Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:12 PM May 2013

Oh... THAT'S What They Mean By "Bipartisan"... Who Knew ???

Stephanie Cutter, Former Obama Adviser, To Help Bank Of America Elude Regulation
Jason Linkins - HuffPo
Posted: 05/10/2013 5:53 pm EDT | Updated: 05/10/2013 6:11 pm EDT



From The Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324244304578471312603346762.html

Regulators and lawmakers increasingly are signaling that more work is needed to lessen the risk posed by large, complex banks, including bigger capital cushions and minimum amounts of expensive long-term debt.

The moves by banks include pushing back against bipartisan legislation sponsored by Sens. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, and Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, that would sharply increase capital cushions at large banks to the point where most analysts expect firms would be forced to shrink.

Stephanie Cutter, a former adviser to President Barack Obama, and Ed Gillespie, a former Bush administration official, are providing strategic advice to Bank of America on several issues, including efforts to break up the banks. Morgan Stanley recently hired Michele Davis, a top aide to former Bush administration Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, to help bolster the firm's credibility in Washington.


From Linkins: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/10/stephanie-cutter-bank-of-america_n_3255326.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

So, Stephanie Cutter (who I guess may also soon be repping Bank Of America's point of view on a rebooted "Crossfire" for CNN?) is working to undermine "tight rules" on banks? That seems like an odd thing for someone who supported Obama's reelection to do. Or does it? Is the implication here that Obama would not sign Brown-Vitter? Or that he contends that "bigger capital cushions" are not required?

It could mean that the White House isn't all that sincere about reining in the banks, maybe. It could also mean that the Obama White House will be battling its own adviser in the parking lot with tridents. I've not heard back from Cutter since I emailed her to ask, "HUH WHAT NOW?" But the day is young.






21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh... THAT'S What They Mean By "Bipartisan"... Who Knew ??? (Original Post) WillyT May 2013 OP
The White House obivously isn't sincere about reining in the banks!... L0oniX May 2013 #1
And best is way back behind us. Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #3
Can you really say youre surprised? lol darkangel218 May 2013 #2
I am not surprised at how many are falling for this good cop bad cop... L0oniX May 2013 #4
Yeps.. darkangel218 May 2013 #7
There's a certain *Shrug* what else is new factor involved in news like this. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #5
I Know, Revolving Door Of Corruption... But We Need To Keep Pointing To It And Spreading The Info... WillyT May 2013 #9
But..but..the Father Knows Best wing of the party tells is the corruption is for our good. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #11
Odd bit there Benton D Struckcheon May 2013 #6
Is there ANYONE in the Obama circle who is on our side? <---Rhetorical question. forestpath May 2013 #8
she will be well compensated for helping a perrenial contender for "worst company in America" quinnox May 2013 #10
Stupid hit piece. ProSense May 2013 #12
Puhleeze. This is corruption, pure and simple. JDPriestly May 2013 #14
It's stupid ProSense May 2013 #15
Pro... Like Most Of Life... It's WHO YOU KNOW... More Than Your Qualifications... WillyT May 2013 #16
No, ProSense May 2013 #18
Ok... Thanks For Kicking Anywho... WillyT May 2013 #19
She is not being hired for her expertise. She is being hired for who she knows. JDPriestly May 2013 #21
It almost seems like the game is rigged... RandiFan1290 May 2013 #13
Oh noes. Ya think? trof May 2013 #20
You will know them by their works. bvar22 May 2013 #17
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
1. The White House obivously isn't sincere about reining in the banks!...
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:18 PM
May 2013

and Dodd Frank is weak at best.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
3. And best is way back behind us.
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:22 PM
May 2013

This administration has made it perfectly clear since even before taking office in 2008 that the financial industry can and will do any damned thing they want and our only role is to pick up and pay their debts when they lose their bet.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
2. Can you really say youre surprised? lol
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:20 PM
May 2013

It's been months since I've realized so so much about politics in general.

......

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
7. Yeps..
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:29 PM
May 2013

I have decided I'd rather worry about stray kittens, metal music and beer.

Leave the puppet dance to those in the slumber.

Life is too short.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
9. I Know, Revolving Door Of Corruption... But We Need To Keep Pointing To It And Spreading The Info...
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:31 PM
May 2013

if anything is ever to be done about it.




Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
6. Odd bit there
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:28 PM
May 2013

I don't think anyone ever said Obama was going to support Brown-Vitter. I think I'd faint dead away if that happened.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
10. she will be well compensated for helping a perrenial contender for "worst company in America"
Sat May 11, 2013, 04:31 PM
May 2013

Ugh, stop the corruption already in politics.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. Stupid hit piece.
Sat May 11, 2013, 05:14 PM
May 2013
Stephanie Cutter, a former adviser to President Barack Obama, and Ed Gillespie, a former Bush administration official, are providing strategic advice to Bank of America on several issues, including efforts to break up the banks. Morgan Stanley recently hired Michele Davis, a top aide to former Bush administration Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, to help bolster the firm's credibility in Washington.

The WSJ article lumps everyone together to give the impression that Cutter and Gillespie are working jointly for Bank of America, and offering the advice claimed. Then it becomes "Stephanie Cutter, Former Obama Adviser, To Help Bank Of America Elude Regulation "

Cutter started a marketing consulting firm.

Stephanie Cutter and other Obama alums start consulting firm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/02/stephanie-cutter-and-other-obama-alums-start-consulting-firm/

http://www.precisionstrategies.com/pages/services

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
14. Puhleeze. This is corruption, pure and simple.
Sat May 11, 2013, 05:55 PM
May 2013

And I suppose that Obama will work with this lobbying firm when he leaves office -- not officially, of course. Kickbacks. That is what we may see here. Kickbacks.

Secret deals. And of course at taxpayer expense.

Shame on these people. Stephanie Cutter could be working in a non-profit that helped people. Instead she is working for a for-profit that specializes in ruining people. That's sad.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
15. It's stupid
Sat May 11, 2013, 05:59 PM
May 2013

"Puhleeze. This is corruption, pure and simple."

Where the hell would Cutter get the expertise to advise people on Dodd-Frank regulations? It's a marketing firm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Cutter

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
16. Pro... Like Most Of Life... It's WHO YOU KNOW... More Than Your Qualifications...
Sat May 11, 2013, 07:13 PM
May 2013

And Cutter knows some seriously important people.

THAT is why she started a "consulting firm"...

She can introduce people who want something, to people who can give it to them.

It's WHAT those "people" want (BofA) that's the problem.

She is now cashing in.


ProSense

(116,464 posts)
18. No,
Sat May 11, 2013, 07:16 PM
May 2013

"She can introduce people who want something, to people who can give it to them. "

...not buying it. That wasn't the point of the piece. The OP article is ridiculous. n/t

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
21. She is not being hired for her expertise. She is being hired for who she knows.
Sat May 11, 2013, 11:37 PM
May 2013

She is selling access to influence. That's the corruption part of it.

If she were serious about serving the nation, she would stick with the Obama administration until 2016 and then trust her luck.

My opinion of her has just dropped drastically.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oh... THAT'S What They Me...