General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsdatasuspect
(26,591 posts)criminals will always commit crimes, no amount of education can change that.
is it right? fuck no. that's why it's a crime.
i'm all for teaching people to not become victims in the first place. you can be very proactive in that regard. i can greatly lessen my chance of becoming a robbery victim by handling financial transactions in appropriate places and not downtown gary, indiana at 3 am.
see where that line of thought can lead you. we all have a responsibility to protect ourselves first before we expect EVERYONE to honor our rights.
bottom line: there will be people who don't even think you are human, let alone as a person with rights and dignity.
we all know and understand that women have an inviolable right to their bodies.
that doesn't mean that criminals will honor that right.
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)my point is that you can have all the rights in the world, it doesn't mean that a criminal will respect them.
a rapist will rape you regardless of anything that you wear.
knowing how to protect yourself with deadly force obviates the need for fashion advice vis a vis rape.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Cause if you are serious...I don't know. (Shakes head and walks away sadly)
Bandit
(21,475 posts)So does wearing nice clothes make it your fault if you get mugged? I hate it when people blame the victim.
mythology
(9,527 posts)I always wear pants around women who haven't expressed a mutual desire to have sex with me. That way, my penis can't go anywhere it's not supposed to.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)many/most of those "rapists" don't consider themselves "criminals" because they didn't grab her, throw her down and mount her; the merely waited until she passed out ... or, joined in on the "train" ... or, proceeded when she finally "gave it up" after hours of saying "No" and slapping hands ... her weeping and biting her lip ... well ...
whathehell
(29,067 posts)" or, proceeded when she finally "gave it up" after hours of saying "No"
and slapping hands ... her weeping and biting her lip"
If someone tried to rape me, the only thing I'd "give up" would be
my foot to his balls or my fist to his face. Somehow, it seems a
better strategy than "weeping", "slapping hands" or "biting" lips.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)from socialization to fear ... that "making it his problem" doesn't occur.
BTW, are you Male or Female? ...
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Why do you want to know my gender?
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)us males seem not to understand what moves females to act, or not act.
It's taken me years of marriage; but more, the active raising of a daughter to understand that females and males operate on different planes. What seems the obvious answer to most males in a particular situation is, often, because of socialization, fear, or emotion, is not an option for some females.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Men and women may "operate on different planes" but a lot of that IS socialization.
Obviously, men and women are a LOT more alike than different.
I'm not sure why so many men want to ignore that fact, but I'm sure
you're aware of how White people have, historically, treated minorities as the "other"
as well, and we know that didn't turn out well.
The fact is, if one is TREATED as a member of a "different" or "lower" type of humanity,
that treatment certainly WILL affect the behavior of the "other", in some way.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)equipped to violently fight back. Physically and by personal traits/ characteristics, many women do get worn down as you describe or believe lies about emotional bonding.....whatever the issue.
Too many women don't know how to take care of themselves effectively JUST AS many MEN haven't learned to control their impulses. Many men also have trouble reading emotions in others, not to mention not knowing how to respect the emotions. They don't listen very well to what other people need them to hear.
So yes, people need to be teaching boys not to rape.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)· 35% anonymously admitted that, under certain circumstances, they would commit rape if they believed they could get away with it (ref 6,7).
· One in 12 admitted to committing acts that met the legal definitions of rape, and 84% of men who committed rape did not label it as rape.(ref 6,7)
- In another survey of college males: (ref 8)
· 43% of college-aged men admitted to using coercive behavior to have sex, including ignoring a woman's protest, using physical aggression, and forcing intercourse.
· 15% acknowledged they had committed acquaintance rape; 11% acknowledged using physical restraints to force a woman to have sex.
http://www.uic.edu/depts/owa/sa_rape_support.html
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)you could try to educate me harder.
and spewing ideology doesn't quite equal education.
what specifically would you like to teach me (we'll assume that all your assumptions about a complete stranger are correct and valid)?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)1. Dupre, A.R., Hampton, H.L., Morrison, H., and Meeks, G.R. Sexual Assault. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 1993;48:640-648.
2. National Crime Center and Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center. Rape in America: A Report to the Nation. Arlington, VA; 1992:1-16
3. National Victim Center, and Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center. Rape in America: A Report to the Nation. Arlington, VA; 1992:1-16.
4. Koss M.P., Hidden rape: sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. In: Burgess A.W., ed Rape and Sexual Assault. New York, NY: Garland Publishing: 1988;2:3-25.
5. White, Jacqueline W. and John A. Humphrey. "Young People's Attitudes Toward Acquaintance Rape." Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden crime." John Wiley and Sons, 1991.
