General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh... THAT'S What They Mean By "Bipartisan"... Who Knew ???
Stephanie Cutter, Former Obama Adviser, To Help Bank Of America Elude RegulationJason Linkins - HuffPo
Posted: 05/10/2013 5:53 pm EDT | Updated: 05/10/2013 6:11 pm EDT
From The Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324244304578471312603346762.html
The moves by banks include pushing back against bipartisan legislation sponsored by Sens. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, and Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, that would sharply increase capital cushions at large banks to the point where most analysts expect firms would be forced to shrink.
Stephanie Cutter, a former adviser to President Barack Obama, and Ed Gillespie, a former Bush administration official, are providing strategic advice to Bank of America on several issues, including efforts to break up the banks. Morgan Stanley recently hired Michele Davis, a top aide to former Bush administration Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, to help bolster the firm's credibility in Washington.
From Linkins: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/10/stephanie-cutter-bank-of-america_n_3255326.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
It could mean that the White House isn't all that sincere about reining in the banks, maybe. It could also mean that the Obama White House will be battling its own adviser in the parking lot with tridents. I've not heard back from Cutter since I emailed her to ask, "HUH WHAT NOW?" But the day is young.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)and Dodd Frank is weak at best.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)This administration has made it perfectly clear since even before taking office in 2008 that the financial industry can and will do any damned thing they want and our only role is to pick up and pay their debts when they lose their bet.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)It's been months since I've realized so so much about politics in general.
......
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)corporate puppet show.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)I have decided I'd rather worry about stray kittens, metal music and beer.
Leave the puppet dance to those in the slumber.
Life is too short.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)if anything is ever to be done about it.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)I don't think anyone ever said Obama was going to support Brown-Vitter. I think I'd faint dead away if that happened.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)Ugh, stop the corruption already in politics.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)The WSJ article lumps everyone together to give the impression that Cutter and Gillespie are working jointly for Bank of America, and offering the advice claimed. Then it becomes "Stephanie Cutter, Former Obama Adviser, To Help Bank Of America Elude Regulation "
Cutter started a marketing consulting firm.
Stephanie Cutter and other Obama alums start consulting firm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/02/stephanie-cutter-and-other-obama-alums-start-consulting-firm/
http://www.precisionstrategies.com/pages/services
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)And I suppose that Obama will work with this lobbying firm when he leaves office -- not officially, of course. Kickbacks. That is what we may see here. Kickbacks.
Secret deals. And of course at taxpayer expense.
Shame on these people. Stephanie Cutter could be working in a non-profit that helped people. Instead she is working for a for-profit that specializes in ruining people. That's sad.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Puhleeze. This is corruption, pure and simple."
Where the hell would Cutter get the expertise to advise people on Dodd-Frank regulations? It's a marketing firm.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Cutter
WillyT
(72,631 posts)And Cutter knows some seriously important people.
THAT is why she started a "consulting firm"...
She can introduce people who want something, to people who can give it to them.
It's WHAT those "people" want (BofA) that's the problem.
She is now cashing in.
"She can introduce people who want something, to people who can give it to them. "
...not buying it. That wasn't the point of the piece. The OP article is ridiculous. n/t
WillyT
(72,631 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)She is selling access to influence. That's the corruption part of it.
If she were serious about serving the nation, she would stick with the Obama administration until 2016 and then trust her luck.
My opinion of her has just dropped drastically.
RandiFan1290
(6,261 posts)trof
(54,256 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)*