance and self-righteousness is amazing, isn't it?
tblue
(16,350 posts)They see only that he is black. Some support him for that reason and some hate him for that reason. BOTH are forms of racism IMHO, and neither see him the way he presents himself. He has never said he wants to be a black leader. He has never said he sees himself as black before he sees himself as president. That is not who he is and he has given no indication that that's what he wants said of him.
People need to stop seeing only BLACK when they look at Obama and evaluate his presidency based on what he does regardless of his skin color. Can you do that???
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)He is not a black leader.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)was to post not one, but two threads bashing Obama for giving that speech.
Does the OP really care about the issue of race? Fuck no. He just hates Obama and thinks he's scoring points for his team.
Just as predictable as the rightwing Obama haters, just slightly less obvious.
But, he has black friends.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Maybe we're looking at a different dictionary, though.
What I do know is that there are a core group of white liberals who constantly post their attacks of President Obama when it comes to race issues. It provides them cover because, you know, they so WANT to attack Obama on his speech about Trayvon Martin, but find it difficult because they're not black - what the hell do they know about anything Obama is saying? So, they trot out those blacks who will do it for 'em and they don't have to worry about being pegged a racist for going after a topic they have no understanding of, because, you know, they're not black. Tavis? He can say whatever the hell he wants - but he should know he's being played by whites.
It's okay, though. The conservative racists do it too. They'll trot out a black conservative to attack Obama to hide their racism. It's common. Doesn't make it, right, though.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)now THAT'S racist
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)It is racist of white people to hide behind black pundits to take shots at Obama.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)You said Tavis was being played by whites.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)I'm not saying he doesn't enjoy being played by whites - and why wouldn't he? It gets his name out there. Hell, before he became so anti-Obama back in 2008 because Obama had the audacity to snub his little event while running for president, most probably wouldn't tell you who the hell he was.
Whites on both sides of the ideological divide have to find blacks to hide behind when it comes to attacking Obama on race issues. FOX does it all the time, and, sadly, so do white liberals.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)he is absolutely RIGHT!!!
Ask yourself this:
Why is it that neither Cornel West nor Tavis Smiley ever appeared on any Sunday talk show, and defintely not anything on Faux News before 2007?
No one in mainstream America gave a fuck about these two clowns until they started to bash Obama.
And now all of the sudden, West and Smiley are everywhere. They have become the darlings of conservative talk radio and of those white liberals who take refuge in what they say because they are either angry with Obama, hate Obama, or never supported him in the first place.
Tavis Smiley only supported Hillary Clinton to spite Obama because he didn't show up to his even during the 2008 primaries and she did.
For both these men, it is personal.
I'm not suggesting that some of the criticisms against Obama aren't relevant (for example, the drones, NSA); however, for me, they lack credibility because many of us especially in the black community understand that their disdain for the president is personal.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Because they don't support Obama on these different issues. Way to dismiss their point of view. As I recall, West campaigned strongly for Obama in 2008. West pointed out something the thee night that I did not know: Obama has used far and away more drones than Bush ever did. Let's see a truthful reckoning of the innocent/guilty ratio on the bomb deaths. There are things that Obama has done and is doing that are reprehensible from a liberal viewpoint.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)read or comprehend very well. You conveniently dismiss the larger, more significant point.
If you were to re-read my comments--and comprehend them--I made it clear that I think they make SOME valid criticisms of the president. However, because their underlying motive is driven by a personal disdain for the president, they lack credibility overall, even when they make some valid points.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)Waaaay back when PO was running the first time, Tavis invited him to some event and PO declined.. Tavis has been quite disrespectful ever since.. INMO
HipChick
(25,485 posts)and has been bringing the shade ever since..
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)equates his "B" level status as an interviewer as a result of racial bias.
Ruben Navarrette Jr. is another who is much more impressed with their own ideas than others are.
JI7
(89,281 posts)AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)stepping up to the microphone at a funeral and telling the audience that what the previous person had to say was bullshit.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)I mean I suspect Travis feels that way.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Instead they go all chickenshit and hide behind Smiley, West, etc.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)That'll be news to them
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)The issue is that there have been some black pundits/intellectuals who have questioned Barack Obama's authenticity as a black man.
After Obama failed to appear at Smiley's "State of Black America" event in 2008, both he and Cornel West took the stage to blast Obama's "blackness". They accused Obama of not being black enough, especially since his father was not a direct descendant of American slaves and therefore could not relate to the struggle, history and impact of slavery and racial discrimination in this country.