6. Koss M.P., Dinero, T.E., Seibel, C.A. Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1988:12:1-24.
7. Malamuth N.M. Rape proclivity among males. J Soc Issues. 1981;37:138-157.
8. Rapaport, Karen R. and C. Dale Posey. Sexually Coercive College Males. Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime, edited by Andrea Parrot. John Wiley and Sons, 1991.
9. Ellis, Atkeson, Calhoun, 1982: Gidycz, Coble, Latham, Layman, (1993); Guthrie, Notgrass, 1992.
10. Frieze IH, Browne A. Violence in marriage. In: Ohlin, L, Tonry, M, eds. Family Violence: Crime and Justice, A Review of Research. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1989:163-218.
11. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence. Sexual assault and the adolescent. Pediatrics. 1994;94(5) 61-765.
12. Heise, L.L. Reproductive freedom and violence against women: where are the intersections? J Law Med Ethics. 1993;21(2):206-216.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)so i can access these materials online.
i'm disabled, live in a rural location, and don't have access to Jstor or anything like that.
you can pm me.
or i will give you my PO box number if you want to make photocopies of these materials, i will gladly read them.
Thanks!
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)lapislzi
(5,762 posts)We (mainly, but not exclusively) women, would like to teach males (mainly, but not exclusively) that many so-called benign behaviors and cultural norms actually facilitate a culture of rape in our society.
The notion that the primary responsibility for rape prevention lies with the woman is one of those notions that needs to be debunked and exposed for what it is: a ducking of responsibility from by the rapist (or would-be rapist) for his or her actions. It is possible that some would-be rapists, like the college kids who don't realize that getting a girl drunk and then having sex with her, don't understand the many forms that rape can take.
What would you like to know? I will happily provide answers to the best of my ability, and without your having to scour academic journals.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)you can teach that.
it is laudable to teach that.
it is of utmost importance to teach that.
but not everyone cares.
you have a right to your dignity and your body.
not everyone will honor that right.
that has to be a component of anti-rape education: a rapist doesn't care if you are empowered - what do you do then?
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)will go a long way towards fixing the problem.
You will never be able to prevent men jumping out of the bushes and raping women. and self-defense of all kinds is great for that. That's not the kind of rape we can really fix to any great extent.
But if we can fix some of the other wrong ideas, then the men who really probably would not like to be labeled rapists, would think twice before forcing sex on a woman. IF they know that it's rape. Teach them that "no" means "no," and that nobody, not nobody, is ENTITLED to sex for any reason.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)it's more than likely someone you already know.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Stranger rape is the least common type of rape, and the kind that we really can't educate for, beyond general common-sense self protection. There are nuts out there.
Most rapists are known to their victims. And I believe that many of these (men) can be reached and educated about what constitutes rape.
Peace to you.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)they committed rape at all.
What does that tell you about who needs to be educated about rape?
What does that tell you about the value in 'teaching women how to avoid rape'? Don't get me wrong, personal security is a good idea, and something to teach regardless. BUT, in the context of eliminating rape, it amounts to raising the lowest common denominator of who is likely to be a victim of rape. That is not a solution to the problem.
The solution is, to a large degree, to teach people what boundaries and consent are, and are not.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)A robber or a murderer may not "care" if one is empowered either.
Isn't that why we have this thing called a CriminaL Justice System?
The level of caring in all violent criminals tends to rise when their victim's
"empowerment" comes at the point of a gun, knife, or something else
that can hurt him as much as he's trying to hurt her.
Just a thought.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)what point did i miss?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)I think the poster intentionally misses the point.
Response to morningfog (Reply #16)
Post removed
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Rape, date-rape and other sexual assaults are far too prevalent on college campuses. The point is, schools and society should be teaching men what is appropriate and what isn't.
Instead, as this sign succinctly illustrates, the path has been to blame the victim. You are supporting that narrative with your response.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)how effective will that ever be?
sounds like they need to teach people how to get tough.
that's what all this psycho babble self esteem nonsense has got us: 20 something year old babies without backbones.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Young men do things that have become social acceptable, at least to their cohorts, that they do not recognize as rape or sexual assault. Or, they don't take it seriously.
Are you calling 20 year old rape victims "babies without backbones?" Rape victims need to get tough?
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)You said:
Young men do things that have become social acceptable, at least to their cohorts, that they do not recognize as rape or sexual assault. Or, they don't take it seriously.
I say:
there isn't any venue within any social group i've encountered in the past 42 years that condones rape. in fact, we were taught that rape is criminal, nonsexual, and socially unacceptable in middle school and in high school.
who are you traveling with?
You said:
Are you calling 20 year old rape victims "babies without backbones?" Rape victims need to get tough?
