Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,093 posts)
Sat Dec 17, 2011, 11:10 AM Dec 2011

Right wing group: Protecting newborns is NOT 'pro-life'

Like David Barton, who has no academic training as a historian but is the Religious Right’s point person on American history, Calvin Beinser of the Cornwall Alliance has no scientific credentials but has become the go-to person for right-wing activists on questions of science, particularly climate change. While he lacks any credentials what Beisner does have is close ties to organizations financed by the energy industry and a history of attacking scientists, spreading misinformation, and fueling fears that the environmental movement is a pagan plot to destroy Christianity and kill “about 95% of the human race.”

Beisner is especially concerned about growing calls for environmental protection made by evangelical Christians, and has went out of his way to attack groups like the Evangelical Environmental Network for calling on public officials to clamp down on mercury poisoning. Beisner’s outburst against his fellow evangelicals should come as no surprise, as he has even gone after a Koch-financed study which actually confirmed the science behind climate change. He joined Focus on the Family’s political arm CitizenLink, whose head Tom Minnery appeared in Beisner’s Green Dragon video series, to disparage the EEN for thanking both Republican and Democratic politicians who supported efforts to reduce mercury emissions:

In truth, only one in every 1,000 American babies is exposed to harmful doses of mercury, and the slight delays in cognitive development it may cause generally disappear by age 7, says Beisner. Moreover, all 12 of the federal legislators EEN is supporting are among the most pro-abortion Congress has to offer.

“Calling this ‘pro-life’ is quite a misnomer, but it will result in a lot of people being confused about who’s really pro-life and who’s not,” Beisner said. “Some of these people have 100 percent pro-abortion voting records in Congress, so people need to know they’re really getting the wool pulled over their eyes if they fall for this.”

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/according-focus-family-its-not-pro-life-protect-newborns-mercury-poisoning

'Sanctity of life starts at conception... and ends at birth', it's a statement that can't be made in jest anymore.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Right wing group: Protecting newborns is NOT 'pro-life' (Original Post) ck4829 Dec 2011 OP
Par for the course, isn't it? baldguy Dec 2011 #1
If they were truly pro-life they would be for health care for all liberal N proud Dec 2011 #2
 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
1. Par for the course, isn't it?
Sat Dec 17, 2011, 11:39 AM
Dec 2011

Goes along with War is Peace, Ignorance is Strength & Freedom is Slavery.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Right wing group: Protect...