General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAll hail Baby! Heroic pit bull saves family, 5 dogs from fire
http://now.msn.com/baby-the-pit-bull-hailed-as-hero-after-saving-family-from-fireThe pit bull terrier is being called a hero after saving her owners from a fire that ravaged their Wellston, Okla., home. Rhonda Westenberger and her sister, Evelyn, were asleep when Baby rushed to their sides, barking and pouncing on Evelyn until she woke up in the nick of time. "If Baby hadn't woken Evelyn up, I don't think either one of us would have come out of it," Westenberger said. But Baby wasn't done. She returned to save the family's five other dogs, dragging out one that was hiding underneath a bed. "She is my hero," Westenberger said. "She's the hero for all of us."
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)usually mistaken identity . . .
that said, good for the dog - sounds like a good one
OwnedByCats
(805 posts)I'm more likely to think it could very well have been a pit bull and not just some reporter calling it a pit bull but can't ID a dog for crap. Having said that, it's true some owners don't know what they've really got sometimes.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)retired rooster
(114 posts)Yeah, she's got another kid so she'll probably get another pitt bull.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)Any dog breed can be vicious .
Bye bye I am tied of your attitude .
retired rooster
(114 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)generalization is bad. period.
retired rooster
(114 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)An Irish Setter is not as potentially vicious as a Pit Bull.
Why pretend otherwise? If you have to make shit up, the argument is no good.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)His life is ruined because of this dog.
Of course all dogs can attack. I was attacked by a small dog when I was little and my dick is still intact.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)but it usually a pit that tears you, your children, or innocent strangers up and takes your life.
time for reason regarding these breeds.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)the 5 other dogs did not bark or wake anybody. Baby saved all 5 of them, actually returning to the burning building to pull one dog out from under a bed.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)pits are born and bred to hurt and kill things.
breed bans are the only bans i accept as necessary.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)about dogs. On the other hand, my pit would take a chunk out of someone trying to hurt my kids.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)That's a human feeling you're projecting onto an animal. All animals, humans included, are "born to kill" in the sense that we'll kill another creature to survive. Insects are born to kill, too. So are fish.
You are probably referring to an aggression tendency, which is a trait. Some breeds have more natural aggression than others. Some are more docile.
Pits aren't usu. trained to kill, either. They're trained to fight with other dogs, but not to the death. And sometimes they are trained to be the one that the meaner dogs fight with...the sissy, so to speak.
There are some dogs trained to kill. German shepherds, Dobermans, maybe some others. Used by law enforcement, usually.
But I'll grant you that there's something there that makes pits susceptible to people who bring out their natural aggression, which is dangerous because of their ability to do damage and kill.
It's mainly the people, I think. I remember not too many yrs ago it was Doberman's and Rotties who were the dogs being trained to be more aggressive than they were "born" to be. But now pits are in fashion. And there are fewer incidents with Doberman's & Rotties, and people have forgotten how feared those dogs were not long ago.
I'm scared of them, though, because I don't know the dog's background or how he's been raised, and he might have been raised by a nut who raised him to be aggressive.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)pits are awesome. bad owners, bad dogs.
If you want to ban breeds, then don't sit next to me. spend time around pitties. It might help you decide that some of your ideas about dogs aren't right. IMHO.
Dorian Gray
(13,501 posts)strong, no doubt. But they can be very sweet and loyal dogs. There are many in my neighborhood. Lots of people rescue them from shelters and provide them with good and happy lives. And train them well. But, they also tend to muzzle them when walking them outside. (There are a LOT of kids in my neighborhood in Brooklyn, too.) It's okay to love pits. But it's good to be aware of what they can potentially do and take precaution, too.
There is middle ground.
OwnedByCats
(805 posts)be people killers? Some were bred for DOG fighting. I watched a doc on dog fighting rings and some of the trainers did interviews, with their faces covered of course, saying that they don't want their fighting dogs to be people aggressive, only dog aggressive and if one showed people aggression, they would kill it because they wouldn't want that dog to turn on them.