Because you continue to ignore the backstory regarding the origin of West and Smiley's disdain for the president, it's hard for you to understand what a lot of us are referring to when we assert that West and Smiley lack credibility. They lack credibility, not because they don't make some valid criticisms of the president; they lack credibility precisely because they have personal issues with the president. Please read the entire thread for context.
Read for comprehension.
jenmito
(37,326 posts)KNEW would say something negative about Obama. He didn't disappoint them. Now they have video to play over and over of "some on the left" who were unhappy with what Obama did.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The media will take some one from the right, and they'll tell us why "OBAMA BAD".
And then, for the counter point, they'll have some one from the left tell us why "OBAMA BAD".
See ... its fair and balanced.
jenmito
(37,326 posts)and the vast majority of those who say "OBAMA GOOD" get ignored.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)do whatever they can to deny its merit.
Smiley has been a bitter-ass Obamasuxer for years now.
markpkessinger
(8,409 posts)... in some areas, let me say unequivocally that I thought his remarks on this case were pitch perfect. (Still doesn't mean I agree with him on drones, prosecuting whistleblowers, etc.)
But do be careful with that one-size-fits-all "hater" label you find so convenient to apply.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and rightly so.
That's not what's going on here. This kind of post is parallel to the wingnut noise mqchine's efforts to denigrate the President and deny him any credit for anything, to kneecap him regardless of circumstance.
And, yes, some on the left have a partisan hatred of him that would make Joe Wilson blush.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)because Obama is 20x the decent human being that they are.
jealous little squalling, snivelling brats.
Indykatie
(3,697 posts)I find all of his criticism of the president suspect because of idiotic statements like this. I stopped following his writing and program because of never ending criticism of the president. Others in the AA community have also written him off.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Or is their opinion suspect as well?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)And I LOVE how so many white people want to dictate the terms of an argument in the African-American Community.
Number23
(24,544 posts)This is not about criticism within the black community. This is about a certain subset of people rushing to put two men on their shoulders one of whom has had the unmitigated gall to say that president Obama "fears free black men." These men have been blatant in their unending, embarrassingly petty and stupid criticisms of this president. They know that a certain sub-set of white liberal loves this type of shit. Cornel, who had been a hero of mine for DECADES is one I can barely stand now because of his unapologetically bitter and blatant dislike of this president.
Now, if these are the kind of folks you want to hitch your little red wagon to, you go right ahead. You aren't black and perhaps this doesn't mean that much to you. But it means alot to many, many black people. Which is why people who quote Tavis and Corney and Black Agenda Report show their true colors and again, they fool NO ONE.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)disrespect him as some do.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)When a white person like me voices an opinion such as "Obama is not a black leader", I get "What do you know, you are white. Black people overwhelmingly support him."
But when I point out prominent black leaders who criticize him on the very points I am, they say that those black leaders are somehow trolls, narcissists or radicals.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)You don't understand how condescending and arrogant that sounds, do you?
WE get to identify our own leaders. Not you or any other white person!!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)for his own goddamn speech about his own goddamn experiences?
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)I know other black people who have criticized the president.
And so what?
We STILL support the president. We don't agree with everything he's done, but he still has overwhelming love and support from the black community.
When Clinton was in office, I criticized him a great deal, as did many blacks and whites for some of his policies. Did that mean that we didn't still support him?
What's the fucking point here?
Dustin DeWinde
(193 posts)Amazing how this idiot ,tavis smiley, didnt hace one tenth as much criticism for former president Bush. And par for course that the establishment media only trots him out to bash our president.
Smiley doesnt speak for black folks, the vast majority of us love and admire our president. Smiley is carrying water for teabaggers. Wittingly or not.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)as a black progressive and a leader of the black community. Tavis Smiley I am not as familiar with, though I am aware he has a talk show of some sort.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)and admired him. I've met him several times when I was in graduate school and he came to speak and do book signings. I participated in college-wide panel discussions on racism, sexism and homophobia. I was impressed that he lives a modest life, vowing to focus his attention on the plight of the poor and downtrodden in this society. I had great appreciation for his intellect as a scholar, but also the work he did with Michael Lerner to try and bridge the divide and create understanding between blacks and American Jews.
However, something changed. Cornel West changed. Ever since Barack Obama ran in the Democratic primaries in 2007-2008, Cornel has morphed into a buffoon, a caricature. He has admitted that he was upset with the president, first and foremost--not because of some policy decision the president made--but because the president didn't personally invite him to the Inauguration and give him priority seating.
