Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants
Declan McCullagh
C/Net
Proposed law scheduled for a vote next week originally increased Americans' e-mail privacy. Then law enforcement complained. Now it increases government access to e-mail and other digital files. Sen. Patrick Leahy previously said his bill boosts Americans' e-mail privacy protections by "requiring that the government obtain a search warrant." That's no longer the case.
A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans' e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.
CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.
Revised bill highlights
Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-mail-without-warrants/?part=rss&subj=news&tag=title
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1075 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants (Original Post)
DaniDubois
Nov 2012
OP
Leahy used to be worthy of respect, now he has devolved into an untrustworthy turd.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2012
#5
Nothing at all to worry about, Obama will veto hammer anything so blatantly wrong
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#10
ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)1. Fine.
Every e-mail I send is going to contain a link to a Rickroll from this point forward.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)2. Here I thought I voted for Democrats.
msongs
(67,405 posts)3. Bush will veto it, right? nt
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)4. So when law enforcement complains, the bill gets rewritten
But when voters complain...we have to "compromise?"
Big Brother always wins, doesn't he?
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)5. Leahy used to be worthy of respect, now he has devolved into an untrustworthy turd.
ChazII
(6,204 posts)6. Time to DU
our senators.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)7. Looks like the 4th Amendment has been officially repealed
When politicians can even contemplate writing a bill like this.
The camels nose under the tent.
Bake
(21,977 posts)8. This is patently unconstitutional!
A SCOTUS case if there ever was one. Maybe we should wait for the Prez to get another appointment to the Court, but a challenge is definitely in order.
Bake
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)9. Law "enforcement" has no respect for the principles of the constitution.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)10. Nothing at all to worry about, Obama will veto hammer anything so blatantly wrong
ChazII
(6,204 posts)11. I worry by nature
so time to DU the WH with our concerns. But thanks for the reminder that with Pres. Obama in the WH we will be okay,