I used to work for a popular chain kennel that welcomed pit bulls, but we were not allowed to mix them with other dogs because they believed pit bulls were much more likely to be dog aggressive than people aggressive. I have to say while I do not know if these pit bulls that came in would be dog aggressive, they were never aggressive to me or any of my coworkers. Must be a correlation between responsible owners and some of the sweetest dogs you could ever come across.
That's not to say that some thugs don't train them to be aggressive towards people, but they were never bred to specifically target people in this way. Usually that takes other training, abuse and isolation.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)But you get enough bad owners and society has to do something about it. I'm not kidding. There should be background checks and specific licenses for these dogs.
flvegan
(64,416 posts)Factually, please.
longship
(40,416 posts)Is anybody here keeping score?
Regretfully, I have not been. Surely, with the number of them here there are enough people who care enough to keep track of these things.
So, what's the score now?
Pit bulls are great: ???
Pit bulls are evil incarnate: ???
I'll come back to this thread for a report.
Thanks.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Sort of like the assholes who abuse Pit Bulls.
pecwae
(8,021 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)None of my friends have a pitbull. But i think they are getting a bad rap.
Put me down as one for the Pit Bulls are great.
Honestly, I think this whole thing is an extreme over-reaction. There were around 33 dog bite fatalities in 2011. There are millions and millions of dogs. Cows kill more people annually than that.
OwnedByCats
(805 posts)or a pack led by a pit bull. The others were either Rottweilers, a German Shepherd, Husky, Mastiff or undetermined mixed breed.
With 28 people dying from a lightening strike in 2012, you had a little bit better chance of dying from that than from a pit bull. The hysteria doesn't match the numbers, still one of the rarest ways to die. It's fear mongering for the most part.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)The news media regularly describe dogs as members of breeds. However, recent developments in canine genetics, along with extensive surveys conducted by university researchers, show that breed identification of dogs of unknown origin based on visual inspection does not correspond with DNA analysis of the same dogs. Equally important, the professionals surveyed disagreed with each other when they attributed a breed or mix of breeds to the same dog.
Unfounded assumptions about the significance of breed and misplaced confidence in visual breed identification have diverted us from a consideration of factors pertinent to the discussion of community safety and dog ownership.
NCRC investigations of the dog bite-related fatalities in 2011 showed that in only eight of the cases could the breed descriptors assigned to the dogs be documented, or otherwise considered reasonable. We have reliably identified six different breeds of dogs in those eight 2011 incidents.
OwnedByCats
(805 posts)I'm being somewhat generous, for argument's sake. The anti crowd do not believe misidentification ever happens, but I believe it happens more than they would like to think. Whether it's in the media or in statistics, it can be hard to know for certain. I've seen dogs that resemble pits bulls, but are not. Those dogs would be pinned as a pit bull if there was ever an altercation involving those dogs. We have so many mixes of dogs running around, it's easy for those who don't know how to properly identify a pit bull to make a mistake, sadly that is what happens. Then a whole breed is maligned for the actions of a teeny percentage that, quite frankly, some aren't even pit bulls. Thank you for pointing that out.
flamingdem
(39,324 posts)JUST KIDDING
tblue
(16,350 posts)I love dogs to pieces. This one is a life saver!!! Sweet puppy!
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)It's a shame a few plus their owners have ruined their reputation of a great family dog.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)redwitch
(14,947 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)You know they wanted too
Dorian Gray
(13,501 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)She just wanted to see which ones tasted the best, so she would know in what order to serve herself her future family entrees and who would be best to save for dessert.
Nine
(1,741 posts)But let me guess. Those were probably other dogs misidentified as pit bulls. Those dogs must have all had abusive owners. The victims must have provoked the dogs in some way. Any dog can kill people, even a yorkshire terrier. Did I leave anything out?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Any honest person with half a brain would have learned by now that any site that advocates genocide can't be considered a reliable authority on the subject.
Response to baldguy (Reply #30)
Post removed
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Convenient how that works.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)I do not have a Pit. I have 5 Newfoundlands. They are our pets first, showdogs second. This is a breed known for sweet temperament.
