Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,078 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:24 PM Feb 2012

Judge: Whales Are 'Non-Persons,' So Seaworld's 'Enslavement' OK


Published on Thursday, February 9, 2012 by Common Dreams
Judge: Whales Are 'Non-Persons,' So Seaworld's 'Enslavement' OK

- Common Dreams staff


A US district judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by the animal rights group PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) against SeaWorld yesterday, saying that the suit -- which aimed to free five orca whales held by the amusement park company -- had no standing because the 13th amendment of the US consitution does not protect the right of 'non-persons.'

“Tilikum, Katina, Kasatka, Ulises and Corky have been captive and subjected to treatment that we feel is slavery,” said PETA attorney Jeffrey Kerr prior to the ruling. PETA had wanted the orcas released into a coastal sanctuary, acknowledging they probably wouldn’t survive in the open ocean.

But the ruling did not fall in favor of the whales, or PETA.

"The only reasonable interpretation of the 13th amendment's plain language is that it applies to persons and not to non-persons such as orcas," US district judge Jeffrey Miller wrote in his ruling. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/09-2



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: Whales Are 'Non-Persons,' So Seaworld's 'Enslavement' OK (Original Post) marmar Feb 2012 OP
I love animals, but the judge made a true enough statement. JohnnyRingo Feb 2012 #1
As to be expected. Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2012 #2
Another waste of The Peoples time and money kctim Feb 2012 #3
Incorporate the whales and refile the lawsuit - problem solved Brother Buzz Feb 2012 #4
+1 joeybee12 Feb 2012 #5
+1 Johonny Feb 2012 #7
Two thumbs up! renie408 Feb 2012 #12
Agree! Larkspur Feb 2012 #13
That was my first thought. HubertHeaver Feb 2012 #17
People and other animals. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #6
No it isn't MFrohike Feb 2012 #14
Fla.Stat. (2002) 501.001 (1)(a)(1)(a) And many many more. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #18
One example MFrohike Feb 2012 #20
SHM Mr Dixon Feb 2012 #8
I'm surprised that this even made it to a judge. Shadowflash Feb 2012 #9
I'm not sure why Bodhi BloodWave Feb 2012 #10
How bout the Game Warden giving it a ticket for illegal fishing. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #19
To quote Angry Dragon, who said it best... RevStPatrick Feb 2012 #11
Counterproductive Johnny2X2X Feb 2012 #15
This is all coming to a head. General strike... kysrsoze Feb 2012 #16

JohnnyRingo

(18,628 posts)
1. I love animals, but the judge made a true enough statement.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:38 PM
Feb 2012

I thought PETA was out on a thin legal limb on this case to begin with, and if they want to ban animal use for the purpose of entertainment, they have their work cut out for them. I hope they didn't waste too much of their donor's precious money pursuing this slavery case in court, and I hope they further curb likely fruitless appeals.

In my opinion, the best PETA can do in this endeavor is educate the public and sway the consumer's sentiment away from paying to see animals perform. Even there, I doubt the majority sees this issue in the same light as PETA, but a few billboards and TV spots can go a long way for their cause.

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
13. Agree!
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 02:25 PM
Feb 2012

How will we treat intelligent life on other planets if we can't treat intelligent beings here with dignity? Is E.T. a person?

 

CAPHAVOC

(1,138 posts)
6. People and other animals.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:47 PM
Feb 2012

Is a common definition in many state and federal statutes. This judge chose persons as the basis for his ruling. This is funny..... If people are animals, what are animals? Oh I get it. Non-Persons.
I hope PETA appeals just to see the fun.

Shadowflash

(1,536 posts)
9. I'm surprised that this even made it to a judge.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:51 PM
Feb 2012

I'm glad he shot it down.

I have a cat that might have brought charges against me for illegal imprisonment because I won't let her go outside. Not to mention the potential suit she could have for me getting her fixed without her consent. Thanks judge! I sure dodged a big bullet there!

Of course, if the judge HAD ruled in favor of the whales, they could have started paying them minimum wage and then start charging them back for room and board.

Also, the ruling might have 'unintended consequences' as, if they were to be found to be people, then the whale that killed it's trainer a few years back could be tried, convicted and sent to the electric chair in Florida. That would be a shame.


All in all, a good ruling.

Bodhi BloodWave

(2,346 posts)
10. I'm not sure why
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 02:06 PM
Feb 2012

but the mental(cartoon) image of a whale 'sitting' in an electric chair amuses me to no end

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
11. To quote Angry Dragon, who said it best...
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 02:16 PM
Feb 2012

...on another thread about this story:

"But corporations are people??

whales are more human than corporations"

Johnny2X2X

(19,060 posts)
15. Counterproductive
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 03:37 PM
Feb 2012

When PETA pulls stunts like this it obscures from view the hundreds of good and logical things they do for animal rights. PETA has done a ton of good, but they pull publicity stunts that hinders their cause and makes them hated.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge: Whales Are 'Non-Pe...