I say:
no.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Who needs to get a backbone? And needs to get tough?
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)my grandfather shot down nazi fighters over the Ruhr by the time he was 20.
he came home and was a respected member of his farming community by age 26.
my nephews are in their early 20s and can barely wipe their own ass.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Put it like you meant it in that post.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)You're backed in a corner, and must realize the vast majority of DU is completely disgusted - truly repulsed - by your take on this issue.
It is revoltingly regressive and has no place here. Fuck this garbage you spew.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)and we could all stand to get more tough.
victims of crime need access to the criminal justice system.
rapists and pedophiles (in my world) get fucked up pretty bad.
they get beaten to within an inch of their life.
i've seen a man get his testicles cut off because he molested a child.
WE don't call the police.
that's MY experience. i didn't grow up in a safe place.
our grandfathers cut off japanese ears and our fathers were jolly green savages in 'nam.
everything centered around violence and alcohol, but women, children, and old people generally were protected and left to do womanly, childly, and elderly shit.
we lived at the intersection of blood, spit, and shit.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)We were talking about victims and potential victims of rape. That is when you mentioned the 20 something needing a backbone and referred to them as babies.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)A lot of people have explained it to you rather well- quite a number of times in this thread, so at this point, I can only presume that you are unwilling, rather than unable to understand the whoosh point by now.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)and have nothing of substance to contribute to this thread except your wickedness.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'm not clever enough to be smart ass... however, I am clever enough to see the point- as I imagine you are too.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Let us be sure we are on the same playing field, vocabulary-wise.
In my, and in many other cogent, intelligent women's opinion, RAPE is forced or unwanted sexual contact instigated and prosecuted without the consent of both parties. Including but not limited to intercourse, oral sex, and digital penetration. Including but not limited to one or both parties' impairment due to drug or alcohol consumption.
That runs the table from diddling the drunk freshman to forced intercourse and battery at knifepoint by a total stranger.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)WTF? Are you talking about?
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Teach MEN what rape is.
--Rape is jumping out of the bushes and assaulting a jogger in the park, and forcing her to have sex.
--Rape is offering lots of alcohol to a girl and having sex with her when she passes out.
--Rape is forcing a woman to have sex with you after you've bought her dinner, even if she doesn't want to.
--Rape is commencing intercourse when she just wants to kiss and cuddle, and says "no" to intercourse.
--Rape is your husband's best friend who locks you in his bedroom at a party and forces you to have sex, and shames you for "flirting" with him.
That last one was me. I'm no lightweight, either. And I had no fucking idea. And that guy, probably STILL doesn't realize he raped me. That's what I'm talking about. The first step in not raping is knowing what rape is.
You're not entitled to sex because she led you on, or because she dressed provactively, or because she flirted with you, or because you think sex is the price of a meal. All false.
You're welcome.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Is this performance art, sarcasm?
Gosh, I hope it;s not for reals1
morningfog
(18,115 posts)lalalu
(1,663 posts)There will always be criminals. Teaching how to avoid, be aware , and defend yourself are good things.
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)that you are attempting to make sound like this to me:
Violence is the best answer to the problem since men can't be taught to engage in socially acceptable behavior, after all they spend their early years planted in front of a screen that subliminally indoctrinates them to the general culture of violence as the norm. Video games, TeeVee, movies and advertising all promote the concept that women are objects and vessels of male satisfaction. From clothing ads to the whores wandering the streets in video games that are predominantly glorification vectors for violence, all teach young men and justify the ideals of misguided older men that women are to be raped, all they want is sex and to be violated because men write the ads and programming and scripts that present that sort of idealism. And then there's the sick fashion industry that is designed to convince women that they are something less than a full human if they aren't buying in to the hype that sexy is all they should aspire to be, and look at the styles that are promoted...
If males are going to attend college with the pretense of becoming educated, there is an absolute, undeniable need for guidelines and protocols on appropriate behavior with regard to women and their rights to be included in that education, period. Unless you have been educated about these factors, and you're male, you don't have a clue.
Real men aren't afraid of real knowledge.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)truly... everyone needs to read.
and welcome to du
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)and Thank You.
It's what happens when you've seen too many excuses for bad behavior... along with a degree in cultural anthropology. It just sort of came out after I read a number of stupid comments from that rape apologist that, I'm guessing, was censured at about the same time as I wrote that.
I just don't do well with ignorance by choice.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)They do not in any shape or form teach you to be a victim. It is the exact opposite. They teach avoiding circumstances that can put you in danger. Similar to teaching a person who likes cycling the way to safely avoid being hit.
