Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 04:56 PM Jan 2013

On armed teachers and guns in schools...

So there is much debate about what can be done now (immediately). Some have advocated putting cops in schools ($$$) and others have stated to arm teachers (crazy). Are there any other proposals aimed at the immediate curbing of gun violence in our schools?

Cops in schools would be crazy expensive. There are alot of schools and no clear way to fund such a measure. And I don't think many teachers want to be armed, nor do I think people want some random teacher with a carry permit toting a gun in a school full of children. So I had a thought...

What if school districts allowed teachers or other school staff who wanted to volunteer to enroll in Sheriff Deputy Reserve or Police Deputy Reserve to carry a firearm? No mandates, 100% voluntary. A deputy reserve is not full time Law enforcement officer but rather they have normal full time citizen jobs and are called to duty as needed. Typically their private job is useful to the department and serves the department in a time of needing someone with those special skills (doctor, nurses, technicians, outdoorsmen, mariners, divers, etc). Think of a deputy reserve officer like you would consider a pinch-hitter or pinch-runner in baseball.

Having some school staff who volunteer as deputy reservists would differ from your garden variety gun-toter in several ways:

A) A Deputy Reserve is a sworn-in law enforcement officer.
B) They have real police training, qualification and examination.
C) They can be certified to carry a firearm anywhere a regular law enforcement officer can.
D) They can actually arrest people anytime and carry weight of law.

Any other thoughts on possible steps aimed at immediately reducing deaths from gun violence in our schools?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
2. I'd prefer an intense new focus on gun control and new laws
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:03 PM
Jan 2013

and regulations rather than talk about bringing instruments of death into schools with children. I would be nervous if I was a parent and I heard a school had people with guns walking around. Guns can be lost, or taken from people and used against them or others in the vicinity.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
4. I understand - but traditional gun ontrol is not immediate. Looking for immediate solutions here.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:09 PM
Jan 2013

Given the media frenzy surrounding school shootings, any crazed gunmen KNOW the best way to be seen and heard by mass media is to shoot up a school. There are 300,000,000+ guns out there. Gun control, no matter how aggressive can un-proliferate 200 years of firearm proliferation ANYTIME soon.

I agree Gun control if fine to pursue, but it won't help our problems today.
Gun control is a separate issue altogether from what I'm trying to discuss in this thread.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
3. Who would do this?
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:06 PM
Jan 2013

I worked in Collier County, Florida, which had Armed Deputies in the schools. Judging from what these Deputies looked like, I doubt very many teachers, or school staff, would ever pass the physical. The woman in one school I worked in with ED 5th grade boys had to be about 6 feet and around 175 lbs. We called her many times in "situations". Training in using a gun? lol She was very well trained in "talking down" potential violent situations. I never saw her pull her gun.

School staff would have to go through THIS training also to be a Deputy besides passing the physical requirements.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
6. But school staff would not HAVE to go through any such training.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:17 PM
Jan 2013

This would be 100% voluntary. I think forcing the armament of schools is a TERRIBLE idea. The school staffer would not have to personally WANT to do do it but also be able to pass the rigors of law enforcement training in their own spare time. Some schools may end up with a few participants in such a program and other schools might not have any. But it gives QUALIFIED teachers with the desire to be PROPERLY trained a chance to do so.

IMO, if one has no problem with a police officer keeping their sidearm when on school grounds, then this proposal is no different. The persons the OP proposes may be allowed to carry ARE sworn-in and trained police officers. Just an idea I had.

mokawanis

(4,455 posts)
5. It's better than just arming teachers who don't have much training with firearms
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:17 PM
Jan 2013

I still have a hard time accepting the idea of anyone walking around a school with a gun, but the additional and more extensive training required to become a Deputy Reserve would probably decrease the odds of things going horribly wrong in a crisis.

It's an idea worth discussing, so I'm interested in seeing how other DU'ers respond.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
7. Perhaps they don't need to walk around with it or keep it on their persons.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:23 PM
Jan 2013

Perhaps a small Biometric safe/lockbox or similarly VERY secure method that sits in a locked drawer. Maybe such a lockbox/safe could be placed in an administrator's office where students don't typically visit/reside. I think there are reasonable solutions for securing a firearm from even determined students.

I don't know, I'm just sort of spitballing this idea here. So far, I don't see a downside.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. This is like worrying about lightning and ignoring traffic accidents
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jan 2013

We can speculate about mass shooting scenarios and what would and wouldn't stop them until we're blue in the face, and we're still missing the significantly worse problem of one student shooting another student over a personal or group conflict. Teachers and police should be involved in that, but whether they are armed is neither here nor there; it's about outreach and intervention.

Any gun in a school is a net safety risk, but not really enough of one to freak out about, but either way it distracts us from the fact that people randomly shooting up classrooms isn't the actual problem with 99.99% of school violence.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
11. Agreed. This isn't a solutoin to STOP he random shooting up of classrooms.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 06:48 PM
Jan 2013

But I do think reactionary methods can save lives by mitigating victims with more rapid response when outreach and intervention fail to prevent some incidents.

Gun violence is a complex problem and needs a multifaceted approach if we hope to tackle it.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On armed teachers and gun...