Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
Mon May 27, 2013, 05:49 PM May 2013

LBJ and Senator Dirksen: Nixon's unpunished treason...


Nixon's campaign committed treason before his initial presidential campaign when LBJ was revealed a tape that showed Nixon's people working with the Viet Cong to keep the Vietnamese war going instead of going to a treaty that LBJ was negotiating. Dirksen agreed here on a video that what Nixon was doing was treason.



LBJ had his National Security Advisor take the evidence of this event, even though it was kept quiet with him when LBJ left the White House. It is said that Nixon, knowing about this evidence of his treason engineered the Watergate break ins to try and find this evidence, which gave us the whole Watergate mess too...

http://consortiumnews.com/2012/03/03/lbjs-x-file-on-nixons-treason/

Just think of how many of our fathers, grandfathers, etc. would still be alive today if LBJ had been able to negotiate that treaty instead of the war being prolonged then unnecessarily. We wouldn't have even gone in to Cambodia.

My thoughts for all of those vets who gave their lives then. They have honor, but those that kept this war going don't.
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LBJ and Senator Dirksen: Nixon's unpunished treason... (Original Post) cascadiance May 2013 OP
K&R Sherman A1 May 2013 #1
And Kissinger was the architect and the facilitator. Le Taz Hot May 2013 #2
Kissinger was a pustulant warmonger and #1 in the voting for Worst. byeya May 2013 #23
and the media kept fawning over him upi402 May 2013 #33
Must be how RayGun got the idea to backstab Carter. lpbk2713 May 2013 #3
Well, Nixon was Prescot's protege. hootinholler May 2013 #20
Here's the longer version of the conversation with Dirksen... cascadiance May 2013 #4
LBJ/Obama democrat2thecore May 2013 #25
That really makes sense of Watergate. roamer65 May 2013 #5
Nixon as VP to Eisenhower was pushing for intervention before JFK and LBJ too... cascadiance May 2013 #6
Ike also reneged on the promised unification elections in Viet Nam. The war, USA version, started byeya May 2013 #24
And LBJ had to deal with the alleged attack in the Gulf of Tonkin .. but Nixon was an evil man. YOHABLO May 2013 #7
"his initial presidential campaign" ashling May 2013 #8
You're right he ran against Kennedy earlier... I should have probably said his first cascadiance May 2013 #12
Who Should Concede? The Secret History of Modern U.S. Politics G_j May 2013 #9
Kick WheelWalker May 2013 #10
Nixon's legacy is a particularly insidious and destructive one. We are still Skidmore May 2013 #11
And to think even Ellsberg says in the above speech that he was "to the left" of Clinton! cascadiance May 2013 #16
Makes me really wonder about the 18.5 minute gap. roamer65 May 2013 #13
I always say it was discussions about Nixon's involvement in assassinating JFK ... zbdent May 2013 #17
That "Bay of Pigs" thing...as Nixon called it. roamer65 May 2013 #19
Like we all knew......... mercymechap May 2013 #14
Now, now, we must not stoop to letting transgressions such as treason be a reason to try to thwart indepat May 2013 #15
"Peace with Honor" ramapo May 2013 #18
This is bigger than Nixon or LBJ. Crimes have been committed by many of these rhett o rick May 2013 #21
Thom Hartmann has played this clip many times Canuckistanian May 2013 #22
Because he illegally bugged Nixon's campaign plane. MrSlayer May 2013 #26
Really? LBJ hated Humphrey? Canuckistanian May 2013 #29
Yeah, he was not a fan. At all. MrSlayer May 2013 #30
Thanks Canuckistanian May 2013 #31
THANKS for the book suggestion, sounds interesting. I'm going Raine May 2013 #32
Tom Lehrer's "Whatever Became of Hubert?" dflprincess May 2013 #34
...and more sad evidence that the Democratic refusal to ever hold Republicans to account... villager May 2013 #27
Humphrey NEVER had a lead over Nixon in the polls. Smarmie Doofus May 2013 #28
Wow! I did not know this! nt Mojorabbit Jun 2013 #35

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. K&R
Mon May 27, 2013, 05:57 PM
May 2013

Thanks for Posting. Yes, you just wonder how things could have been different if this was revealed at the time.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
2. And Kissinger was the architect and the facilitator.
Mon May 27, 2013, 06:12 PM
May 2013