Here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/23/1164307/-Naivet-of-Tavis-Smiley-Cornel-West-Attack-On-Obama-Danger-To-Poor-Blacks
But, a good number of white liberals love Cornel West and Tavis Smiley--even though many didn't even know who they were 20, 25 years ago. They love them NOW because these two clowns make them feel better about bashing the president. And yes, I've said it before and I'll say it again: there is racism in the Democratic party and among liberals. There absolutely is! And just as white conservatives are guilty of exploiting West and Smiley to serve their own ends, so too are some white liberals.
The black community, on the other hand, is very familiar with Tavis Smiley and Cornel West and have been since the beginning of their public careers. We know what Tavis Smiley is about and what he cares about. And there is a large number of blacks who have abandoned these two due to their treatment of President Obama.
The supporters of West and Smiley never even question why there is almost no criticism of the unprecedent Republican Party obstruction and how the Republicans have deliberately blocked JOBS bills. These two men are incredibly smart. They know very well how government works, and yet they choose to ignore the disrespect and downright hatred directed at the president from the political right.
West and Smiley have never given credit to the president for all the good things he has done. For instance, one of the first acts of his presidency was signing an Executive Order that repeals mandatory minimum sentencing for crack vs. cocaine.
Here: http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/08/03/as-obama-signs-crack-sentencing-bill-supporters-vow-push-for-retroactivity/
Yes, admittedly more needs to be done to address racial disparities in the criminal justice sytem. Neither the president nor congressional black members have avoided this fact.
And where Tavis and Cornel have made very valid criticisms for why Obama hasn't moved on some policies, I commend them. Where Cornel has criticized the president for drone attacks and NSA/FISA and other civil liberties transgressions, I agree and commend him.
However, I have never heard either of these men congratulate Obama when he has done anything good. It's much like here on DU where the ODSers will never give this president any credit for anything right that he does. It doesn't matter what it is.
I just don't think these men are credible. It is clear that they have personal animus against this president. And when they go on Faux News to join with the political right and reaffirm the hatred on that network, I continue to lose respect for them. I start to feel that they are really about promoting themselves, not about what is right and wrong.
West and Smiley's personal animus towards Barack Obama is well documented in both mainstream progressive and black media circles:
http://www.essence.com/2011/08/13/tavis-smiley-and-cornel-west-criticize-president-obama-steve-harvey-responds/
http://ericcharlessmith.thoughts.com/posts/cornel-west-s-animus-toward-obama
http://www.laprogressive.com/smiley-west/
http://rollingout.com/politics/tom-joyner-rips-tavis-smiley-and-cornel-west-for-their-hatred-towards-president-obama/
http://extremeliberal.wordpress.com/2011/09/20/cornel-west-and-tavis-smiley-have-never-supported-president-obama/
http://www.thenation.com/blog/160725/cornel-west-v-barack-obama#axzz2ZyaJcKH3
JI7
(89,281 posts)JI7
(89,281 posts)to try to lecture most black people and think they are not racist because he is black .......................
JI7
(89,281 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Oh yeah, because if it's negative about Obama, WillyT always drags it into DU. Seems to be a boring mission in life, but I guess it's better than hoarding cats.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)One that was repeated On MSNBC on every show this morning.
But posting it here... and getting opinions...
Is now taboo ???
How vulnerable do you think this President is ???
Sorry you are afraid.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Much less any of the bullshit you churn out every 20 seconds on DU. Like the tired old, but hilarious, fear thing. Yeah, a silly article has me just shaking in my shoes!! I am hiding under my bed, typing this post! In the dark. Shh. Be vewy vewy qwiet.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)So thanks for that.
But... you apparently... are afraid of something here.
Hope you come to terms with it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)talk about horseshit...
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)It's been nothing but nitpicking and criticism from BOTH sides from the minute he took his oath of office.
Peacetrain
(22,881 posts)speak in 2008 at his State of the Black Union conference.. The President couldn't make it.. and he got in a royal snit.. and refused to let Michelle even speak..
edit : You know WillyT if I were a suspicious person.. with all your ops going after the President.. and you are pretty consistent on that.. I would start thinking you were Tavis.. Tavis is that you?
quinnox
(20,600 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)if I felt the need to correct your notion.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)to see what you are trying to claim based on all your previous postings..
SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)a neighborhood because of stuff he had in his backpack at some separate time in the past.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)ecstatic
(32,766 posts)he's lost almost all credibility over the past 4 years? A real journalist would not try to put words in Pres. Obama's mouth. "He was pushed to the podium." Really? Forced by who? It's his last term. Technically, he doesn't have to do shit. It's amazing how the "haters" demand that Obama "say something" but are ready to attack the moment he does.
