Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Senate panel condemns Syria's 'brutal' use of force
(AFP) 13 hours ago
WASHINGTON A key US Senate panel unanimously approved a resolution Thursday strongly condemning Syria's "brutal and unjustifiable" use of force against civilians, and called for a review of legal options to hold regime officials accountable.
The measure also expresses "strong disappointment" over Russia and China's veto earlier this month of a UN Security Council resolution that would have censured Damascus for its deadly crackdown on dissent.
The Senate resolution urges the international community "to review the legal processes available to hold officials of the government of Syria accountable for crimes against humanity and gross violations of human rights."
But Democratic Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, acknowledged the resolution had been softened because some members felt the original language went too far. He said it was "a powerful first step," nevertheless.
Republican Senator Bob Corker expressed concern the original resolution could be used to authorize US military action against Syria, likening it to a Senate resolution that he said was invoked by the administration as backing the US intervention in Libya.
The measure also expresses "strong disappointment" over Russia and China's veto earlier this month of a UN Security Council resolution that would have censured Damascus for its deadly crackdown on dissent.
The Senate resolution urges the international community "to review the legal processes available to hold officials of the government of Syria accountable for crimes against humanity and gross violations of human rights."
But Democratic Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, acknowledged the resolution had been softened because some members felt the original language went too far. He said it was "a powerful first step," nevertheless.
Republican Senator Bob Corker expressed concern the original resolution could be used to authorize US military action against Syria, likening it to a Senate resolution that he said was invoked by the administration as backing the US intervention in Libya.
PLEASE NOTE - EVEN THE NEOCONS DO NOT WANT MILITARY ACTION
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1638 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Senate panel condemns Syria's 'brutal' use of force (Original Post)
tabatha
Feb 2012
OP
tabatha
(18,795 posts)1. Senator Richard Lugar
Senator Richard Lugar, an influential Republican on foreign policy, said the United States lacked a clear understanding of the nature of the Syrian opposition, and noted that the regime had a credible military, significant air defenses and possible chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
I.E. NO MILITARY ACTION
tabatha
(18,795 posts)2. Some tweets
Mohamed Fadel Fahmy @Repent11 Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
FSA: " We buy all our weapons from inside Syria, from traitors in Assad's army who want money, we also raided several weapons warehouses"
BSyria @BSyria Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
How many times can i stress this? The country is moving toward an armed revolt, whether the west arms the FSA or not. #Syria
Martin Chulov @martinchulov Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
FSA supply lines to Bab al-Amr in #Homs totally cut for now. No-one has got in from the south, or west for 10 days #Syria
FSA: " We buy all our weapons from inside Syria, from traitors in Assad's army who want money, we also raided several weapons warehouses"
BSyria @BSyria Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
How many times can i stress this? The country is moving toward an armed revolt, whether the west arms the FSA or not. #Syria
Martin Chulov @martinchulov Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
FSA supply lines to Bab al-Amr in #Homs totally cut for now. No-one has got in from the south, or west for 10 days #Syria
tabatha
(18,795 posts)3. Threats of war cloud hopes for Middle East
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/threats-of-war-cloud-hopes-for-brighter-future-in-the-middle-east/2012/02/10/gIQA64BN6Q_story_1.html
That is why Lugar and others do not want any involvement,
Though there is no evidence yet to support Syrian government claims that Qatar and Saudi Arabia have been arming the Syrian opposition, that could well change now that concerted international action to resolve the Syria crisis seems unlikely, said Emile Hokayem of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in Bahrain.
With Russia already providing arms to the government and Iran offering technical assistance and military advice, according to U.S. officials, the stage is set for Syria to serve as the venue for a messy proxy war that could spill into Lebanon, Iraq and perhaps beyond
With Russia already providing arms to the government and Iran offering technical assistance and military advice, according to U.S. officials, the stage is set for Syria to serve as the venue for a messy proxy war that could spill into Lebanon, Iraq and perhaps beyond
That is why Lugar and others do not want any involvement,
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)4. Syria laughs, rest of world smirks...
Oh look it's the pot calling the kettle black.
I'm not sure what we can or should do, if anything, regarding the situation in Syria. Providing humanitarian support, I think, to the extent that we are able, would be helpful. We don't have any right to condemn another Nation for the brutal use of force though. Frankly I think we need to stay away from this one militarily.