Cole: In the Arab world today the remarkable thing is that there are any political stories at all.

[pampango]

What are the big stories in the Arab world today? A newly elected parliament is being seated, and a deposed president is leaving the country. But beyond that, the remarkable thing is that there are any political stories at all. There weren’t, a year and a half ago. The political stories of today are not about the advent of paradise, but about the politics of transitions.

The new Arab world created by the people power movements of 2011 is not suddenly Sweden. No one should have expected it to be. The Arab world had been stuck in a stagnating rut, of dictatorship, family cartels, embezzlement, corruption, and stagnation. Where economic growth of 5% a year began being reported, as in Tunisia or Egypt, it was either a lie or was mostly captured by a small economic elite, the Arab 1%.

What began in some of these countries in 2011 was a transition, a transition that activists hoped would be toward regular, free and fair parliamentary elections and ways for students, workers, office workers, women, religious activists, and religious minorities to have an impact on policy. None of these things would have been possible in the least under the old regimes. There was no hope. Now there is hope but no certitude.

The transitions may fail. They involve politics, the working of social conflict among large social groups into political speeches, elections and policies. Sometimes a democratic transition begins and stalls out. Sometimes it is incomplete (one thinks of Russia). Sometimes it remains incomplete for a long time. Sometimes dictatorship returns (Ukraine?).

Those who throw up their hands over the rise of Muslim religious parties in Egypt or the continued instability in Libya are not looking at what has happened as a set of processes. If anything good came out of the uprisings of 2011 it is precisely this flux, this opening toward possibilities, this politics. Because in Hosni Mubarak’s Egypt or Muammar Qaddafi’s Libya there was no politics of an ordinary sort, only secret police and massive embezzlement and arbitrary arrest and torture.

If some of the transitions don’t get off the ground or if they fail, there are concrete economic and political reasons for it. Those need to be investigated and understood. The day when bigots could say that Arabs or Muslims are incapable of a certain kind of politics has passed. But the day when we can understand in detail why their politics evolves as it does is still not here.

http://www.juancole.com/2012/01/sharp-elbowed-politics-in-the-new-arab-world.html

[joshcryer]

1. Thanks for this wonderful article by Juan Cole, pampango. Your bolding and italicizing is also...

...quite good. You get straight to the meat of the matter.

"The day when bigots could say that Arabs or Muslims are incapable of a certain kind of politics has passed."

Almost good enough for a new sig, but I'll keep this one for awhile.

[pampango]

2. I do like your sig. It's more generic than this "bigots" quote, but I think I'll go with

the new one - for diversity's sake.

[joshcryer]

4. Nice sig.

[tabatha]

3. Excellent. Juan Cole really understands and can put it into words.

It is astonishing that anyone would expect to think things would be perfect afterwards.

After more than 200 years, the US is not perfect.

What is important, is for people to have the ability and voice to be able to fix things that are wrong.