HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » The idea that you should ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:54 AM

The idea that you should run the government like a business...

is ridiculous in the reality based world.

First of all, a business is in marketplace, competing. Government operates outside the marketplace.

A business has a primary mission to turn a profit. There is no profit incentive in government. If you don't have enough to supply the basic needs of your citizens, you raise funds. If you have a surplus you cut taxes. A business does not have that luxury.

A business makes a commitment to its customers. A government has to provide for citizens without any other connection except that they are alive and live in that governments jurisdiction.

A government is there to provide access to the basic functions of society. A business is not.

A business can not operate with a deficit for very long. A national government can borrow money to keep providing essential needs by borrowing.

By the way, pushing more and more government provided by the federal to the states is just another way to get rid of the functions of government because states cannot run a deficit like the federal government.

So mull that over, offer some more examples and think about this the next time a conservative says privatize.

21 replies, 1832 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Reply The idea that you should run the government like a business... (Original post)
WCGreen Dec 2012 OP
annabanana Dec 2012 #1
KurtNYC Dec 2012 #2
RKP5637 Dec 2012 #4
KurtNYC Dec 2012 #8
RKP5637 Dec 2012 #9
kentuck Dec 2012 #3
riqster Dec 2012 #5
WCGreen Dec 2012 #6
lunatica Dec 2012 #7
WCGreen Dec 2012 #11
Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #10
Yavin4 Dec 2012 #12
Vox Moi Dec 2012 #13
ck4829 Dec 2012 #14
Lucky Luciano Dec 2012 #15
WCGreen Dec 2012 #20
Gman Dec 2012 #16
WCGreen Dec 2012 #19
Gman Dec 2012 #21
jmowreader Dec 2012 #17
quaker bill Dec 2012 #18

Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:58 AM

1. Yeah.. except a "business's commitment to its customers" is secondary

to its commitment to its shareholders.

Which makes it even LESS appropriate for governance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:03 PM

2. "Run like a business" is NOT 'government should BE a business'

I think that government programs should be required to have performance measures. Government's best goal is quality of life for all citizens and we should link expenditures to results so that programs and practices can be voted on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KurtNYC (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:06 PM

4. Definitely, if the gating measure is "quality of life for all citizens." Pathetically, $$$$$ is

generally the gating measure and "quality of life for all citizens" comes in as a secondary concern.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RKP5637 (Reply #4)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:30 PM

8. I think it is worse than that. If the government is a business then it is one

that lets its vendors write their own purchase orders. It is a business that does the bidding of other businesses with no regard for its own financial condition. It is like a giant Citibank that needs a bailout every 15th of April.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KurtNYC (Reply #8)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:35 PM

9. Sadly, quite true! We're stuck in a rut and I often wonder what will

be the catalyst for dynamic change. TPTB, the 1%, the $$$$$ controllers will not make any change, because well, it's the right thing to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:04 PM

3. Too bad more Democrats do not point this out....

kick and rec

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:09 PM

5. A government can define profit as a stable, just society

If that were how they defined it, no prob. But they cling to the monetary definition, which is why the "run it like a business" idea doesn't' work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riqster (Reply #5)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:12 PM

6. I like that..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:24 PM

7. The primary role of government is to spend money

And to spend it on the welfare and well being of the American citizens. It's therefore run by elected officials, who are put in their offices to run the government and to see to it that the citizens are the beneficiaries of said government.

I don't see how anyone can confuse the roles of business and government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lunatica (Reply #7)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:40 PM

11. Conservatives are always yammering about running the government

like a business.

