Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:26 PM Jul 2013

A Letter to Edward Snowden

A Letter to Edward Snowden

...

No matter what’s written about him here in the mainstream, the spectacle of a single remarkably articulate and self-confident individual outwitting the last superpower has been, in its own way, uplifting. Although the first global polls haven’t come in, I think it’s safe to assume that from Bolivia to Hong Kong, Germany to Japan, Washington is taking a remarkable licking in the global opinion wars. Even at home, we know that, among the young in particular, opinion seems to be shifting on both Snowden’s acts and the surveillance state whose architecture he revealed.

Given its utter tone-deafness and its flurry of threats against various foreign governments, the downing of Bolivian President Evo Morales’s plane, and ever more ham-handed moves against Snowden himself, Washington is clearly building up a store of global anger and resentment, including over the way it’s scooping up private communications worldwide. In the end, this twenty-first-century spectacle may truly make a difference. As Rebecca Solnit, TomDispatch regular and author of the new book The Faraway Nearby, writes today, it’s been a moving show so far. One man against the machine: if you’ve ever been to the local multiplex, given such a scenario you can’t for a second doubt where global sympathies lie. Tom


http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175726/tomgram%3A_rebecca_solnit%2C_emerging_from_darkness%2C_the_edward_snowden_story/


Prometheus Among the Cannibals
A Letter to Edward Snowden
By Rebecca Solnit

Dear Edward Snowden,

...

Pity the country that requires a hero, Bertolt Brecht once remarked, but pity the heroes too. They are the other homeless, the people who don’t fit in. They are the ones who see the hardest work and do it, and pay the price we charge those who do what we can’t or won’t. If the old stories were about heroes who saved us from others, modern heroes -- Nelson Mandela, Cesar Chavez, Rachel Carson, Ella Baker, Martin Luther King, Aung San Suu Kyi -- endeavored to save us from ourselves, from our own governments and systems of power.

The rest of us so often sacrifice that self and those ideals to fit in, to be part of a cannibal system, a system that eats souls and defiles truths and serves only power. Or we negotiate quietly to maintain an uneasy distance from it and then go about our own business. Though in my world quite a few of us strike our small blows against empire, you, young man, you were situated where you could run a dagger through the dragon’s eye, and that dragon is writhing in agony now; in that agony it has lost its magic: an arrangement whereby it remains invisible while making the rest of us ever more naked to its glaring eye.

Private Eyes and Public Rights

Privacy is a kind of power as well as a right, one that public librarians fought to protect against the Bush administration and the PATRIOT Act and that online companies violate in every way that’s profitable and expedient. Our lack of privacy, their monstrous privacy -- even their invasion of our privacy must, by law, remain classified -- is what you made visible. The agony of a monster with nowhere to stand -- you are accused of spying on the spies, of invading the privacy of their invasion of privacy -- is a truly curious thing. And it is changing the world. Europe and South America are in an uproar, and attempts to contain you and your damage are putting out fire with gasoline.

...

You said, "I know the media likes to personalize political debates, and I know the government will demonize me." Who you are is fascinating, but what you’ve exposed is what matters. It is upending the world. It is damaging Washington’s relations with many Latin American and some European countries, with Russia and China as well as with its own people -- those, at least, who bother to read or listen to the news and care about what they find there. “Edward Snowden Single-Handedly Forces Tech Companies To Come Forward With Government Data Request Stats,” said a headline in Forbes. Your act is rearranging our world. How much no one yet knows.

...

Prometheus and Being Burned

I think of a man even younger than you, Edward Snowden, who unlike you acted without knowing what he did: 26-year-old Mohammed Bouazizi, whose December 2010 self-immolation to protest his humiliation and hopelessness triggered what became the still-blooming, still-burning Arab Spring. Sometimes one person changes the world. This should make most of us hopeful and some of them fearful, because what I am also saying is that we now live in a world of us and them, a binary world. It’s not the old world of capitalism versus communism, but of the big versus the little, of oligarchy versus democracy, of hierarchies versus swarms, of corporations versus public interest and civil society.

...

Love,

Rebecca

Like Edward Snowden, Rebecca Solnit has a GED, not a high-school diploma. She lives in Silicon Valley's shadow, in a city where billionaires race $10 million yachts and austerity is closing the community college. Her newest book is The Faraway Nearby.

