General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI never liked Ernest Hemingway, and now here's another reason.
I felt he glorified war as the ultimate "manly pursuit," ignoring the innocents who always suffer.
Now it turns out the asshole wanted to be a KGB spy for Joe Stalin.
Up till now, this has been a notably cheerful year for admirers of Ernest Hemingway a surprisingly diverse set of people who range from Michael Palin to Elmore Leonard. Almost every month has brought good news: a planned Hemingway biopic; a new, improved version of his memoir, A Moveable Feast; the opening of a digital archive of papers found in his Cuban home; progress on a movie of Islands in the Stream.
Last week, however, saw the publication of Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America (Yale University Press), which reveals the Nobel prize-winning novelist was for a while on the KGB's list of its agents in America. Co-written by John Earl Haynes, Harvey Klehr and Alexander Vassiliev, the book is based on notes that Vassiliev, a former KGB officer, made when he was given access in the 90s to Stalin-era intelligence archives in Moscow.
Its section on the author's secret life as a "dilettante spy" draws on his KGB file in saying he was recruited in 1941 before making a trip to China, given the cover name "Argo", and "repeatedly expressed his desire and willingness to help us" when he met Soviet agents in Havana and London in the 40s. However, he failed to "give us any political information" and was never "verified in practical work", so contacts with Argo had ceased by the end of the decade. Was he only ever a pseudo-spook, possibly seeing his clandestine dealings as potential literary material, or a genuine but hopelessly ineffective one?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/jul/09/hemingway-failed-kgb-spy
Response to Archae (Original post)
Whisp This message was self-deleted by its author.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)protagnist deserts, for Christ's sake. EH was no pro-war Yahoo!
deutsey
(20,166 posts)HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)to be reading with a pre-determined bias to get 'war as a test of manhood' out of his novels by equating the 'Hemingway code' into pro-war sentiment. I suppose one could say that EH valorizes war in For Whom the Bell Tolls, but it's war against Franco's fascists. And Robert Jordan, the protagonist, dies at the end. The love scenes in FWTBT are way better anyway. EH was a lover, not a fighter!
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)If he did want to spy for Stalin, I think it probably was from a sense of adventure more than anything else.
BTW...I like Hemingway. A lot. Many of today's writers could learn a lot from his starkness of prose.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)also great with economy and letting silences do the talking. Carver's story "A Small, Good Thing" is probably one of the best examples of this.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)were both resolutely anti-fascist and, if any war were going to be justifiable, it would be the war against fascism, as contrasted to World War I, a conflict between decadent empires, and one which Frederic Henry understandably bails out on.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)The Communist were largely seen in the late 30's and early 40's by almost everyone as leading the fight against the Nazis and the Fascist. Most people didn't know about Statin's atrocities at that point. In 1943 at the request of the FDR administration the movie, Mission to Moscow was made in Hollywood and released to assure the American public that The Soviets were our friends and Joe Stalin may have had his faults but was in fact a really nice guy - This popular mainstream movie which was applauded by the U.S. government itself even defended the purges of Stalin and the invasion of Finland. So, in the context of that time having a romanticized and very favorable view of the Soviet Union would have been very common among a certain wing of the international intellectual class. The timing in which Hemmingway volunteered to spy for the Soviets - was a very different time and context than if he had done so a decade or two later.
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)thereabouts. I think i remember something like that, anyhoo....
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Warpy
(111,277 posts)and a lot of people (my mother included) abandoned the Party once they found out where Stalin was at and just how miserable he had made his people during his mad rush to drag the USSR from a feudal country into an industrial superpower. He did ultimately succeed, but the cost in human life was appalling.
However, during most of the 30s, the Communists were pretty much alone in standing up to Hitler and his sympathizers here. A lot of people went to meetings, leafleted, and supported the party then.
LostOne4Ever
(9,289 posts)LOVED Hemmingway...but reading him was a struggle for me. He usually put me to sleep for most of the story.
Warpy
(111,277 posts)of his novels. "A Farewell to Arms" was arguably the most accessible.
As far as manly men went, I preferred Kenneth Roberts.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)White Elephants," as powerful for what is not said as for what is said.