They teach self defense and how to assess the best way to take control of a dangerous situation. Rapists are about violence and control and they teach methods in which women can take control. It is not teaching anyone to be a victim. It seems she is trying to make herself into a victim.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)reinforced by those advocating against education of possible rapists, too. Datasuspect was arguing that there was no point in raising awareness on the potential perpetrator side.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)Back when I was on campus in the olden days they were just starting to enforce harsh penalties against students who committed the crime of rape. They were also stopping the policy of keeping the numbers hidden and protecting the criminals. Yet even now a lot still get away with committing this crime and campuses try to hide how big an issue this is.
To me this is one of the most destructive and brutal acts that can be committed against another human being.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)These are just my thoughts.
Where as criminals commit crimes for many reasons, those that rape do so for the power. We live in a culture that considers men to be superior and rape is a demonstration of that superiority. Again, IMHO rapists think that it is ok to rape because it's a women's place to be subservient. Rape is an extension of male dominance.
I think the intention of the OP is that we should teach men that women dont deserve to be raped. That may sound obvious to some but those that rape havent learned it.
I hope my meaning came thru and I didnt offend anyone.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Sex is not your god-given right, nor is power, nor is dominance. All false.
I taught my daughter that her sexual experiences were entirely within her control. She is the owner of her sexuality, not a man. Any man who thinks differently or tries to force the issue is to be ejected, discarded, shunned, and otherwise shown the door. Any man who doesn't go willingly can be dealt with however she sees fit.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)thank you soooo much for truly empowering your daughter in the right way. so true. and so many girls do not get this. are not taught. society teaches them otherwise. the worst thing i see in the last decade and more.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)It is the 21st fuckin' century and you are not in it.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)That doesn't mean we have to accept that rape(and all other violations of body and spirit)must simply be accepted as an inevitable and unchangeable aspect of life.
Why SHOULDN'T we demand that universities teach "DON'T RAPE" as part of freshman orientation?
Why SHOULDN'T we challenge the culture of violation with the same vigor with which we teach people to protect themselves AGAINST violation?
Your view is predicated on the notion that nothing can ever really change.
TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)If the latter, they're unlikely reach anyone who needs (or is at all likely to heed) the message, and if mandatory, you're working from the pressumption that ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS who must be actively thwarted.
We tell people to lock their doors and call them fools when they don't.
We (in some places) prosecute people who leave the engine running and the keys in the ignition.
We teach people not to keep unsecured valuables in their homes, and again call them idiots when they're robbed.
We teach people to protect their PIN, and laugh (or cry) at people still falling for the latest African Oil/gold/diamonds scheme.
Our view is predicated on thousands of years of demonstrable history. And yet people continue to be shocked and surprised when the world presents as it IS, and fails to meet their demands as to how it should be.
Our view is based on the knowledge, that no matter how wonderful it looks from the outside, civilisation is a very thin veneer over a very dirty cesspool.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And, rather than taking the view that all men ARE rapists, I'd work from the philosophy that no man HAS to be a rapist...that men can STOP rape and stop rape culture...that every man has it within himself to avoid, and to help all other men to avoid, being a violator...being a destroyer...being part of death, in short instead of part of life.
That we, as men, can free the world from rape and rape culture, and in doing so, can free ourselves to be men in the highest, truest, most positive sense...to be whole and to find the only true strength, the strength to do nothing but good in this world.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)So many do.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)that life can ever be anything other than what it is right now...that nothing that can't be seen, touched or heard at this very moment can ever be brought into being.
Also, fear of being proven wrong, in many, many cases.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)Several thousand years of recorded history, plus the odd stove in skull from pre-history, tells us that what you said is so much bullshit and wishful thinking.
If EVERY man had it in himself to be and not be those things, then we'd be living in a utopia.
Look at just how quickly we can devolve to the worst of human behaviour, when the brakes of civilised behaviour are removed. From the 15 YO inner city gangbanger pimping out his 10 YO sister, to the grizzled staff seargent teaching fresh recruits the best trophy ear drying techniques.
You react with shock and horror at: The parent or babysitter shaking a kid's brains into so much porridge; The dad who drives off a bridge with his kids to "punnish the bitch", or the mum who drowns them one by one in the bathtub to "save them".
Teaching someone that they should never be a victim is just plain cruel, unless you also teach them what they can do to avoid becoming one.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Is not the same thing as saying there was going to be a guarantee that every man would find the way to get to that place.
We as men need to find the way to get all of our brothers in life to choose to go there, to chose to be the best of themselves.
