Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 01:22 PM Jun 2013

Udall/Wyden say they have not seen any evidence NSA program has uniquely provided valuable intel

Senators Mark Udall and Ron Wyden, who serve on the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, called on Gen. Keith B. Alexander, the head of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command, to clarify his statements that the surveillance programs disclosed through leaks over the past week have helped avert "dozens of terrorist attacks" in recent years.

Alexander testified yesterday that the collection of millions of Americans' phone records was "critical in corroborating" information gleaned through the PRISM program, without providing further information.

"We have not yet seen any evidence showing that the NSA's dragnet collection of Americans' phone records has produced any uniquely valuable intelligence. Gen. Alexander's testimony yesterday suggested that the NSA’s bulk phone records collection program helped thwart 'dozens' of terrorist attacks, but all of the plots that he mentioned appear to have been identified using other collection methods. The public deserves a clear explanation," Udall and Wyden said. "We look forward to reviewing the analysis that the general has promised to provide showing how the intelligence community arrived at these numbers. In our view, a key measure of the effectiveness of the bulk collection program will be whether it provided any intelligence that couldn’t be obtained through other methods."

Udall and Wyden questioned assertions last week that the NSA's bulk collection of Americans' phone records "has actually provided any uniquely valuable intelligence" beyond what is available through other, less intrusive surveillance programs: "As far as we can see, all of the useful information that it has provided appears to have also been available through other collection methods that do not violate the privacy of law-abiding Americans in the way that the Patriot Act collection does. We hope that President Obama will probe the basis for these assertions, as we have."

http://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/udall-wyden-call-on-national-security-agency-director-to-clarify-comments-on-effectiveness-of-phone-data-collection-program

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Udall/Wyden say they have not seen any evidence NSA program has uniquely provided valuable intel (Original Post) dkf Jun 2013 OP
But ineffectuality is a small price to pay for voiding the 4th amendment kenny blankenship Jun 2013 #1
K&R AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #2
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #3
NSA SamKnause Jun 2013 #4
They have their eyes closed. MjolnirTime Jun 2013 #5
Obvious is as obvious demonstrates. theaocp Jun 2013 #6
Looks like a good article. Quantess Jun 2013 #7
This is sounding more and more like the same crap they tried to sell us about torture. n/t magellan Jun 2013 #8
Wyden and Udall couldn't even talk with the US public about the NSA program before Snowden... Octafish Jun 2013 #9
I admit I totally let that fly under my radar at the time. dkf Jun 2013 #10
K&R JDPriestly Jun 2013 #11
See, this is the silly little detail that screws up the noisemachine Hydra Jun 2013 #12
Well, there's always torture (n/t) thesquanderer Jun 2013 #13
They're making a list, blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #14
Know why the Senators secondvariety Jun 2013 #15

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
1. But ineffectuality is a small price to pay for voiding the 4th amendment
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 01:25 PM
Jun 2013

and leaving for future leaders the most exquisitely perfect mechanism for a police state ever devised or imagined - all just sitting there humming away, and waiting for them to drop it in gear. Isn't ineffectuality just a trifle and proof no harm is being done?

The price tag in dollars on the other hand - well it's certainly bigger than a trifle. And it's probably unknown to anyone alive. But with our economy running at full employment and prosperity spreading throughout the land,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/12/inequality-us-_n_3421381.html?ref=topbar

can't we afford to treat our leadership to a few perks like this?

SamKnause

(13,114 posts)
4. NSA
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 01:39 PM
Jun 2013

The proof backing up that statement is classified.

See how that works ?

Classified is code for we will do whatever the fuck we want.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
9. Wyden and Udall couldn't even talk with the US public about the NSA program before Snowden...
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:05 PM
Jun 2013

Otherwise, they would've brought it up more than a year ago...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=440614

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
10. I admit I totally let that fly under my radar at the time.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:14 PM
Jun 2013

It wasn't til Boston when Tim Clemente basically said the were keeping our cell calls that my antennae started tingling.

Wyden tried his best to expose this, questioning Clapper in public and the man lied straight to his face.

Finally Wyden and Udall get to delve into this solely due to Snowden and his actions.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
12. See, this is the silly little detail that screws up the noisemachine
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:39 PM
Jun 2013

All the tools needed to deal with this Trillion Dollar Terrorist Threat(TM) were already on the books pre-9/11 and don't require all of this monitoring.

They only need this to watch us for dissent. Why would we dissent if we knew they were all squeaky clean?

You can see all of this as a massive admission of guilt from the people up top.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Udall/Wyden say they have...