Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
2. No, it means that GOPrs in SC think the most evil, arrogant & corrupt candidate represents them best
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 12:04 AM
Jan 2012

It's the responsibility of the news media to supply voters with all the information they need to make a proper choice. Some low-information voters can't handle it, but that's not the fault of the few reporters who try to do their job.

dsc

(52,161 posts)
3. just how is it propoganda
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 12:08 AM
Jan 2012

Newt, and only Newt, decided to be a total bastard to both his ex wives. Newt, and only Newt, decided to make a central issue of his campaign denying a class of people the right to marry on the grounds that the class of people were so immoral that their getting married would literally destroy civilization. His second ex wife finally decides to go on camera what should ABC have done?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. I don't think it is propaganda at all.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 01:16 AM
Jan 2012

I think it's clever manipulation by opposition agents.

I don't think Marianne is done yet. We'll see.

ABC did what anyone would have done, had they gotten the chance.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. Maybe. But what I thought when it broke was...it won't have much effect.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 12:09 AM
Jan 2012

People don't pay much attention to ex-wives or ex-girlfriends, esp. when they're older. I think people suspect they're bitter, angry, etc. Also, a lot of people had already heard the story about Newt serving his wife divorce papers while she was in the hospital (not sure which wife that was), and other stories showing what an ammoral and immoral man he is. So this "new" story didn't break new ground.

Everyone in the know already knows he's immoral.

Now, if that story had been about Romney or Santorum, THAT would've been news.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
6. No, that bomb was set to explode DOWNSTREAM.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 01:11 AM
Jan 2012

No one believes a "last minute" accusation like that, hours before voting. The smart manipulator plants that sort of story right before one primary, knowing it may not move opinion more than a point or three, but hoping that there's a ripple effect in the next primary.

People who hear that sort of stuff, after they've already personally "invested" in their candidate, in terms of time, money, or simply trash talk, will still vote for their guy--just with less enthusiasm. The payoff is the primary that follows--eventually, if the accusations are juicy enough and can be fleshed out, people will start to turn away in disgust and the momentum will be halted.

la la

(1,855 posts)
7. ...didn't drudge's 'outing' about the ABC program
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 01:14 AM
Jan 2012

cause ABC to have to run the program early? if so---it's dudge effing up the works again...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ABC interview with Newts ...