Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 12:04 PM Jul 2013

A broadcaster said that the Women's Champion at Wimbledon, Marion Bartoli, "wasn't a looker".

Then somebody from DU chimed in about her fat. I was incredulous.
Post #69 here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3192294
A long time tennis writer at Sports Illustrated posted this comment. From Jon Wertheim's column:
<snip>
• A lot of talk this week about fitness and overtraining. Reader Brian S. raises an interesting point: "Did I hear correctly? Did the ESPN guys actually question Bartoli's fitness?
The same Bartoli who, at the Mercury Insurance Open last summer, played three-set matches on three consecutive days in which she averaged about 50 percent more running per match than Nadal did in his five-set Australian Open semifinal against Fernando Verdasco in 2009? She did 50 percent more running in half the time, hence working three times as hard, and does it three days in a row, and her fitness is being questioned?
How many times do I have to remind people: The correlation between appearance and fitness level is far less direct for female athletes."
<snip>
Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/tennis/news/20130707/wimbledon-50-thoughts-andy-murray-marion-bartoli/#ixzz2YTDNhtCS

It never ends anywhere.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A broadcaster said that the Women's Champion at Wimbledon, Marion Bartoli, "wasn't a looker". (Original Post) Are_grits_groceries Jul 2013 OP
Doofus WovenGems Jul 2013 #1
I could not believe it when I heard it Sanity Claws Jul 2013 #2
You don't need to be a "looker" to play tennis - you just have to be good at tennis. EdwardSmith74 Jul 2013 #3
Discussed elsewhere..and what he said was actually an insult to the lookers, not the other way round truebrit71 Jul 2013 #4

WovenGems

(776 posts)
1. Doofus
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 12:08 PM
Jul 2013

It ain't a beauty contest it's an athletic event.
Did the twits sister beat him to a pulp? He had it coming.

Sanity Claws

(21,851 posts)
2. I could not believe it when I heard it
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 12:14 PM
Jul 2013

Incredible. Women do not exist just to be pleasing to men's eyes. Here was a great athlete and all they could do was complain about her appearance.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
4. Discussed elsewhere..and what he said was actually an insult to the lookers, not the other way round
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 12:46 PM
Jul 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3192294

It was in-artful at best, a back-handed compliment at worst, but what he said essentially was that she earned it because she worked for it, rather than having had it handed to her simple because she looked good...
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A broadcaster said that t...