Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
19 replies, 3353 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (51)
ReplyReply to this post
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Republicans Be Able To Marry? (Original Post)
MrScorpio
Feb 2012
OP
My ancient religious text - which I've arbitrarily made up just now - says they can't.
baldguy
Feb 2012
#10
Did you know that "Republican" comes from the ancient sumerian word "Republi"...
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2012
#14
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)1. Yes, but not breed.
opihimoimoi
(52,426 posts)2. They make a case for Breeding Permits....?
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)4. Only if they're gay - it will reduce their population AND reduce abortions.
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)5. No, we already have enough fools. n/t
Hatchling
(2,323 posts)6. If I can't marry, why should they?
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)7. Only if the agree not to have children
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)8. It is the procreation that I'm not so keen on or more accurately
rearing children.
I'm not against but it is worrisome.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)9. That is brilliant! Love it!
Stealing it.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)10. My ancient religious text - which I've arbitrarily made up just now - says they can't.
It would be an offense against God.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)14. Did you know that "Republican" comes from the ancient sumerian word "Republi"...
meaning "flush or rinse", and "can" which means "inerted into the naughty bits"?
Clearly all right thinking people can agree that we should extend special rights to douchebags.
SteveG
(3,109 posts)11. Only if they are sterilized first. (n/t)
nt
dooner
(1,217 posts)12. Only if they lose their right to vote. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)13. I don't see why they should expect special rights. n/t
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)15. only if the public votes on it
If Governor Fat Fuck (R-NJ) wants marriage equality to be on the ballot, then I should be able to vote on his marriage.
TBF
(32,056 posts)16. They definitely should not be allowed to reproduce. nt
jimlup
(7,968 posts)17. I vote NO and prefer to reserve marriage for human beings...
Reptilians are not sentient and can't make such a choice.
Son of Gob
(1,502 posts)18. Yes they should.
But only to blood relatives. Wait a minute, that wouldn't change anything. What's this vote for again?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)19. Unfortunately, this does not only need to be directed at Republicans.
I wish Barack "marriage is between a man and a woman.... God is in the mix" Obama would announce that he now favors marriage equality.