Now let me tell you about the 150 pound Newfie that went through a glass patio door to attack a party guest. Then there was the newf that attacked a woman biting her in the face, the newf that attacked a dog that was walking by at a dog show. I have friends years ago that got a Newfie pup (their second Newfie after their previous one died of old age) and ended up having to have it put to sleep. As it matured it attacked them several times. They tried everything and consulted trainers to no avail. They put the dog down after it tried to bite their tottler.
No,not any of my dogs would ever bite anyone. The UPS guy comes in my home and places packages on the kitchen table when I am not home. He is surounded by 5 Newfies and a Pom. He maybe drooled on and hairy when he walks out but no bites.
My son has a Pit who loves everyone but they have gone out of their way to socialize him. He goes to doggy day care 2x a week and plays with other dogs.
Condemning a whole breed is like saying any Muslim, black, or any nationality is dangerous.
Yes there bad dogs just like people. There are also bad dog owners. Ones that do not socialize their dog and those that go out of their way to make dogs mean for a status symbol.
Dobermans, German Shepherds, Chows, etc have all been condemned as vile evil breeds at some point.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Your argument is the same as the argument made by gun nuts and why we can have ZERO gun laws. Sorry, but it falls flat once you start to look at the stats.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Like I said, a family friend has a 4 year old who is alive, so he didn't make this analysis. Of course, he will live the rest of his life with no dick, but that doesn't count.
And I have a hard time believing a group could not determine the breed of 68% of the dogs they "studied."
And these "studies" they did are bull shit. Lets look at the first one: it doesn't really count because she walked in her back yard at night, she was sick with cancer and the dog couldn't see very well.
Looking at how they determined the breed in their studies was also bull shit. Nice try, though.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)"What breed is it?" is the wrong question to ask. And if you're trying to ID the breed just by looking at it, you'll fail. DNA testing is THE ONLY RELIABLE WAY to determine the actual breed makeup of any dog. If the genetic tests were not done, or the genetic material is not available, then the breed cannot be accurately determined. The fact that you dismiss the science out of hand is a good indication of where you're head is. [font color="white"]Meaning that your head is full of shit.[/font]
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Findthebull/findpitbull_v3.html
It's the same error the lazy local media makes when they try to sensationalize any story. Every animal with four legs and a tail that bites a person is described as a "Pit Bull".
http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2012/03/18/Many-shelter-dogs-mislabeled-pit-bulls.html
The correct questions you should be asking are:
"How has this dog treated by its owner?"
"Has this dog been spayed/neutered?"
"Is this dog a Family Dog (where the owners interact with the dog on a regular basis in positive and humane ways), or a Resident Dog (where the owners isolate the dog from regular, positive human interactions)?"
and "What did I do to provoke this behavior?"
Of course, your crusade won't be diverted by simple things like facts or the truth, will it? It's easier to be stupid & lazy.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)You sound very much like the gun nuts when discussing their need for more powerful weapons.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Especially when there's a mountain range of evidence proving that the breed doesn't matter.
Of course, there's a whole lot of people who like being stupid & lazy. You seem to be one of them.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)I am questioning the damage when the bite takes place.
Response to baldguy (Reply #77)
newfie11 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Orrex
(63,224 posts)I'm cool with that.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)Is the same type wanting an aggressive dog.
If the statics could tell the owners personality and what training was done with the dog then I would be inclined to believe it.
Statics can be deceiving depending on questions.
Yes this breed and others can be aggressive and some idiots breed for that.
This is not a breed for a novice dog owner.
Neither are Cane Corsos, Malinois, dobys (although breeders have done a great job improving temperament), Chows, etc.
You hear more about " pit bulls" because many times is is a cross but has a short muzzle. Boxers ( breed I grew up with) bull dogs, American Boxer are just a few that could also produce that head in cross breeding.
Sorry I cannot blame a breed but I can blame irresponsible owners and breeders.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)We own a working farm. I grew up with guns and my Dad gave me a 22 for
my 11th birthday. My Dad and my brother ( marine) both gave me a very good education. I used it once to shoot a stray dog that was attacking my daughters small pony( it was not a Pit).
I have also shot prairie dogs.
That 22 is now 55 years old.
I also own a muzzle loader.
