Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's The Court Order (4p.) Of The Verizon/NSA Deal In Layout Form... Come Read... (Original Post) WillyT Jun 2013 OP
Considering VOIP. Downwinder Jun 2013 #1
Our government is coming hard after our freedom, on every front it seems. Skip Intro Jun 2013 #2
Remember the Shmoos? Downwinder Jun 2013 #3
K&R Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #4
thanks for this WillyT nt steve2470 Jun 2013 #5
You Are Quite Welcome !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #7
I thought they didn't need a court order for just call phone numbers and times limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #6
Did You Catch The Part... WillyT Jun 2013 #9
Whoa. That is pretty messed up. nt limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #10
Safe bet that AT&T got the same order. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2013 #17
Since this is for the entire country, not for a specific investigation muriel_volestrangler Jun 2013 #37
Oh for fuck's sake. This is why we can't have nice things. Gravitycollapse Jun 2013 #8
! OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #13
NOTE: "or (ii) wholey within the United States, including local telephone calls." leveymg Jun 2013 #11
ACLU Calls for End to Program, Disclosure of Program’s Scope, Congressional Investigation limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #12
How are the propagandists spinning this? morningfog Jun 2013 #14
Don't Know Yet... BUT... WillyT Jun 2013 #15
Glad it is getting eyes, hopefully it has legs. morningfog Jun 2013 #16
It will be interesting to see how the RW... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2013 #18
So the order was given by a Reagan-appointed judge? Why is Obama being blamed for it? UrbScotty Jun 2013 #19
You left out the whole "FBI" part - Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #21
The Judge Didn't Come To The Executive Wanting To Do This... WillyT Jun 2013 #22
I was scratching my head at that one, too. Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #23
LOL !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #24
Up in Tahoe -- Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #32
Perfect Weekend To Be Up There...Gonna Be Hot In The Valley... WillyT Jun 2013 #33
You cant be series. Reagan is dead. Obama is calling the shots. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #25
K&R Solly Mack Jun 2013 #20
This says "Top Secret" how did it get released? nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #26
It Also Says... WillyT Jun 2013 #28
Karl Rove WestStar Jun 2013 #31
Well at least we know the Gaurdian is some kind of espionage front. ucrdem Jun 2013 #27
Hahaha. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #30
"...espionage front." Hell Hath No Fury Jun 2013 #34
Oh for chrissake... Hissyspit Jun 2013 #36
WTF? ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #29
ONE single document Canuckistanian Jun 2013 #35
Phone numbers are obviously already part of the carrier's records. randome Jun 2013 #38
You sign an agreement with the phone company allowing them to do that (which is bad enough) Canuckistanian Jun 2013 #40
Kick !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #39
And Another... WillyT Jun 2013 #41
Nuts Savannahmann Jun 2013 #42
Wait...aren't we supposed to be blaming Verizon? The Link Jun 2013 #43
"... The order ... directs a Verizon Communications subsidiary, Verizon Business Network Services, struggle4progress Jun 2013 #44
Last Kick From Me... WillyT Jun 2013 #45
I'll add a K &R for you suffragette Jun 2013 #46
Thank You For That !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #47
K&R woo me with science Jun 2013 #48

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
2. Our government is coming hard after our freedom, on every front it seems.
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jun 2013

Happening right in front of our eyes.

I can't believe how apathetic, gullible, and easily manipulated so many seem to be.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
6. I thought they didn't need a court order for just call phone numbers and times
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 11:13 PM
Jun 2013

Maybe they just went to a court so they would be able to deflect the blame off onto the court when it became public.

2) Did they think this would never become public?

3) I thought FISA was for calls out of the country. This looks like it authorizes stuff for purely domestic calls. So what's that about?

weird.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
37. Since this is for the entire country, not for a specific investigation
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:02 AM
Jun 2013

I think it needed this secret court order.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
11. NOTE: "or (ii) wholey within the United States, including local telephone calls."
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 11:24 PM
Jun 2013

This goes beyond driftnet warrants - there is no longer any pretense of warrant originating in any particular calls made to parties abroad from a particular location or within a telco switching facility. This is universal surveillance, and it violates the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

We will stop the police state or it will stop us.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
12. ACLU Calls for End to Program, Disclosure of Program’s Scope, Congressional Investigation
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 11:26 PM
Jun 2013
NEW YORK – Using the Patriot Act, the U.S. government has been secretly tracking the calls of every Verizon Business Network Services customer – whom they talked to, from where, and for how long – for the past 41 days, according to a report published by The Guardian.

"From a civil liberties perspective, the program could hardly be any more alarming. It’s a program in which some untold number of innocent people have been put under the constant surveillance of government agents," said Jameel Jaffer, American Civil Liberties Union deputy legal director. "It is beyond Orwellian, and it provides further evidence of the extent to which basic democratic rights are being surrendered in secret to the demands of unaccountable intelligence agencies."