It's time to make them own it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:38 PM

10. Business is unethical. Period.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:41 PM

12. A Business Can Declare Bankruptcy, Close Up Shop, and Walk Away Forever

A government cannot do this. A government has to serve the people no matter what.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:23 PM

13. The Government-as-business meme infuriated me ...

... because not only was total nonsense, nobody ever challenged it.
Why didn't Obama and supporters challenge Romney to do something more than just repeat this mantra?
Exactly how would government-as-business work?
Make a profit?
Have a board of directors and investors?
What?
It was a bogus panacea, propagated by people who think that 'business' is the only social institution a society needs.
It was The Big, Stinking Lie.
... and nobody ever called them on it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:33 PM

14. If the govt was a business ran according to the people who say it should be ran like a business...

It wouldn't last a year, probably not even a month.

* Let's not raise any money
* Let's not spend any money on things that people want, things like infrastructure, but on antique military products
* Let's not compete with private businesses that provide similar to services as us
* Let's not provide our people with benefits

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:48 PM

15. My boss here often comments that the business skill

that would be most valuable would be negotiating - not the profit motive. There are clearly a lot of hard line negotiating tactics that must be used in government and his claim is that a C-level executive is the type that can tactfully maneuver through those negotiations. I agree to a point, but it is hard to trust that the negotiating skills being employed would be for the maximal benefit of the country over selfish aspirations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lucky Luciano (Reply #15)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 04:53 PM

20. the problem with state and especially local governments....

is the lenders are often forced to make adjustments through out the fiscal year if funds are not going to match the expenses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:52 PM

16. I just like to say that there is no Owner's Equity in government's balance sheet

they start sputtering after that. Usual responses are along the lines of "well, we're the owners" or something just as inane or worse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gman (Reply #16)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 04:50 PM

19. That's a really good point..

State and local governments are not allowed, by law, to run into a deficit at the end of the fiscal year. They have to cut stuff as the future shortfall is known.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Reply #19)

Thu Dec 27, 2012, 07:20 PM

21. Exactly

But the basics of accounting are lost on these idiots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 02:54 PM

17. Business is not required to go broke on September 30

Every government agency is required to go broke on the last day of the fiscal year.

There is a government agency called the National Reconnaissance Office. They run our spy satellites. Satellites are very expensive and so is all the equipment that supports them. In the 1980s they got a director who decided to run NRO like a business. He got Congress to fund him at levels proper for his agency, and then he hired the best negotiators he could to deal with suppliers and the like. Over five years this asshole saved up enough to build a new $220 million headquarters without an additional nickel of tax funds.

When Congress found out they shit bricks and went into "we must make sure this never happens again!" mode. I thought they should have figured out a system of controls to prevent fraud then allowed every government agency to do the same thing. Requiring them to spend it all does not motivate a sense of thrift in our bureaucrats.

My thinking is, we allow agencies to retain the funds they don't use in a safe investment vehicle they can get out of quick. They report their interest earnings to a Congressional office. They can use the money as rainy-day funding or to buy capital equipment. And in the event their interest earnings reach one percent of what Congress gives them, Congress can have the option to reduce their funding by half their interest income.

I can see some government agencies being run exactly like businesses. Take the Army and Air Force Exchange Service - the PX system. Right now, it's only open to the military. There is no reason why AAFES could not change to a two-tier price structure - 10% off for military ID card holders - and open their stores to the public. The additional profits would go to the government to reduce the deficit. The added volume would allow AAFES to negotiate better prices from suppliers. And the "troop profit" (those guys sell to soldiers at a profit now; the profit earned up to the price soldiers pay will be called troop profit) will go toward supporting soldiers. Only allow them to build next to military bases, so we don't have another Walmart on our hands, and only let PXs on the edges of installations, or new ones built outside the gate, do it for security reasons.

We also have two manufacturers in our government: Skilcraft (National Institutes for the Blind) and Unicor (Federal Prison Industries). Why can't these two sell to the public? Most of their competitors manufacture in China, and people want to buy American.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WCGreen (Original post)

Wed Dec 26, 2012, 02:58 PM

18. Don't we have enough theft already?

Never in government's wildest excesses has it ever done anything as destructive as ENRON, World Com or the housing bubble. Why would we want it to work like a business?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread