President Obama, did or did you not kill Anwar al-Awlaki?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/president-obama-did-or-did-you-not-kill-anwar-al-awlaki/2013/02/08/0347f4de-70c9-11e2-a050-b83a7b35c4b5_story.html?hpid=z2
David Cole teaches constitutional law at Georgetown University and is the legal affairs correspondent for the Nation. He is the author of The Torture Memos: Rationalizing the Unthinkable.
There are plenty of problems with President Obamas targeted killings in the war against terrorism: The policy remains secret in most aspects, involves no judicial review, has resulted in the deaths of innocent civilians, has been employed far from any battlefield and has sparked deep anti-American resentment in countries where we can ill afford it.
But when it comes to the particular legal issue raised in a recently leaked white paper from the Justice Department namely, whether it is legal to kill Americans with drones one problem looms largest: The policy permits the government to kill its citizens in secret while refusing to acknowledge, even after the fact, that it has done so.
There may be extraordinary occasions when killing a citizen is permissible, but it should never be acceptable for the government to refuse to acknowledge the act. How can we be free if our government has the power to kill us in secret? And how can a sovereign authority be accountable to the people if the sovereign can refuse to own up to its actions?
When Argentinas military junta secretly abducted and killed its citizens during that countrys dirty war in the 1970s, the world labeled these acts disappearances and condemned them as violations of human rights. A disappearance is not just an abduction or killing, but an unacknowledged abduction or killing. To disappear citizens not only deprives them of their liberty or life without fair process but is deeply corrosive of democratic politics, casting a shadow of fear over all.