http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175726/tomgram%3A_rebecca_solnit%2C_emerging_from_darkness%2C_the_edward_snowden_story/
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Letter to Edward Snowden (Original Post) Catherina Jul 2013 OP
kick to read the whole thing later grasswire Jul 2013 #1
Thank you for reading it. Catherina Jul 2013 #3
Example of what we owe Ed Snowden Catherina Jul 2013 #2
Given the way our technology is now, Waiting For Everyman Jul 2013 #4
Well said! n/t Catherina Jul 2013 #6
Ty, but Waiting For Everyman Jul 2013 #7
Thank you Catherina Jul 2013 #10
A lot of people Waiting For Everyman Jul 2013 #12
I got Solnit's letter forwarded to me in an email and came here to post it... AnotherDreamWeaver Jul 2013 #13
What's one more time lol? It deserves to be read and reread n/t Catherina Jul 2013 #14
+1 Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #11
Excellent comment, thank you. This is very important and cannot be said enough: sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #19
Why even write a letter to Snowden? I thought it's not about him. n/t Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #5
There are many important and overlapping "its". morningfog Jul 2013 #8
That's only a response you get shawn703 Jul 2013 #15
Kick and rec to the greatest page. Cleita Jul 2013 #9
Here is an exchange I had in the comments to this article . . . markpkessinger Jul 2013 #16
Great response, and thanks for the information you provided about Mandela. Catherina Jul 2013 #17
Huge K&R woo me with science Aug 2013 #18

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
2. Example of what we owe Ed Snowden
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 01:52 PM
Jul 2013

Published on Jul 18, 2013

http://www.democracynow.org - As Congress holds its second major public hearing on the National Security Agency's bulk spying, we speak with Glenn Greenwald, the Guardian journalist who first published whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations. The NSA admitted their analysis of phone records and online behavior far exceeded what it had previously disclosed. "The fact that you now see members of both political parties increasingly angry over the fact that they were misled and lied to by top level Obama administration officials, that the laws that they enacted in the wake of 9/11 -- as broad as they were -- are being incredibly distorted by secret legal interpretations approved by secret courts, really indicates exactly that Snowden's motives to come forward with these revelations, at the expense of his liberty and even his life, were valid and compelling," Greenwald says. "If you think about whistleblowing in terms of people who expose things the government is hiding that they shouldn't be, in order to bring about reform, I think what you're seeing is the fruits of classic whistleblowing."

See our recent interviews with Glenn Greenwald about his NSA/Snowden reporting at
http://www.democracynow.org/appearances/glenn_greenwald

Democracy Now!, is an independent global news hour that airs weekdays on 1,100+ TV and radio stations Monday through Friday.

FOLLOW DEMOCRACY NOW! ONLINE:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/democracynow
Twitter: @democracynow
Subscribe on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/democracynow
Listen on SoundCloud: http://www.soundcloud.com/democracynow
Daily Email News Digest: http://www.democracynow.org/subscribe

Please consider supporting independent media by making a donation to Democracy Now! today, visit http://www.democracynow.org/donate/YT

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
4. Given the way our technology is now,
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 02:22 PM
Jul 2013

this may be the only way to confront its abuses. Why should we so easily accept that the very nature of security and privacy are completely different because of the ubiquitousness of technology, but yet still expect that whistleblowing should have to always remain as it traditionally was. Frankly that isn't logical.

Until the Surveillance State is cut way down to size, I don't think we can expect that whistleblowing can be what it used to be either. We should probably just get used to it this way, just like we're told to about everything else.

Edward Snowden thought outside the box and saw a perfect shot at the "Star Wars Death Star" and took it. Bravo!

The machine will always be vulnerable to fortuitously placed individuals who can and will do that, and the machine will always have to buy their creativity... because neither machines nor systematized people can do that kind of thinking. It is a built-in flaw of any machine, and it's little enough for us individuals to have on our side.

I don't need for Snowden to be a perfect person, to call what he did uplifting. Oh hell yes, it sure was. And he did it very well. If we all took the similar opportunities we have, in our own way, and in our own spots in life, this world might change a great deal. It doesn't necessarily even have to mean anything illegal, just being original in aid of the individual against the monolith.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
7. Ty, but
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 03:11 PM
Jul 2013

more a propos of the piece you posted. That is some of the best writing I've read in a long while. Just want to add... I thought this too, and agree with it 100%...

The goal of gathering all this meta-data is to be able to identify where the “hubs” are, who the people are who sit at key points in networks, helping pass news and messages along, but especially, who the people are who spread ideas and information from one network of people to the next, who help connect small networks into larger ones, and thus facilitate the unpredictable and rapid spread of dissent when it appears.


Don't know about about today, but that used to be called "centers of influence". And you are one of those, Catherina. So are quite a few others here, and that is a very valuable thing to be. I hope no DUers here believe anyone who says that spreading ideas (such as posting here) is a waste of time. That couldn't be more false.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
10. Thank you
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 03:37 PM
Jul 2013

I try hard, which is why I refuse to get affected or distracted by attacks. Between DU and twitter, I learn more than anywhere else thanks to the hard work of many posters here. I know NSA already has a nice thick file on me, made 100% legal since I reside overseas now. I might as well make the best of it, especially with all the solidarity we have here. Thank you for being an important link in that solidarity and always speaking out.