The key problem is that, for most of history, men were REWARDED(and continue to be rewarded) for embodying the most negative and destructive aspects of masculinity...strength was and is defined as the ability to inflict suffering, on the battlefield, at the hunt, or in the workplace. Toughness was and is defined by the capacity for heartlessness and inflexibility, for refusing to change or bend at ALL cost(think LBJ and Nixon on Vietnam externally...think Trump on our TV screens...think Biblical-style patriarch in the home. We've been trained and have trained ourselves, overall, to think that that the way to be a man is to be a brutal, destructive, soul-destroying bastard...a rapist not only physically, but socially, economically, and spiritually-to rip out our own hearts as soon as possible and to turn ourselves into stone.
Like any bad lesson that has been learned, all of this can be unlearned, can be untrained. We can free ourselves of it and free the world of it. We owe it to all those we share the planet with to do that work. It's a collective male responsibility.
The challenge is to reward and value the good, rather than the brutal and ugly. Men will then be much more likely to go to the good when the good is valued more than the bad in this world.
And of course, women should be taught to protect themselves for the forseeable future...no one would deny that...but it's disgusting to say that women should be given a greater responsibility for surviving rape culture than men are given for ending it. At this point, no one can expect to never be a victim, but everyone can expect that we, as men, will work to make the world where, at some point, everyone WILL be able to expect that.
Is there any reason NOT to try?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)the women how to not be raped, versus telling the men not to rape/what consent means, etc?
Let me know if it was even CLOSE.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Anything else is subject to post hoc revocation.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Wow. These threads truly illuminate.
FarCenter (11,286 posts)
77. Men should not have sex unless they have written permission, properly notarized
Anything else is subject to post hoc revocation.
Reply to this post
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)she wants sex, let it be know.
if they want sex, know she does.
everyone is happy.
wow, a tough one.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)That's some pretty ignorant shit, but hey, maybe you just forgot a sarcasm tag or something.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Communally recognized agreement to have sex is part of the vows.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Husbands can be and are prosecuted for raping their wives.
You do agree that this is as it should be, don't you?
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)The ceremony isn't what makes the legal marriage and never has in this country. The government legalizes the marriage and also legislates that one half of a married couple who forces sex on the other is guilty of rape. Certain religious groups have only been recognized to officiate a marriage ceremony where certain individuals from those groups are granted the power to sign off on the governmental marriage contract and put it to the government for processing in the same way a Justice of the Peace is granted that authority by the government. The contract is a government contract, not a religious one. There is no legal marriage without the government contract regardless if any ceremony is conducted.
I know of no religion that has any marriage vow that one half can rape the other either. This society has long since recognized that a woman is not the property of the man within a marriage to do with whatever he likes including forcing sex on her at those times she doesn't want to have sex.
There are and always have been legal marriages with or without any ceremony where the couple is not going to be having any sex with each other... marriages of "convenience" and marriages where one or both in the partnership are not physically capable of having sex. Those people are still permitted to marry by both religious groups and the government. No one ever asks whether or not the people in the partnership are going to be having sex or not - it's not their business and why no marriage contract stipulates that there must be sex at all. It is only society that makes the assumption concerning which couples who marry are likely or not likely to be having sex with each other.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)This is typically after the exchange of vows presided over by some secular or religious personage, and it is the real legal act including the witnessing of the act by two others, such as the best man and the maid of honor.
Rape can certainly occur within marriage. However, it is a lot harder for the woman to falsely charge the man with rape, since such a charge would require some physical evidence of violence. A bride is unlikely to successfully charge the groom with rape the morning after the wedding simply on the basis of his DNA in her vagina.
Some religions do not consider a marriage valid without sexual intercourse. Catholics regard a failure to consummate the marriage as a ground for annulment on the basis that the marriage did not exist.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)you're wrong.
Hypothetically, If my wife said 'no' and I plied her with say, booze, and then did things to her while she was unconscious, a marriage is no protection against a rape charge.
Physical violence is not required.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Just Wow!
You should come with a warning sign because you clearly DON'T GIVE A SHIT whether or not it's consensual. Making rape "jokes" on DU. Now I truly have seen it all on this board.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)agree with her point and recc'ed it off to the greatest page.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Even with a lot of evidence.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)so severely that the punishment ends up being a slap on the wrist whereby the perpetrator is then free to go off and do it again to some other unsuspecting woman. Lived that one.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Some of us men, such as myself, wouldn't rape under any circumstance. Others are the mirror opposite and look for any opportunity to do so. Would it not be a good idea for freshmen women to know ways of limiting those opportunities?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and the wrong in it. and also awares for them to be aware.
also what society teaches my nieces as far as their expected role and the wrong in that.
i do it all the way around and back again.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)I think it is a little naive to think any institution can stop all rapists. Does she think just telling a rapist to not rape will work? That's a bit naive and in my view gives the rapist control which is what rape is really about. It is about control and violence and not sex.