Kissinger -- whom the current president consults from time to time. Kissinger -- still alive and still on top of the heap for Most Evil, Vile Man in America. Watch the Trial of Henry Kissinger here (if you have the stomach):

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-trials-of-henry-kissinger/

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
20. Well, Nixon was Prescot's protege.
Mon May 27, 2013, 09:29 PM
May 2013

Poppy was involved in the Bay of Pigs fiasco which was organized by Nixon. I'm sure they had conversations on many subjects over the years.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
4. Here's the longer version of the conversation with Dirksen...
Mon May 27, 2013, 06:17 PM
May 2013

... that has Lyndon Johnson saying Nixon committed treason that was missing from the earlier story.

democrat2thecore

(3,572 posts)
25. LBJ/Obama
Tue May 28, 2013, 04:23 PM
May 2013

Somebody a couple of weeks ago was talking about President Obama's aversion to picking up the phone and talking with members of even our own party, much less Republicans. Listening to that call to Sen. Dirksen made me think of the contrast. LBJ was a son of a bitch, but he got things done. He was a strong president who picked up the phone all the time to try to talk sense into people on both sides of the aisle. His tapes are fascinating as you see he knew exactly how to use the "bully pulpit."

roamer65

(36,749 posts)
5. That really makes sense of Watergate.
Mon May 27, 2013, 06:29 PM
May 2013

Last edited Mon May 27, 2013, 08:12 PM - Edit history (1)

I have always believed it was about something more than McGovern's election plans. Looks like Christopher Hitchens had it right in his book on Kissenger and Nixon.

Why didn't LBJ go public with this information in 1968??? I think that is a good question to ask as well.

For Nixon to be so sure this kind of evil gamble would work, he must have had something on LBJ.

Makes me really wonder now what was on that 18.5 minute gap.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
6. Nixon as VP to Eisenhower was pushing for intervention before JFK and LBJ too...
Mon May 27, 2013, 06:53 PM
May 2013

... and Eisenhower limited U.S. presence to "advisors" to take over the vacuum left by the French...

And it had been revealed later too that Nixon as president had considered using nukes in Vietnam, and it was our war protests and activism in the streets that kept him from doing that.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB195/

Daniel Ellsberg has spoken a number of times about Nixon's plans to use nukes as well (I attended one of his talks a few years ago)...


Part 1:


Part 2:
 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
24. Ike also reneged on the promised unification elections in Viet Nam. The war, USA version, started
Tue May 28, 2013, 04:08 PM
May 2013

with Eisenhower. Ike was shite.

ashling

(25,771 posts)
8. "his initial presidential campaign"
Mon May 27, 2013, 07:51 PM
May 2013

This was campaign #2.

However, I don't have any trouble believing that some of Nixon's deceptions and other duplicity prior to 1960 might have been treasonous.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
12. You're right he ran against Kennedy earlier... I should have probably said his first
Mon May 27, 2013, 08:03 PM
May 2013

presidential term... He did get reelected in his second term while Watergate was happening.

G_j

(40,372 posts)
9. Who Should Concede? The Secret History of Modern U.S. Politics
Mon May 27, 2013, 07:54 PM
May 2013

Who Should Concede?
The Secret History of Modern U.S. Politics

By Robert Parry

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/111300a.html

<snip>
For the past four decades, the Republicans have built a record of dirty tricks and October Surprises in presidential contests. And typically, it is the Democrats who stay silent after learning of the schemes – to avert constitutional crises and avoid public disillusionment with the political process.
<snip>

The Vietnam War was raging and was creating deep divisions within the Democratic Party. In October 1968, President Lyndon Johnson was maneuvering to achieve the framework for a peace settlement with North Vietnam and the Viet Cong through negotiations in Paris.

<snip>
Journalist Seymour Hersh described the initiative sketchily in his biography of Henry Kissinger, The Price of Power. Hersh reported that U.S. intelligence “agencies had caught on that Chennault was the go-between between Nixon and his people and President Thieu in Saigon. … The idea was to bring things to a stop in Paris and prevent any show of progress.”