I'm happy you appreciated that letter. I was very impressed with its quality and thoughtfulness. I hope Ed Snowden sees it soon, if he hasn't already.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
12. A lot of people
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 03:56 PM
Jul 2013

have lived a long time on their radar screen, as you say, with deep files. In the old days, it used to be done by the Rand Corporation. But the truth is, the Surveillance State isn't nearly as clever as it likes us to believe. It has lots of money and toys, and that is formidable. But it isn't very bright. Case in point, grounding Morales' plane, or trying to boycott the Olympics.

It stands to reason that would be true because at the end of the day, what it's always trying to do -- a power trip -- is stupid.

AnotherDreamWeaver

(2,850 posts)
13. I got Solnit's letter forwarded to me in an email and came here to post it...
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 12:06 AM
Jul 2013

But I see you already had. Thank you.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
19. Excellent comment, thank you. This is very important and cannot be said enough:
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 03:55 PM
Aug 2013
Why should we so easily accept that the very nature of security and privacy are completely different because of the ubiquitousness of technology, but yet still expect that whistleblowing should have to always remain as it traditionally was. Frankly that isn't logical.


So true, those who admonish Snowden for not 'staying and facing the consequences of his actions' are living in the past.

As Drake pointed out this week at the National Press Club, he did it the old way, he tried to follow the rules, and they in return, tried to and nearly succeeded, in destroying HIM.

He spoke honestly to the FBI, trusting in the system he knew, THEY twisted his words and used them to base their false charges on.

As he said he spent 'five years in Hell' and offered his advice to future Whistle Blowers 'do not speak to the FBI, you cannot trust them'.

He stated that Snowden should be free. This is a man who spent forty years inside the system, in Intel and in the Military and trusted them. But he found out the hard way that he was living in the past. He advises others to adapt to the real world we now live in as Snowden did.
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
8. There are many important and overlapping "its".
Thu Jul 18, 2013, 03:13 PM
Jul 2013

One "it" does not preclude or negate the discussion of another "it".

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
16. Here is an exchange I had in the comments to this article . . .
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:44 AM
Jul 2013

. . . that appeared on TheNation.com, with a commenter who claimed to be supportive of what Snowden did, but suggested he was a "coward" for not returning to the U.S. to face charges.

Vendetta

Hero worship of Snowden like this is just nauseating. I think he did the right thing by leaking what he did, but that does not make him a hero. This letter is offensive to real heroes like Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela, who were willing to go to prison for what they stood for, by comparing Edward Snowden to them. Hell, Martin Luther King gave his own life.

Snowden, though? Snowden has proved himself a coward. He's all too happy to be throwing rocks at the US government from his refuge in the police states of China and Russia, and letting the clown show of his fugitive hot potato game overshadow the issue he exposed. A real hero like MLK or Mandela would have let the government arrest him, let his trial be a rallying point, and have actually stood for something. A real hero wouldn't have fled to China and Russia and given over US secrets to them in exchange for sanctuary.

Yesterday 01:12 PM

markpkessinger

Your ignorance of history is astounding. Nelson Mandela did not willingly submit to arrest. When Mandela was arrested, he had recently been in another part of Africa receiving military training. He sneaked back into South Africa to lead a band of saboteurs, having grown frustrated with the lack of positive results from the ANC's previous, peaceful efforts. On the day he was an associate, he and an associate were driving from Johannesburg to Durban, when a police car swerved in front of them, stopping the car. Mandela initially tried to pose as a chauffeur, using the alias David Motsamayi, but the police did not believe him. The only thing Mandela willingly did in all of this was choose not to use the revolver in the glove compartment of the car he was in (which probably would have been suicidal). None of this takes away from the greatness of the man, but the suggestion that he willingly submitted to arrest is pure fiction. The realization he came to, which your quote above references, came after he was arrested, not before.

And Martin Luther King, Jr. didn't give his life, it was taken from him by a murderer. Yes, he was willing to go to jail, but he wasn't facing the likelihood of spending most of the rest of his life in prison either.

Whether or not one believes Snowden is on par with the likes of King or Mandela, the U.S. government is seeking to make an example of him (indeed, much as they are doing with Bradley Manning). The suggestion that anybody who has -- as you concede Snowden has -- done the right thing should willingly submit to that is simply insane.

19 minutes ago

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
17. Great response, and thanks for the information you provided about Mandela.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:05 PM
Jul 2013

The people who call Snowden a coward are the funniest ones. How come we never EVER see calls from them for all the criminal asylees we're harboring in this country to go home and face the music?

Ed Snowden will go down in history as a hero, unless we let them win this fight and rewrite history their way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Letter to Edward Snowde...