My husband has his Granddads shotgun.
So I am not against guns but I am against people wandering around with assault rifles strapped on their back while shopping.
That is the type person I am talking about.
One that wants to draw attention, look at me attitude.
So what is your view regarding guns?
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)And they are not as easily identified as, say, a Doberman.
Pits are fairly ordinary looking, except for the head. Most people who see a dog that might be dangerous, and it's medium sized, with short hair, kinda stocky, esp if it's one color, would probably think it's a pit bull, when it could be a mix or just about anything.
I've seen a few pit bulls in the neighborhood close up, and there's no mistaking the face and head. They have a unique look and eyes. A shortish muzzle. A big head. Proportioned body and straight legs. Shortish skinny tail.
I know this because I have a dog that a few people have asked if she's a pit bull. She's not. She's a mix of Jack Russell/rat Terrier, probably lab...she's smallish (30 lbs), short legs with longish body, feet that turn out, "hare" feet, rough waterproof coat, webbed feet, long muzzle, huge ears that stand up, long tail, and a really long neck (like a JRT). I think they think she's a pit because she's white with hazel eyes and brown nose and short hair. But people don't know what a pit looks like, or they'd know she's not one, not even close. She looks like a somewhat large JRT with a few weird characteristics like webbed feet.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)They admit they are not dividing the number of attacks by breed and when you take population into consideration pit bulls don't come close to being the most dangerous dog on their list.
Now my obligatory posting on this subject:
Further:
http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/uploaded_files/tinymce/2011%20Final%20Investigative%20DBRF%20Report.pdf
Note that your site LIED about the number of pit-bull attacks that year.
randome
(34,845 posts)Thank you!
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
xchrom
(108,903 posts)justanidea
(291 posts)flamingdem
(39,324 posts)I posted the same
justanidea
(291 posts)Thats a scary thought.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)to escape their owners and kill babies and geezers.
Nine
(1,741 posts)You're correct that the very young and very old are overrepresented in pit bull fatality statistics (ages of those killed so far this year: 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 4, 7, 7, 35, 38, 65, 91). However the term "geezer" seems like an especially cold-hearted and hateful term to use to describe these victims. I wish you had as much compassion for these human victims as you do for the reputation of pit bulls and the rights of people to breed them without restriction or regulation.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)I suggest that you move on as pretty much everything I write will provide you with something to be offended by.
I have been around both humans and dogs longer than you've probably been alive, and I'll take my chances with the dogs every time. Dogs are dogs, they have no capacity to be anything else. It is people that can choose, and all-to-frequently they chose to be the problem.
If you want to rid the world of a dangerous breed, start killing rich people. The world will be better far more quickly with the elimination of these parasites than with that of any canine breed.
Nine
(1,741 posts)"Dogs are dogs, they have no capacity to be anything else. It is people that can choose..."
That's sure what it sounds like to me. And I agree with you. Dogs act according to their instincts and their breeding. Those dogs that have been bred for pit fighting now have an instinct for attacking without warning or provocation and for sustaining that attack as long as possible. Does this make pit bulls and similar fighting dogs "evil"? No. But it makes them dangerous and it makes them unsuitable for continued breeding. Good and evil are constructs I will save for humans.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)It is only biding its time.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)MWAAHAAHAA... !
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)- Will Rogers
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Orrex
(63,224 posts)Nice story.
Of course, since we're invariably told that this or that murderous pit bull isn't really a pit bull, and that this or that murderous non-pit bull is an outlier that doesn't represent the behavior of the noble and much-maligned breed, I don't see how another extreme outlier can be taken as an example of the breed's behavior either.
richmwill
(1,326 posts)One of the most gentle, loving dogs I've ever known. Lives with a cat and loves the cat as if it were one of its own puppies. As the old saying goes, "Don't believe the hype".
baldguy
(36,649 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)flvegan
(64,416 posts)*looking at you, pit bull bigots*
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)and demand she be put down immediately before she turns around and kills everyone in the entire world in an uncontrollable, demonic, pit bull rampage.
Donning virtual rubber suit now and expecting hateful replies to start bouncing off in 5...4...3...2...