Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:10 PM Jan 2013

Marco Rubio said that what the President did would not stop Sandy Hook. How does he know?

If certain types of firearms are less available and some folks cannot obtain guns then that creates a 'less' chance of murders happening. Rubio is mathematically challenged. If there is a massacre of 50 people and a regulation prevents one death or injury it is worth it. The status quo is what is killing people. Doing nothing is not the answer. What the President has done is a start. There will be more murders today in the USA. The next mass killing will be a definite nail in the coffin of the loons running the NRA and Gun Owners of America. Maybe they should join Glenn Beck in his Libertarian Utopia land.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Marco Rubio said that what the President did would not stop Sandy Hook. How does he know? (Original Post) Lint Head Jan 2013 OP
How many kids could he have mowed down if he had a revolver? gateley Jan 2013 #1
You mean, a standard revolver. pnwmom Jan 2013 #9
Just something that wasn't designed for war. gateley Jan 2013 #14
Ignore Rubio Dpm12 Jan 2013 #2
It might of not happened if his mother was a responsible gun owner. She paid the ultimate southernyankeebelle Jan 2013 #3
Let me see - malaise Jan 2013 #4
Clearly not, since Connecticut does already, and the rifle was legal Recursion Jan 2013 #8
A state ban doesn't stop you from driving into another state and buying a banned gun there. pnwmom Jan 2013 #10
His rifle was legal under the former Federal ban, as well as the current state ban Recursion Jan 2013 #12
+1 gateley Jan 2013 #15
It would have still left handguns hack89 Jan 2013 #13
That photo is hauntingly iconic and will go down in the history books. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #5
I don't know of anyone Smilo Jan 2013 #6
Exactly. Lint Head Jan 2013 #7
All I have to say... Dpm12 Jan 2013 #11
Exactly. At least he wants his potential voters to think that. gateley Jan 2013 #16

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
9. You mean, a standard revolver.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:27 PM
Jan 2013

Apparently, even revolvers can have high capacity clips. (Go ahead, gun fans, correct me if I used the wrong terminology.)

Dpm12

(512 posts)
2. Ignore Rubio
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:13 PM
Jan 2013

Ignore everything that comes out of Marco Rubio's mouth. He never knows what the hell he is talking about?

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
3. It might of not happened if his mother was a responsible gun owner. She paid the ultimate
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:13 PM
Jan 2013

price for her neglience.

malaise

(268,976 posts)
4. Let me see -
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:13 PM
Jan 2013

banning assault rifles and magazines would not have stopped that slaughter?

He's dumber than a rock

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. Clearly not, since Connecticut does already, and the rifle was legal
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:22 PM
Jan 2013

Banning semi-automatics might.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
10. A state ban doesn't stop you from driving into another state and buying a banned gun there.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:28 PM
Jan 2013

A Federal ban is what is needed.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. His rifle was legal under the former Federal ban, as well as the current state ban
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:35 PM
Jan 2013

And his mother legally purchased it in Connecticut.

If Feinstein's proposed ban passed, it would have to be modified to have a differently-shaped grip. What does that help exactly?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
13. It would have still left handguns
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:40 PM
Jan 2013

have you forgotten Va Tech?

An AWB is security theater - the weapon of choice for mass killer has always been handguns.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
5. That photo is hauntingly iconic and will go down in the history books.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:15 PM
Jan 2013

As for Rubio, what he doesn't understand is that WE KNOW we will never eradicate all gun violence, we want to LESSEN gun violence. Even if it saved one more child in that classroom. And these morons call themselves "pro-life".

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
6. I don't know of anyone
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:18 PM
Jan 2013

who wants to ban all guns - what we are asking for is a commonsensical review and action - but that is so severely lacking within the ranks of the right and the NRA.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marco Rubio said that wha...