General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA couple of points: "It's a joke, you must have no sense of humor" is a lame
rejoinder. All jokes are not funny. And no, the argument now raging here is not trivial. It's about, as someone said, the continuum of sexism and how pervasive it is. What else is it not about? It's not about men admiring breasts. That song and dance routine had little to do with admiring breasts. It's not really about so-called crude humor either. And imo, it's not so much about objectifying women as it is about demeaning them.
That song and dance routine could have been done without doing the above. Hell, considering that Hollywood has almost as big a thing about showing the buffed torsos of young men as the breasts of young women, It could have been: "We saw your boobs, we saw your pecs". But no, it had to be about women. And a lot of the references were to serious movies where the nudity was not gratuitous.
I have no problem with men looking at breasts sexually. That's a natural enough impulse. I have no problem with crude humor though it's pretty much not my thing.
I do have a problem with the everlasting sexism that's so pervasive- and the defense of of it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)"lame". I'm not sure how the differently abled feel about the word, but libertarians here are latching on to anything they can.
cali
(114,904 posts)I have Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy as a result of smashing my leg to bits a year and a half ago.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)to be a spokesperson for the differently abled. I declined, because I can't even begin to imagine what that's like. Not for me to say.
Hope you heal more and more each day. Great OP.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Is there a good prognosis for it ? I have no clue.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)for example---
The guy in the middle is not laughing
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I have a bully around here who tried for a while to suggest I was too serious when he picked on me. Eventually had to shut him out completely.
Bully Humor is funny to bullies, less so to those being bullied.
Bryant
snooper2
(30,151 posts)a browsing of the googles, it looks like that term is used as a way to deal with bullies--
first website hit-
http://www.kickbully.com/best.html
second
http://www.ehow.com/how_8221452_use-humor-stop-bullying.html
third
http://www.transcendinclude.com/2009/02/humor-line-how-to-stop-bully.html
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)It's my own term I have to admit - should have made that clear in my post.
Bryant
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)I think MacFarlane was attempting to make himself the butt of the joke.
That song reminded me of a "Family Guy" episode with two guys discussing movies. All they could talk about where the nude scenes, which they had timed to the second, as in "and 17 minutes, 14 seconds in, she took her shirt off."
In that scene, the joke was about what TOTAL LOSERS those guys were because that's all they bothered to notice about any movie.
I took the "boob song" skit to be an attempt at the same kind of irony. That's what Seth MacFarlane does -- he portrays complete losers doing the kinds of inappropriate things that losers do and say.
Not everyone gets the joke. Some people who get the joke don't appreciate it or think it is funny.
And that is probably why MacFarlane probably should not have been in front of a large, general audience. His stuff lives mainly on the Cartoon Network's Adult Swim. That's where it belongs.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)as total losers?
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)But I do know he's not a "main stage" act. He's clearly not for everybody and does not try to be. Putting him on the Oscars dilutes both brands.
reorg
(3,317 posts)which is not to say that the sight of naked breasts is unwelcome to most men. Of course we look at them, and of course it is self-mockery to a certain extent to laugh at those losers obsessing about boobs. Oh yes, I still remember some of the scenes that were mentioned.
Another aspect of the joke was, as has been mentioned before, that these movies are all extraordinary. So, no harm done if those who really didn't get the joke are now motivated to watch them, for whatever reason. They may get more than they want to, and there is nothing wrong about that.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)reorg
(3,317 posts)He can be quite subtle. I can only speak for myself, but I never had the impulse to slap anybody's back while watching Family Guy. I was crying with laughter, sure, about some episodes such as the one featuring Bill Clinton. More often I find it just slightly amusing.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)And not 'holy shit that movie was showing a rape and I'm still fixated on 'boobs', I'm shocked, and likely to do some soul searching over this and reconsider the way I look at women's bodies'
reorg
(3,317 posts)it really doesn't matter at all what a movie is actually, mostly, about - whenever it has nude scenes people will discuss them extensively.
When The Reader came out I wasted some time on the respective board. One of the most passionately debated questions (to my great surprise at the time, actually) was if it was really "necessary" for Kate Winslet to show her boobs ... and no, it wasn't those losers fixated on boobs, or at least not ones who would admit it, it was self-described feminists and conservatives who were concerned about this issue. In a movie about the holocaust, go figure.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)reorg
(3,317 posts)are the back-slapping kind? Or what else am I supposed to make of your weird observation?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)This isn't rocket science.
reorg
(3,317 posts)whereas I stayed with the topic.
