Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:21 PM Nov 2012

Durbin is only doing his Job

Dick Durbin is very close to President Obama and has long had the function of WH liaison with senate liberals.

It's not like Durbin just decided to go rogue and talk up entitlement reductions. He is fulfilling his now familiar role as de facto WH representative and negotiator within the caucus.

At the same time, Sen. Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat, tapped his ties to the liberal wing of the party to urge a broader deficit deal in 2013 that would include trims to Medicare and other entitlement cuts.

"We can't be so naive to believe that just taxing the rich will solve our problems," said Durbin, speaking at the influential liberal group called Center for American Progress. "Put everything on the table. Repeat. Everything on the table."


Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/11/29/175856/senates-no-2-democrat-calls-for.html
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

still_one

(92,189 posts)
1. Obviously that must be his position also. There have always been Senators and Representatives in
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:24 PM
Nov 2012

our party who spoke their own mind, even if disagreeing with the President.

in addition, this isn't the first time durbin has brought this up

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
2. No. Dick Durbin is a defacto WH spokesman
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:29 PM
Nov 2012

This has been Durbin's job for years, and it is a necessary job. I am not knocking it.

Durbin acts as liaison between the WH and Senate liberals.

Most senators do not have the role of WH liaison in the Senate. Durbin does.

still_one

(92,189 posts)
5. Accepting that, why would there be a reason to put social security and medicare in the negotiating
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:44 PM
Nov 2012

if we have a majority in the Senate right now?

I don't care whether it is Durbin's position or the administrations, either way they lose me if they do that

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
6. At some point I have to figure the President supports it for
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:49 PM
Nov 2012

some reason -- that he believes it is the right thing to do as policy.

Response to cthulu2016 (Original post)

 

MotherPetrie

(3,145 posts)
7. Yup, the canary in the coalmine. And the tension target.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 12:50 PM
Nov 2012

He takes the heat off Obama while Obama screws us behind the scenes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Durbin is only doing his ...