<snip>

“In the end, though, Johnson’s advisers decided it was too late and too potentially damaging to U.S. interests to uncover what had been going on,” Summers wrote. “If Nixon should emerge as the victor, what would the Chennault outrage do to his viability as an incoming president? And what effect would it have on American opinion about the war?”
<snip>

A late Humphrey surge fell short. Nixon won the election.
<snip>

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
11. Nixon's legacy is a particularly insidious and destructive one. We are still
Mon May 27, 2013, 07:59 PM
May 2013

reaping the destruction he sowed. So many of these nasty R power brokers were birthed in the viper's pit of the Nixon administration.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
16. And to think even Ellsberg says in the above speech that he was "to the left" of Clinton!
Mon May 27, 2013, 08:38 PM
May 2013

When he put in place things like the EPA, etc. that would make many feel that he wasn't so evil, when at his core, people like him and Kissinger were all about having power and wielding it sometimes very cruelly.

I think that's why it's so important today even to look at our own party's pols sometimes to look below the window dressing to see where their heart is, and what they are really doing to "fight city hall", when today "city hall" is so much more powerful and working against all of us. And "City Hall" probably doesn't let us hear about the evils of many of today's pols like we had a chance to hear about them in the past with those like Deep Throat and Daniel Ellsberg feeling empowered to tell us the truth, instead of slapped down so heavily like Bradly Manning has been.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
17. I always say it was discussions about Nixon's involvement in assassinating JFK ...
Mon May 27, 2013, 08:44 PM
May 2013

(if true)

Something like that would have not only destroyed the GOP, but plunged this nation into darkness that would make 9/11/2001 look like a cherry bomb in a toilet ...

indepat

(20,899 posts)
15. Now, now, we must not stoop to letting transgressions such as treason be a reason to try to thwart
Mon May 27, 2013, 08:23 PM
May 2013

the rising political aspirations of Republican operatives.

ramapo

(4,594 posts)
18. "Peace with Honor"
Mon May 27, 2013, 08:49 PM
May 2013

Not only did Nixon tamper with the treaty negotiations in 1968, but he then prolonged the war four more years so he could use it in his reelection campaign. His "Peace with Honor" motto was a centerpiece of his 1972 capaign against McGovern.

In many ways, Nixon is far preferable to the current batch of Republicans but the fact that he is a treasonous war criminal cannot be overlooked.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
21. This is bigger than Nixon or LBJ. Crimes have been committed by many of these
Mon May 27, 2013, 11:43 PM
May 2013

people but they are immune to any prosecution because they all belong to the same club. Pres Obama belongs to that club also.

It wouldnt surprise me in the least if Pres Obama pardons the Cheney-Iraq cabal.

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
22. Thom Hartmann has played this clip many times
Tue May 28, 2013, 03:48 PM
May 2013

Why in the world did LBJ and those who knew about this say nothing?

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
26. Because he illegally bugged Nixon's campaign plane.
Tue May 28, 2013, 04:38 PM
May 2013

It's all about preserving the office. They all protect one another's back. One of the things the plumbers wanted most was the evidence and transcripts of the airplane bugs.

LBJ also hated Humphrey, he wasn't going to help him.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
30. Yeah, he was not a fan. At all.
Tue May 28, 2013, 08:51 PM
May 2013

I highly recommend the book "The Presidents Club". It is chock full of great stories and facts I never knew before. It covers Hoover to Obama and how they interact(ed) with each other.

My two favorites are Nixon and Carter.

Nixon, of course, did some fucked up things but may have been the smartest President of modern times, he's incredibly fascinating. And Carter just doesn't give a fuck about anything but doing the right thing. Politics and respect be damned.

Buy it, borrow it, steal it. Whatever you have to do. Just read it.

Raine

(30,565 posts)
32. THANKS for the book suggestion, sounds interesting. I'm going
Tue May 28, 2013, 09:40 PM
May 2013

to see if I can get a hold of it. Love him or hate him Nixon is fascinating IMO. And Carter, a really good guy whose underated.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
27. ...and more sad evidence that the Democratic refusal to ever hold Republicans to account...
Tue May 28, 2013, 04:51 PM
May 2013

...for their ongoing, treasonous misdeeds has led the nation to its present ruinous precipice...

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
28. Humphrey NEVER had a lead over Nixon in the polls.
Tue May 28, 2013, 06:00 PM
May 2013

As far as I can remember, anyway.

Maybe the very last weekend before election day: one poll, I think it was Harris, had him up nationally by about 1%. But the other polls including Gallup had Nixon winning by 2% or more.

My guess is HHH didn't release the evidence because he didn't HAVE the evidence. Johnson HAD it... or his people did... and a late charge of this kind by HHH w/o incontrovertible evidence in his possession would have smelled like desperation.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LBJ and Senator Dirksen: ...