Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
1. My take on it is, employee's have been intimidated and are frightened. They have been
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 08:39 PM
Nov 2012

threatened with store closure if they join a union.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
2. They have.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 08:40 PM
Nov 2012

Bosses use fear tactics, intimidation, and the practical fact of union dues to prevent it. Others will probably know better, but I believe there are specific procedures to follow and thresholds to achieve in order to take a vote. A union rep. cannot just walk into the store and say "let's vote."

 

former-republican

(2,163 posts)
4. I know , I think they first need 30% to sign off in order to have a vote
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 08:47 PM
Nov 2012

If they try to fire an employee that tries to organize this Walmart would face stiff Federal fines.
And a hell of a lawsuit they would lose.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
8. Well, Federal fines if they can prove their case before the NLRB.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 08:49 PM
Nov 2012

Lawsuits are expensive and their results are uncertain. Walmart may consider them worth the risk to keep the unions out.

Saving Hawaii

(441 posts)
16. Stiff Federal Fines? It's pocket money.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:19 PM
Nov 2012

Companies do this and get nailed with the fines all the time. Wal-Mart is hardly an exception. Sad thing to say, but the NLRB is very much a paper tiger. There are rules that companies break all the time during union campaigns and they get little slaps on the wrist for it because that's all that can be done.

prairierose

(2,145 posts)
3. Walmart threatens to fire any worker who says the word "union" out loud...
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 08:46 PM
Nov 2012

they force them to watch anti-union films and other anti-union "educational" materials.

Saving Hawaii

(441 posts)
17. From Wal-Mart? I dunno.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:21 PM
Nov 2012

Elsewhere? Sure.

Highly illegal don't matter much if the union organizers have been intimidated into silence, the union has been squashed, and the fines and back-pay are a pittance when it all finally gets worked out in court months later. That's part of the problem.

Booster

(10,021 posts)
6. Don't know it for a fact, but I've read in the past that Walmart never owns the buildings they're in
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 08:49 PM
Nov 2012

just because if there's a threat of a union coming in they just move the entire store to someplace else & start up again. The employees know also that if they start talking about forming a union they will be automatically fired.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
7. Walmart has so many fines against it from the NLBR
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 08:49 PM
Nov 2012

For preventing this, it is legend.

No, seriously, they have lost case after case and have been fined. Those are just the cost of doing business.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. The cases take so long...that some of those employees
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:01 PM
Nov 2012

Drop cases and move on.

Part of the problem is that the NLBR has become a toothless enforcer. On the bright side, Wally World filed an emergency injunction to stop the Black Friday story ( they have presented a me worry face to the media...same statement everybody else got is in my hd, read it and read the quotes in the NYT same deal) that the NLBR will not get to it until after Back Friday. They might get to it by next week, if at all.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
15. EFCA, that is the reason a lot in labor
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:19 PM
Nov 2012

While not officially, are pissed. Walmart, not surprisingly, led the fight to stop it. In the current Congress it is not viable, not with Republicans in charge.

Now, if things go not as Walmart expects, that might change the politics of unions all of a sudden. That be optimistic. What I think we are seeing is the emergence of a new labor movement, and we are in for the long slog. Walmart is the brass ring since they do set the pace, due to size.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Explain something to me a...