Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNice image to share concerning the effect of taxes. Those who do not remember history are bound...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 2690 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (59)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nice image to share concerning the effect of taxes. Those who do not remember history are bound... (Original Post)
Whovian
Dec 2012
OP
But surely a third column showing % employment would show decreasing unemployment in line with ...
pkdu
Dec 2012
#1
pkdu
(3,977 posts)1. But surely a third column showing % employment would show decreasing unemployment in line with ...
decreasing "Taxes on the top tax bracket"...
Ok SARC/ OFF
Atman
(31,464 posts)2. Posted it on FB...immediate "Jimmy Carter sucked!" response.
My GOP friend says he served in the military during Carter's term. Carter disrespected the troops. Carter sucks. Didn't we have a recession under Carter?
It was fun posting Reagan's record.
ashling
(25,771 posts)3. And those that do remember?
Whovian
(2,866 posts)4. Damn, I loved that! LOL! nt
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)7. Wow that is a great toon! Nt
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)10. Great Cartoon...
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)5. No coincidence, those figures. (nt)
lexw
(804 posts)6. Maybe the GOP wants another depression to destroy the internet—www is the GOP's harbinger of death.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)8. We need to start paying for things. It's math 101.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)9. ...to repeat it.
K&R
Yet we do. Over. And over. And over. I don't know about anybody else, but it makes me sick to recall that old adage : "The more things change, the more they stay the same." I always wondered why. Why do we always end up in the same place? Over and over and over again. Why?????
That chart clearly and conclusively shows exactly why we always end back up in the same place. Thank you Whovian for posting it. This is why wingers don't like history. They don't like history because they don't want anyone to figure out what the Hell they're up to. Everyone needs to make a hard copy of this little chart, frame it, and hang it up on the wall. Believe me, if you don't, you will. You will forget.
So, looking at this chart, what does everyone think the top tax rate should be returned to in 2013 (of course, after top tax rates have gone back up to 35% on New Years Day 2013,) to make this country solvent again? I say 70%, the rate it was in 1975. NOT 35-38%, where it was in approx 2001 when GW came in. Scroll down to see how I arrived at 70%, as it was in 1975:
2012-1945= 67yrs (present day back to end of last depression)
67/2= 37yrs
2012-37= 1975
What think? That was 5 years before Reagan came in. Reagan, who ramped up the cold war leading us to believe that the Soviet's were getting ready to attack us. Reagan, who lead us to believe our war machine was sorely in ill repair and blew $4 trillion to update it. Reagan, who actually had lied to us about our war machine. It wasn't broken at all. Rather, our Intelligence actually said that the Soviet Army was all but broken and defunct. Reagan went over and told Gorbachev to "Tear. Down. This. Wall."..around 1985. Every one screamed and shouted in patriotic fervor. Wingers deduced that "Ronald Reagan won the Cold War."
GHWB comes in 1988, by telling his Repub friends (who all knew the tremendous debt that Reagan had run up and would need to be dealt with by raising taxes but yet didn't want to pay it) "Read-my-lips. No-new-taxes." Then GHWB tried as naught to reduce the debt by closing military bases. (In the middle of it all, in 1989, the Iron Curtain fell. 1.e. the Wall that Reagan told Gorbachev to tear down back in 1985.) When closing bases didn't work, he passed the "Omnibus Bill", which indeed increased tax rates, and he was all but booed out of office because of it.
In comes Clinton in 1992, faced with that huge debt. He promised that he would balance the budget, if given enough time to do it. Low, and behold, at the end of hi 8 yrs, the budget WAS balanced. GWB comes in (via the SC) in 2000 with a surplus. The rest is history. The only thing is...instead of raising taxes to pay for his wars and keep the bills paid, GWB lowered taxes. Oops. Arithmetic. And on top of the huge debt he built up, the market crashed in Sep of 2008, and Treas Sec Paulson convinced GWB and Congress that Wall Street had to be bailed out. And soon after, PO was elected.
I rest. I know most of us know all of this, but I also know that we have a lot of young people who may not know all of this. It's a rough outline, and maybe I got some things wrong, but I think it was mostly right.. someone will pipe in in a minute and point out my mistakes, and that's OK... That's why I luv DU, THE FACTS PLACE.
Yet we do. Over. And over. And over. I don't know about anybody else, but it makes me sick to recall that old adage : "The more things change, the more they stay the same." I always wondered why. Why do we always end up in the same place? Over and over and over again. Why?????
That chart clearly and conclusively shows exactly why we always end back up in the same place. Thank you Whovian for posting it. This is why wingers don't like history. They don't like history because they don't want anyone to figure out what the Hell they're up to. Everyone needs to make a hard copy of this little chart, frame it, and hang it up on the wall. Believe me, if you don't, you will. You will forget.
So, looking at this chart, what does everyone think the top tax rate should be returned to in 2013 (of course, after top tax rates have gone back up to 35% on New Years Day 2013,) to make this country solvent again? I say 70%, the rate it was in 1975. NOT 35-38%, where it was in approx 2001 when GW came in. Scroll down to see how I arrived at 70%, as it was in 1975:
2012-1945= 67yrs (present day back to end of last depression)
67/2= 37yrs
2012-37= 1975
What think? That was 5 years before Reagan came in. Reagan, who ramped up the cold war leading us to believe that the Soviet's were getting ready to attack us. Reagan, who lead us to believe our war machine was sorely in ill repair and blew $4 trillion to update it. Reagan, who actually had lied to us about our war machine. It wasn't broken at all. Rather, our Intelligence actually said that the Soviet Army was all but broken and defunct. Reagan went over and told Gorbachev to "Tear. Down. This. Wall."..around 1985. Every one screamed and shouted in patriotic fervor. Wingers deduced that "Ronald Reagan won the Cold War."
GHWB comes in 1988, by telling his Repub friends (who all knew the tremendous debt that Reagan had run up and would need to be dealt with by raising taxes but yet didn't want to pay it) "Read-my-lips. No-new-taxes." Then GHWB tried as naught to reduce the debt by closing military bases. (In the middle of it all, in 1989, the Iron Curtain fell. 1.e. the Wall that Reagan told Gorbachev to tear down back in 1985.) When closing bases didn't work, he passed the "Omnibus Bill", which indeed increased tax rates, and he was all but booed out of office because of it.
In comes Clinton in 1992, faced with that huge debt. He promised that he would balance the budget, if given enough time to do it. Low, and behold, at the end of hi 8 yrs, the budget WAS balanced. GWB comes in (via the SC) in 2000 with a surplus. The rest is history. The only thing is...instead of raising taxes to pay for his wars and keep the bills paid, GWB lowered taxes. Oops. Arithmetic. And on top of the huge debt he built up, the market crashed in Sep of 2008, and Treas Sec Paulson convinced GWB and Congress that Wall Street had to be bailed out. And soon after, PO was elected.
I rest. I know most of us know all of this, but I also know that we have a lot of young people who may not know all of this. It's a rough outline, and maybe I got some things wrong, but I think it was mostly right.. someone will pipe in in a minute and point out my mistakes, and that's OK... That's why I luv DU, THE FACTS PLACE.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)11. Kickin' and reccin'!
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)12. And, gosh, how quickly would a 94% rate pay off the deficit?
pipewrench
(194 posts)13. +1 Whovian
Sirveri
(4,517 posts)14. There's a typo, 1987 should be 28%. They actually had it totally flat for a while there.