Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jumping John

(930 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:07 AM Dec 2012

Two Women violated by Texas Troopers on the side of the road

Two Texas women pulled over for littering - Throwing a cigarette out the car. So the pig State Trooper says he smells pot in the car and calls a female trooper to search the women.

So the female trooper checks the women's bra and then does a body cavity search on the side of the road. So the female cop puts on gloves and sticks her finger up the anus of the first woman and then makes her turn around and then sticks her finger up her vagina.

Then w/o changing gloves she does the same routine to the second woman.

That seems very un-hygienic to me and not professional at all. I reckon she is probably a republican!

So the women are filing suit. The Texas Rangers investigated and sent a report to the Dallas DA. I wonder how many other women had to go through this road side personal affront by these two?



The women are being interviewed at this site:

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2012/12/18/irving-women-claim-assault-humiliation-after-roadside-cavity-search-by-troopers/
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two Women violated by Texas Troopers on the side of the road (Original Post) Jumping John Dec 2012 OP
She definitely does not stick her finger in the first woman's anus cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #1
According to the women she did. Jumping John Dec 2012 #2
I hate cops plenty, but if she's claiming cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #3
What??? You assume that this isn't a cavity search because?????? Looks like one to me! flying_wahini Dec 2012 #15
What happened to the womens rights? shintao Dec 2012 #4
Cross-posted to the Texas Group. TexasTowelie Dec 2012 #5
I'm sorry, but just because it is a woman cop doesn't make THAT okay! Bonobo Dec 2012 #6
Never ever consent to searches, period MrScorpio Dec 2012 #7
Jeepers! FarPoint Dec 2012 #8
Disgusting RedCappedBandit Dec 2012 #9
Texas RandiFan1290 Dec 2012 #10
Update. TexasTowelie Dec 2012 #11
Texass justice. 99Forever Dec 2012 #13
They are suing and the female trooper has been suspended. n/t RebelOne Dec 2012 #12
This is just disgusting! Imaginable! I wouldn't let them even if I was arrested! Auntie Bush Dec 2012 #14
Yes, And they should start my firing the man that stopped them and called for the search. flying_wahini Dec 2012 #16
Updete: Female trooper terminated. TexasTowelie Jan 2013 #17

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
1. She definitely does not stick her finger in the first woman's anus
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:15 AM
Dec 2012

and appears to also not stick her finger in the woman's vagina. Same for the second, though that search is more aggressive.

I appears that she is looking for an object in the undergarments of both women. (It sounds like "vial of meth" is discussed in the video.)

I hate searches, but I also hate these casual lies about every damn thing.

Is is possible to describe anything honestly anymore?

The OP could have been about a "humiliating search" but for some reason just has to go into this hyperbolic BS.

 

Jumping John

(930 posts)
2. According to the women she did.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:19 AM
Dec 2012

You must really hate politicians.

I hate cops who think it is their job to punish and get away with it.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
3. I hate cops plenty, but if she's claiming
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:29 AM
Dec 2012

a cavity search on the video she's lying.

If she is alleging something *not on the video* then that's another matter.

As to whether the search is proper... it might be tremendously improper. I'm fine with an allegation it is improper. I'm kind of a 4th and 5th Amendment die-hard. They would want me on the jury.

But neither search was a cavity search, despite being intrusive and involving a cop putting her hand in ones ass crack and on ones external genitalia. It is a remarkably personal search. Agreed.

flying_wahini

(6,594 posts)
15. What??? You assume that this isn't a cavity search because?????? Looks like one to me!
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 11:14 AM
Dec 2012

Just because she's not bent over doesn't mean she didn't "dig in"
If someone has their gloved fingers fishing around and find a tampon inserted would they
arrest her?

So define Cavity, would you?
 

shintao

(487 posts)
4. What happened to the womens rights?
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:35 AM
Dec 2012

There is was not probable cause for any of this. The car was not was not searched, nor was any drugs found to suggest a body cavity search is in order.

Hmm, I was just thinking the Supreme Court OKed roadside body cavity searches. Here we just seen one, and you could be next.

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/04/03/us-supreme-court-affirms-warrantless-ass-searches

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
6. I'm sorry, but just because it is a woman cop doesn't make THAT okay!
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:18 AM
Dec 2012

If that is not considered abuse, assault or whatever, it SHOULD be.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
7. Never ever consent to searches, period
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 07:20 AM
Dec 2012

Even if the cop is going to search you anyway, always tell them that you do not consent to searches.

Repeat after me: "Officer, I do not consent to searches."

Don't physically resist any search, only decline your consent verbally. Don't give the cop a reason to clobber or shoot you.

Repeat after me again: "Officer, I do not consent to searches."

This is your best protection from asshole cops.

FarPoint

(12,368 posts)
8. Jeepers!
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 07:24 AM
Dec 2012

Ya learn something new every day!

I always thought they checked pockets by pulling out them inside out and had the suspects squat to loosen any cavity items from placement. I also thought the pat-down was external, over the clothing as seen in the bra check on the video..

RedCappedBandit

(5,514 posts)
9. Disgusting
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 07:25 AM
Dec 2012

All because some people think it's okay to dictate what other people put into their bodies. God forbid someone has some drugs on their person!

TexasTowelie

(112,188 posts)
11. Update.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:29 PM
Dec 2012

A female Texas trooper has been suspended amid an investigation of her videotaped body cavity search of two women along a busy highway.

Department of Public Safety spokesman Tom Vinger said late Wednesday that Trooper Kelley Halleson has been suspended with pay. Results of a Texas Rangers inquiry are expected to go to a Dallas County grand jury in January.

An Irving woman and her adult niece this week sued Halleson and a male trooper, plus DPS director Steve McCraw, over the July traffic stop. Angel and Ashley Dobbs say the search videotaped by a patrol car camera was unlawful and humiliating.

The women say a male trooper says he saw them throw cigarette butts out a window, questioned them about drugs and summoned Halleson. No drugs were found.

http://www.statesman.com/news/ap/texas/female-texas-trooper-suspended-amid-body-search/nTbmF/#cmComments

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
14. This is just disgusting! Imaginable! I wouldn't let them even if I was arrested!
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:43 PM
Dec 2012

The Female trooper should not get paid while suspended...that's just like being on paid vacation.
All three of those cops should have been fired on the spot! The nerve of them! Just the kind of stupid Rethugs that have guns...beware!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two Women violated by Tex...