MADem
(135,425 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)But I never liked him much either, and mainly for the macho bullshit too.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)male narrator and hero of The Sun Also Rises, Jake Barnes, has lost his 'macho bullshit' (and possibly his male 'business' to boot) from a war wound. Barnes and Brett still partake of the Hemingway code (exemplified through the ethos of bull-fighting), but I've just never felt an overwhelming 'macho bullshit' vibe off the novel.
But I'm a man, so there you have it
bemildred
(90,061 posts)It's not personal, I've just never liked that stuff, and I'm a guy too. Mostly the "big man" aspects of it. As long as you are not into bullying, you can be as tough as you like by me. And killing animals for "sport" I can do without too, if you kill it, you better eat it.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)I'm being facetious of course. But back in those days being radically left-wing just did not carry the image of Prius driving, Birkenstock wearing, Pinot Noir sipping, organic farming metro-sexual, "Modern Family" sensitive men.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,991 posts)I read a lot of his stuff, and got tired of the macho, sexist crap. But as far as being a wordsmith, he is up there with the greats and no personal dislike of mine is ever going to change that.
I don't think he was an anti-American spy per se being a communist sympathizer was popular for many back then--almost a fad-- and this would fit his search of 'adventure'
(Besides using the book "A Farewell To Arms" to contain Ash's possessed chopped off forearm in "Evil Dead 2" was comedic genius and we would have missed out on on it if he never wrote that book)
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I've found it a great relief to separate the art from the artist, else I'd be very, very bored in my off-time.
Additionally, it also helps to know not only his writings, and the genesis of those writings, but also the political feel of the late twenties and early thirties. For example, For Whom the Bell Tolls was written in, during, and about the Spanish Civil War which was fought (on the Republican side) by and large Soviet proxies... including the American Abraham Lincoln brigade-- which was considered an heroic unit for standing up to and against Fascism.
The enemy, Fascism. The ally, Socialism and Communism.
So it's not too great a stretch to liken this to American pilots in 1939-1941 who fought under British command (our ally) against the Germans (our de-facto enemy).
Demoiselle
(6,787 posts)But any writer who can get me to cry while I'm sitting on a beautiful beach without a care in the world has my unalloyed respect.(Islands in the Stream.) And, as my father said once, anybody who wasn't a Leftist in those days was a jerk.
markiv
(1,489 posts)kept wondering 'how long is this part about the guy talking to himself, while trying to real in the fish' was going to go on
AND IT WAS THE WHOLE F--KING BOOK!!!!!!!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)life. He realized he had REALLY screwed up when he foolishly lost the love of his first wife, Hadley. He said in Moveable Feast "I wish I had died before I loved anyone other than Hadley..." He realized that his best days were in Paris with her. He really felt his genius then. And, sure enough, he killed himself not too long after Feast was published.
It's a sad story...
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)but mostly he was just a scared little boy.
In so many ways, he acted like the male embodiment of Ayn Rand. A hell of a lot better writer though.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)And the most aggressive anti-fascists in Spain and Germany were the Communists.
So I'll cut Hemingway some slack if he sided with Commies over Hitler and Franco.
Naturally, if he put the blinders on after WWII, and our government stopped covering for Stalin, then I'll be less happy with him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln_Brigade
Supporters of the Spanish Republicans
Paul Robeson -Honorary member
Dashiell Hammett
Lillian Hellman
Gypsy Rose Lee
Dorothy Parker
Pablo Picasso
Sam Yorty
Helen Keller
Ernest Hemingway
Woody Guthrie
George Orwell
Pretty sweet company he kept.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)Roosevelt thought better of Stalin than of Churchill. FDR actually found little to trust in Churchill and believed that the Soviets would be our greatest ally post-war.
Some people are more anti-Nazi/Fascist than pro-Communist.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)If I have to read one more review of his work that talks about "muscular sentences," I am going to scream.
misanthrope
(7,418 posts)Hemingway was arrogant, cruel, and misogynistic. A braggart and boor, he could be passive-aggressive, duplicitous and thin-skinned. The alcoholism isn't endearing either.
I can admire his stylistic conventions and developments without admiring or even liking him the person his actions and words show him to have been. At worst, he is utterly revolting. At best, pitiable.
The Ken Burns series currently being televised contains plenty of Hemingway worshippers. More power to them, but I prefer Steinbeck.