The best action is to be proactive and I see nothing wrong with that.
meegbear
(25,438 posts)Springslips
(533 posts)Obviously. There needs to be a "don't rape class," at freshman orientation too.
I don't know what they say in the class, but if it "dress appropriately," or "act more ladylike" then I agree with her protest 2000-percent.
But,
Please tell me, and this lesson would be good for all crimes, what is wrong with telling youngsters how they can protect themselves and take preventive action? Like:
Go to social events in a group with people you trust
Don't get too wasted, but if you do have a member in your group be sober, a DD.
Try not to be with someone you don't know alone.
When meeting someone new, drive yourself and meet in a public space.
Know your rights, it is Ok to say no.
Carry pepper spray, or other self defense items.
Never accept a drink from a stranger.
Always defend your boundaries, even with people you know
Always report anything that crosses the line, it is not your fought.
Stuff like that. What we need in our society is to understand the difference between "blame" and teaching a healthy internal locus of control.
And by all means TEACH guys the no raping class; too many of them are idiots with crazy beliefs.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)I agree 100%, except for point 2. It is never okay to hand over control. "Too wasted" is unacceptable. I was taught (and went on to teach my daughter) that you ALWAYS must assume that you are responsible for your own transportation and be in a fit condition to drive if you must. Being "too wasted" puts you at the mercy of others who may not have your best interest in mind.
I'm in no way abrogating common sense in this thread; I just think that rape is embedded in our culture and needs to be rooted out. As I said downthread, the guy who raped me probably still doesn't realize it.
Springslips
(533 posts)They can't and shouldn't teach that.
But it does happen and happen a lot; if you are going to lose control at least protect yourself and have some sober enough to protect you.
I hope you are you giving yourself plenty of self compassion, being trespass like that can do a lot of damage long after the event; I am sure you know that, but it nice to have it reinforced from someone else.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Instead of beating myself up for using poor judgment, I try to channel those feelings into educating people of all ages about gender issues and hidden biases. I have a long way to go in my own personal growth, but I hope I am moving in the right direction.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)or if they do get "the talk", they don't believe their parents. It's a tough issue, because for many girls/young women who go away to college or move out from the familial home, their first foray into independence often includes stepping across many lines..some of them potentially dangerous.
I do think that the recent "crops" of young people are more savvy than those of my era (freshman in college in 1968). Things seemed more mysterious then, and the urge to experiment was overpowering to many..
I am 63 and most of my friends throughout the years have had experiences of date-rape...near date-rape, and for many of us, downright "unfriendly" plain ole rape.
Drinking & drugs often present the "opportunity", and sometimes that's all it takes
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)to help where needed....
it is a very interesting concept.
she doesnt drink.... so she sees herself as one that keeps her eyes open and has helped, total strangers, get home.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Why aren't we learning ethics, empathy and reason?
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Men need to be taught that no means no and drunkeness does not equal consent.
Women need to be taught to avoid situations that put themselves at risk unnecessarily.
Bicoastal
(12,645 posts)And as such, I won't rec it. I'm not anti-Feminism by any means, but...
"How to Avoid Getting Raped" could mean anything from horrible ("Don't wear slutty clothing, ya sluts!" to actually useful ("Take a cab if you've had a few drinks; know your route home ahead of time, etc." The former category is undeniably offensive, and I think everyone here knows it. But if you're on you're own in a large city for the first time in your young life, the latter category is simply being smart and safe--my girlfriend wasn't at all insulted when she moved to Brooklyn and her roommate told her which empty, warehouse-lined streets to avoid late at night, regardless of her attire. But again, we don't know the details.
As for the starkly worded "Don't Rape," it's illegal and most people smart enough to be at college know it's illegal. If you're 18 years old and you don't understand that yet, why would a lecture from your freshman college orientation change your mind? If someone set 18-year-old me down in a room with other guys and told me "You know, you really shouldn't be thinking about raping people," I'd be insulted as hell. But again, we don't know the details.
Now, if she means "no means no" education, she has a point, I guess--although that isn't strictly a safety issue and thus really doesn't fall under the responsibility of freshman orientation, which (last time I went through it) was mostly about getting you through the next four years in one piece. It's more in the realm of High School Health, which I remember covered sexual assault pretty thoroughly. Should they cover this issue just in case young men didn't receive this education? And then go on to cover other issues like drugs and suicide and gun violence and...this is ORIENTATION. Usually organized by student volunteers. Their responsibility for the decisions legally-adult students choose to make over the last 4 years is LIMITED at best. BUT. ONCE AGAIN. WE DON'T KNOW THE DETAILS of this college and this young woman.