Tavis, here's my open letter to you:
It's time to do some real journalism and leave the petty, bitter bullshit behind. You can still come back from this, but you seem painfully ignorant of how you're coming across, maybe because you have a devoted firebagger following, but firebaggers are only like .05% of the population. They just talk loud.
Tavis, it's obvious you're still pissed that candidate Obama didn't attend the SOTBU conference 4 years ago, and that you and your BFF Cornel West didn't get front row tickets to the inauguration. But seriously, it's time to move on. Personal beef should never interfere with the quality of your work.
Response to WillyT (Original post)
boilerbabe This message was self-deleted by its author.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)boilerbabe
(2,214 posts)Someone else has my account info, from a long time ago. I changed my password. Sorry for the things that may have been posted in my name. Years ago, I gave my password to someone to introduce them to DU. Duh, not too smart I apologize
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bob Dole once got a particularly insulting, nutty piece of constituent mail. He sent it back to the guy, noting "some jackass wrote me this letter and signed your name to it."
Cheers!
fortyfeetunder
(8,894 posts)I think POTUS had to take his time to craft a response. And I respect him for not shooting off within days of the verdict, knowing there were people all over hurting over this decision.
"Timing is everything"
LuvLoogie
(7,064 posts)Between segments they'll often display a quote from someone of note. I remember one of these transition quotes that sort of sounded profound if you didn't think about what others had said with more grace years before. It was a Tavis Smiley quote.
Maybe the world will one day wake up to how important Mr. Smiley is.
The Link
(757 posts)He is right.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Obama has to be pushed to do many things. It is a deep part of who he is as a President. Secondly, it isn't really his job to tell us where we go from here. His comments were wonderful and from the heart. He understands that it is the country that needs to move in a better direction and he was walking a difficult line with his comments. He did an amazing job.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)and his feelings seem quite similar to a large number of democrats who were thrown under the bus by this administration. Fuck the DLC.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Anything to get him on meet the press.
Funny enough I never noticed him until he started Obama bashing. He and his Friend Cornell are trying to make their names bashing Obama. I can see the jealousy in their eyes anytime someone mentions the president. It must piss them off that we picked Obama over them as our leader.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)This is definitely something the president didn't "have" to do (and I am incredibly proud of him for doing so), especially since the RW pundits already disseminated their pre-made talking points about the verdict being some kind of repudiation on Obama allegedly trying to "politicize" the entire case...
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The opinion expressed by Tavis Smiley and Cornell West that President Obama wan not forceful enough in confronting the rampant RACISM apparent in the Jury and SYG laws
is a VALID opinion.
I am disturbed that there is a Posse roaming DU attacking anybody who expresses this opinion and now directly branding them as "racists".
I have trouble wrapping my mind around the logic behind that attack.
[font size=3]If someone believe that President Obama should have used the Bully Pulpit more forcefully in calling out the RACISM of Zimmerman, the Zimmerman Jury, and the SYG laws,
that somehow makes them a "racist"?[/font]
I noticed that Not a Single attacker chose to confront the substance of Smiley's remarks,
and exposed any flaw in his logic or opinions.
Every Single One used Ad Hominem Logical Fallacies to attack the messenger.
I listened to the speech, and thought it was a "Good Speech",
but felt that he was very careful to Walk Exactly Down the Center Line,
and his speech was more to Calm the Troubled waters than to solve the Problem,
or take an Unequivocal STAND on the Issues involved.
That IS My Opinion.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Because I don't think many white people (especially white liberals) understand the back story behind the animosity directed at President Obama from both men:
Both have had a personal vendetta against the president since the 2008 primaries. For Tavis, the animosity began when Obama couldnt make his event due to a scheduling conflict, but Hillary came. Tavis took that time to bash Obama, questioning his authenticity as a black man. Things havent been the same since, and Tavis has taken every opportunity to bash the president for one reason or another, even appearing on Fox News and other conservative outlets to castigate the president. For Cornel West and a few other black intellectuals, they see Obama as havent experienced the kinds of hardships faced by most black Americans, since his ancestors are not the direct ascendants of slaves.
In addition, Cornel took personal insult when Obama didnt give him a front row seat, personal invitation to the 2008 Inauguration. Since then, both Cornel and Tavis have been the Bash Obama Tag Team and have garnered adoring fans from both the conservative right and the liberal left, angry at Obama for various reasons. And mainstream media loves it when there are black folks who hate the president; they can use that to shield them against any charges of racial bias or unfairness. I see how the Sunday talk shows jumped with glee to have Tavis Smiley on to trash the president. It was sickening.
No one in the mainstream press would give Tavis Smiley or Cornel West the time of day 5 years ago!!