Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(70,684 posts)
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 11:20 AM Feb 2013

Foregone "Killing LINCOLN" would suck b/c O'LOOFAH but why did HANKS/Ridley SCOTT participate?!1

Besides the quality movie in circulation, there are tons of excellent LINCOLN products on cable, so WHY OH WHY would great Lib HANKS and various other Lib production entities give O'LOOFAH's insufferable ego such a boost as to partner with him?!1

After the first hour of a test drive, I switched to the Shahs of Sunset, to *much* more edifying effect!1 The actor portraying LINCOLN looked like Dennis MILLER, in tune with O'LOOFAH's self-indulgence in recycling FAILED jerks like MILLER, Bernie GOLDDIGGER, CAROLLA, Toesucker (erstwhile), and countless others, like him who couldn't soar in the real networks.

The format of the crapola was something like, "At this point LINCOLN/BOOTH had X number of days/hours to live." There's a series on Current TV featuring the "last 24" hours of celebrities (Janis JOPLIN, MORRISON, GAYE, BELUSHI) that is much better done.

Just WHO is "buying" O'LOOFAH's paid-for-writers' books to keep them on the NYT best sellers list for over a year?!1

Here're some subjects for O'LOOFAH that would be legitimate facinators: His failed "reporting" career, his marriage, his sexual harassment...


*************QUOTE*************

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/killing-lincoln-tv-review-421188

[font size=5]Killing Lincoln: TV Review[/font]

.... Killing Lincoln is a docudrama narrated by Tom Hanks, executive produced by Ridley Scott and his late brother Tony and written by Erik Jendresen (Band of Brothers), based on Bill O’Reilly’s book. ....

Much of the history is spoken, not seen, and though Campbell does the best he can with his role, the docudrama seems thin and disconnected -- as if the scripted, acted parts are merely in service of Hanks’ narration. This doesn’t allow the characters, events or even the sense of place to be fully realized. ....

Johnson plays Booth in a manner far too broad to be taken seriously. It’s as if he’s trying to do a dramatic reading of how Booth the actor might grandiosely say the words as put into his mouth in this film. That is, if we’re to view Booth as a man who spoke like he was onstage no matter what situation he was in -- plotting Lincoln’s death, picking up his mail, reading his own letters out loud -- then we get all too well he’s a misguided, delusional blowhard. If, however, that wasn’t the intent, someone needed to ratchet Johnson back and have him play the role with a less flowery flourish. It’s like he’s impersonating The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show’s Snidely Whiplash, twisting his mustache while plotting to tie Lincoln to the railroad tracks.

The other structure that crumbles is a narrative device wherein Hanks must repeat such lines as, “Lincoln has 12 days to live.” Or, “Lincoln has four days to live.” Or, “Booth will be dead in 10 days.” This running timeline is littered throughout Killing Lincoln and doesn’t make it more dramatic, only more obvious in its desperation to be dramatic.

Ultimately, Killing Lincoln is 90 minutes of bad timing.

*************UNQUOTE*************

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Foregone "Killing LINCOLN" would suck b/c O'LOOFAH but why did HANKS/Ridley SCOTT participate?!1 (Original Post) UTUSN Feb 2013 OP
All these Lincoln thingies..... AlbertCat Feb 2013 #1
Reaching here: Maybe this project was a Lib conspiracy to give O'LOOFAH plenty of rope UTUSN Feb 2013 #2
From the promo commercials alone... theHandpuppet Feb 2013 #3
That would be Miami Vice/Don JOHNSON's son. n/t UTUSN Feb 2013 #7
Personally I plan on watching a much more accurate Lincoln Movie that just came out: Katashi_itto Feb 2013 #4
Maybe ABRAHAM LINCOLN VS. ZOMBIES (2012) Katashi_itto Feb 2013 #5
I am less averse to O'Reilly than say Hannity Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #6
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
1. All these Lincoln thingies.....
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 01:07 PM
Feb 2013

.... just help remind one that the current Republicans have little, if nothing, to do with the Radical Republicans of Lincoln.

Do the RWers not SEE that?

UTUSN

(70,684 posts)
2. Reaching here: Maybe this project was a Lib conspiracy to give O'LOOFAH plenty of rope
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 01:30 PM
Feb 2013

to hang himself with, to give it enough exposure (Natl Geo; HANKS; SCOTT) to EXPOSE what a pitiful piece of crap it was. Oh-well, "Killing KENNEDY" is next!1

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
3. From the promo commercials alone...
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 01:59 PM
Feb 2013

... all I can say about the guy playing Booth is, was there actually any scenery left for him to chew by the end of this production? Gads, he was awful.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
6. I am less averse to O'Reilly than say Hannity
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 02:07 PM
Feb 2013

I wouldn't read O'Reilly's books but I may see this. As for Hannity, cannot stand the sight of him, I only bring him up to make contrast.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Foregone "Killing LI...