I'm anti-rape and pro-woman, but I dislike hollow context-free self-righteousness for its own sake. And I'm bored at work, which explains why this went on so long.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Don't Rape," it's illegal and most people smart enough to be at college know it's illegal. If you're 18 years old and you don't understand that yet, why would a lecture from your freshman college orientation change your mind?"
Clearing up ethical ambiguities a college freshman may never have been confronted with, i.e., the course may assist their judgements and their decisions when dealing with an extremely intoxicated young lady.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Part of multi-culturalism is that different cultures have different standards for sexual interactions.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)(Sorry, I've been reading too much Fire & Ice books lately.)
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)...and the conversation that ensued was just as obnoxious.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021898292
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)It's frightening, yet illuminating.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)This same argument can be made about defensive driving. Shouldn't we be teaching other people to drive properly rather than teaching me how to anticipate the fact that they run lights, can't stay in their lane, don't know what the turn signal is for, etc.?
The point of defensive driving is not to shift responsibility to victims. It is an acknowledgment of the fact that the dangerous driver exists, despite our efforts to reduce such driving. And there is no injustice or slight in teaching reasonable persons how to best deal with that fact.
The fact my car door has a lock is not an implicit endorsement of auto theft. It is a recognition of the fact that aberrations exist despite our efforts to eliminate them.
It is an excellent thing to educate men to not commit sexual violence but it will not eliminate the problem because most rapists have something wrong with them beyond having never been told to not rape.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)There is nothing "wrong" with a young man who thinks he's entitled to sex after he's had a date or three with a girl. Nothing wrong that can't be fixed, I mean. He simply needs to have it explained to him, maybe 20 or 30 times that you're never "entitled" to sex, ever.
It involves broadening our definition of rape, and it will take time. But I think it can be done.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Maybe I'm just different, but I've never felt entitled to sex. Of course I've always been shy around girls so that may have something to do with the fact that I don't feel entitled to anything. I know there are guys out there who do think they are entitled, it just pisses me off that so many guys still hold that view.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i think we tend to do a broad brush with that. a lot of men do feel entitled to sex. a lot of men do not. i always choose fun, good, nice, respectful men to hang with. not a single one of the felt that. they were appreciative when we had sex. but none felt entitled. i simply would not be around a man that had that attitude.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)That sends a terrible message to young women...
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Actually, it should be taught in high school.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)By that I don't mean what you are wearing. Look like you have a RIGHT to be where you are. NEVER not meet the glaze of anyone looking at you. Glare right back at them becase YOU have a right, just as much as any male, to be where you are.
As a young woman, I went all over NYC, riding the subways all hours, from the South Bronx to Bed Sty. I had a friend who was a 3rd Degree Black Belt and gave me this advice. She was absolutely right. If you think you will be a victim, you will be. REFUSE to be a victim, and you won't be.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)It's not like you're given a choice to be a victim or not, and you can say, "Oh sure, victimize me," or "No, I refuse to be victimized." They don't ask permission.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)I was raped in my own bed, while suffering a high fever due to pneumonia. I guess I didn't do a good enough job of mean mugging my attacker in my more lucid moments.
Rape is not a force of nature, rape is a conscious choice to disrespect another person. It is almost always committed by people the victim knows and trusts. Advice based on warding off weirdos in alleys is less than useless because almost no rape is the sort of stranger rape committed by weirdos in alleys. In fact it serves to make life more difficult for women who suffer rape under the more usual non-stranger, non-alley circumstances.
Telling women that it's their fault for not being assertive enough or "looking like a victim" or avoiding eye contact is woman blaming bullshit. Rape is not caused by meek women or lack of eye contact. Rape is caused by men putting their dicks in women who don't consent. THE END.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)All this, yes.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)ornotna
(10,803 posts)OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)because after reading the responses it is clear that a few (men and women) in this thread just DON'T SEEM TO GET IT.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Kick. Scream. No. No. No. No. That's Freshman Orientation for both sexes, IMHO. No means No.
If that doesn't work, no poster on the wall or procedure in the company handbook or parsing of jargon or law on the books will help until it's too late. If parents have not taught their young men to respect No ... the rights of others, female or male, then it is up to the the law.
The next step, if necessary, is to report it. Hard as that might be, No means No. I seem to be repeating myself.
rainin
(3,011 posts)I teach my sons that no means no. If I had a daughter, I would teach her to use good judgement to stay safe. Wouldn't you?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Knowledge and info.
flvegan
(64,409 posts)There shouldn't be any "avoid" like it's on her to not be raped.