The program was put in place under the Patriot Act’s Section 215, a controversial provision that authorizes the government to seek secret court orders for the production of "any tangible thing" relevant to a foreign-intelligence or terrorism investigation. Recipients of Section 215 orders, such as telecommunications companies, are prohibited from disclosing that they gave the government their customers’ records.

"Now that this unconstitutional surveillance effort has been revealed, the government should end it and disclose its full scope, and Congress should initiate a full investigation," said Michelle Richardson, legislative counsel with the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. "This disclosure also highlights the growing gap between the public’s and the government’s understandings of the many sweeping surveillance authorities enacted by Congress. Since 9/11, the government has increasingly classified and concealed not just facts, but the law itself. Such extreme secrecy is inconsistent with our democratic values of open government and accountability."
...
http://www.aclu.org/national-security-technology-and-liberty/massive-nsa-phone-data-mining-operation-revealed

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
15. Don't Know Yet... BUT...
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 11:47 PM
Jun 2013

Go here to Google's News Link on this story,and watch them flood in.

It'ss being picked up everywhere, and I've been sitting here, just watching them scroll on and on.

Link: http://tinyurl.com/lyw2mtl


tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
18. It will be interesting to see how the RW...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:13 AM
Jun 2013

Propoganda machine handles this as the program was put in place to benefit the corporatists, which the propogandists carry water for. My guess is that they will sacrifice the program to demonize Obama.

UrbScotty

(23,980 posts)
19. So the order was given by a Reagan-appointed judge? Why is Obama being blamed for it?
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:15 AM
Jun 2013

Last time I checked, the judicial and executive branches are two different branches.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
21. You left out the whole "FBI" part -
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:25 AM
Jun 2013

This was a request to the Court from the FBI -- you know them, the group that is the investigative force for the Justice Department? The Justice Department headed by Obama appointee Eric Holder? A request of this scope and nature came from the top and with the permission of the Top.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
22. The Judge Didn't Come To The Executive Wanting To Do This...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:26 AM
Jun 2013

The executive came to the judge.

And I'm pretty sure the FBI and the NSA are under the purview of the executive branch.


 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
32. Up in Tahoe --
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:59 AM
Jun 2013

Mom had a cornea transplant, so I'm working around the house and enjoying the beautiful Tahoe weather.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
25. You cant be series. Reagan is dead. Obama is calling the shots.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:34 AM
Jun 2013

The justice branch didnt ask for the order. The executive branch asked.

If Pres Obama isnt responsible, then who is???

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
27. Well at least we know the Gaurdian is some kind of espionage front.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 12:37 AM
Jun 2013

Always figured it was. And if Mr Holder wants to start saving my landline billing record I guess I can clean out a dusty drawer or two.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
34. "...espionage front."
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 01:07 AM
Jun 2013

Seriously? Did you really just type that? The Guardian is one of the more impeccable news sources out there. Their work during the Bush years was critical in undermining the Administrations lies on Iraq and a whole host of other wrongdoings.

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
35. ONE single document
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 01:13 AM
Jun 2013

Effectively nullifies the 4th Amendment.

And nobody challenges it. Or protests it. Or even gives a shit... outside of a small circle of friends.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
38. Phone numbers are obviously already part of the carrier's records.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 08:06 AM
Jun 2013

Do you think a private corporation does not already make use of this data?

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
40. You sign an agreement with the phone company allowing them to do that (which is bad enough)
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 11:07 AM
Jun 2013

But there is NOTHING in the agreement either expressed or implied that you agree to have your information turned over to the GOVERNMENT.

Big difference

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
42. Nuts
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:04 PM
Jun 2013

This is enough to make George Orwell stand up from his grave and scream at us all. So many defenders of the party here think all this is just fine. Sad to say, part of me wishes that there was a Republican in office so we could again stand on principle and scream about Government intrusion like we used to. At least then, I wouldn't feel responsible, like I campaigned for the guy who is doing this to us.

struggle4progress

(118,290 posts)
44. "... The order ... directs a Verizon Communications subsidiary, Verizon Business Network Services,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:41 PM
Jun 2013

to turn over ... all call logs ... Verizon Business Network Services is one of the nation’s largest telecommunications and Internet providers for corporations. It is not clear whether similar orders have gone to other parts of Verizon ..."
U.S. Is Secretly Collecting Records of Verizon Calls
By CHARLIE SAVAGE and EDWARD WYATT
Published: June 5, 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/us/us-secretly-collecting-logs-of-business-calls.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130606&_r=0

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's The Court Order (4...