One of those movies mentioned was The Reader, I thought it was an excellent movie, raising issues that had been rarely talked about before. While I do remember the nude scenes with Kate Winslet and the young male lead, I was never "obsessing" about them. On the contrary, I was aghast that self-described feminists and/or "conservatives" from the US found it worthwhile to discuss whether these scenes were really "necessary" or rather "gratuitous" (a complaint you can find about pretty much all movies with nude scenes).
Actually, some of those self-described feminists and/or conservatives pointed out what Seth MacFarlane's parody hinted at: She ALWAYS SHOWS!!! They found this to be very scandalous indeed, and somehow unworthy of a famous film star. As I said, these threads - just as similar threads on other movies - kept growing and growing for weeks on end. Talk about obsessive, that's where I mostly see it.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I asked if it was good natured... the alternative being critical.
When I spelled out the difference, you interpreted that as making accusations? Interesting.
You now seem intent on discussing this other topic you're interested in so have fun with that. And thanks again for providing an insight into just what type of mocking it is we feminists are supposed to be appreciating.
reorg
(3,317 posts)and if it is not unequivocally used to shame and blame something it must be because it is used to reaffirm certain attitudes. OMG I hope I didn't use the word "subtle" anywhere near you.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)reorg
(3,317 posts)As you may see, a critical impetus can take several directions at once.
reorg
(3,317 posts)and I am not surprised that certain critics don't even try to rebut it.
Like with this very similar, somewhat more comprehensive take:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2431040
cali
(114,904 posts)reorg
(3,317 posts)and I'm pretty sure none of them is able to show that the above mentioned interpretation is false.
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)If they did, they would get it. That humor is not for everyone, so they might not like it. But they would get it.
reorg
(3,317 posts)Maybe they'll admit that he is not that simple-minded as they now make him out to be, but still ... he has no respect for taboos which puts him squarely against much of what they stand for.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)The Rhianna/Chris Brown "joke," a crack at Adele's weight, a crack at Jennifer Aniston about her being a stripper, the sickening comment about that wonderful 9-year-old actress and George Clooney, and so on. The entire message conveyed was that women mean count for nothing more than what men think of their bodies. So, I don't agree that he was spoofing idiots with the boobs song.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Nudity very rarely adds to the story. The same exact story can be told with the breast covered by camera angles. Actually seeing the actress nude is "extra" to the story, in most cases.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I think songs like that and the other issue here today the orgasm gap have something in common. That is the fact that so many men are children when it comes to sex. "I saw your breasts" is something I heard in grade school.
I see these kinds of guys on the beach. It's as if they think that the women come to the beach for the men's entertainment.
It embarrasses me because it gives the rest of us a bad reputation.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Not everybody thinks everything is funny. Personally I'm not a Steve Carrell fan and my friends think I'm insane. Other people hate Seinfeld, Louis CK, Chris Rock, Tina Fey. Name a comedian, and you'll find a host of people who think he or she is not funny.
Fair enough.
But it's ANOTHER THING altogether to say, "That guy isn't funny AND he's a racist" or "That guy's not funny AND he's misogynist" or "Homophobic" or "Anti-Semitic" or Whatever.
You don't dig Seth MacFarlane? Fine. He'll get along just fine without your support. But your trashing the guy because you don't like his style is utter and complete bullshit. You're basically saying that your views are the only views and anybody who transgresses against your personal taste must be a knuckle-dragging troglodyte.
Has it occurred to you that MacFarlane's song and dance number was an attempt to MOCK the puerile way that Hollywood objectifies women? Did it occur to you that MacFarlane might actually AGREE with your sentiments, and is using his own brand of over-the-top, outrageous humor to make the point?
Johonny
(20,851 posts)it is very hard to know where the line is drawn as some comedic acts are of course set to be intentionally mean spirit, and the comedic foil not likable. In general people are more willing to accept it if it is surround by a greater context like say Archie Bunker, but other times the comedic character is unlikable and their is no context. Andy Kaufman created several such characters. I won't pretend to tell comedians where to draw their line as many have reached success with unlikable characters, although I think it is safe to say those that do this will and do draw scorn. If the comedian can not take the heat then they should not perform their act. That said I think you will find most successful comedians are generally aware that not every bit they do will be accepted by every audience member because once again people's sense of humor is a continuum.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)this.
bhikkhu
(10,716 posts)its the all-encompassing excuse. So what if its obnoxious and demeaning and foul and juvenile and hateful - its funny!