I smell a rant...yes I do.
Seriously, they "teach" how not to be raped. Like everything they do is subject to male consideration. LOL! Okay, I guess that's in response to the glut of male idiots admitted to a school that haven't been raised right. Here's the thing...mom, dad, raise your kid right. Don't be a breeder who doesn't follow up. Compassion, empathy, equality...teach these things. Then we might not need classes on not being raped for women.
Teach? It's on you parents. Don't breed, raise properly. And men, and I speak to you as one, rape...you just stopped being a man, and are nothing but shit. Know the difference and embrace it.
Lastly, rape is violence. And violence may beget violence. Payback can be a real bitch.
The *b* word may get this deleted, so have at it until.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)For nearly a year, a criminal terrorized women walking alone at night near campus. "Educating" the male student body didn't protect anyone. The rapist was coming from outside the community.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)Yes, we all should be able to walk down the street alone at any time, day or not, without worrying about being attacked.
Unfortunately, that world doesn't exist. Until then, we should all learn to protect ourselves as best we can.
Eyes of the World
(93 posts)The society has made laws that tell everyone not to rape. You can get into a lot of trouble. Someone who knows this and rapes anyway is probably troubled themselves.
I do think it's important for women to know that they do have responsibility for what happens to them. It makes a lot of sense to orient young women who may be on their own for the first time about the dangers they may face in their new enviroment. Being disgusted won't make the dangers go away.
If a rich man wears his wealth openly in a dangerous part of town then he should expect to be mugged. Despite the fact that it is not legal, muggings happen. It is important to know how to stay safe.
Why should it be different for anyone else?
PS I'm sorry that you have to live in a sexist world, but you will function better if you accept it for what it is.
And what would you cover in a Don't Rape class anyway? How many times and different ways can you point out that rape is illegal and they don't need any reasons to not commit a crime?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)they are just right? there are even "cutsey" little sayings men have made up for it. how many times in the many many times a boy sees this, does another man say.... fuck no, that would be rape?
ya, tell me how there is NOTHING to learn.
how about yale university, young men walking thru freshman pod with a cutsey little chant, no means yes.
For good measure they also reportedly chanted "Fucking sluts." The Yale Daily News reports that they also yelled stuff like, "My name is Jack, Im a necrophiliac, I fuck dead women." Our future CEO's of America in action! Of course, the DKE president has apologized for "the serious lapse in judgment" and declared that the fraternity does not condone sexual violence. But The Womens Center at Yale isn't placated, and calls the incident hate speech and an active call for sexual violence.
And Good Feed reports that Broad Recognition, a Yale feminist publication, is demanding administrative action against DKE. "Yale women are not new to fraternity misogyny, nor are we a stranger to our administration sitting on their hands and doing absolutely nothing about it," Hannah Zeavin wrote in an editorial.
http://gothamist.com/2010/10/15/video_yale_frat_boys_chant_no_means.php
how about amherst university our young men making up a tshirt of a near naked girl, roasting on a spit over a fire, with visible bruises.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/18/amherst-sexual-assault-tshirt-rape-sexual-violence_n_1982159.html
nah, our guys absolutely need no education. they got it down.
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)Yeah, no doubt about it, those in that group at Yale are idiots and dangerous to boot.
But there are lots of responsible young men on college campuses who would condemn them as well and are helpful and sincere in their desire and efforts to prevent such things as rape. I know that when my daughter attended Rutgers there were a group of young men all over campus, I think they called themselves the "Green Lantern Men" who volunteered each night to escort women walking on campus from one point to another to prevent crimes and my daughter and the young women there greatly appreciated their efforts.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)this is about education. not being foolish or protective on thinking that we are not living in a society that does not promote this. and that we do not want to throw these kids away as monsters, but educate and enlighten them to the realities that they are not seeing in their society.
guardian
(2,282 posts)OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)For example if I walk around making displays of large amounts of money where I work, I will likely get robbed. If I walk around the wrong parts of town at certain times alone, I'll probably get sexually assaulted. However, neither of these outcomes would mean that I deserved it or was to blame... someone ELSE broke the law and violated the social contract that exists in our society. There are a myriad of actions that I could do which may predispose myself to bad situations. However regardless of how one acts, so long as they are acting lawfully, the victim is never to blame.
As to why the young lady's school does not teach "Don't Rape"... that would be a waste of time.
Society teaches us this lesson completely free of tuition. It's called "The Law"
Chalco
(1,308 posts)let's add a class in How to Keep Your Dick from Getting Someone Pregnant and If You Do Get a Woman Pregnant Here's How to Plan for Your Child's Future