I found a biased wiki called Conservapedia

[Dpm12]

http://www.conservapedia.com/James_Earl_Carter

Read this

[CBGLuthier]

1. no thanks.

who gives a shit what they have to say about anything?

[Berserker]

26. Speaking of shit

This should be their logo

Spreading Shit for years!!1!!!11

[IMG][/IMG]

[dipsydoodle]

2. Odd they didn't call it

Diarrheapedia.

[limpyhobbler]

25. LOL

odd indeed. That would have been the obvious first choice.

[A HERETIC I AM]

3. It's been around a long time.

And if you look through it more, particularly the entries on evolution, you will find it terribly funny.


BTW, Welcome to DU

[el_bryanto]

4. boy that really opened my eyes. I thought Jimmy Carter was an ok guy

but now I see how wrong I was. Thanks Dpm12. As a liberal I've just never really tried to learn anything, preferring instead to parrot things other people said, depending on what makes me feel good. After all I care far more about feeling good than intellectual rigor, but you've shown me a better way.

Bryant

[Sekhmets Daughter]

5. Welcome to DU...

They are also rewriting the Bible...seems the original is not conservative enough!

[Dpm12]

6. I like

Jimmy Carter. Conservatives don't know anyhting

[Buzz Clik]

7. With a name like that, I would have expected total objectivity.

[srican69]

8. Does it finally prove that the earth is young and flat .... and and ..

that the sun goes round and round the earth ... and and .. sweet lord turns off the stars during the day and turns them on during the night ....


take that you godless liberals !!!

[Buzz Clik]

9. Tell me why I would want to read that bullshit? And why would you post that bullshit here?

What are you trying to do?

[snooper2]

34. make you mad?

[Buzz Clik]

36. You mean trolling?

Good guess.

Didn't work.

[snooper2]

37. trollin? you started a new internet meme!

[Dpm12]

10. They said this

on the Bible article: "The Bible is a collection of the most logical books and letters ever written." LOL

[ProudToBeBlueInRhody]

11. Please delete

We are not interested.

[Dpm12]

13. I just

want you guys to see how biased and stupid it is

[datasuspect]

14. what makes you think folks here don't already know that?

please delete.

[ProudToBeBlueInRhody]

16. I don't need shit rubbed in my face....

....to know it stinks.

But you already knew that.

[longship]

12. Phyllis Schlafly's son runs that site.

Andrew Schlafly is an idiot and his site pretty much gets everything wrong.

[Dpm12]

15. Here he is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Schaflay

[RevStPatrick]

17. Conservapedia is good for hours of laughs.

Although, I must admit that it pains me that so many members of my species are so fucking stupid!

The irony here is that Carter may have been our only true, honest to go Christian president.
In the 20th century, anyway...

[alcibiades_mystery]

18. Do you post anything other than links to right wing stuff?

Just wondering.

Here's yesterday's offering, in case anyone was curious:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2277682

[sakabatou]

19. You just heard of it?

That place is full of shit.

[Ganja Ninja]

20. I'm surprised it's still around. n/t

[JaneyVee]

21. Yeah because the fact-based world of Wikipedia is too much for them to handle.

Its no wonder they live in an alternate universe.

[Gothmog]

22. My youngeset child used to troll on that site

I think that she was banned 8 or 9 times before she moved onto another hobby

[backscatter712]

23. Conservapedia's been around for a while.

I've found them to be a great source of unintentional comedy!

[Dpm12]

24. That is why

I like to go there. Just to read what the idiots have got to say

[Bucky]

27. Conservapedia? Biased? The hell you say!

Is truth biased? Is righteousness in the face of moral decay biased? Are a few brave souls standing resolute against a sea of creeping compassio-fascism a form of bias, while all about them the Constitution is perverted to allow mere majorities of voters to thwart the will of Rush God this so-called bias you speak of? Nay! A thousand times nay! Though mountains fall, though buildings crumble, though seas surge to drown the nation in a froth of salt and BP-sludge, Conservapedia will stand on the parapets of freedom and scream "self-made reality!" at the very heavens!

What is truth anyway, indeed, what is freedom itself if it is not the freedom to love Ronald Reagan?

[Bjorn Against]

28. Read their entry on dinosaurs

Dinosaurs are animals, often believed to be extinct, that range in size from a few ounces to some of the largest land animals ever to exist. The word dinosaur was coined in 1841 by Richard Owen, from the Greek words for "terrible lizard", and reflected the creatures' large size and fearsome appearance to the early paleontologists.

Creation science asserts that the biblical account, that dinosaurs were created on day 6 of creation approximately 6,000 years ago, along with other land animals, and therefore co-existed with humans, thus debunking the Theory of Evolution and the beliefs of evolutionary scientists about the age and creation of the earth.

Creation science posits that dinosaurs lived in harmony with other animals, (probably including in the Garden of Eden) eating only plants; that pairs of each dinosaur kind were taken onto Noah's Ark during the Great Flood and were preserved from drowning; that many of the fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood; and that possibly some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark are still around today. At least 300 distinct genera of dinosaur have been identified.

Archaeological, fossil, and documentary evidence supports the logical conclusion that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Dinosaurs

[wryter2000]

31. OMG

Such ignorance ought to collapse under its own weight.

[Fantastic Anarchist]

29. Some of the references cite Conservapedia as the source or to pages that don't exist.

[Fantastic Anarchist]

30. They cite themselves as "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" ...

Yet, they have a page on "liberal claptrap."

I searched for "conservative claptrap" on Wikipedia, and found no such page.

[Dpm12]

32. Read their

article on political gaffes. No Bushisms there. Hmm, susoicioius anyone? Biased maybe:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Political_gaffes

[Iggo]

33. You can go ahead and lose it again.

It's useless.

[Zorra]

35. Yes, that's the internet's primary fact free encyclopedia. nt

[NoGOPZone]

38. I found a wiki called uncyclopedia

which has more useful information the Conservapedia and is a lot funnier

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page